‘Transformational' new breast cancer drug could halt the growth of tumours
A new drug has been shown to halt the growth of certain breast cancer tumours, potentially delaying the need for chemotherapy, according to a new study.
The Serena-6 trial found that camizestrant is effective in stopping cancer cells from using hormones to grow. One professor described the drug as representing "a pivotal moment in breast cancer care".
Scientists said the trial marked the first global study demonstrating that early detection of cancer resistance through blood tests can significantly benefit patients.
The study focused on patients with hormone-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, which accounts for approximately 70 per cent of all cases. The results indicated that patients treated with camizestrant experienced a 56 per cent reduction in cancer progression compared to those receiving standard therapies.
Doctors used a blood test to identify changes in the cancer's DNA, which signal the potential failure of current treatments. Upon detecting these signs, some patients were administered camizestrant, while others continued with their standard treatment.
Those on camizestrant had their cancer stay the same and not get worse for much longer, 16 months on average, compared with about nine months for the others.
The drug was safe for most patients but 1 per cent stopped taking it because of side effects.
More than 3,000 patients from 23 countries took part in the study, which was funded by AstraZeneca and co-led by researchers at The Institute of Cancer Research in London.
Co-principal investigator Professor Nick Turner, group leader in molecular oncology at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, said the drug is 'a pivotal moment in breast cancer care'.
Professor Kristian Helin, chief executive of The Institute of Cancer Research said: 'The results of the Serena-6 trial represent more than a clinical milestone, they represent a transformational shift in how we approach precision medicine.'
About 55,000 women are diagnosed with breast cancer in the UK every year and 11,500 will die from the disease, The Institute of Cancer Research said.
The Serena-6 trial results were to be presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting in Chicago on Sunday.
Dr Catherine Elliott, director of research at Cancer Research UK, said: 'This study is a clear example of how blood tests are starting to transform cancer treatment.
'By tracking tiny traces of tumour DNA in the blood, researchers were able to spot early signs of treatment resistance and switch therapies before cancer had a chance to grow.
'It shows how circulating tumour DNA, or ctDNA, could help doctors make smarter, more timely treatment decisions.
'This approach could become an important part of how we personalise care for people with advanced breast cancer.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Why Astrazeneca (AZN) is a Top Momentum Stock for the Long-Term
For new and old investors, taking full advantage of the stock market and investing with confidence are common goals. While you may have an investing style you rely on, finding great stocks is made easier with the Zacks Style Scores. These are complementary indicators that rate stocks based on value, growth, and/or momentum characteristics. Different than value or growth investors, momentum-oriented investors live by the saying "the trend is your friend." This investing style is all about taking advantage of upward or downward trends in a stock's price or earnings outlook. Employing factors like one-week price change and the monthly percentage change in earnings estimates, the Momentum Style Score can indicate favorable times to build a position in high-momentum stocks. AstraZeneca plc, headquartered in London, UK, is one of the largest biopharmaceutical companies in the world. AstraZeneca was formed on Apr 6, 1999, through the merger of Sweden's Astra AB and UK's Zeneca Group plc. AstraZeneca's business can be broken down into separate lines based on therapeutic classes. These include CVRM (cardiovascular, renal and metabolism), Respiratory & Immunology (R&I), Oncology, Rare Diseases, Vaccines and Other. AZN boasts a Momentum Style Score of B and VGM Score of A, and holds a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) rating. Shares of Astrazeneca has seen some interesting price action recently; the stock is down 5.7% over the past one week and up 1.2% over the past four weeks. And in the last one-year period, AZN has lost 9.9%. As for the stock's trading volume, 3,618,926.50 shares on average were traded over the last 20 days. A company's earnings performance is important for momentum investors as well. For fiscal 2025, two analysts revised their earnings estimate higher in the last 60 days for AZN, while the Zacks Consensus Estimate has increased $0 to $4.49 per share. AZN also boasts an average earnings surprise of 4.2%. AZN should be on investors' short list because of its impressive earnings fundamentals, a good Zacks Rank, and strong Momentum and VGM Style Scores. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Transgene completes initial screening in Phase II part of TG4050 vaccine trial
Transgene has completed the initial subject screening for the Phase II segment of its Phase I/II trial of individualised neoantigen therapeutic vaccine, TG4050, as a monotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative squamous head and neck cancers. The vaccine is based on the myvac platform powered by its partner NEC's AI to enhance antigen selection. During the Phase I portion of the trial, all subjects treated with the vaccine remained disease-free post a minimum follow-up of two years, demonstrating clinical proof of principle. Translational data indicated that these subjects showed sustained T cell responses at 24 months. Meeting all trial endpoints, the findings were shared at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO 2025) annual meeting. The company anticipates completing the randomisation of all subjects in the Phase II part by the end of this year, after a second screening carried out post-surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. Around 80 subjects who have completely responded to adjuvant therapy are expected to be enrolled and randomised in the Phase I/II trial. The first immunogenicity data from the Phase II part are projected to be available in the second half of 2026, with preliminary efficacy data anticipated in the second half of 2027. The trial is assessing the treatment benefits of the vaccine in individuals at risk of relapse. So far, 32 evaluable patients have been included in the Phase I part, with the Phase II continuing globally. Transgene chief medical officer Dr Emmanuelle Dochy said: 'Timely completion of first patient screening of the Phase II part of our Phase I/II trial is an important milestone for Transgene and brings us one step closer to providing a new treatment option for patients living with operable squamous head and neck cancer. 'With meaningful data readouts expected over the next two years, we are preparing to deliver important data for TG4050 and, at the same time, explore its wider potential. We are grateful to the patients, their families, investigators, and clinical staff whose commitment made this achievement possible.' "Transgene completes initial screening in Phase II part of TG4050 vaccine trial" was originally created and published by Clinical Trials Arena, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Medscape
2 days ago
- Medscape
BMJ Investigation Increases Concerns About Ticagrelor Trials
An investigation by The BMJ is raising fresh concerns about the clinical studies that supported the approval of the antiplatelet drug ticagrelor (Brilinta, AstraZeneca), almost 15 years after the medication was first approved and as generic versions are set to hit the market. Peter Doshi, PhD, a senior editor at The BMJ , previously reported inconsistencies and omissions in data reporting from the 2009 PLATO study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine , which showed ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel in treating acute coronary syndrome. Now a follow-up investigation of two supporting studies published in Circulation , ONSET/OFFSET and RESPOND, has revealed primary endpoints were reported inaccurately, data were missing from the submission to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and study centers may not have received adequate training. Doshi said the results of his investigations call into question the drug's approval and suggested that it should be revisited. 'The FDA's approval in 2011 went against the evidence according to its reviewers, and now, my investigations into PLATO, ONSET/OFFSET, and RESPOND, suggest that even the data presented to the FDA and reported in The New England Journal of Medicine and Circulation , is not trustworthy,' he told Medscape Medical News. The investigation identified several problems with data integrity in the two trials. The original primary endpoint results for RESPOND, which aimed to test whether ticagrelor could convert nonresponders to clopidogrel into responders, were statistically nonsignificant ( P = .157) but were subsequently reported in Circulation as significant ( P = .005) because of an undeclared change in its primary endpoint definition. For ONSET/OFFSET, which reported ticagrelor provided faster and greater inhibition of platelets than clopidogrel, the investigators now claim several patients were excluded from the analysis. However, those who remained were identified as the 'intention-to-treat' population, implying all patients were included. Implausible data points were also included in the analysis of the primary endpoint but were first transformed through an unpublished data analysis, Doshi claimed. Doshi also gained access to readouts from some of the platelet function test machines used in the trial. He found more than 60 of 282 readings were not present in the datasets submitted to the FDA, and the levels of platelet activity in those readings were significantly higher than those reported in Circulation . Victor Serebruany, MD, from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, and one of the more high-profile critics of ticagrelor, told The BMJ the missing readings show 'there are episodes of skyrocketing rebound and profound platelet inhibition after ticagrelor, making patients prone to thrombosis or bleeding. If doctors had known what happened in these trials, they would never have started using ticagrelor.' The investigation also revealed oddities around the authorship of the publications. One active trial investigator was never identified as a study author, while one author told The BMJ he was not involved in the trial. The BMJ states that AstraZeneca, the journal Circulation , and many of the original investigators either declined to comment on the new claims or were unreachable. Ticagrelor has been under fire since the beginning. The drug failed in its first bid for FDA approval and was the subject of an investigation by the US Department of Justice in 2013 at the urging of Serebruany. That investigation was closed in 2014 with no further action. A review of several major trials of ticagrelor by Eric Bates, MD, professor of internal medicine at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and a co-author of the US guidelines that recommend ticagrelor, concluded 'the clinical conventional wisdom and clinical trial guideline support for…ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel may be overemphasized.' Bates is now calling for a review of ticagrelor's recommendation in guidelines, according to the earlier The BMJ report.
