Just Five Submissions Drip In On Tasman's Water Plan
Three Waters reform dominated headlines and generated public backlash for years but now only five Tasman residents have had their say on the future of the district's water.
The previous Labour Government's scrapped water policy, which would have rolled Tasman into larger regional water entities, received stiff opposition and 'Stop Three Waters' banners can still occasionally be seen across the wider region.
Tasman is now undertaking the necessary work to determine how its three waters services will be delivered under the Coalition Government's replacement policy, Local Water Done Well.
Consultation has been open on Tasman District Council's proposal for four weeks and closes at 4pm on Friday, but just five people have had their say, as of Monday morning.
Currently, the council is looking to manage its water in an internal business unit.
That approach would keep the council in control of its water infrastructure but wouldn't take advantage of the potential economies of scale that could be achieved if Tasman teamed up with its neighbours.
Despite the low engagement and importance of water services, the council's group manager for community infrastructure wasn't worried and thought the 'silent majority' had given the plan the thumbs up.
'I feel as though there's been no kind of angst in the community because, essentially, council's still running it,' Richard Kirby said.
Whatever option the council chooses will have a financial impact on residents when they receive their water bills in the future.
A multi-council organisation with Buller and Marlborough would be the cheapest option for water users, but financial modelling of the different options showed yearly water fees would only vary by $335 after a decade and so the council opted to retain direct control.
Reduced costs became more evident beyond 10 years under a combined approach, but Kirby said there are other opportunities to share services and reduce costs across the region in the future.
'We're still going to be having discussions with our neighbours.'
The proposed in-house approach will place 'a bit of stress' on the council as it upgrades its systems and changes its procedures, and water will no longer be subsidised by the hundreds of thousands in dividends from Port Nelson, he added.
Council's preferred approach will require Governmental approval and is expected to be implemented on 1 July 2027.
Nelson City Council only received 12 responses to its own Local Water Done Well consultation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
Nelson Parent's Relief As NZTA Keeps Lower Speed Limit
State Highway 6 through Marybank in northern Nelson will remain at 60km/h after the community rallied to keep the lower speed limit, much to the relief of locals. The New Zealand Transport Agency confirmed the decision on Thursday afternoon. The 1.8km section of SH6/Atawhai Drive was slated to return to a mix of 80 and 100km/h speeds as part of the Coalition Government's automatic reversals of Labour-era speed limit reductions. The change would have saved 13 seconds of travel time. But a massive grassroots campaign, led by local parents, opposed the changes and eventually prompted Transport Minister Chris Bishop to backpedal, asking NZTA to engage with the community. NZTA subsequently undertook a targeted review of that specific stretch of highway which has now resulted in the speed limit remaining unchanged from 60km/h. Parents for Active Transport Atawhai member Femke Meinderts has been driving the 'Keep it 60' campaign. She said she was 'very relieved' after hearing the announcement. 'We're really happy for the kids, I feel like this is partly their victory as much as it is the community's, and we know this is the right thing for them. But relief is the word, because we just didn't really know what was going to happen.' Keeping the existing speed limit achieved widespread support, with 76% of submitters saying the lower speed had positive impacts. 'The community actually really does care about kids getting to school safely and actively. That's been awesome, but it's also been a lot of hard work,' Meinderts said. Nelson's Labour MP Rachel Boyack was 'delighted and relieved' the road was staying at 60km/h. 'This is a good decision today, but we shouldn't even have been put in this position. It has led to a lot of frustration and a lot of wasted money.' She echoed previous comments from Mayor Nick Smith that speed limits had become too politicised. 'We have to make good decisions based on good evidence, not people's reckons. I think there are lessons to be learned for everybody about how these reviews are conducted.' Smith said the Atawhai community should 'take a bow' for their effective campaign. 'It's not easy to reverse a government decision, but they have been successful. I'm pleased that the government has listened.' He added that speed limits were a 'localised issue' and the 'right decisions' could only be made by looking at each section of highway's unique circumstances. That was echoed by Nelson's Atawhai liaison councillor James Hodgson, a self-professed advocate of taking a 'thoughtful and bespoke approach' to policy. He said the issue was the result of two successive governments making 'big blanket' changes to speed limits but was pleased to see a 'common sense' decision had been made. 'I'm stoked to see that a community had a concern, and they raised it, and a good outcome was achieved. That's the best you can hope for.' Chair of the region's joint transport committee, Tasman's deputy mayor Stuart Bryant was 'pleased' by the result for Marybank and acknowledged the efforts of the community. 'Their voices have well and truly been heard.' But Marybank wasn't the only section of SH6 in the region that had been facing an increase in speed. An 800-metre stretch of Whitby Road in northern Wakefield, about 20km south of Nelson, will also stay at 60km/h after it had been slated to return to 70km/h. That change would have saved 3 seconds of time. Feedback on retaining that 60km/h speed was mixed, with 49% of submitters saying the lower speed had positive impacts, but NZTA opted to keep the lower speed. The agency noted that the lower speed made it easier for residents to cross the road, and that a 60km/h limit mitigated safety hazards well in an area that had shifted from rural to residential. Bryant, who lives in Wakefield, additionally said he had 'no issues' with the retention of the slower speed. 'People are well used to that … people can feel confident coming in and out of their driveways.' Wakefield Community Council chair Julian Eggers said NZTA had made the 'right decision'. 'The community is going to start growing soon, so there'll be more cars on the road. It's more of a safety concern.' He added that the work involved to make the change didn't match the small effects for a short stretch of road. 'To put the speed up for that and change the signs and all … the costs that are involved for that – it doesn't make sense.' But even though the speed limits won't change, Nelson parent Femke Meinderts and Parents for Active Transport Atawhai will continue campaigning for safety improvements in their area. 'We're not done. This was never really a fight we wanted to fight anyway; we're glad that we won, but we want to keep going with what we originally really were trying to fight for, which was just overall improvements in safety for the pedestrians and cyclists,' she said. 'We'd hate to see the Government and our local authorities sort of sitting back now and thinking they've done all they can, because they really haven't.' Like the two sections in Marybank and Wakefield, NZTA undertook targeted consultations and reviews for 14 other sections of state highway around the country that were otherwise slated to automatically increase in speed. Only three of the 16 sections will increase in speed. NZTA's announcement comes after SH6 between Nelson and Blenheim reverted to 100kmh on Monday, including sections in Nelson where local leaders and the community had preferred retaining lower speed limits.
Scoop
4 days ago
- Scoop
Biggest Threat To Financial Recovery Is Mad Opposition Parties
"New Zealand just posted the best quarter of economic growth in two years, and it's a tribute New Zealanders," says ACT Leader David Seymour. "Hard working people have knuckled down through a very challenging period and today's figure summarises that. The biggest threat to a recovery is now the destabilising threats of a mad opposition. "New Zealand firms, farms and families are beating the slump induced by Labour's six-year spending, inflation and interest rate nightmare. By contrast, the Coalition Government's approach of managing its own finances carefully mirrors what everyone else in New Zealand had to do while Labour went wild. "I hear every day that the Coalition Government's disciplined approach to its own finances is working. The government is taking a smaller slice of the pie each year, meaning there is more for everyone else to provide for their needs. Employers have more to pay wages, wage earners have more to feed their families, and businesses get the benefit of more spending. In other words, there's a virtuous circle when government gets out of the way. "I also hear real concern that the mad Opposition could upset the apple cart. The Green' so-called alternative Budget, and fiscal plan, are only the latest examples. The Greens suggest the government should take on half a trillion worth of debt. The interest on that debt would be more than we currently spend on education, but they smile on unhinged as if money doesn't matter. "The Greens are a paragon of sanity, though, when compared with Te Pāti Māori, who believe a new tax could raise $200 billion, or about half of all the money made in the New Zealand economy each year. Labour were pretty irresponsible, racking up $150 billion of extra debt in their time. Combined with the other fiscal terrorist outriders, though, they would be catastrophic. "ACT is committed to keeping this Government right where it is, and making it better by pushing harder for more savings every year. Our goal is that growth figures like today are only the beginning and the New Zealand economy gives financial room to breathe for all our futures in this beautiful land."
RNZ News
4 days ago
- RNZ News
Police Minister's office blames Labour government for police recruit exemptions
Police Minister Mark Mitchell and Police Commissioner Richard Chambers fronted a scrutiny hearing this week. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone The Police Minister's office says the use of discretion over police college recruits who had not passed a literacy test was introduced in 2018 under the Labour government. It comes after the minister Mark Mitchell and Police Commissioner Richard Chambers were challenged over revelations an Assistant Commissioner personally signed off at least two exemptions from recruitment standards. It follows statements from Chambers and Mitchell at a select committee at Parliament this week that there were never any specific orders to drop standards, and that the current administration has been clear what the expectations are. Chambers reportedly knew of the approvals when he told the hearing no one in the executive had said applying discretion was allowed. In a statement, Mitchell's office said a draft report showed "that for the delivery of the 1800 new police target, a discretionary pass was introduced where the literacy assessment standards were not met, which has since become common practice". "This does raise questions about political pressure. "We have made very clear on discovering this practice that it does not meet our expectations and Police have responded quickly with the Commissioner directing that the practice be ended. "Labour should be upfront with New Zealanders about the mess they created in order to deliver their well overdue and incomplete 1800 new police target, instead of trying to blame this Government that had to come in and clean it up." Police in a written statement confirmed Assistant Commissioner Jill Rogers gave at least two approvals in the past year, and records were being checked to see if there were more. "As is already accepted, there had been a practice of discretion applied to some applicants to Police College in relation to the Physical Appraisal Test (PAT)," the statement said. "Assistant Commissioner Jill Rogers can recall two occasions in the last year where she gave approval to be applied to two applicants. There was no directive, instruction, or request issued in relation to this. We are searching available documentation to confirm this number. "As with other recruits, those two candidates went on to pass all the tests required to graduate as constables. "The Commissioner has made it very clear no more discretion is to be applied, and that is in place now. "He has discussed the standards with his Police Executive, and emphasised his very clear expectation that standards will not be dropped for entry to Police College." Police also confirmed Chambers was told in April about Rogers' approvals - the same month concerns about recruits being admitted for training despite failing physical testing was made public . Chambers told reporters this week the decisions had been made by "decision makers" involved in the recruitment process and some others at the Police College, but from now on any decisions of "that importance" would sit with him. Asked whether it was members of the Police Executive who drilled into those decision-makers that using discretion was okay, he said "not that I'm aware of, no". The government committed in its coalition agreements to recruiting 500 more police officers by November - but seems unlikely to meet that target . Labour's Police spokesperson Ginny Andersen said the revelations Rogers was involved raised serious questions about whether political pressure had been applied to the Police College to deliver on that promise. "It's pretty clear that people at the Police College themselves don't make these types of decisions, there's a hierarchy in police. "There's been a clear pattern here of recruits not meeting standards and when the government has promised 500 more police it's pretty clear that pressure has been applied to the college and that's not right. "They've delivered around 30 of 500, and they have until November. It's pretty clear they've failed." She said the minister had not been upfront about the matter with New Zealanders when he fronted at the select committee. "He was asked if there was any direction or intervention from the police executive to the college, and he said that there was not to his knowledge. He may wish to revise those words in light of the information that's come to hand. "This really causes concern whether it might undermine integrity of police." RNZ has sought further comment from Andersen.
