CISC Dixit cites expansion in China's military space programme at defence surveillance seminar
New Delhi, As India contemplates its own surveillance capabilities, the rapidly evolving threat landscape, particularly the remarkable advances made by "our neighbours to the north" must be understood, Chief of Integrated Defence Staff Air Marshal Ashutosh Dixit said on Wednesday, as he also cited expansion in China's military space programme.
In his address at a seminar here, Air Marshal Dixit also said Chinese satellites have recently demonstrated "sophisticated 'dog-fighting' manouvres" in low earth orbits.
He was speaking on 'Surveillance and Electro-optics' at the event hosted by think-tank CS and Indian Military Reviews at Subroto Park.
China's military space programme has expanded from "operating just 36 satellites in 2010 to over a thousand by 2024, with more than 360 dedicated to ISR missions".
ISR refers to intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.
"As we contemplate our own surveillance capabilities, we must understand the rapidly evolving threat landscape, particularly the remarkable advances made by our neighbours to the north," Air Marshal Dixit said.
"They have evolved from a kill chain to a kill mesh, an integrated network that seamlessly interweaves ISR satellites with weapon systems," he added.
However, he laid emphasis on the success of Operation Sindoor and said while these challenges be acknowledged, "we must also celebrate our remarkable achievements."
At the "heart of our success" was the integrated air command and control system , a testament to Indian engineering's excellent and strategic vision," the officer said.
It was also synchronised and integrated with the Indian Army's Akasheteer system, providing a joint and integrated approach to the air defence of the nation.
What made IACCS particularly effective was its impact on decision-making and speed, he said, adding in modern warfare, information without the ability to act upon it rapidly, is of limited value.
"IACCS compressed our sensor-to-shooter timelines dramatically, enabling responses that outpaced adversary's decision cycles," Air Marshal Dixit said.
As we look to the future, we must recognise that tomorrow's battlefields will demand sensors in all domains. Surveillance and electro-optics will be one of the foundational layers of military operations, enabling dominance through foresight and planning, rather than firepower alone, the officer added.
India's MALE and HALE platforms, including the MQ9, must therefore evolve with modular payloads, advanced system, AI-assisted analysis to provide commanders with unprecedented situational awareness, he said.
At a symposium in 2023, Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan while highlighting the intense race towards militarisation of space, had made a strong pitch for developing dual-use platforms with a special focus on incorporating cutting-edge technology in the space domain.
The CDS, in another session of the symposium had also said that India needs to sharpen its focus on developing space capabilities to counter the rapid advances in the sector made by "an adversary", an apparent reference to China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
24 minutes ago
- Hans India
Won't get Nobel Prize for 'stopping' Indo-Pak war... rues Donald Trump
Washington: US President Donald Trump has bemoaned that he won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for "stopping" the war between India and Pakistan or for his efforts in the Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Iran conflicts. In a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, on Friday, Trump said, "I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize, no matter what I do." He started his post by mentioning that he is very happy to report that he has arranged, along with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a wonderful treaty between Congo and Rwanda, in their war, which was known for violent bloodshed and death, more so even than most other Wars, and has gone on for decades. Noting that representatives from Rwanda and Congo will be in Washington on Monday to sign documents in this regard, Trump described it as a "Great Day for Africa and, quite frankly, a Great Day for the World!" He then went on to say that, however, he won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for any of his efforts. "I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for this, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between Serbia and Kosovo," Trump said. Tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad escalated after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, with India carrying out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in the early hours of May 7. Pakistan attempted to attack Indian military bases on May 8, 9, and 10. The Indian side responded strongly to the Pakistani actions. The on-ground hostilities ended with an understanding of stopping the military actions following talks between the directors general of military operations of both sides on May 10. Trump has been claiming that the US has stopped India and Pakistan from fighting. However, India has been consistently maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. In his social media post, Trump further said he won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for "keeping peace between Egypt and Ethiopia (A massive Ethiopian built dam, stupidly financed by the United States of America, substantially reduces the water flowing into The Nile River)". The US President said he won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for doing the Abraham Accords in the Middle East which, if all goes well, "will be loaded to the brim" with additional countries signing on, and will unify the Middle East for the first time in The Ages!" "No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be, but the people know, and that's all that matters to me," he said. Meanwhile, the Pakistan government said in a statement that it has decided to formally recommend Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis. At a moment of heightened regional turbulence, President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation, ultimately securing a ceasefire and averting a broader conflict between the two nuclear states that would have had catastrophic consequences for millions of people in the region and beyond, the statement claimed. It said this intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker and his commitment to conflict resolution through dialogue. It also noted Trump's offers to resolve the Kashmir issue. President Trump's leadership during the 2025 Pakistan India crisis manifestly showcases the continuation of his legacy of pragmatic diplomacy and effective peace-building. Pakistan remains hopeful that his earnest efforts will continue to contribute towards regional and global stability, particularly in the context of ongoing crises in the Middle East, including the humanitarian tragedy unfolding in Gaza and the deteriorating escalation involving Iran, the Pakistani government said. In a post on X, John Bolton, who was National Security Advisor during Trump's first term as President, said the Republican leader wants a Nobel Peace Prize, because former US president Barack Obama received one. He won't get it for solving the Russian-Ukraine war. He tried unsuccessfully to claim credit for the recent India-Pakistan ceasefire. He's now failing to reach an agreement with Iran, and is being asked by Israel to help destroy Tehran's nuclear-weapons programme. And he still hasn't made up his mind, Bolton said. Obama had been US President for less than eight months when he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009. On May 10, Trump claimed on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire after a long night of talks mediated by Washington. He has repeated the claim over a dozen times that he helped settle the tensions between India and Pakistan. Trump said that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America will do a lot of trade with them if they stopped the conflict.
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
House panel may suggest high commissions' audits
A parliamentary panel is likely to recommend that the government revamp the internal mechanisms of Indian embassies, and mandate that each diplomatic mission undergoes at least one audit every three to four years, after a review of some reports revealed rule violations and procedural lapses in the Indian High Commission in London, officials familiar with the matter said. House panel may suggest high commissions' audits According to the report, which HT has seen, some of the officials at the London high commissionallegedly accepted compensation from a property developer without approval from the ministry of external affairs (MEA) and without any documented justification for the amount accepted. Additionally, a private party was reportedly irregularly authorised to receive and retain government receipts and use them to cover mission expenses. The report also cited that renovation work in the basement of India House, London, was carried out without proper approvals from the concerned authorities. A draft report, which was adopted by a House panel earlier this week, said, 'The Committee are pained to note the feeble reply of the ministry that punitive action has already been initiated by the Ministry and that there is absence of necessary evidence to support criminal charges against the concerned officials, The Committee are of the considered opinion that the Ministry is trying to protect the delinquent officers when audit has clearly established violation of rules and processes.' The panel observed that it is not the first time it has seen cases involving violation of rules and guidelines of missions abroad. The draft report maintains the need for a strong deterant action and asked the ministry to proceed with criminal charges against errant officials. The House panel, according to functionaries, might ask for a wider preventive measure and suggest that internal audit mechanism including its mandate and terms of reference to include transaction and compliance4 audit. The panel might also suggest that parliamentary panels must be appraised of such audits from at least last five years and its findings. 'The committee emphasize that revamping of the internal audit mechanism is of paramount importance given the frequent occurrence and non-detection of such cases of blatant violations of rules and regulations. Internal audit will help uncover potential risks, vulnerabilities and areas of weakness within the missions allowing for proactive risk management and mitigation strategies to be develop,' the draft added.
Scroll.in
27 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
After Pahalgam, what is the counterterrorism grid in Jammu and Kashmir up against?
Two months ago, on April 22, a group of militants gunned down 25 tourists holidaying in the meadows of Pahalgam in South Kashmir. A local man was also killed. Even by the standards of violence seen in Kashmir's 36-year-old armed insurgency, the targeted killing of tourists was a first. It pushed India and Pakistan to the brink of war. On May 7, India launched Operation Sindoor and carried out military strikes on alleged terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The four-day conflict eventually came to an end following the purported intervention of the United States. But the attackers of Pahalgam are still untraced. The National Investigation Agency has taken over the investigation but there has been no major breakthrough in the case. The Pahalgam attack came at a time when the Centre's grip over the restive region was absolute and militancy-related violence was at its lowest. After New Delhi scrapped Jammu and Kashmir's special status under Article 370 of the Constitution and downsized it from a state to a Union territory, it has ruled the region directly with the security establishment under the central government's exclusive control. For the counterinsurgency grid in Jammu and Kashmir, the April 22 terror strike has left behind several questions. Scroll spoke to security officials in Kashmir, who mapped the landscape in which they now operate post-Pahalgam and Operation Sindoor. They contended that the Pahalgam attackers had crossed a 'red line'. 'The line between who can be targeted and who cannot has blurred in the eyes of terrorists,' said a senior police officer in Kashmir. 'After Pahalgam, we are working on the assumption that they can go for any soft target.' In the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, security forces detained around 2,800 individuals for questioning, most of whom were eventually released. In addition, more than a hundred individuals, with past records of militancy, have been detained under the preventive detention law Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act. The security agencies also demolished the homes of the families of around nine active local and Pakistan-based militants to send a message. Yet, success has eluded them. Security officials told Scroll that they are up against a lack of strong intelligence, the evolving tactics of hardened Pakistan-backed militants in Kashmir – and the possibility of a new front opening up in the skies through drones. A new militancy After 2019, the Centre carried out a widespread crackdown on militancy and its support system in Kashmir. As a result, local recruitment to militant ranks drastically went down. According to government officials, there are only seven active militants from Kashmir Valley at the moment – the lowest since militancy broke out in 1989. However, the number of foreign militants has continued to remain in two digits owing to infiltration from across the border. Even if few, these militants have made their presence felt in the last six years. 'How does a terrorist show his presence? It's not that a militant will leisurely walk with a gun on a street to show he exists. He needs to attack someone in order to show that they exist,' said a second police officer, not wishing to be identified by name. 'A single militant with a gun can kill 100 people if there's no gun against him.' Among the many tactics adopted by these militants is choosing what the security officials describe as 'soft targets' – like migrant workers, and members of the minority community. From August 5, 2019, to July 9, 2022, 118 civilians were killed in militancy-related incidents across Jammu and Kashmir, the Minister of State for Home Affairs told Parliament. Five of the dead were Kashmiri Pandits and 16 belonged to other Hindu or Sikh communities. Observers see the Pahalgam incident as part of the same continuum of tactics. 'Counter-terrorism is a cat-and-mouse game,' explained retired Lieutenant General Deependra Singh Hooda, former Northern Commander of the Indian Army. 'The terrorists observe the tactics of the security forces and they look for weaklings, soft spots and areas with weak presence of security forces.' The dip in intelligence Conventionally, the counter-insurgency policy adopted by the security forces in Jammu and Kashmir involved reliance on quality intelligence, a third police officer explained. 'Once terrorists started using mobile phones, technical intelligence was key to eliminating them,' the officer said. 'Plus, terrorists hiding in populated areas would also lead to human intelligence on them. As a result, it's easier to nail them down and neutralise them,' the officer added. Over the last few years, the third officer conceded, there has been a considerable impact on the quality of the intelligence primarily as a result of the different tactics adopted by the militants. 'Technology is an evolving spectrum and we have seen terrorists using high-end encrypted communication devices which are difficult to intercept. As a result, the technical inputs have gone dry to an extent,' the officer explained. Human intelligence, too, has suffered. One of the key strategies adopted by militants post-2019 is that they have largely avoided staying in populated areas. 'The cost of aiding militants has increased manifold because of the government,' the officer said. 'Therefore, anyone who was sheltering militants would find his house seized and himself in jail. While this helped in creating fear and a deterrence among over-ground workers, it also compelled terrorists to stay deep inside jungles. The net result was that human intelligence on them was not much because they were not seeking shelter among the people.' Besides the change in tactics, the officer added, the terrorists seemed to be well-trained and prepared for jungle warfare, particularly in the Jammu region. In the last five years, ostensibly well-trained Pakistani militants have carried out multiple precision strikes or ambushes against the security forces in the challenging and dense topography of Jammu hinterland. Militants from across the border infiltrate into Jammu region via Kathua and Samba districts, which sit on the international border with Pakistan. Once inside the Indian territory, the militants then venture deep into other districts of the region while navigating a dense terrain and challenging topography. 'The assumption with the Pahalgam attack is also that the terrorists who carried it out came from across the border and had been active in the mountainous areas along the border dividing Kashmir Valley and Jammu region,' explained the first senior police officer. In most cases, the militants are adept at surviving in deep jungles. 'They rely on dry rations and mostly take food once a day,' said the third police officer. 'They hardly venture into civilian areas and even when they do, they will pick an isolated house, take whatever they need and never come back to that house again.' That the militants are highly trained is also reflected in the weaponry and type of attacks they have carried out in the last few years. 'These are terrorists who wear body cameras to shoot their action and then use that footage for propaganda…in most of the attacks, the slain soldiers had been shot in the upper parts of their body or head suggesting that these are professionally trained foreign terrorists,' he added. 'In almost every attack, we have seen the use of US-made M4 carbine rifles.' Significantly, none of these militants tracked down by security forces in the Jammu region has given up without a fight. 'It's possible to get a good amount of information from a militant if he's arrested alive but in this case these terrorists have preferred to fight till death than surrender.' 'Challenge of drones' During the four-day-long military clashes between India and Pakistan in May, Indian security forces spotted massive drone activity across the length and breadth of Jammu and Kashmir. While these drones were not able to create any significant damage, the fact that Pakistani drones could land up in the heart of Srinagar city was not lost on anyone. The security establishment has been aware of this aspect of warfare for some years now. In 2020, then Director General of Jammu and Kashmir Police, Dilbag Singh, had pointed out a new tactic adopted by the militants across the border. 'Pakistan has been trying to send arms and ammunition to militants through drones. We have detected several such incidents in the past," Singh told reporters in Srinagar. Weapons had been delivered via unmanned aerial vehicles, Singh added, in border areas of Jammu and Kashmir including Jammu's Kathua and Rajouri and along the line of control in Kupwara in North Kashmir. Less than a year later in June 2021, Indian Air Force's Jammu station was hit by two improvised explosive devices that had been dropped by low-flying drones. While there was no significant damage, this was something new. Since the early 2000s, drones have increasingly become part of modern warfare with the United States using UAVs to hit targets in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan. Prior to this groups like Islamic State, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah and Houthis have used drones as a part of their military arsenal. However, the 2021 attack was arguably the first time drones had entered the landscape of militancy in Jammu and Kashmir. After Operation Sindoor, the threat of drones being used for combative use has become more real than ever – and it is one that the Jammu and Kashmir's security establishment is not taking lightly. 'Not only the armies but even terrorists have used drones in many regions of the globe and this is not the first time we have anticipated such a thing,' the first senior police officer added. 'Having seen what Pakistan tried to do during the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, we cannot ignore the possibility of terrorists also using drones for their actions.' On June 16, Jammu and Kashmir union territory administration declared all the routes leading to the Amarnath holy cave as a 'no flying zone'. As per the orders, no one is allowed to use 'any kind of aviation platforms' including drones and balloons during the duration of the yatra that begins from July 1 and goes on till August 10. According to the administration, the decision was taken on the 'advice' of the Ministry of Home Affairs. Retired Lieutenant General Hooda, who was the General Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Indian army's Northern Command during the 2016 'surgical strike' in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, said the concern of the security establishment in Jammu and Kashmir regarding drones is rightly placed. 'After seeing how drone technology has been used in Ukraine, I anticipate that for not just the Pakistani military but even the non-state actors, the use of drones is a feasibility they will adopt.' Given their readiness of use, low cost and capacity to go unnoticed, Hooda added, the security establishment has to be proactive. 'Drones are easy to fly and very difficult to protect against. They are so small that one often doesn't even notice how suddenly they appear. We have already seen an attack on the Jammu airbase,' Hooda remarked, referring to the June 2021 attack on Jammu station of the Indian Air Force. 'So now, when it comes to security force establishments, sensitive areas, and sensitive targets, we have to be extremely concerned and careful.'
