'Are We Being Lied To?' — 55-Year-Old Making $150K Says He Thinks He's 'Middle Class' But Everyone Else Appears To Be So Much Richer

He's 55, brings in over $150,000 a year, has a mortgage, a retirement fund, little debt — and a wife who doesn't have to work. On paper, he's doing fine.
But something about those yachts and beach homes keeps messing with his head.
In a Reddit post titled "Are there a lot of rich people?" in the r/middleclass subreddit, a user wrote:
"I think I'm middle class. At 55, I finally have some retirement money, a mortgage and not much other debt. My wife doesn't have to work and I make north of 150k in middle America."
Don't Miss:
Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing —
Inspired by Uber and Airbnb – Deloitte's fastest-growing software company is transforming 7 billion smartphones into income-generating assets –
"But I swear when I go to a coastal city and see all the boats and beach homes, I wonder if there are tons of rich people? Are we being lied to that it's only a few?"
He's not the only one wondering.
The Reddit comments came flooding in — some reassuring, some cold, hard math.
"WAAAAY more than that. $2M isn't even top 5% anymore."
"2 million household net worth isn't rich."
"Every 10 years that 2 million of 'worth' will dilute about 500k of value."
One user tried to add some clarity with stats pulled straight from the Richmond Fed's 2023 data:
50th percentile household net worth: $162,350
75th percentile: $553,100
90th percentile: $1.56 million
99th percentile: $11.6 million
Based on that, another user estimated around 13.1 million U.S. households hold $1.6 million or more in wealth. That's about 10% of households — a number way bigger than most people assume.
"Now that is on a nationwide basis," they added. "In the U.S., wealth and income is not evenly distributed with the coastal areas having both more wealth and more income."
Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: .
Not everyone believed what they saw was real wealth. Several users suggested the coastal fantasy could be just that — a façade. "Maybe people are in debt to their eyeballs trying to keep up with the Joneses," the original poster wrote.
Others backed that theory up:
"As someone born and raised on Long Island, I can tell you half of those people living on the water are drowning in debt to maintain appearances. The other half are really rich though."
"People that own beachfront houses on Long Island don't keep up with the Joneses. They are the Joneses."
Actually... yes.
According to the 2025 USA Wealth Report by Henley & Partners and New World Wealth, over 6 million Americans now qualify as high-net-worth individuals with $1M+ in investable assets. That's more than one-third of the world's millionaires — 37% to be exact.
And they're not just in New York or Los Angeles.
The San Francisco Bay Area, Miami, Austin, Houston, and Dallas have all seen double-digit millionaire growth over the last decade — with Scottsdale, Arizona leading the charge at 125% growth.The original poster's confusion is understandable. By income, he's well above average — even for his age bracket.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the median household income in 2023 was about $80,610. Pew Research defines "middle class" as anyone earning between two-thirds and twice that amount — which shakes out to a range of roughly $54,000 to $161,000 for a two-person household.
So while the poster technically sits at the upper end of the "middle class" range, the goalposts have clearly moved.
Many Redditors pointed out that perceptions are warped by social media, geography, and inflation.
"$1.6 million household net worth is not beach house money. It's 'you will be able to retire' money."
"It's a normal, low-key retirement. Watching your money and hoping you or your partner don't get very sick."
The guy's question was simple — but the response was anything but. Yes, there are a lot of rich people. Yes, the bar for being "rich" keeps moving. And yes, some of those beach house neighbors might just be leasing the lifestyle with credit cards.
But it turns out he's not alone in asking the question that started it all: "Are we being lied to?"
Read Next:
Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy.
Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – Many are rushing to
Image: Shutterstock
Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report
TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article 'Are We Being Lied To?' — 55-Year-Old Making $150K Says He Thinks He's 'Middle Class' But Everyone Else Appears To Be So Much Richer originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Insider

an hour ago

• Business Insider

Meet the Gen Z HENRYs: They're making $565K on average but still renting

Earning six figures but living paycheck to paycheck — that's what it means to be a HENRY. As Gen Zers approach 30, a very small subset of the generation is aging into this acronym, which stands for high earners, not rich yet, and was coined by Fortune's Shawn Tully. With inflation biting extra hard during their young adult years, younger Americans increasingly think they need to earn more to achieve stability. In a 2024 Bankrate survey, Gen Zers said they'd need to make $200,000 a year to feel financially secure. At the same time, Gen Zers deal with " money dysmorphia," or an unrealistic perception of their own financial soundness and feeling stressed over money, largely due to social comparison and outdated ideas of what's affordable. Indeed, middle-income Americans have been living more like their lower-income counterparts, indicating that for Americans to feel middle-class, they actually need to be high-earning. To figure out who in Gen Z is actually earning above that threshold — and may exemplify the HENRY title — we delved into Census Bureau microdata from the Current Population Survey's 2024 Annual Social and Economic Supplement. We only looked at adult Gen Zers with a total income of $250,000 or more. Though Gen Z birth years span from 1997 to 2012, we only looked at those ages 18 to 27 in 2024. On average, these Gen Z HENRYs made just above $565,000 a year, compared to around $28,700 for all Gen Zers reflected in the microdata. They also skewed slightly more male than the wider Gen Z cohort. On average, Gen Z HENRYs were around 24 years old in 2024. They were also more likely to be married than their wider Gen Z cohort, and those marriages seem to be sticking so far — essentially 0% of Gen Z HENRYs were separated or divorced. Demographically, Gen Z HENRYs were also less likely to be white than their cohort peers, and more likely to be Asian or Pacific Islander. Gen Z HENRYs were also more likely to have a bachelor's degree or a master's degree and beyond, both of which can contribute to a wage premium. And HENRYs might have the entrepreneurial bug: They're more likely than the rest of Gen Z to be self-employed, although the vast majority held wage or salary roles in the private sector. Gen Z HENRYs were less likely to be homeowners than the wider Gen Z cohort, with 40% of HENRYs owning homes compared to around 53% of all Gen Zers. Conversely, HENRYs were more likely to be renters. However, homeowning HENRYs were more likely to live in more valuable properties — their estimated current property values were around $455,000 compared to around $441,000 for all of Gen Z. That tracks with a larger trend: Some high-earning Americans, especially younger ones, are opting for rent — it's increasingly become a better deal than maintaining and buying a home for many, and many higher-earners like the flexibility and amenities that come with a rental.

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

It Seems That Many Young Adults Don't Know That Credit Cards Aren't 'Free Money.' Isn't Knowing To Pay It Off Monthly Just Common Sense?

A Reddit post from r/NoStupidQuestions revealed something eye-opening: many young adults don't realize they have to pay off their credit card balances in full each month to avoid interest. The original poster asked, 'Why do so many people not know that credit cards aren't free money?' and the comments quickly filled with stories, confessions, and hard-earned lessons. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can Hundreds of commenters shared that they had never been taught how credit cards work, and that financial literacy wasn't part of their education at home or in school. As one person said, 'My mom worked all the time and I was a latchkey kid. She never had time to teach me anything. I know to pay it in full now but I was never taught how to handle money. If I knew then even half of what I know now I would be in a much better place.' Another said they thought credit cards worked like a car loan: pay the minimum each month and eventually it's paid off. They don't understand that interest piles on unless you pay in full. Some admitted they once believed credit cards were basically free money. One wrote, 'No one taught me or prepared me for it. I was racking up a bill and paying off the minimum amount and had no idea what interest was and was stuck in it for a long time.' Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . Many pointed out that young adults are often offered credit cards the moment they turn 18, without understanding the consequences. 'When I was in college, banks would set up a desk in the student center, usually staffed by attractive young women, and sign students up for credit cards,' one commenter shared. 'They had a low minimum payment for as long as you were in school. Imagine handing a 19-year-old a piece of plastic and saying 'Spend as much as you want and only pay $15/month.'' Others shared that financial lessons, if taught, came too early. 'At my school it was taught in 9th grade... four years before any of us even turned 18,' one person wrote. Plenty of financially savvy users said they use credit cards for cashback or points but stressed the importance of paying off the full balance every month. 'I get about $1,000 a year between my Amex and Amazon Prime cards,' one said. 'But you MUST pay off your balance each month to make it work.' Another added, 'Think of it as basically a debit card that doesn't deduct money immediately, but you instead pay for it in one big chunk each month.'Impulse spending came up frequently, not just as a result of poor education but also as a separate challenge. 'If I see something I want in a store and I know I can just whip out a card and take it home there and then, it's hard to resist,' one Redditor confessed. Others pointed out that sometimes it's not about irresponsibility, but necessity. 'You're in a big city and being good with your money but your partner loses her job and for a couple of months money gets ridiculously tight,' one person wrote. While some commenters mocked the idea of anyone thinking credit cards were free money, most responses were empathetic: 'Things that are obvious and common sense to an adult often aren't actually innate behaviors, they're learned.' For many, it wasn't a lack of intelligence, but a combination of being young, under financial stress, and never having someone explain how compound interest and minimum payments really work. Read Next:Inspired by Uber and Airbnb – Deloitte's fastest-growing software company is transforming 7 billion smartphones into income-generating assets – Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article It Seems That Many Young Adults Don't Know That Credit Cards Aren't 'Free Money.' Isn't Knowing To Pay It Off Monthly Just Common Sense? originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

The Hill

4 hours ago

• The Hill

How Senate Republicans want to change the tax breaks in Trump's big bill

WASHINGTON (AP) — House and Senate Republicans are taking slightly different approaches when it comes to the tax cuts that lawmakers are looking to include in their massive tax and spending cuts bill. Republicans in the two chambers don't agree on the size of a deduction for state and local taxes. And they are at odds on such things as allowing people to use their health savings accounts to help pay for their gym membership, or whether electric vehicle and hybrid owners should have to pay an annual fee. The House passed its version shortly before Memorial Day. Now the Senate is looking to pass its version. While the two bills are similar on the major tax provisions, how they work out their differences in the coming weeks will determine how quickly they can get a final product over the finish line. President Donald Trump is pushing to have the legislation on his desk by July 4th. Here's a look at some of the key differences between the two bills: The child tax credit currently stands at $2,000 per child. The House bill temporarily boosts the child tax credit to $2,500 for the 2025 through 2028 tax years, roughly the length of President Donald Trump's second term. It also indexes the credit amount for inflation beginning in 2027. The Senate bill provides a smaller, initial bump-up to $2,200, but the bump is permanent, with the credit amount indexed for inflation beginning next year. Trump promised on the campaign trail that he would seek to end income taxes on tips, overtime and Social Security benefits. Also, he would give car buyers a new tax break by allowing them to deduct the interest paid on auto loans. The House and Senate bills incorporate those promises with temporary deductions lasting from the 2025 through 2028 tax years, but with some differences. The House bill creates a deduction on tips for those working in jobs that have customarily received tips. The House also provides for a deduction for overtime that's equal to the amount of OT a worker has earned. The Senate bill comes with more restrictions. The deduction for tips is limited to $25,000 per taxpayer and the deduction for overtime is limited to $12,500 per taxpayer. The House and Senate bills both provide a deduction of up to $10,000 for interest paid on loans for vehicles made in the United States. And on Social Security, the bills don't directly touch the program. Instead, they grant a larger tax deduction for Americans age 65 and older. The House sets the deduction at $4,000. The Senate sets it at $6,000. Both chambers include income limits over which the new deductions begin to phase out. The caps on state and local tax deductions, known in Washington as the SALT cap, now stand at $10,000. The House bill, in a bid to win over Republicans from New York, California and New Jersey, lifts the cap to $40,000 per household with incomes of less than $500,000. The credit phases down for households earning more than $500,000. The Senate bill keeps the cap at $10,000. That's a non-starter in the House, but Republicans in the two chambers will look to negotiate a final number over the coming weeks that both sides can accept. The House bill prohibits states from establishing new provider taxes or increasing existing taxes. These are taxes that Medicaid providers, such as hospitals, pay to help states finance their share of Medicaid costs. In turn, the taxes allow states to receive increased federal matching funds while generally holding providers harmless through higher reimbursements that offset the taxes paid. Such taxes now are effectively capped at 6%. The Senate looks to gradually lower that threshold for states that have expanded their Medicaid populations under the Affordable Care Act, or 'Obamacare,' until it reaches 3.5% in 2031, with exceptions for nursing homes and intermediate care facilities. Industry groups have warned that limiting the ability of states to tax providers may lead to some states making significant cuts to their Medicaid programs as they make up for the lost revenue in other ways. The Medicaid provision could be a flashpoint in the coming House and Senate negotiations. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., was highly critical of the proposed Senate changes. 'This needs a lot of work. It's really concerning and I'm really surprised by it,' he said. 'Rural hospitals are going to be in bad shape.' The House bill would allow companies for five years to fully deduct equipment purchases and domestic research and development expenses. The Senate bill includes no sunset, making the tax breaks permanent, which was a key priority of powerful trade groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Republicans in both chambers are looking to scale back the clean energy tax credits enacted through then-President Joe Biden's climate law. It aimed to boost the nation's transition away from planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions toward renewable energy such as wind and solar power. Under the Senate bill, the tax credits for clean energy and home energy efficiency would still be phased out, but less quickly than under the House bill. Still, advocacy groups fear that the final measure will threaten hundreds of thousands of jobs and drive up household energy costs. The House bill would allow millions of Americans to use their health savings accounts to pay for gym memberships, with a cap of $500 for single taxpayers and $1,000 for joint filers. The Senate bill doesn't include such a provision. The House reinstates a charitable deduction for non-itemizers of $150 per taxpayer. The Senate bill increases that deduction for donations to $1,000 per taxpayer. Republicans in the House bill included a new annual fee of $250 for EV owners and $100 for hybrid owners that would be collected by state motor vehicle departments. The Senate bill excludes the proposed fees. ___