The ‘father of the internet' and hundreds of tech experts worry we'll rely on AI too much
While the top minds in artificial intelligence are racing to make the technology think more like humans, researchers at Elon University have asked the opposite question: How will AI change the way humans think?
The answer comes with a grim warning: Many tech experts worry that AI will make people worse at skills core to being human, such as empathy and deep thinking.
'I fear — for the time being — that while there will be a growing minority benefitting ever more significantly with these tools, most people will continue to give up agency, creativity, decision-making and other vital skills to these still-primitive AIs,' futurist John Smart wrote in an essay submitted for the university's nearly 300-page report, titled 'The Future of Being Human,' which was provided exclusively to CNN ahead of its publication Wednesday.
The concerns come amid an ongoing race to accelerate AI development and adoption that has attracted billions of dollars in investment, along with both skepticism and support from governments around the world. Tech giants are staking their businesses on the belief that AI will change how we do everything — working, communicating, searching for information — and companies like Google, Microsoft and Meta are racing to build 'AI agents' that can perform tasks on a person's behalf. But experts warn in the report that such advancements could make people too reliant on AI in the future.
Already, the proliferation of AI has raised big questions about how humans will adapt to this latest technology wave, including whether it could lead to job losses or generate dangerous misinformation. The Elon University report further calls into question promises from tech giants that the value of AI will be in automating rote, menial tasks so that humans can spend more time on complex, creative pursuits.
Wednesday's report also follows research published this year by Microsoft and Carnegie Mellon University that suggested using generative AI tools could negatively impact critical thinking skills.
Elon University researchers surveyed 301 tech leaders, analysts and academics, including Vint Cerf, one of the 'fathers of the internet' and now a Google vice president; Jonathan Grudin, University of Washington Information School professor and former longtime Microsoft researcher and project manager; former Aspen Institute executive vice president Charlie Firestone; and tech futurist and Futuremade CEO Tracey Follows. Nearly 200 of the respondents wrote full-length essay responses for the report.
More than 60% of the respondents said they expect AI will change human capabilities in a 'deep and meaningful' or 'fundamental, revolutionary' way over the next 10 years. Half said they expect AI will create changes to humanity for the better and the worse in equal measure, while 23% said the changes will be mostly for the worse. Just 16% said changes will be mostly for the better (the remainder said they didn't know or expected little change overall).
The respondents also predicted that AI will cause 'mostly negative' changes to 12 human traits by 2035, including social and emotional intelligence, capacity and willingness to think deeply, empathy, and application of moral judgment and mental well-being.
Human capacity in those areas could worsen if people increasingly turn to AI for help with tasks such as research and relationship-building for convenience's sake, the report claims. And a decline in those and other key skills could have troubling implications for human society, such as 'widening polarization, broadening inequities and diminishing human agency,' the researchers wrote.
The report's contributors expect just three areas to experience mostly positive change: curiosity and capacity to learn, decision-making, and problem-solving and innovative thinking and creativity. Even in tools available today, programs that can generate artwork and solve coding problems are among the most popular. And many experts believe that while AI could replace some human jobs, it could also create new categories of work that don't yet exist.
Many of the concerns detailed in the report relate to how tech leaders predict people will incorporate AI into their daily lives by 2035.
Cerf said he expects humans will soon rely on AI agents, which are digital helpers that could independently do everything from taking notes during a meeting to making dinner reservations, negotiating complex business contracts or writing code. Tech companies are already rolling out early AI agent offerings — Amazon says its revamped Alexa voice assistant can order your groceries, and Meta is letting businesses create AI customer service agents to answer questions on its social media platforms.
Such tools could save people time and energy in everyday tasks while aiding with fields like medical research. But Cerf also worries about humans becoming 'increasingly technologically dependent' on systems that can fail or get things wrong.
'You can also anticipate some fragility in all of this. For example, none of this stuff works without electricity, right?' Cerf said in an interview with CNN. 'These heavy dependencies are wonderful when they work, and when they don't work, they can be potentially quite hazardous.'
Cerf stressed the importance of tools that help differentiate humans versus AI bots online, and transparency around the effectiveness of highly autonomous AI tools. He urged companies that build AI models to keep 'audit trails' that would let them interrogate when and why their tools get things wrong.
Futuremade's Follows told CNN that she expects humans' interactions with AI to move beyond the screens where people generally talk to AI chatbots today. Instead, AI technology will be integrated into various devices, such as wearables, as well as buildings and homes where humans can just ask questions out loud.
But with that ease of access, humans may begin outsourcing empathy to AI agents.
'AI may take over acts of kindness, emotional support, caregiving and charity fundraising,' Follows wrote in her essay. She added that 'humans may form emotional attachments to AI personas and influencers,' raising 'concerns about whether authentic, reciprocal relationships will be sidelined in favor of more predictable, controllable digital connection.'
Humans have already begun to form relationships with AI chatbots, to mixed effect. Some people have, for example, created AI replicas of deceased loved ones to seek closure, but parents of young people have also taken legal action after they say their children were harmed by relationships with AI chatbots.
Still, experts say people have time to curb some of the worst potential outcomes of AI through regulation, digital literacy training and simply prioritizing human relationships.
Richard Reisman, nonresident senior fellow at the Foundation for American Innovation, said in the report that the next decade marks a tipping point in whether AI 'augments humanity or de-augments it.'
'We are now being driven in the wrong direction by the dominating power of the 'tech-industrial complex,' but we still have a chance to right that,' Reisman wrote.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 AI stocks to consider buying and holding for the long term
Many AI applications are still in development, offering ground-floor buying opportunities in their stocks. Below are some established companies that five of contract writers like as investments to consider buying to capitalise on this transformational technology. What it does: Alphabet is a global technology company best known for Google, YouTube, Android, and cloud services. By Mark Hartley. When considering an AI investment for the long term, Google's parent company Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) stands out. It has emerged as a key player in the AI space, leveraging its vast data resources and computational power to dig deep roots into the industry. Through DeepMind and its Gemini AI models, Alphabet is at the forefront of generative AI development. Google Cloud offers scalable AI tools and infrastructure for businesses, while AI enhancements in products like Search, Gmail, and YouTube are well-positioned to benefit from advertising revenue. Alphabet's expansive ecosystem gives it a strategic advantage in training and deploying AI models at scale. A significant risk, however, lies in the potential disruption of its core search business. As AI chatbots and generative search become more prevalent, traditional search advertising could face margin pressure. Additionally, if faces increased regulatory scrutiny on data usage, antitrust concerns and competition from rivals like Microsoft and Amazon. Mark Hartley doesn't own shares in any of the stocks mentioned. What it does: Cellebrite is the global leader in decrypting mobile phones and other devices supporting digital forensic investigations. By Zaven Boyrazian. Many AI stocks today are unproven. That's why I prefer established players leveraging AI to improve their existing mission-critical products like Cellebrite (NASDAQ:CLBT). Cellebrite specialises in extracting encrypted data from mobile phones and other devices aiding law enforcement and enterprises in criminal and cybersecurity investigations. Over 90% of crime commited today has a digital element. And when it comes to decrypting mobile phones, Cellebrite is the global gold standard. The company is now leveraging AI to analyse encrypted data – drastically accelerating a task that's historically been increadibly labour intensive identifying patterns, discovering connections, and establishing leads. Most of Cellebrite's revenue comes from law enforcement, exposing Cellebrite to the risk of budget cuts. In fact, fears of lower US federal spending is why the stock dropped sharply in early 2025. And with a premium valuation, investors can expect more volatility moving forward. But in the long run, Cellebrite has what it takes to be an AI winner in my mind. That's why I've already bought shares. Zaven Boyrazian owns shares in Cellebrite. What it does: Dell Technologies provides a broad range of IT products and services and is an influential player in AI. By Royston Wild. Dell Technologies (NYSE:DELL) isn't one of the more fashionable names in the realm of artificial intelligence (AI). The good news is that this means it trades at a whopping discount to many of its peers. For this financial year (to January 2026), City analysts think earnings will soar 41% year on year, leaving it on a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of 12.6 times. Such readings are as rare as hen's teeth in the high-growth tech industry. In addition, Dell shares also trade on a price-to-earnings growth (PEG) ratio of 0.3 for this year. Any reading below 1 implies a share is undervalued. These modest readings fail to reflect the exceptional progress the company's making in AI, in my opinion. Indeed, Dell last month raised guidance for the current quarter as it announced 'unprecedented demand for our AI-optimised servers' during January-March. It booked $12.1bn in AI orders in the last quarter alone, beating the entire total for the last financial year. Dell is a major supplier of server infrastructure that let Nvidia's high-power chips do their thing. Dell's shares could sink if unfavourable developments in the ongoing tariff wars transpire. But the company's low valuation could help limit the scale of any falls. Royston Wild does not own shares in Dell or Nvidia. What it does: Salesforce is a customer relationship management (CRM) software company that is developing AI agents. By Edward Sheldon, CFA. We've all seen the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in recent years. Using apps like ChatGPT and Gemini, we can do a lot of amazing things today. These apps are just the start of the AI story, however. I expect the next chapter to be about AI agents – software programmes that can complete tasks autonomously and increase business productivity exponentially. One company that is active in this space is Salesforce (NYSE: CRM). It's a CRM software company that has recently developed an agentic AI offering for businesses called 'Agentforce'. It's still early days here. But already the company is having a lot of success with this offering, having signed up 8,000 customers since the product's launch last October. Now, Salesforce is not the only company developing AI agents. So, competition from rivals is a risk. I like the fact that the company's software is already embedded in over 150,000 organisations worldwide though. This could potentially give it a major competitive advantage in the agentic AI race. Edward Sheldon has positions in Salesforce. What it does: Salesforce is a cloud-based software company specialising in customer relationship management, helping businesses manage sales, marketing, support, and data. By Ben McPoland. I think Salefsforce (NYSE: CRM) looks well set up to benefit in the age of AI. Specifically, its Agentforce platform, which lets businesses deploy AI agents to handle various tasks, could be the company's next big growth engine. By the end of April, it had already closed over 8,000 deals, just six months after launching Agentforce. Half of those were paid deals, taking its combined data cloud and AI annual recurring revenue above $1bn. Granted, that looks like small potatoes set against the $41.2bn in sales it's expected to generate this fiscal year. But it's still very early days, and management reckons the digital labour market opportunity could run into the trillions of dollars. Of course, it's always best to treat such mind-boggling projections with a healthy dose of scepticism. And the company does face stiff competition in the AI agent space, especially from Microsoft and ServiceNow. Nevertheless, I'm bullish here. Salesforce is already deeply embedded in sales, service, and marketing. Its AI agents slot into existing workflows, which I think will prove to be a big advantage over unproven AI upstarts. Ben McPoland owns shares of Salesforce. The post 5 AI stocks to consider buying and holding for the long term appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Alphabet, Amazon, Cellebrite, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Salesforce. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Google Confirms Most Gmail Users Must Upgrade All Their Accounts
Most accoiunts need an upgrade, says Google. Republished on June 21 with new advice after 'record breaking' security alert. Google has confirmed another atack on Gmail users this week. Yet again, its own infrastructure has been exploited to compromise user accounts. And yet again, it comes with another warning for users to upgrade their accounts — this is now a must. Earlier this month, I covered Google's warning that most of its users still only use basic password security and are wide open to data breaches and attacks. 'We want to move beyond passwords altogether," Google said, pushing users to replace them. Passkeys, it says, "are phishing-resistant and can log you in simply with the method you use to unlock your device (like your fingerprint or face ID) — no password required.' Put simply, this links account security to hardware security, and means there are no passwords to steal or two-factor authentication (2FA) codes to bypass or intercept. While that is critical for Gmail users, it's actually much wider. Google reached out to me after that article, to emphasize that the benefits are more significant for users: Adding a passkey to a Google account protects all the services and accounts that can be accessed by that sign in. Conversely, not doing so leaves all those other accounts at risk. Even if most user accounts were secured by passwords and 2FA codes, there would still be a push to passkeys. And while Google, Microsoft and others make 2FA mandatory, the reality is that there's still a risk that codes can be shared even if they can't be stolen. That was the crux of the latest Gmail attack, tricking users into sharing codes. Scams and Protections (June 2025) The raft of headlines around a new 16 billion record data breach should focus minds, even if 'this is not a new data breach, or a breach at all,' says Bleeping Computer. 'The websites involved were not recently compromised to steal these credentials.' Mashable agrees. 'Some commentators were quick to call it the largest password leak in history, and in terms of raw records exposed, that's mostly, technically true. However, these records did not come from a single breach — or even a new breach. Instead, they came from many smaller ones," with 'the end result more a 'greatest hits' rather than a new, noteworthy hack.' Albeit that doesn't change the fact the data is out there. Kaspersky says 'the journalists haven't provided any evidence of existence of this database. Therefore, neither Kaspersky's experts nor anyone else has managed to analyze it. Therefore, we cannot say whether yours – or anyone else's – data is in there.' But, regardless, Google's latest survey still paints a bleak picture. Although '60% of U.S. consumers say they 'use strong, unique passwords,' less than 50% 'enable 2FA.' The truth is that the only form of simple 2FA is SMS codes, which are sent quickly without having to exit the app or click or tap. They even autofill and often auto-delete. But SMS is woefully insecure, it's the worst possible 2FA option. And anything else — authenticator apps, physical keys, even trusted device or app sign-ins — is more painful. Passkeys are the opposite. They're even easier than passwords and SMS 2FA. The code (which you never see) combines your login ID, password and 2FA into a simple sign-in process authenticated by your device security — ideally biometrics. And because there is no code you can see or copy, you can't share the passkey even if you want to. Even if any of the underlying code is stolen, it only works on your actual device. Google is right — this is about much more than Gmail, even if those email account attacks generate headline after headline. While there are some misgivings about the dominance and data overreach in big tech using its span of control to sign you into multiple services, even those they don't own or control, it is more secure. As Kaspersky suggests, 'let's set skepticism aside. Yes, we don't reliably know what exactly this leak is, or whose data is in it. But that doesn't mean you should do nothing. The first and best recommendation is to change your passwords,' which is an obvious immediate step. But it doesn't solve the problem. 'Use passkeys wherever possible,' Kaspersky also tells users. 'This is the modern passwordless method of logging into accounts, which is already supported by Google, iCloud, Microsoft, Meta and others.' As Google says, 'when you pair the ease and safety of passkeys with your Google Account, you can then use Sign in with Google to log in to your favorite websites and apps — limiting the number of accounts you have to maintain.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
3 growth stocks I've bought for the ‘AI agent' revolution
As a long-term investor, I tend to focus on big, powerful investment themes. And one theme I'm really excited about today is the emergence of 'AI agents' – software that can perform business tasks autonomously. I believe the investment potential here is enormous. With that in mind, here are three growth stocks I've bought for the agentic AI revolution. My number one play on AI agents today is software company Salesforce (NYSE: CRM). It has a product called Agentforce and it's having a lot of success with it. Indeed, since its launch in October last year, the company has signed over 8,000 customers. Of these, around half are now paying for the service. The main reason I'm bullish here is that Agentforce integrates really well with Salesforce's apps and data services (Data Cloud and Tableau Next). This is important – without the right data, agents are likely to be useless. I'll point out that ServiceNow's agentic AI offering also integrates well with data and apps. So, competition from this firm is a risk. However, I like the risk-reward proposition here at today's share price and valuation. Salesforce trades on a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of just 23. I believe the stock offers value at present and is worth considering. Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) is well known for its generative AI capabilities (it's a part-owner of ChatGPT-owner OpenAI). What a lot of investors don't realise, however, is that this company is also a major player in the agentic AI space. Today, it offers a range of services designed to help developers/organisations build and deploy agents to increase business productivity. For example, Azure AI Foundry Agent Service allows professional developers to build specialised agents to handle complex business tasks. I was buying this growth stock a few months ago when it was near $350. It's now at $480, so doesn't look as attractive as it did back then. That said, I think it's still worth considering for the long term (especially on a 5%-10% pullback). While competition from other cloud computing giants such as Amazon and Alphabet is a risk, I believe this stock has bags of potential. Finally, I think CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD) could be a major player in the agentic AI revolution. It's one of the world's leading cybersecurity companies. It offers a solution called Charlotte AI, which CEO George Kurtz refers to as the company's agentic security analyst. This is designed to transform threat detection and response by bringing automation and autonomous reasoning to cybersecurity operations. CrowdStrike should also benefit from other companies' rollout of AI agents. Given that they typically have access to massive amounts of data, they are going to significantly increase the surface area of IT that needs to be protected. Now, this stock is the riskiest of the three. That's because it's a much younger company (meaning it's a little more unproven) and doesn't have a lot of profits at this stage. It has also had a huge run this year, rising over 40%. I still believe it's worth considering, but I think investors are better off waiting for a pullback before buying. The post 3 growth stocks I've bought for the 'AI agent' revolution appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Edward Sheldon has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, and Salesforce. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Alphabet, Amazon, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, ServiceNow, and Salesforce. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
