A Donor Heart Saved Her Life. Why Are Others With Down Syndrome Denied Transplants? (Exclusive)
Charlotte Woodward was born with a heart defect, as nearly half of all people with Down syndrome, and 13 years ago, received a donor heart that saved her life
Research has shown people with Down syndrome and other disabilities face discrimination when being evaluated for organ transplants
Woodward has been fighting for justice for others with disabilities in need of transplants, and now a bill that could help is awaiting a floor vote in CongressCharlotte Woodward's doctors tell her she's a boring patient — even though she lives with a transplanted heart. 'It's because I'm so healthy,' she explains. 'I take very good care of my heart.'
Woodward, 35, knows she's lucky. Born with a heart defect — like nearly half of all people with Down syndrome — she received her donor heart in 2012.
But research has shown that more than 40% of pediatric transplant centers often consider intellectual disabilities a cause for concern when evaluating for organ transplants, because of assumptions that patients with disabilities may not be able to care for themselves and because of 'preconceived notions about their quality of life,' says Michelle Sagan, communications director for the National Down Syndrome Society (NDSS). 'Their life is seen as not as important.'
Another study found that adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities are less than half as likely to receive a kidney transplant as adults without IDD.
Woodward has been working to change that. In 2020, she led a successful campaign to pass a bill in her home state of Virginia protecting those who are disabled from transplant discrimination.
And now a similar federal bill named in her honor has been passed by a House committee and is headed for a floor vote in the House. It aims to provide protections, in part by mandating an expedited judicial review if someone is denied a transplant and believes their civil rights have been violated.
'People with Down syndrome and other disabilities should not be denied a lifesaving opportunity,' says Woodward, a program associate at the NDSS who went viral on the group's TikTok in 2020 for her video on "Things About Having Down Syndrome That Don't Make Sense". 'We need a legal solution to make it clear that blatant discrimination is wrong and is not permissible. I don't think people are doing it maliciously. They're just uneducated. It's rooted in fear and ignorance."
From the day she was born, Woodward was underestimated, says her mom, Darcy. 'I was told she most likely never would read or write. It bewildered me. I didn't understand how someone could predict a baby's future.' Darcy ignored the warnings and read to her daughter, who learned to read by the time she was 4: 'I've been in awe of her every day of her life.'
Her health was more concerning. She had four open-heart surgeries by age 10, and by the time she was 22, her heart began to fail. Her cardiologist told her mom he would have to 'go to bat' and work to convince hospital officials to get her name on the transplant list.
'He knew there might be opposition from the transplant team,' Woodward says. Fortunately she was matched with a donor heart in less than two weeks — and went on to graduate summa cum laude with a sociology degree from George Mason University.
When Woodward, who loves to dance, is learning to play the electric guitar, and is in a long-term relationship with Peanut Butter Falcon actor Zack Gottsagen — began her job at NDSS, she learned her transplant experience was not the norm.
The knowledge pained her. 'There have been many stories about denials of organs and transplants. We will never know how many,' she says, tearing up. 'I think, 'How could you?' '
The solution, she says, is legislation and education.
'I don't think people are doing it maliciously. It's rooted in fear and ignorance,' says Woodward, who urges people to consider organ donation — and call their representatives in Congress and urge them to support her bill. 'People with Down syndrome are just that: people. They have strengths and challenges like everyone else. They shouldn't have to prove their worth in order to get a transplant.'
Read the original article on People
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
The hidden casualties of Medicaid cuts: America's family caregivers
In Arroyo Seco, N.M., Vanessa Herrera routinely inserts a needle into her 6-year-old son's chest, administering life-saving medication for his rare bleeding disorder. This weekly ritual, made possible by Medicaid, represents the thin line between health and catastrophe for millions of American families. For Herrera, a single working mother of three, the math is brutally simple: 'Without Medicaid, we would not be able to afford it,' she says. 'We are scared to lose it, because I don't want to lose my son.' Across America, more than 53 million people are family caregivers like Herrera's — parents supporting children with rare diseases, adult children assisting aging parents, spouses tending to partners with chronic illnesses. And more than 4 million family caregivers rely on Medicaid for their own health care coverage. This invisible workforce forms the foundation of our nation's long-term care system. Now, with the House passing a budget bill that slashes more than $1 trillion from Medicaid and the Senate Finance Committee advancing similar devastating cuts, these essential caregivers fear for the already-fragile support system that enables their critical work. As a governor managing the frontline impacts of health care policy on American families, and as someone who has also been a family caregiver, I have deep concerns about how these proposed cuts would unravel the already fragile support system that makes caregiving possible for millions of families. This isn't merely a budgetary abstraction. It is a looming humanitarian crisis with faces and names attached. Take New Mexico, where approximately 40 percent of residents rely on Medicaid — the highest per-capita coverage in the nation. The proposed cuts would eliminate up to $2.8 billion in federal funding in the first year alone. New Mexico isn't alone. In 15 states, at least one-fifth of working-age adults in rural areas depend on Medicaid. Tellingly, eight of these 15 highly vulnerable states went for President Trump in the last election — a stark reminder that health care security transcends partisan divides. For family caregivers, Medicaid often represents the only meaningful support available. As the primary funder of home and community-based services, it helps 4.5 million people with complex needs remain in their homes rather than face costlier institutional care. These services include respite care that gives exhausted caregivers essential breaks, training programs that teach specialized caregiving skills, and self-directed services that allow Medicaid enrollees to hire family members as caregivers. The proposed cuts would unravel this safety net in important ways. As federal funding disappears, states will be forced into impossible decisions about services critical to caregiving. History shows that when forced to cut spending, states typically target home and community-based services first — the very programs that help people maintain independence and provide critical support to family caregivers. Essential services like respite care, caregiver training and self-directed care options would be reclassified from 'life-sustaining' to 'optional' in state budgets. Compounding these challenges, the proposed work requirements for Medicaid fail to recognize economic reality. Many recipients who can work already do. And those who serve as full-time caregivers for family members with medical needs are already working — just without a paycheck. The math is straightforward: a family caregiver providing round-the-clock care to elderly parent costs our Medicaid system virtually nothing, whereas institutional settings such as nursing homes or board-and-care facilities can cost taxpayers $100,000 per year per patient. Work requirement proposals create bureaucratic hurdles for people already stretched thin, potentially forcing more into expensive institutional care — dramatically increasing costs while reducing quality of life for the most vulnerable. The House-passed bill included an exemption from work requirements for 'the parent, guardian, or caretaker relative of a disabled individual or a dependent child,' but it notably fails to address those caring for seniors or individuals with serious health conditions like cancer. Even with these limited exemptions, strict work requirements create an excessive administrative burden for family caregivers already navigating the complexities of daily care. Additionally, families must verify their eligibility twice yearly, adding yet another layer of bureaucracy to their already demanding caregiving responsibilities. As the Senate considers the House-passed bill, we call on all senators to recognize the care crisis unfolding in states across America and reject these devastating cuts. Our nation must come together to strengthen Medicaid's support for family caregivers, acknowledging their indispensable role in health care delivery. Investing in family caregivers through Medicaid isn't just compassionate policy; it's fiscal common sense. By enabling care at home, we prevent costly institutional care, reduce emergency room visits, and address workforce shortages in long-term care. There are millions of family caregivers like Vanessa Herrera filling critical gaps in our nation's health care system every day. If we fail to protect Medicaid, we fail them — and ultimately, we fail ourselves. Michelle Lujan Grisham, a Democrat, is governor of New Mexico. Jason Resendez is president and CEO of the National Alliance for Caregiving.
The Hill
3 days ago
- The Hill
Lawmakers, USDA seek to combat New World screwworm along the southern border
Just a few hundred miles from our southern border, a flesh-eating parasite has been detected in Mexico, putting America's farmers and ranchers on watch. The New World screwworm is a parasitic fly that lays its eggs in the open wounds of livestock, primarily cattle and sheep, deer and other wildlife, and on rare occasions, humans and pets. Once hatched, the fly's larvae feed on tissue, leading to severe infection and often death. If this parasite were ever to reach the United States, our agricultural economy and supply chain would be in serious trouble. That is not a hypothetical scenario. Flare-ups have occurred within our borders in the past, costing American producers hundreds of millions of dollars. Mrs. D., a Central Texas rancher, remembers all too well the devastation of the last major screwworm outbreak in the United States that took place during the 1960s. 'Every day from dawn to dusk, my husband would ride horseback to find animals affected by the screwworm. We worked tirelessly to ensure our livestock survived. We had to make sure our calves were born in the winter to stand a chance against the fly that caused the screwworm because the flies are not as prevalent in the cold weather.' Although screwworms were eradicated from the U.S. in the 1960s using a sterilized fly technique, all the signs are there for a repeat scenario. As of March of this year, 369 confirmed cases had been reported in Mexico, creeping north from its confinement zone in Central America and towards the United States. As the representative of the largest congressional district in Texas, I have heard repeatedly from my constituents that a reemergence of New World screwworm is their biggest concern. Texas tops the charts for beef production in the nation, and some of my district's counties have more sheep and goats than live human beings. There is no doubt that a screwworm outbreak would be absolutely devastating to communities like mine. I am not alone in these concerns. In March, 43 of my colleagues joined me in bipartisan outreach to the Agriculture Department to offer congressional support on screwworm eradication efforts. I also introduced the STOP Screwworms Act along with 31 of my House colleagues and Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.), and Martin Heinrich (D-N.M). This important legislation would establish a sterile fly production facility in the U.S. — a critical step in our fight to shore up our domestic infrastructure against this deadly parasite. Fortunately, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins has been incredibly proactive on this issue. This week, I joined Rollins to announce the launch of an $8.5 million sterile New World screwworm fly dispersal facility in South Texas and a five-pronged plan to enhance the Agriculture Department's ability to detect, control and eliminate this pest. Per the Agriculture Department, the facility in South Texas is expected to be ready within six months. President Trump and Rollins have made protecting America's agriculture industry a priority. Together, we will fight to codify executive branch wins into long-term legislative solutions. Tony Gonzales represents Texas's 23rd District in the U.S. House of Representatives. He serves as the chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Conference and represents the largest congressional district in Texas, spanning over 800 miles of the southern border.
New York Times
3 days ago
- New York Times
‘Little Lobbyists' Urge Senators to Oppose Trump's Bill Cutting Medicaid
Landry Bell, a 1-year-old boy who was born with Down syndrome, wriggled and smiled in his big sister's lap on the floor outside Republican Senator Mike Lee's office this week as he took a break from going office to office with his mother while she explained how cuts to Medicaid would devastate their family. Wearing a bright blue T-shirt emblazoned with the words 'Little Lobbyists,' Landry was among a group of children with serious medical needs who crisscrossed the Capitol with their parents urging senators to vote 'no' on the sprawling Republican bill carrying President Trump's agenda. The legislation would cut deeply into Medicaid to help pay for large tax cuts that would benefit businesses and the richest Americans. The Senate version of the legislation would make even more aggressive cuts to Medicaid than the version of the legislation that passed the House last month. Those proposed reductions, and the elimination of some clean-energy tax credits, are among the most contentious provisions driving debate on the bill among Republicans, as party leaders push to complete it and send it to Mr. Trump's desk within weeks. The Little Lobbyists formed in 2017 during Mr. Trump's first term to push back against Republican efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act, taking to Capitol Hill to demand that lawmakers oppose the move. Their successful campaign to save the law was part of a broader backlash against the proposal, which was driven in large part by major health care lobbies, like hospitals and insurance companies, as well as patient groups worried about losing insurance coverage. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
