US military's highest ranking transgender officer says seperation process is broken
The highest-ranking transgender officer in the Department of Defense said that the military's transgender separation policy is going to leave gaps in units as skilled service members are removed from the armed forces.
U.S. Space Force Col. Bree Fram said that as of June 7, she is on administrative leave from the service, pending separation, as a result of the Pentagon's ban on transgender troops.
She told Task & Purpose Monday that she is at the end of her more than two-decade career in the armed forces. She spoke to Task & Purpose in her personal capacity, not in reflection of Pentagon policy
Fram, an aeronautical engineer who previously served in the Air Force before moving to Space Force in 2021, was serving as director of requirements and integration for Space Force. In posts on social media, she said that her last official act was to pin medals on three people who served under her. She cried as they saluted her.
The Department of Defense officials say they believe there are approximately 4,200 service members with gender dysphoria in the ranks, and that as of May 15, 1,000 had come forward to begin a so-called 'voluntary' separation process. Others who may later be identified and 'involuntarily' separated could receive smaller compensation packages, officials say.
'People are on pins and needles. We're asking each other 'what do you know? What do we all know?' It's been really difficult,' she told Task & Purpose on Monday. 'I want to stress that although this is labeled voluntarily, neither the 'voluntary' or 'involuntary' process is a choice, or what anyone wanted or would have done.'
Fram joined the military after Sept. 11, 2001, and came out as transgender in 2016, the same day that the Department of Defense lifted its ban on transgender service. She spent nearly 20 years in the Air Force, then moved to the Space Force in 2021.
Transgender service members, Fram said, 'have been operating in a vacuum,' and are looking for more information from military leadership. The military's involuntary separation process for transgender troops, which started on June 7, remains vague on details.
Members in the reserves have until July 7 to choose to go through the voluntary separation process. The Air Force and Navy have said that troops with certain years of service are eligible for early retirement in this process.
A technical but life-altering issue for troops, said Fram, is the 'separation code' under which they will leave the service.
Most troops leaving the military are granted an 'honorable discharge,' a separation code that indicates they left in good standing with no serious discipline issues or professional failures.
Though the Pentagon has, at times, said that transgender troops with clean records would receive honorable discharges, but Fram said that's no longer clear.
A May 15 memo from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness said transgender enlisted personnel would be separated under the JFF separation code, meaning it was done by secretarial authority. Officers would be given a JDK code, which indicates on their service record that 'their continued service is not clearly consistent with the interests of national security' — a black mark for troops in the job market, as it could prevent them from getting or maintaining security clearances that are required for certain jobs.
Rachel VanLandingham, a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel and JAG, told Task & Purpose that the JDK separation code is usually reserved for matters such as mishandling classified information.
Fram said that the main concern for them has been uncertainty over what is next. 'Anyone navigating a transition out of the military is put in a challenging position, but they have this extra burden of being labeled as dishonorable or liars,' she said.
Fram also noted that the separations will cause disruptions for ongoing operations as troops who are qualified for specific roles are 'suddenly gone.'
Fram's work focused on researching what capabilities and 'fight critical' systems the Space Force will need to field in the next decade. It's specialized work drawing on her years of experience, which others in Space Force don't have, she said. Fram noted that units that have open transgender personnel have tried to do some planning to fill gaps left by separation, but replacing thousands of people across the military 'is not something that happens tomorrow.'
'The impact of this is not just on today. It stretches far into the future,' she said.
At her final awards ceremony, Fram said, her colleagues were stunned to learned she was leaving the service and all shook her hand as the event broke up.
'We served with our friends, our colleagues, with people who respected us, and now that's just missing,' she said.
A Marine Corps reply-all email apocalypse has an incredible real-life ending
Army shuts down its sole active-duty information operations command
Army plans to close more than 20 base museums in major reduction
Former Green Beret nominated to top Pentagon position to oversee special ops
The Navy's new recruiting commercial puts the 'dirt wars' in the past
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
2 aircraft carriers, 9 destroyers, and multiple fighter wings gather in the Middle East
As fighting between Israel and Iran carries on for a second week, the United States continues to build up its already large presence in the Middle East. For the last 20 months, U.S. forces have sent ground, air, and naval assets into the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility, both as deterrents against Iran and as part of more than a year of fighting against the Houthis in Yemen. There are approximately 40,000 U.S. troops in the area currently, including a Navy carrier strike group with another on the way, several fighter squadrons and two of the United States' Terminal High Altitude Area Defense or THAAD systems, one of its most advanced missile defense interceptors. The Pentagon recently sent additional air and naval assets to the area, as the Trump administration threatens to potentially attack Iran, out of the stated intent of stopping Tehran from getting a nuclear bomb, though American intelligence found in March that the country is not pursuing development of nuclear weapons. The military maintains 10 bases in the region, including major installations in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates, as well as smaller outposts in Jordan and Syria, among others. There are also additional forces and support infrastructure in Turkey and Djibouti, although those are not under CENTCOM's purview, which covers the Middle East, Egypt, and much of Central Asia, including Afghanistan and Pakistan. There are currently 2,500 service members in Iraq and roughly 1,500 in Syria. They are there primarily as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the ongoing anti-ISIS fight. American forces are starting a drawdown from Syria but still maintain posts in the country's south and east. In Iraq, U.S. soldiers have at least two MIM-104 Patriot surface-to-air missile batteries — one in Irbil in Iraqi Kurdistan and another at the al-Asad airbase in the country's west. Both have seen action in past interception missions over the Middle East. Additionally, two THAAD air defense systems, operated by roughly 100 American soldiers each, are deployed to Israel. The USS Carl Vinson Carrier Strike Group is in the Arabian Sea. Along with the carrier and its embarked Carrier Air Wing 2, the task force includes the guided-missile cruiser USS Princeton and the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers USS Sterett and USS William P. Lawrence. Carrier Air Wing 2 includes close to 50 fighters and strike aircraft across three squadrons of F/A-18E/F strike fighters and one squadron each of F-35C fighters and E/A-18G Growler electronic warfare fighters. Three other destroyers, the USS Sullivans, the USS Arleigh Burke, and the USS Thomas Hudner, are in the eastern Mediterranean. The USS Thomas Hudner had previously taken part in interceptions of Houthi missiles in late 2023. Another pair of independent destroyers are in the Red Sea, per USNI News. In Bahrain, the headquarters of the 5th Fleet, the Navy also has four anti-mining vessels. Soon to join the Carl Vinson is the USS Nimitz, whose deployment to the region was moved up earlier this month. The Nimitz, on its final operational deployment before being decommissioned, will arrive with four guided-missile destroyers and similar air power to the Vinson with Carrier Air Wing 17. Originally meant to replace the Carl Vinson, the two carrier groups will overlap in their deployment to the CENTCOM area of responsibility, a tactic that has been regularly used in the last 20 months. The U.S. Air Force also maintains a strong presence at some of CENTCOM's major bases. Ali al-Salem Air Base in Kuwait hosts the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing, while the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing is in Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. Both installations include dozens of combat aircraft as well as military drones such as the MQ-9 Reaper. Air Force jets proved to be a major part of the successful interception operation in April 2024, when American and other partner forces shot down dozens of Iranian drones and ballistic missiles aimed at Israel. In the last week, more than two dozen Air Force refueling tankers flew across the Atlantic to the Middle East and Europe, in a buildup of logistical support. Earlier this week, Reuters reported that an unspecified number of F-16, F-22, and F-35 fighter jets were being sent over. Outside of the CENTCOM area of responsibility, U.S. forces also maintain bombers and other aircraft at their Indian Ocean base on the island of Diego Garcia. That strategic outpost — jointly operated with the United Kingdom — is a staging base for B-2 bombers. B-2s were briefly sent over earlier in the spring. Their ability to be based there has been a major discussion point this week as the U.S. weighs targeting Iranian nuclear facilities — the Fordo nuclear site is several hundred feet underground, too deep for most bombing campaigns but within the destructive range of the GBU-57 bunker buster bombs, which only the B-2 can carry. If the ongoing fighting in the Middle East were to spread, many of these installations and vessels in the region could be at risk. Many were targeted by pro-Iran militias inside Iraq over the last two years, as regional violence picked up as the Israeli war in Gaza began. In his own warning amid back-and-forth threats, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, posted to social media this week that 'The harm the U.S. will suffer will definitely be irreparable if they enter this conflict militarily.' During the two stages of fighting around Yemen over the past 20 months, Houthis repeatedly fired one-way attack drones and missiles towards Navy ships, which were all intercepted. Meanwhile, several militias active in Syria and Iraq fired multiple barrages of rockets and drones at various American and coalition bases in multiple countries in the area. Dozens were injured, including receiving traumatic brain injuries as a result. The dangers of shorter-ranged attacks were already proven last year, when three Army reserve soldiers were killed at Tower 22 in Jordan and several more were injured. Given the rise in small rocket and drone barrages on bases in the regions, troops deploying to the Middle East have begun training on simulators on how to respond to such an attack. Sailors who can't deploy will be moved to empty jobs under Navy program Air Force relieves commander of pilot training squadron US military's highest-ranking transgender officer says the separation process is broken Army bringing in big tech executives as lieutenant colonels Trump reverts 7 Army bases to former names with new honorees, including Delta Force soldier
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Deal, Not Bombs, Seen as Only Way to End Iranian Nuclear Threat
By , John Bowker, and Ramsey Al-Rikabi Save While President Donald Trump weighs whether to join Israel's assault on Iran, foreign policy veterans and analysts argue that a negotiated settlement, not bombs nor commandos, is the only way to eliminate the threat of Tehran gaining a nuclear weapon. 'I don't believe there's a lasting military solution to the Iranian nuclear problem,' said Caroline Zier, a former senior Pentagon official under both Republican and Democratic administrations. 'You can delay, you can set back, but the long-term solution comes at the negotiating table.'
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
Trump says the US doesn't have to meet NATO spending goal
President Donald Trump said Friday that the U.S. shouldn't have to abide by the same defense spending standards as the rest of NATO — potentially antagonizing leaders from the rest of the alliance days before he's to meet with them in The Netherlands. Trump has long demanded that NATO states spend 5 percent of their GDP on defense but has never said if the U.S. should be included in that or not. The U.S. is currently at 3.4 percent. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' he said, responding to a question about his 5 percent defense spending goal. 'We've been supporting NATO so long. … So I don't think we should, but I think that the NATO countries should, absolutely,' he added. The summit kicks off Tuesday in The Hague with the leaders of 32 member states coming together to plan spending goals and reaffirm NATO force structure and deployment plans. Most NATO states spend just over 2 percent of their GDP on defense currently, with a growing number having outlined plans to get to around 3 percent over the next year or two. Trump's spending demand has hovered over the alliance since his reelection however, and the alliance has come up with a novel solution: Call for 3.5 percent on defense, with the remaining 1.5 percent taken up by domestic infrastructure and cybersecurity spending. Trump's apparent opting out of the higher target is unlikely to sit well with Republicans on Capitol Hill who've pushed for larger Pentagon budgets and have clashed with the administration over defense spending. Both Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.), the chairs of the Senate and House Armed Services Committees respectively, have been pushing to drive U.S. defense spending to 5 percent of GDP. They and other GOP leaders criticized Trump's budget plans for keeping annual defense funding flat, save a one-time investment from Republicans' megabill of spending and tax cuts. Hitting that goal would mean a roughly $1.4 trillion defense budget for the Pentagon. Only Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania have committed to 5 percent number so far, but most of the rest of the alliance is expected to follow suit at The Hague. There are outlines, however. The Spanish government, which is one of the lowest spenders on defense in the alliance, flatly rejected the 5 percent goal this week. In a letter to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte obtained by POLITICO, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said his government 'cannot commit to a specific spending target in terms of GDP at this summit.' Other allies who have spent more on defense in recent years are also grappling with how to keep pumping more money into their militaries. 'We have to find a realistic compromise between what is necessary and what is possible, really, to spend,' Germany's defense minister, Boris Pistorius said this month during a NATO meeting in Brussels. Seth Jones, president of the defense and security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said in a press call Friday that U.S. defense spending, at 3.4 percent of GDP, is 'lower than during any time during the Cold War,' and the Trump administration's defense budget as a percentage of GDP 'is likely to be lower than the Carter administration's defense budget in the 1970s.' Connor O'Brien contributed to this report.
