'I will not be intimidated by Trump': Malema vows to continue singing 'Kill the Boer' chant
EFF leader Julius Malema says he will not stop singing the controversial 'Kill the Boer' song.
During a recent meeting between US President Donald Trump and President Cyril Ramaphosa, Trump played a clip of Malema chanting 'Kill the Boer' and questioned why he hadn't been arrested.
Addressing EFF supporters in the Free State before a local government by-election, Malema said the song is a part of the country's history.
'I will not be silenced.
'The courts have said there's nothing wrong with the song. This is not my song, I did not compose the song. The [anti-apartheid] struggle heroes composed this song and all I'm trying to do is to defend the legacy of our struggle. This is the heritage of our struggle.'
The Equality Court, Supreme Court of Appeal and Constitutional Court have all ruled the song is not hate speech.
Malema criticised Ramaphosa for not adequately explaining the context of the song.
'When Trump asked him why he's not arresting me, he couldn't respond to the simple fact that the song was approved by the Constitutional Court.
'I will never be intimidated by Donald Trump. They were speaking about me in that meeting in the White House. If they were not gossiping about me they should have called me into that meeting; I would have answered everything that Trump wanted from us.
'Farmers are not only white; there are also black farmers. Ramaphosa is a farmer himself; why did he not present that fact to Trump?'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
3 hours ago
- eNCA
Concourt landmark rulings as it celebrates 30 years
JOHANNESBURG - This year marks 30 years since South Africa's highest court opened its doors not just as a courtroom and as a beacon of hope for justice, equality and Constitutional supremacy. Established after apartheid the Constitutional Court doors were first opened by former President Nelson Mandela in the land in 1995. Its first President was Justice Arthur Chaskalson under then Chief Justice Michael Corbett. Among the first justices on the bench were Richard Goldstone, Pius Langa and Ismail Mohamed. The court Chief Justice, Mandisa Maya. She takes over from Raymond Zondo, as the first woman to hold the position. According to Maya the ConCourt was entrusted with the responsibility to enforce constitutional limitations on the exercise of public power and safeguarding human rights. She was speaking at a celebratory event held in Braamfontein, Johannesburg on Friday. She says the court functions as an independent and impartial institution tasked to ensure compliance and provision of the constitution and serve as the ultimate arbiter of all constitutional matters. 📸| The 30th anniversary of the Constitutional Court. The @ConCourt is the apex court in South Africa and was established following the first democratic election in 1994. #GovZAUpdates — South African Government (@GovernmentZA) June 20, 2025 And over the three decades, it has done just that, handing down landmark rulings that transformed the law, protected rights and deepened constitutional democracy. Here are some of the most influential Constitutional Court rulings that changed South Africa. S v Makwanyane (1995) Issue: The death penalty Outcome: The death penalty is a cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment and it should be declared unconstitutional. It was the court's first ruling. National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Home Affairs (1999) Issue - Same-sex marriage Outcome - The impact of discrimination on gays and lesbians is rendered more serious. And their vulnerability increased by the fact that they are a political minority, not able on their own to use political power to secure favourable legislation for themselves. This also led to the legalisation of same-sex marriage- the first in Africa. Government of the RSV v Grootboom (2000) Issue: Right to housing Outcomes: The state must devise and implement within its available resources a comprehensive and coordinated programme progressively to realise the right of access to adequate housing. Minister of Health v Treatment Action Campaign (2002) Issue - Inheritance under the African customary law of intestate succession Outcome - This ruling struck down male-only inheritance promoting gender equality. It found that the rule that male primogeniture wherein the eldest son inherits property was declared inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid, to the extent that it excludes women and extra-marital children from inheriting property. Bhe and Others v The Magistrate, (2004) Outcome - This ruling struck down male-only inheritance promoting gender equality. It found that the rule that male primogeniture wherein the eldest son inherits property was declared inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid, to the extent that it excludes women and extra-marital children from inheriting property.
Eyewitness News
3 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Ramaphosa: The Constitution is a guardian watching over SA's legal health
JOHANNESBURG - President Cyril Ramaphosa has described the Constitution as a guardian that has been watching over the nation's legal health. Dignitaries gathered at Constitutional Hill on Friday to mark the 30th anniversary of the Constitutional Court. Ramaphosa was the chairperson of the Constitutional Assembly, which was tasked with drafting the new Constitution in 1994. On Friday, while delivering the keynote address at the 30th anniversary of the apex court, Ramaphosa recalled the steps that led towards the finalisation of the country's supreme law. "Speaking in my capacity, then, as chairperson of the Constitutional Assembly, I described this, our Constitution, as our new nation's birth certificate, reflecting the history from which we have emerged and the values of human dignity, equality, and freedom that we now cherish." He said that Friday's festivities called for more than just celebration but also reflection. A packed programme has been prepared for Friday's celebration, with dialogues expected to reflect on significant judgments by the Constitutional Court, such as State vs Makwanyane, which led to the abolition of the death penalty.
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
Does South Africa need a political party led by Floyd Shivambu?
Is it a matter of time until the axe falls on Shivambu's head? Launching a new political party may not be the best move for Floyd Shivambu, the former secretary-general of uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party, according to a political analyst. On Thursday, Shivambu told reporters that he plans to consult various sectors of society about forming a new political party. This follows his public fallouts with the founder of the MK party, Jacob Zuma and his daughter, Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla. Speaking to The Citizen on Friday, political analyst Sanet Solomon said South Africa's ballot paper is already congested with a number of political parties, some of whom even fail to make it to parliament. 'I believe that his [Shivambu's] question has been answered before; the answer is no! The country already has 1 613 registered political parties. The country's challenges are well documented. 'What South Africa currently needs is service delivery, good governance, accountable leaders, and capable state institutions,' he said. Is Shivambu 'reading the room'? Solomon said that despite the wide range of political parties available to voters, many South Africans continue to face the realities of a stagnant economy and one of the most unequal societies in the world. 'While Shivambu did express the desire to consult different communities, it should be noted that the establishment of a new party suggests that he is not reading the room. 'People are disheartened by the lack of action from politicians and need accountability.' Solomon said Shivambu may also have to gain public trust if he is to launch a new political party. 'Given Floyd's current disposition, it may be advisable to take a few months to reflect and re-strategise as voters may distrust him owing that he had already represented the African National Congress (ANC), the EFF and MK [party] in such a short space of time. 'This political 'flip-flopping' is frowned upon,' she said. What happens to career politicians? Solomon said Shivambu's predicament in the MK party sheds light on a broader challenge facing career politicians. 'What happens once you have exhausted all your political options, but have never worked in another environment? 'As the country's political landscape shifts, future politicians may have to consider acquiring additional skill sets that allow them to move beyond the political realm,' she said. ALSO READ: Zuma's tirade against Shivambu indicates he is 'no longer useful to him' Still a member of the MK party Meanwhile, Shivambu reiterated that leaving the EFF for the MK party was the best political decision he has ever made. He took some jabs at the EFF saying he had learnt more in the MK party in the short space of time compared to the long years he had spent in the EFF. The MK party has not officially responded to Shivambu's remarks made during a press briefing held in his personal capacity. The party had removed him from the position of secretary-general for allegedly going on an unauthorised trip to Malawi where he met with Prophet Shepherd Bushiri. NOW READ: Shivambu says money stolen from MK party – and he won't resign
