Poilievre to undergo Conservative Party leadership review in January
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre will face a mandatory leadership review in January, after the party failed to form government in the last federal election.
The Conservative Party's national council agreed on Saturday that the leadership review would take place in Calgary, according to CBC News sources.
The Globe and Mail first reported the story.
If a leader does not resign following an election loss, the party's constitution requires Conservative Party members to vote on whether that leader should stay on at its next national convention.
While the Conservative Party saw a boost in vote share under Poilievre with a breakthrough among new voting blocs, they failed to form government and he lost the Ottawa-area seat of Carleton — one he had held since 2004 — by more than 4,000 votes.
In May, Battle River-Crowfoot MP Damien Kurek said he would step aside to allow Poilievre to run in the Alberta riding, which is considered one of the safest Conservative seats in the country.
Poilievre was set to lead the Conservatives to a historic majority government after the party enjoyed double-digit leads for more than 18 months in national polls over the Liberals and as former prime minister Justin Trudeau's popularity waned.
But the trade war launched by U.S. President Donald Trump and Trudeau's resignation precipitated a reversal of fortunes for the Conservative Party, which won 144 seats in the recent federal election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Spy agency says it 'improperly' shared Canadians' data with international partners
One of Canada's intelligence agencies says it "improperly" shared information about Canadians that it had obtained "incidentally" with international partners. The Communications Security Establishment (CSE) shared some details about the incident after the intelligence commissioner — the quasi-judicial position that reviews the cyber spy agency's activities — flagged the case in his annual report tabled in Parliament earlier this week. CSE spokesperson Janny Bender Asselin told CBC News that last year the agency had to notify the defence minister "of an incident where CSE improperly shared information." "CSE identified an activity where, between 2020 and 2023, we shared some information with international partners without properly removing Canadian information that had been acquired incidentally when targeting valid foreign intelligence targets," she said. "CSE acted quickly to contain the issue." The CSE is considered one of Canada's intelligence crown jewels, responsible for intercepting and analyzing foreign electronic communications, launching cyber operations and defending the government's networks and critical infrastructure from attacks. Asselin said that included seeking assurances from CSE's trusted partners that the shared information was deleted. "We continue to update our policies and procedures to prevent reoccurrence," she said. CSE did not say how many Canadians were impacted or to which countries the information was shared, citing operational security. Details were shared with Intelligence Commissioner Simon Noël, who raised it in his recently published report. The commissioner is part of the chain of approval before CSE and its sister agency, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), can go ahead with certain intelligence-gathering and cybersecurity activities. CSE first needs to seek permission from the minister of defence — known as ministerial authorization — if the proposed action would otherwise break the law or potentially infringe on the privacy interests of Canadians. Under the law, ministerial authorizations must prove the activities are reasonable, necessary and that measures are in place to protect Canadians' privacy. The intelligence commissioner then provides a layer of oversight and either signs off on the mission, approves with conditions or denies the request outright. Noël also makes sure CSE remains compliant after receiving the green light and sticks to what was approved — which was not the case in this information-sharing matter. The commissioner's report doesn't include many details, citing national security. The case will be included in CSE's own annual report, which is expected later this month, said Asselin. Noël's report said he urged the intelligence agency to be as transparent about the incident as possible. It doesn't appear the individuals involved were alerted, although CSE said it reported the incident to its oversight and review bodies, including the Office of the Privacy Commissioner. "The disclosure of this incident involving CSE raises many serious concerns," said Matt Malone, director of the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic. The University of Ottawa professor said the findings justify many of the fears raised by civil society groups about the potential for inappropriate information in the Liberal government's cybersecurity bill. The first iteration of the bill died when the House prorogued earlier this year, and it was reintroduced by Prime Minister Mark Carney's government as Bill C-8. If passed, federally regulated industries would have to report cybersecurity incidents to CSE, meaning it would be in possession of more information. "All of this bodes very poorly for the state of privacy protection in Canada," Malone said. "Three of the eight government bills introduced so far in this Parliament are extremely privacy-corrosive." In 2024, the information commissioner received 13 ministerial authorizations for review — seven relating to CSE activities and six relating to CSIS activities. He approved the activities in 11 authorizations, approved the activities with conditions in one authorization and partially approved the activities in the other authorization.
Associated Press
10 hours ago
- Associated Press
House of Commons passes One Canadian Economy Act
OTTAWA, ON, June 20, 2025 /CNW/ - Canada's new government has a mandate to build big, build bold, and build now. Today, the Prime Minister, Mark Carney, welcomed the passing in the House of Commons of Bill C-5, One Canadian Economy Act. The legislation will build one strong Canadian economy by: Taken together, these measures will create and connect Canadians to good-paying careers and more prosperity. The Prime Minister shared an update on this work with the premiers of the provinces and territories during their meeting earlier today. The leaders agreed to stay in close contact as they reinforce Canada's strength at home. Indigenous partnership is a critical component of this legislation, and fulsome consultation will be pivotal to the success of future projects. The Government of Canada is committed to respecting the rights of Indigenous Peoples recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 and the rights set out in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. To this end, Prime Minister Carney will be meeting with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis over the coming weeks. Bill C-5 now moves to the Senate for consideration and brings us one step closer to removing federal barriers to free trade by Canada Day. Quotes 'Today's passing of Bill C-5, One Canadian Economy Act, will remove trade barriers, expedite nation-building projects, and unleash economic growth, with Indigenous partnership at the centre of this growth. It's time to build big, build bold, and build now. As Canadians, we can give ourselves more than any foreign nation can ever take away.' — The Rt. Hon. Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada 'The adoption of Bill C-5 by the House of Commons is a crucial step in building one Canadian economy and getting big projects built faster. Thank you to colleagues who supported this legislation – you are helping build a stronger Canada.' — The Hon. Dominic LeBlanc, President of the King's Privy Council for Canada and Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade, Intergovernmental Affairs and One Canadian Economy 'This legislation is about building a stronger, more united Canada. Let's build trust, tear down internal trade barriers, and create one single economy – from coast to coast to coast. Together, we're building a stronger Canada, for everyone.' — The Hon. Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Transport and Internal Trade 'I am pleased to see the One Canadian Economy Act achieve this milestone. This Act means we are no longer asking 'Why build?', but instead 'How do we get it done?'. We are removing barriers, leveraging Canada's resources and talented workers, centring Indigenous consultation and equity, and continuing to fight climate change – all to get building and to become an energy superpower. In the new economy we are building, Canada will be defined by delivery, not delay.' — The Hon. Tim Hodgson, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources 'Indigenous Peoples' voices are at the table where discussions are happening, and decisions are made. This government understands that Indigenous Peoples have the right to determine their future. As the first Indigenous Minister of Indigenous Services, I understand the importance of relationship moving forward – and I am pleased to see the Prime Minister has determined this as a priority and a critical part of the work ahead.' — The Hon. Mandy Gull-Masty, Minister of Indigenous Services Related Product This document is also available at SOURCE Prime Minister's Office
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Liberals' major projects bill passes House of Commons with Conservative support
The Liberal government's major projects legislation passed in the House of Commons on Friday evening as MPs wrapped up the spring parliamentary sitting. Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, essentially gives cabinet the ability to pick certain projects to speed through the regulatory process, with an eye to projects that can deliver an economic boost to Canada, help strengthen the country's autonomy and resilience, "advance the interests of Indigenous peoples" and contribute to "clean growth." The legislation was a priority for Prime Minister Mark Carney who promised to "build big, build bold" during the spring election campaign. Once a project is deemed in the national interest, the legislation would allow the government to skirt certain laws — such as the Impact Assessment Act — in order to get construction underway. The legislation passed fairly quickly, having only been introduced earlier this month. The Conservatives supported the bill as a whole, while the NDP and Bloc Québécois backed a part of the bill that removes internal trade barriers. Liberal backbencher Nathaniel Erskine-Smith, who had previously called on the government to allow for more time to study the bill, also voted against the legislation. The government hasn't said what exactly would be fast-tracked under this legislation — and there are no specific projects mentioned in the bill itself — but Carney has signalled support for new energy "corridors" in the east and west, which could include pipelines and electricity grids, new and expanded port facilities, mines and other resource-related initiatives. After Friday's vote, Carney crossed the House floor to shake hands with a number of Conservative MPs. Despite the bill passing in the House in less than a month, it isn't without its critics. WATCH | Carney on Indigenous consultation: Indigenous and environmental groups, along with MPs — some within the Liberal Party — and senators, raised concerns that the bill is being rushed through Parliament and will grant cabinet sweeping powers to override other laws to plow ahead with industrial projects favoured by the government of the day. Those criticisms prompted Carney to hold a news conference immediately after the bill passed. "These projects will build our national economy — and through Indigenous equity and resource management, these projects will be built with Indigenous nations and communities," he said outside the House chamber. "This is not an aspiration. It is the plan embedded in the bill itself." The legislation itself states the government will recognize, affirm and "respect" Indigenous peoples' constitutional rights when considering a project. But there's a fear among some leaders that the consultation process with First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities will be inadequate. Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, national chief of The Assembly of First Nations (AFN), told the House transport committee on Tuesday that the bill was being rushed through Parliament without giving First Nations communities time to have their questions answered and concerns heard. "We all need more time and opportunity to speak to this legislation and get answers," she told MPs on the committee, saying she's hearing these concerns from multiple chiefs. WATCH | Grand chief says bill won't apply on First Nations territory: The government sent letters to Indigenous communities last month, outlining what the legislation would look like before the bill was tabled. But Woodhouse Nepinak and other leaders who appeared at the transport committee said the consultations have been inadequate. "The process that led to Bill C-5 is a case study in how not to engage with Indigenous nations," Kebaowek First Nation Chief Lance Haymond told the same committee on Wednesday. "The conditions for an Idle No More 2.0 uprising are being written into the law as we speak," Haymond cautioned, referring to the movement that began in 2012 and led to countrywide protests, including road and rail blockades. Nishnawbe Aski Nation Grand Chief Alvin Fiddler, who represents 49 First Nations in northern Ontario, wants the Governor General to step in before giving the legislation royal assent — an unlikely and constitutionally dubious proposition. "I'm hoping she's paying attention to what's happening here so that she can think about intervening," he said. When asked Friday about those concerns, the prime minister said moving forward in partnership with Indigenous communities was always the intention of the bill. But he said that message might not have been articulated "as clearly and as structured" as it could have been at the start. Carney promised Friday to hold "summits" regarding the legislation with Indigenous leaders starting next month. The legislation is supported by the business community and building trades, who testified to Parliament that it can take longer to get projects approved than to get them built. Other government legislation that the House was examining hasn't yet made it to the finish line, and therefor will need to wait until MPs return to Ottawa in September. Bill C-2 and Bill C-4 were both seen as government priorities that the Liberals were pushing to get through fairly quickly. C-4 primarily would have brought the Liberals' proposed income tax cut officially into law. But even though the bill hasn't passed, the government can move forward with the tax cut starting July 1, thanks to the passage of a ways-and-means motion earlier this month. The government's Bill C-2 focuses on strengthening Canada's borders, but advocates and some opposition MPs have raised concerns that the legislation would create new surveillance powers infringing on personal privacy and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The privacy commissioner also raised concerns with some of the provisions in C-4. The Senate will continue to sit next week after agreeing to examine C-5. The House is scheduled to return Sept. 15.
