Latest news with #IsraelIranConflict
CBC
an hour ago
- Politics
- CBC
What questions do you have about the conflict between Israel and Iran?
Social Sharing You've got smart questions, we've got solid answers. Click here to listen to the CBC's Just Asking every Saturday at 4 p.m. when you need to make sense of the world around you. Let your friend Saroja Coelho be your guide. With guest experts, Just Asking turns the week's news and latest trends into tips that help you make better decisions in your life. Whether it's tech, money, career or health — we'll hear you out, and help you out. The show takes live calls on CBC Radio every Saturday afternoon, and drops the podcast that same evening. Here's what's happening this Saturday: What questions do you have about the conflict between Israel and Iran? Israel launched attacks on the heart of Iran's nuclear and military structure on Friday, killing at least three top military officers. Iran has launched a counter strike firing hundred of ballistic missiles toward Israel. As we watch this developing story, our experts will share their analysis and answer your questions on the conflict. Dennis Horak was Canada's ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Yemen from 2015 to 2018. Alex Vatanka is the Director of the Iran Program at the Middle East Institute, a non-partisan think tank providing expert policy analysis on the answer your questions. What questions do you have about imposter syndrome? Have you ever felt like a fraud at work, plagued by self-doubt? Our experts we'll dive into why so many of us feel "imposter syndrome," what to do about it, and what employers can do to create more supportive work environments. Kim Meninger is a leadership coach who has her own story of imposter syndrome that fuels her work. Kevin Cokley is a professor of psychology at the University of Michigan and the editor of "The Impostor Phenomenon." They'll take your questions!
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Politics
- Al Jazeera
Trump to decide whether US will strike Iran ‘within two weeks'
United States President Donald Trump will decide on whether his country will join the Israel-Iran conflict in the next two weeks, the White House has said, amid growing speculation of US involvement and fears of wider escalation. On Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Trump had shared a message: 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks. That's a quote directly from President Trump,' she said. 'The president is always interested in a diplomatic solution … he is a peacemaker in chief. He is the peace through strength president. And so if there's a chance for diplomacy, the president's always going to grab it. But he's not afraid to use strength as well,' the press secretary added. The US described its ally Israel's initial June 13 strike on Iran as a 'unilateral action'. But Trump himself has signalled that he knew of the attack in advance and supported Israel's military campaign. At the same time, according to the Reuters news agency, which cited three unnamed diplomats, Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, has spoken to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi several times on the phone since Israel began its attacks. Meanwhile, Tel Aviv and Tehran have continued to trade attacks. On Thursday, Israel targeted Iran's Arak heavy water nuclear reactor. Iran, in turn, hit the Soroka Medical Centre, which it claimed was near an Israeli military and intelligence centre. Over the past few days, Trump has hinted at joining Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, but at the same time has proposed a swift diplomatic solution in a confusing message from Washington. Following a report by the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday night that Trump had already signed off on striking Iran but had not decided on when they would do it, the president took to his Truth Social social media account to deny the report. 'The Wall Street Journal has No Idea what my thoughts are concerning Iran!' Trump wrote. But Al Jazeera's senior political analyst Marwan Bishara said that Leavitt's comments could well be a ploy, and if so, Trump would be able to use it as a 'pretext in order to camouflage whatever his intentions are and attack tomorrow'. As Araghchi is expected to speak with his British, French and German counterparts in Geneva on Friday, along with the European Union's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, to discuss Tehran's nuclear programme, Bishara said Trump could be waiting to hear the outcome of the talks before making his decision to attack. 'If one has to over-interpret, I would say the following: He's giving the Europeans some time so that everyone could save face,' Bishara said. At the same time, Russia and China have repeatedly warned against the US's involvement in the conflict and called for a ceasefire.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
Trump Grows Pissed at Tulsi Gabbard as Israel-Iran Conflict Worsens
President Trump is reportedly furious with Tulsi Gabbard after the director of national intelligence posted a professionally produced, three-minute-long X video last week referencing past nuclear disasters. Gabbard's post went mostly unnoticed at the time, but now seems like a clear rebuke of U.S. support for Israel's war on Iran. 'As we stand here today, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before, political elite warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers,' Gabbard says in the video as ominous music swells in the background. 'And perhaps it's because they are confident that they will have access to nuclear shelters for themselves and for their families that regular people won't have access to. So it's up to us, the people, to speak up and demand an end to this madness. We must reject this path to nuclear war and work toward a world where no one has to live in fear of a nuclear holocaust.' The president was apparently not a fan of Gabbard's unauthorized rebuke of the direction his administration was leaning on Israel, as multiple war hawks visited Trump just days before Gabbard posted the video. 'I don't care what she said,' Trump stated on Tuesday when asked about Gabbard's video on Air Force One. 'I think they were very close to having a weapon.' 'I don't think he dislikes Tulsi as a person.… But certainly the video made him not super hot on her … and he doesn't like it when people are off message,' a senior administration official told Politico. The beef between Trump and Gabbard shows that the MAGA split between blind military support for Israel versus 'America First' anti-interventionists, like Gabbard, is much more than just an online spat. There is a real ideological schism on display with regard to Trump's deference to Israel's wars, and even die-hard Trump supporters have begun raising their voices against another endless war in the Middle East—something Trump promised to stop during his campaign.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Politics
- Fox News
Caroline Sunshine: I Don't See A Reason For The U.S. To Militarily Engage In The Middle East At This Current Moment
Former Trump 2024 Campaign Deputy Communications Director Caroline Sunshine joins Fox Across America With guest host Rich Zeoli to explain why she is opposed to the U.S. getting involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran. In our country, the government derives its power from the consent of the governed. And the power resides with us, the people, and we give that power. And we have given that power to President Trump because the leaders of the past have failed us, particularly on foreign policy. And a huge reason President Trump was elected was because the American people saw that prolonged conflicts in the Middle East have been costly to us in terms of blood, in terms treasure, in times of time. They haven't seen how they've in the interest, in our interest. And every conflict always starts with some big, bold promise or that it'll be quick, that it will be just a strike, that it would be five minutes, but then it fails to answer the question of then what. And our country doesn't have a good track record there. And so, like President Trump said, great nations don't fight prolonged conflicts. And I don't see a how it is directly in the interests of the American people to go get involved in this conflict right now. And I do see a huge downside, which is that getting involved in the conflict, I see derailing President Trump's domestic agenda, which is so important and another reason why he was elected. I think if we get involved with this conflict, this war will become a huge distraction. And President Trump's extremely popular agenda here at home of deporting the 15 million illegal immigrants that were let in under the previous administration, implementing tariffs, and rebuilding our middle class will get completely derailed. And those things are more directly in the interest of the American people than getting involved in a conflict again in the Middle East. Caroline Sunshine Reacts To The Trump-Elon Feud Check out the podcast to hear their full discussion!
CNN
2 hours ago
- Politics
- CNN
‘2 in 3 chance' Trump will strike Iranian nuclear facility, says Fmr. NATO Commander
Admiral James Stavridis, the former Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, joined the Situation Room to discuss the potential for US involvement in the conflict between Israel and Iran.
