Shivambu under fire after visit to fugitive ‘prophet' Shepherd Bushiri in Malawi
uMkhonto Wesizwe party secretary-general Floyd Shivambu was fraternising with fugitive and self-proclaimed prophet Shepherd Bushiri in Malawi this weekend, where Bushiri and his wife fled after appearing in South African courts on charges of fraud and rape.
As South Africa awaits the appeal process outcome to continue its extradition efforts, uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party secretary-general Floyd Shivambu's visit to Malawi and public association with Bushiri this weekend at Bushiri's Enlightened Christian Gathering (ECG) Church sparked outrage, with the Justice Ministry condemning Shivambu's action.
Comrade Floyd Shivambu 🫡 #bushiri pic.twitter.com/x2PolzzsLl
— Shepherd Bushiri (@psbushiri_) April 19, 2025
Self-proclaimed prophet Bushiri fled South Africa in 2020 while facing charges that included rape and fraud. His and his wife's departure from South Africa was described as a direct violation of their bail conditions and prompted an official extradition request to the Malawian government.
During November 2020, a request was received by the department from the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) for the extradition of the Bushiris from Malawi to South Africa to stand trial on the charges.
The request was subsequently delivered at the office of the Attorney-General in Malawi on 5 December 2020. The South African government has since been attempting to extradite the pair through a complicated legal process.
The pair has been charged for contraventions of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, the Banking Act, the Civil Aviation Act and the Immigration Act.
'Undermining the credibility of our judiciary'
Terrence Manase, spokesperson to the Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development, told Daily Maverick that Shivambu's association with a known fugitive, as a public figure and representative of a political party in Parliament, sent a concerning message about the integrity of South Africa's justice system.
'Such actions risk undermining the credibility of our judiciary and may inadvertently portray the system as weak, an impression that stands in stark contrast to the strength and resilience of our legal institutions,' Manase told Daily Maverick.
The ministry sought to assure the public that it remained fully committed to ensuring that Bushiri and his wife returned to South Africa to stand trial.
'Our actions continue to be guided by legal protocols and international cooperation agreements,' said Manase.
The Ministry of Justice said it was concerned that a leader of a political party represented in Parliament would publicly associate with an individual who was viewed as a fugitive from justice. This, while frowned upon, was not illegal, and the pair had not yet been convicted.
Justice Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi cautioned that such conduct by a political leader not only undermined the credibility of the judiciary, but also diminished the seriousness of the charges against Bushiri.
Shivambu's party distanced itself from his visit to Bushiri's church and said the visit had not been sanctioned, endorsed or initiated by the leadership or any official structure of the MK Party.
The MK statement said that Shivambu, the party's secretary-general, undertook the visit in his personal capacity and without the mandate or knowledge of the party. The party indicated that the visit did not reflect the party's stance.
'We reiterate our commitment to ethical leadership and the principles of justice, and we call on all members and representatives of the MK Party to act in a manner that reflects the highest standards of responsibility and accountability.'
The party did not respond to questions on whether steps would be taken to address Shivambu's action.
Extradition efforts under way
Following Shivambu's visit and meeting with Bushiri, the ministry said it remains committed to securing the extradition of the Bushiris after Malawi's Chief Resident Magistrates' Court ruled that the pair were eligible for extradition.
But they have since filed an appeal.
'We are respecting the legal processes of the Republic of Malawi. We await the outcome of the appeal process,' Manase said when questioned about the status of the extradition efforts.
The Ministry of Justice said the matter before the Malawian courts was the direct result of ongoing mutual bilateral cooperation between the governments of South Africa and Malawi.
'We continue to engage through legal channels and remain encouraged by the cooperation we have received to date,' said Manase.
The ministry did not believe that Shivambu's visit to Malawi would influence the independent judicial processes.
Minister Kubayi said that political leaders, like Shivambu, had a responsibility to uphold the rule of law, 'not fraternise with fugitives', as his actions emboldened those who believed they could escape accountability.
However, the ministry said it would not engage with the MK Party on the matter.
Fraternising
In posts on Twitter/X, Bushiri jubilantly welcomed Shivambu as a businessman, politician and family man, announcing his presence on Saturday and Shivambu's support for African affairs.
'Sadly, some still peddle jealousy and negativity, labelling successful black individuals as 'corrupt' and 'must be investigated', while praising white individuals as 'investors'. That's not Pan-Africanism; that's jealousy. Let's move beyond politics of attrition,' said Bushiri.
He added as a 'bonus fact' that after their meeting, Shivambu attended Bushiri's Enlightened Christian Gathering (ECG) church for a prayer session.
'I guess you could say he wanted to 'pray away' any political stress or ensure his prayers were 'politically correct'. Either way, his visit was a blessing, and we appreciate his willingness and humility to seek divine guidance,' said Bushiri.
Shivambu did not respond to queries sent by the time of publication. His response will be added once received. However, he did respond to Bushiri publicly on X:
'Thank you my brother, Prophet Bushiri for hosting us and for the kind words. The government scale amount of work you do to economically, educationally, socially and spiritually uplift our people is unparalleled now and in history.
'I know that the leadership and people of Malawi appreciate and cherish the many massive programmes you do for the people on the ground. Continue doing the good work.
'The Book says, 'Kindness to the poor is a loan to the LORD, and He will repay the lender'. God Bless!'
While the optics of such visits may raise concerns within public discourse, the Ministry of Justice said Shivambu's actions did not constitute direct political interference in the legal matter.
'We maintain full confidence in the independence of Malawi's judiciary and its ability to adjudicate the matter impartially,' Manase said. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
34 minutes ago
- The South African
Chris Brown pleads 'not guilty' in London assault case
American singer Chris Brown appeared in a London court on Friday and pleaded not guilty to charges of attempting to cause grievous bodily harm with intent. The 36-year-old R&B star faces allegations related to a nightclub brawl in London in 2023. Dressed in a dark suit and tie with glasses, Brown stood calmly in the dock at Southwark Crown Court. When asked to enter his plea, he responded clearly, 'Not guilty, ma'am.' The case has drawn international attention, including from fans and media in South Africa, where Brown has a significant following. Chris Brown was arrested last month in Manchester, in the north-west of England, according to IOL. He was released on bail set at £5 million, which is approximately R130 million. The high bail amount reflects the seriousness of the charges. A spokesperson for Brown said, 'Chris is confident the truth will come out during the trial. He denies all allegations and looks forward to clearing his name.' The incident reportedly took place during a nightclub altercation in London last year. The prosecution alleges that Brown intended to cause serious harm. However, Brown's legal team insists the charges are unfounded. South African fans have expressed mixed reactions on social media. Some show support, hoping for a fair trial, while others stress the importance of justice and accountability. Chris Brown enjoys immense popularity in South Africa, where he has built a devoted fan base over nearly two decades. His music, rooted in R&B, resonates deeply with South African audiences, particularly among black middle-class listeners who have long embraced American R&B on radio stations. In December 2024, Brown made history by selling out two consecutive nights at Johannesburg's FNB Stadium. Each night drew nearly 95,000 fans—a remarkable feat that few international artists achieve on the continent. This case highlights how international celebrities can face legal challenges far from home. The court will continue the trial in the coming months. Chris Brown remains out on bail as the court prepares for further hearings. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
39 minutes ago
- IOL News
South African engineers granted clemency by Equatorial Guinea's President
Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Ronlad Lamola, welcomed Frik Potgieter and Peter Huxham home at Lanseria Airport with their families. Image: Supplied Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Ronald Lamola, has confirmed that Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, the President of Equatorial Guinea, has granted clemency for the two South African engineers imprisoned for drug trafficking charges two years ago. The families of engineers Peter Huxham and Frik Potgieter also expressed their relief and gratitude to everyone including the South African government for never giving up on their plight Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) spokesperson, Chrispin Phiri, said the release was a coordinated effort between the department, the families and their employer, SBM Offshore. 'The Government of the Republic of South Africa welcomes the release of Mr Peter Shane Huxham and Mr Frik Potgieter from detention in the Republic of Equatorial Guinea. This release follows the granting of clemency by the President of Equatorial Guinea,' said Phiri. The duo were arrested on February 9, 2023 on drug trafficking charges and were sentenced to 12 years' imprisonment. They were working offshore in the central African country, and the arrest came just two days after a South African court ordered the seizure of a super yacht, called Blue Shadow valued above R300 million, and two luxury villas belonging to vice president of Equatorial Guinea, Teodoro 'Teodorin' Nguema Obiang Mangue, the son of the president Mbasogo. "South Africa expresses its sincere gratitude to the Government of Equatorial Guinea for considering and ultimately granting this Presidential pardon, allowing Mr Huxham and Mr Potgieter to return home to their loved ones,' said Phiri. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'Since their arrest, the South African Government has remained actively engaged through diplomatic channels, including sending Special Envoys, to secure their release on humanitarian grounds. Throughout these sustained engagements, the Government consistently appealed for clemency, highlighting the humanitarian aspects of the case and the profound impact on the families of the detained. 'The Government of South Africa acknowledges the complexity of the matter, including its sensitive diplomatic and legal dimensions. It appreciated the Government of Equatorial Guinea's continued provision of consular access and the spirit of constructive diplomatic dialogue that has been maintained throughout this period." Shaun Murphy and Francois Nigrini, spokespersons for the families, said they were relieved. 'We are overwhelmed with relief and joy. The last two years and four months have been unimaginably painful for both of our families. Today, we are finally able to say: Frik and Peter are safely back home. 'The families expressed their deepest appreciation to everyone who worked tirelessly behind the scenes, including Frik and Peter's employer (SBM Offshore), the South African and UK governments, international diplomatic partners, parliamentarians, legal teams, Hostage International and other civil society organisations, and the media. They are also grateful to former Minister of International Relations, Naledi Pandor, and the current Minister, Ronald Lamola, who visited Equatorial Guinea as envoys for the President of South Africa, Cyril Ramaphosa. ' The families also thanked South Africans and everyone worldwide for signing their online petition which called for their release. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus
The Citizen
41 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Viral claims about SA agriculture: Do white farmers produce most of our key crops?
Viral claims about SA agriculture: Do white farmers produce most of our key crops? While formal surveys show that white South African farmers produce the majority of key crops, this discounts much of the output of black farmers, which is often not reflected. Production by black farmers is often for household use and not reflected in commercial farming data. Neither are sales in small local markets. The claim that black farmers own '50% of all the land area when you add state land' is not backed up by any available data. It further disregards several important factors, for example that not all land designated as 'agricultural' is arable. For weeks in May and June, widely followed accounts on X have circulated eye-catching and divisive statistics about race and farming in South Africa. But ironically, these numbers originated in a speech aimed at debunking misinformation and were then misquoted and repurposed for a global audience. Where did it all start? The account @EndWokeness, which has 3.7 million followers, played a key role. It has a track record of spreading false information. In the past, some of the account's posts have been countered by community notes, which are factual corrections added by X users, though some of these have later been removed. False posts, like a viral story of immigrants to the US eating pets, remain on the site uncorrected. But as the Washington Post has reported, the account has often escaped consequences. It has boasted about making thousands of dollars a month from such claims and its posts are sometimes amplified by platform owner Elon Musk. In May, @EndWokeness took to posting about the 49 white South Africans who claimed refugee status in the US. While at the same time implementing sweeping deportation policies, US president Donald Trump has claimed that white Afrikaner South Africans face persecution, for example through employment equity laws and the false narrative of 'white genocide'. Based on this, Trump has allowed asylum claims from South Africans who are 'Afrikaners or members of a racial minority', even while blocking most other refugees. In this context, @EndWokeness warned that South Africa's perceived actions against Afrikaners would have negative consequences, claiming that 'white farmers currently produce' over 90% of all corn, soy beans, wheat, cotton, citrus, and almost all potatoes (99%). These stats were likely copied directly from a reply to @EndWokeness posted less than two hours earlier by another account, @CrazyVibes_1, which had added: 'Why are the black farmers not commercially producing? They do own millions of hectares of land. Approximately 50% of all the land area when you add state land.' But @CrazyVibes_1 was also copying. Its tweet, word for word including formatting and emojis, matched one posted in March by @twatterbaas, who has repeated variations of these same claims before. News24, South Africa's most-visited news website, identified @twatterbaas as Sebastiaan Jooste, a former farmer. After the investigation the government condemned what it called deliberate misinformation and the spread of racial hatred. Jooste's posts helped push these claims to a global audience, possibly even reaching Musk, the world's richest man. Yet no one along the way seems to have checked whether the numbers were accurate. So, Africa Check did. In his earliest post, Jooste said the statistics came from an February 18 X post by Wandile Sihlobo, chief economist at the Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa, a group that represents commercial farming businesses. Sihlobo's post showed that his research was used in a speech by agriculture minister John Steenhuisen titled Briefing on malicious misinformation. In the speech, Steenhuisen said that 'South Africa remains an economically unjust society', including in farming. As evidence, he cited Sihlobo's estimates of the average share of black farmers in commercial agricultural output between 2015 and 2019 (though he mistakenly said 2015 to 2020). To calculate the output of white farmers, Jooste seems to have simply subtracted Sihlobo's figures from 100%. For instance, Sihlobo estimated black farmers produced 1.3% of commercially sold wheat, leading Jooste to conclude that white farmers must then produce the other '98.7% of all the wheat'. But this ignores key context. Widely shared stats are incomplete 'guesstimates' The original statistics came from a paper called Agriculture in South Africa, written by Sihlobo and Prof Johann Kirsten, director of Stellenbosch University's Bureau for Economic Research (BER). Their data was based on records from the National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC), which collects figures from agricultural organisations. For example, the Citrus Growers' Association tracks citrus exports and levies based on reports from its members. These organisations have committed to initiatives addressing inequalities in farming, and so keep some data related to race. But these records do not represent all agricultural activity in South Africa. The NAMC's data is limited to commercial activity reported by individual agricultural organisations. Kirsten told Africa Check that although quoted extensively, these numbers were 'incomplete … and in any case only a guesstimate'. He said 'it is very difficult to allocate a race dimension to agricultural output' without more comprehensive data and concluded the number was an 'inaccurate' minimum that could be much higher. Speaking to Africa Check, Sihlobo described Jooste's framing as 'a 'naughty' use of our valuable research'. Not only could these figures from 2019 have changed since, but black farmers in South Africa may well have a larger share in commercial agriculture than the statistics represent. While these figures are misleading, black farmers are underrepresented in agricultural output – but Jooste obscured the reasons why. Historical divides in commercial agriculture In his book A Country of Two Agricultures, Sihlobo explains that agricultural surveys typically exclude 'transactions in small value chains and sales in small local markets'. It is worth nothing that most South African households that farm do so mainly to feed themselves. According to Statistics South Africa estimates based on the 2022 census, 80.7% of agricultural households grow food only for their own use, and another 7.7% also sell some of it. These households usually don't appear in agricultural surveys based on commercial data. In his post, Jooste conflated commercial agriculture – produce eventually sold in formal markets – with 'all' produce grown in South Africa. There are many reasons why produce grown by black farmers is less likely to be recorded in these kinds of formal surveys. Dr Siphe Zantsi, an economist at the Agricultural Research Council, explained that historical divides resulted in black farmers not having access to the commercial sector to begin with. For example, Zantsi said, apartheid-era spatial planning has meant 'black smallholder farmers are located in remote areas (former homelands) that are far from the output markets'. These areas, also called 'Bantustans', were segregated areas designed to keep black South Africans out of major urban areas and political life. Zantsi also referred to a 2015 paper by South African researcher Stefan Schirmer, which noted that 'Apartheid … massively increased the barriers that black farmers were forced to confront', who were cut off from markets and confined to unproductive land, locking many into 'almost permanent forms of unemployment or employment in very low income jobs'. Kirsten further told Africa Check that an often-overlooked issue was 'who owns the best quality land and most productive land'. This helps explain why white farmers still dominate commercial agriculture. Zantsi noted that most agribusinesses in South Africa were white-owned, while black farmers often owned smaller pieces of land that were usually further from economic hubs, making it harder for them to sell in formal markets. This is supported by research that suggests South African commercial agriculture has been increasingly dominated by large, well-resourced farms. Zantsi cited 2013 research showing that as supermarkets became more powerful, they were incentivised to buy mainly from large commercial farms, pushing small-scale farmers out of supply chains. On top of this, there is the issue of land ownership, something that Jooste apparently tried to side-step, but not very deftly. It wasn't in the first version of his tweet, but at some point Jooste tacked on the claim that black farmers owned 'approximately 50% of all the land area'. This statistic veers far from all reliable data on the topic. Experts say inequality in agricultural land ownership is substantial and a key reason why black farmers have a smaller role in commercial agriculture. According to the 2017 land audit report, the most recent national data available, 72% of all individually owned land was held by white people. Land owned by individuals of all other racial groupings made up the remainder, including just 4% by 'African' or black individuals. In 2023, the Bureau for Economic Research estimated that around 25% of freehold agricultural land had been redistributed to black South Africans since 1994. This includes all land that has a registered title deed. But this land can be owned by multiple people or a corporation or other entity, which makes it complicated to determine ownership by race. Even so, the BER estimates that white farmers still own about 74% of freehold agricultural land, or 58 million out of 77.5 million hectares. Black farmers may own 13.5 million hectares (about 17%), but Kirsten said this was likely an undercount as title deeds did not include race and so surnames were used as a proxy, which could be inaccurate. Even if this is an under-estimate, nothing suggests that most farmland is black-owned. This could be why Jooste specified that black farmers own 'approximately 50% of all the land area when you add state land'. But the BER estimates around 6 million hectares of the remaining freehold farmland is owned by the government or has been restituted to black owners through financial compensation. Even if you include all of that, black ownership would still only equal about 25% of freehold farmland. A final category that could include farmland is rural land in the former homelands. Not all of this was used for farming, Kirsten said. Adding all of this and all government farmland, white farmers would still own around 60% of all farmland. This again contradicts Jooste's claim, but also misses the point that not all 'farmland' can be properly used for farming. Not all farmland can be farmed Of South Africa's 77.5 million hectares of freehold farmland, less than a quarter (18 million) is considered arable. Much of the rest is dry land like Karoo or Kalahari Desert, which has limited farming value. Black farmers are more likely to own land with little agricultural potential and the former homelands system explicitly carved out more valuable land for white South Africans. Efforts to redress these imbalances by providing land to black farmers have faced criticism. Zantsi explained that a 'lack of timely post settlement support' had left many beneficiaries without money or resources to run a farm. Sihlobo added that this land was generally leased, meaning recipients didn't actually own the land they farmed. This made it harder to get loans or to buy and modernise equipment. Land ownership in South Africa is complex and contested, and the data certainly isn't perfect. But even the most generous reading of the available statistics doesn't back Jooste's claim that most agricultural land is black-owned. It is especially striking that Jooste misused data from a speech meant to fight misinformation. By removing context, he gave a misleading picture of South African agriculture – one that distorts both its history and current reality. This article was first published on Africa Check. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
