Trump Stokes Fox News Feud Fires After 'The Five' Host Reports Low Polling Numbers: 'People Like Jessica Tarlov Make MAGA Absolutely Hate Fox!'
President Trump attacked Fox News anchor Jessica Tarlov in a Truth Social post shared Friday.
President Donald Trump escalated his feud with Fox News, claiming that anchor Jessica Tarlov is the reason many in the MAGA movement have turned against the once-favored network.
In a Truth Social post shared Friday evening, the president blamed "failed TV personality" Tarlov of "soiling" "The Five," a roundtable discussion led by five rotating Fox News personalities.
"Her voice, her manner, and above all else, what she says, are a disgrace to television broadcasting," wrote, before sharing a series of polls showing him with a favorable majority, including Rasmussen, Insider Advantage, "and many others."
Trump went on to claim that he won the 2024 presidential election by a "landslide," winning all seven swing states, which is true, and the "Popular Vote by millions, with records broken everywhere!" The Republican candidate became the first of his party in 20 years to win the popular vote, which he secured with more than 2 million votes more than Kamala Harris. — Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) June 20, 2025
The president praised anchors and other "The Five" regulars Jesse Watters and Greg Gutfeld as "terrific" before once again criticizing Tarlov's demeanor and career.
"Nobody can stand Tarlov! She lies over and over again, and MAGA is complaining, BIG LEAGUE, that she's all over Fox," Trump continued. "Watch their ratings go down by keeping her on the show — nobody wants to listen to her."
"Why doesn't she talk about the fact that I had ZERO illegal aliens come into our Country last month, whereas Sleepy Joe Biden allowed 62,000 people in, many from prisons, mental institutions, and gangs," Trump added. "People like Jessica Tarlov make MAGA absolutely hate Fox!"
Originally published on Latin Times
© Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
US updates: Activist Mahmoud Khalil vows to keep protesting – DW – 06/21/2025
Mahmoud Khalil returned to New York after his release from detention at an immigration facility Louisiana. DW rounds up the latest headlines form the his visit to Los Angeles, Republican Vice President JD Vance falsely referred to Democratic California Senator Alex Padilla as "Jose Padilla." Alex Padilla last week was restrained and taken into handcuffs when he tried to ask Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem a question during a news conference in a Los Angeles federal building. "I was hoping Jose Padilla would be here to ask a question;" Vance said, apparently referring to the incident last week involving Padilla. Jose Padilla was convicted in 2007 for supporting al-Qaeda and accused of planning a "dirty bomb" attack. California Governor Gavin Newsom said it was "not an accident" that Vance referred to Padilla as "Jose." Newsom pointed out that Vance and Padilla had both served in the Senate together. "How dare you disrespect him and call him Jose," Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said after the incident. US Vice President JD Vance met with troops deployed in Los Angeles, claiming they are still "necessary" to maintain order in the Californian city. There are some 700 US Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops in the city. "Unfortunately, the soldiers and Marines are still very much a necessary part of what's going on here because they're worried that it's going to flare back up," Vance told journalists in Los Angeles. Vance had earlier served in the US Marine Corps. Vance's comments came after a US appeals court allowed Trump to retain control of California's National Guard. Vance said the ruling backed up the claim that the troop deployment is "a completely legitimate and proper use of federal law enforcement." The decision to deploy National Guard troops to Los Angeles was against the wishes of Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom. Protests earlier this month against immigration raids sparked some clashes between demonstrators and police. Vance claimed that Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass did not support law enforcement earlier this month in preventing unrest. California officials such as Newsom and Bass have argued that the deployment of troops in Los Angeles escalated the situation and say the deployment is unconstitutional overreach by the Trump administration. The idea of troops dealing with domestic unrest on US soil has a dark past. During an anti-Vietnam war rally at Kent State University in Ohio in 1970, Ohio National Guard shot dead four college students and left nine others wounded. US President Donald Trump claimed that the US doesn't need to meet the 5% defense spending target he insists on for other nations. The Trump administration has pushed US allies in Europe and Asia to pay 5% of its GDP on defense. The US currently spends 3.4% of its GDP on defense. Next week, NATO members are expected to meet in the Hague, Netherlands for talks on defense and security. NATO members are moving toward a formal pledge to spend 5% of GDP on defense which could be formalized at the summit next week. When asked whether the US should abide by the 5% target, Trump replied: "I don't think we should, but I think they should." "We've been supporting NATO so long," Trump told journalists. Spain has reportedly declined to pursue the 5% defense spending pledge. In 2024, Spain just spent 1.3% of GDP on defense. Trump called Spain a "very low payer" and said he thinks "Spain has to pay what everybody else has to pay." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Although Trump has criticized European countries for not paying enough, some countries, such as Poland, pay more than the US when it comes to defense. Poland spent 4.2% of GDP on defense in 2024 and is expected to spend even more this year. Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist who played a role in the Columbia University protests against Israel's war in Gaza, has been released from federal immigration jail in Louisiana. He spent 104 days in US custody. "Justice prevailed, but it's very long overdue," he said outside the facility. "This shouldn't have taken three months." Khalil was born in Syria and holds Algerian citizenship. He is not a US national but is a permanent resident. US District Judge Michael Farbiarz ordered Khalil's release earlier on Friday. Farbiarz said the US government made no attempt to rebut evidence from Khalil's attorneys that he is not a flight risk nor a danger to the public. The Trump administration has targeted Khalil, saying he played a role in antisemitic protests. Khalil's legal team have argued that he is not antisemtitic or anti-US. The Trump administration had detained Khalil on foreign policy grounds, but Fabiarz had earlier ruled that the foreign policy reasons did not justify his detention. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Khalil's green card will be returned to him, and he is permitted to limited travel within the US. At the same time, the Trump administration is still attempting to deport Khalil based on allegations that he lied to obtain his green card. This means that Khalil's legal battle to stay in the US is still not over. Khalil is married to US citizen Noor Abdalla, who gave birth to their son while he was in immigration detention. Abdalla celebrated Khalil's release in a statement: "We know this ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family, and so many others." "But today we are celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York to be reunited with our little family." The latest cuts to VOA were met with fierce criticism from employees of the outlet and congressional Democrats. VOA employees Jessica Jerreat, Kate Neeper and Patsy Widakuswara are involved in a legal battle against Trump's cuts to the news outlet and US-funded public media. Jerreat, Neeper and Widakuswara were among those laid off on Friday. "It spells the death of 83 years of independent journalism that upholds US ideals of democracy and freedom around the world," Jerreat, Neeper and Widakuswara said in a statement in response to the latest cuts. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In a post on X, Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire strongly condemned the cuts. Jeanne Shaheen is the ranking member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Shaheen said the "decimation of US broadcasting leaves authoritarian propaganda unchecked by US backed independent media and is a perversion of hte law and congressional intent." "It is a dark day for the truth," Shaheen said. The Trump administration on Friday laid off 639 employees at US public broadcaster Voice of America (VoA) and its parent organization, the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM). VoA was established in World War II and aims much of its programming at countries under authoritarian regimes such as North Korea and Iran. Kari Lake, a former television anchor and Trump ally who serves as the senior advisor to the USAGM, said the cuts are part of a "long overdue effort to dismantle a bloated, unaccountable bureaucracy." Some 1,400 people have been fired at VoA and USAGM since March, Lake said. Many VOA staff have been on administrative leave since March 15 amid legal proceedings. Trump has attacked publicly-funded news outlets such as VoA and National Public Radio (NPR), claiming without concrete evidence that their programming is biased toward conservatives. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Welcome to DW's coverage of current affairs in the US and the second term of President Donald Trump. In addition to the latest news on the US, this blog will also bring you multimedia content, analysis and on-the-ground reporting from DW correspondents. Stay tuned for more!
Int'l Business Times
5 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Stokes Fox News Feud Fires After 'The Five' Host Reports Low Polling Numbers: 'People Like Jessica Tarlov Make MAGA Absolutely Hate Fox!'
President Trump attacked Fox News anchor Jessica Tarlov in a Truth Social post shared Friday. President Donald Trump escalated his feud with Fox News, claiming that anchor Jessica Tarlov is the reason many in the MAGA movement have turned against the once-favored network. In a Truth Social post shared Friday evening, the president blamed "failed TV personality" Tarlov of "soiling" "The Five," a roundtable discussion led by five rotating Fox News personalities. "Her voice, her manner, and above all else, what she says, are a disgrace to television broadcasting," wrote, before sharing a series of polls showing him with a favorable majority, including Rasmussen, Insider Advantage, "and many others." Trump went on to claim that he won the 2024 presidential election by a "landslide," winning all seven swing states, which is true, and the "Popular Vote by millions, with records broken everywhere!" The Republican candidate became the first of his party in 20 years to win the popular vote, which he secured with more than 2 million votes more than Kamala Harris. — Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) June 20, 2025 The president praised anchors and other "The Five" regulars Jesse Watters and Greg Gutfeld as "terrific" before once again criticizing Tarlov's demeanor and career. "Nobody can stand Tarlov! She lies over and over again, and MAGA is complaining, BIG LEAGUE, that she's all over Fox," Trump continued. "Watch their ratings go down by keeping her on the show — nobody wants to listen to her." "Why doesn't she talk about the fact that I had ZERO illegal aliens come into our Country last month, whereas Sleepy Joe Biden allowed 62,000 people in, many from prisons, mental institutions, and gangs," Trump added. "People like Jessica Tarlov make MAGA absolutely hate Fox!" Originally published on Latin Times © Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
DW
9 hours ago
- DW
Iran: The dangerous dream of regime change – DW – 06/21/2025
The longer Israel's attack on Iran goes on, the greater the speculation about the possibility of overthrowing the government in Tehran. But regime change has historically had disastrous consequences in the region. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu openly told the US broadcaster Fox News on Sunday that regime change in Iran "could certainly be the result" of Israel's operation there, because, he said, the government in Tehran was "very weak." US President Donald Trump has meanwhile sent out contradictory signals. "We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding," he announced on his personal social network, Truth Social. "He is an easy target, but is safe there — We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now." It remains unclear how long "for now" might last, however. The longer the conflict between Israel and an Iran goes on, the more tempting it might appear to Israel and the United States to get rid not just of the Iranian nuclear program, but of the Islamic Republic as well. "It's extremely doubtful that it would be possible to bring about a regime change like that from the outside, with the push of a button," warns Eckart Woertz, the head of the German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA) in Hamburg. "If it did come to that, whether things would then go in the right direction is a whole other question." Foreign-imposed "regime change" is a highly controversial concept. Under international law, it is a clear violation of the sovereignty of the affected state. Often, it is not democratically legitimized, and it frequently leads to a power vacuum or violence and instability. Newly installed governments often find themselves unable to cope with the challenge of resolving the country's problems, and this results in further crises and conflicts. This is was what happened in Afghanistan. After the terrorist attacks on New York on September 11, 2001, NATO invoked the mutual defense guarantee contained in Article 5 of the NATO Treaty for the first and (so far) only time. A Western military alliance led by the United States resolved to topple Afghanistan's Islamist Taliban regime, and fight the terrorist organization al-Qaeda. Initially, it was quite successful, and by the end of 2001 the Taliban had been driven out of Kabul. But various parties to the alliance disagreed on a number of things, including how military, political and development aid should cooperate. And so, for 20 years, the security situation remained extremely precarious. The country was devastated by attacks as the Taliban launched repeated counteroffensives. Between 2001 and 2021 around 3,600 Western soldiers and almost 50,000 Afghan civilians were killed. The Afghanistan mission cost a total of almost $1 billion (€868 million). After the chaotic withdrawal of the US and its allies in the summer of 2021, the Taliban returned to power. Since then, they have rolled back almost all the progress made over the past 20 years. Afghanistan is isolated and desperately poor, with 23 million people dependent on humanitarian aid. The US once armed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, who was in power for more than two decades. In 2003, however, it decided to overthrow him, with help of a "coalition of the willing," but without a mandate from the UN Security Council. Washington justified the decision with the assertion that Saddam Hussein was supporting al-Qaeda and was in possession of weapons of mass destruction — claims later proven to be false. "Saddam Hussein was overthrown not because he possessed weapons of mass destruction, but because he did not possess them," the Middle East expert Eckhart Woertz says today. And, at the time, Iran took note. Once Saddam Hussein had been toppled, the Americans installed a transitional government, which was later heavily criticized for mismanagement and lack of knowledge of the country. Existing enmities between Iraq's different religious groups deteriorated into a situation akin to civil war between Sunni and Shia Muslims. Deadly attacks were an almost daily occurrence. Soldiers discharged from the Iraqi army started fighting the US troops who had previously toppled Saddam. Twenty years after the American invasion and the attempted regime change in Iraq, the situation has improved. Violence has died down, and the next round of parliamentary elections is due to take place in November. Nonetheless, Iraq remains a country in the process of change. Libya is also still suffering the consequences of an attempted regime change, which came from within and was flanked from abroad. In the wake of the Arab Spring, a civil war there began in 2011 with protests against the rule of longtime dictator Muammar Gaddafi. When attempted to put down the uprisings with bloodshed, NATO intervened militarily in the form of a no-fly zone to protect the civilian population. The regime held on for a few months. Then on October 20, 2011, Gaddafi was killed. But a government acceptable to the entire country was never established. Instead, there have been years of further conflict between rival militias. The state has virtually disintegrated, with two different governments fighting for control since March 2022. The human rights situation remains extremely precarious. Aside from these cautionary examples from recent history, Eckart Woertz sees another problem: Ultimately, ground force would be required to force a change of government in Iran. "I don't see a massively strong rebel movement within Iran that could topple the current regime," says Woertz. And from outside? "While there was a successful regime change in Germany once, at the end of the Second World War, that required a ground invasion," says Woertz. "And then you need a transition backed by local people. It helps if there is a common external enemy — like the Soviet bloc after 1945 — which glosses over the differences. But regime change has never happened with aerial bombardment alone, and I don't think Iran will be an exception now."
