Nelson Parent's Relief As NZTA Keeps Lower Speed Limit
State Highway 6 through Marybank in northern Nelson will remain at 60km/h after the community rallied to keep the lower speed limit, much to the relief of locals.
The New Zealand Transport Agency confirmed the decision on Thursday afternoon.
The 1.8km section of SH6/Atawhai Drive was slated to return to a mix of 80 and 100km/h speeds as part of the Coalition Government's automatic reversals of Labour-era speed limit reductions.
The change would have saved 13 seconds of travel time.
But a massive grassroots campaign, led by local parents, opposed the changes and eventually prompted Transport Minister Chris Bishop to backpedal, asking NZTA to engage with the community.
NZTA subsequently undertook a targeted review of that specific stretch of highway which has now resulted in the speed limit remaining unchanged from 60km/h.
Parents for Active Transport Atawhai member Femke Meinderts has been driving the 'Keep it 60' campaign. She said she was 'very relieved' after hearing the announcement.
'We're really happy for the kids, I feel like this is partly their victory as much as it is the community's, and we know this is the right thing for them. But relief is the word, because we just didn't really know what was going to happen.'
Keeping the existing speed limit achieved widespread support, with 76% of submitters saying the lower speed had positive impacts.
'The community actually really does care about kids getting to school safely and actively. That's been awesome, but it's also been a lot of hard work,' Meinderts said.
Nelson's Labour MP Rachel Boyack was 'delighted and relieved' the road was staying at 60km/h.
'This is a good decision today, but we shouldn't even have been put in this position. It has led to a lot of frustration and a lot of wasted money.'
She echoed previous comments from Mayor Nick Smith that speed limits had become too politicised.
'We have to make good decisions based on good evidence, not people's reckons. I think there are lessons to be learned for everybody about how these reviews are conducted.'
Smith said the Atawhai community should 'take a bow' for their effective campaign.
'It's not easy to reverse a government decision, but they have been successful. I'm pleased that the government has listened.'
He added that speed limits were a 'localised issue' and the 'right decisions' could only be made by looking at each section of highway's unique circumstances.
That was echoed by Nelson's Atawhai liaison councillor James Hodgson, a self-professed advocate of taking a 'thoughtful and bespoke approach' to policy.
He said the issue was the result of two successive governments making 'big blanket' changes to speed limits but was pleased to see a 'common sense' decision had been made.
'I'm stoked to see that a community had a concern, and they raised it, and a good outcome was achieved. That's the best you can hope for.'
Chair of the region's joint transport committee, Tasman's deputy mayor Stuart Bryant was 'pleased' by the result for Marybank and acknowledged the efforts of the community.
'Their voices have well and truly been heard.'
But Marybank wasn't the only section of SH6 in the region that had been facing an increase in speed.
An 800-metre stretch of Whitby Road in northern Wakefield, about 20km south of Nelson, will also stay at 60km/h after it had been slated to return to 70km/h.
That change would have saved 3 seconds of time.
Feedback on retaining that 60km/h speed was mixed, with 49% of submitters saying the lower speed had positive impacts, but NZTA opted to keep the lower speed.
The agency noted that the lower speed made it easier for residents to cross the road, and that a 60km/h limit mitigated safety hazards well in an area that had shifted from rural to residential.
Bryant, who lives in Wakefield, additionally said he had 'no issues' with the retention of the slower speed.
'People are well used to that … people can feel confident coming in and out of their driveways.'
Wakefield Community Council chair Julian Eggers said NZTA had made the 'right decision'.
'The community is going to start growing soon, so there'll be more cars on the road. It's more of a safety concern.'
He added that the work involved to make the change didn't match the small effects for a short stretch of road.
'To put the speed up for that and change the signs and all … the costs that are involved for that – it doesn't make sense.'
But even though the speed limits won't change, Nelson parent Femke Meinderts and Parents for Active Transport Atawhai will continue campaigning for safety improvements in their area.
'We're not done. This was never really a fight we wanted to fight anyway; we're glad that we won, but we want to keep going with what we originally really were trying to fight for, which was just overall improvements in safety for the pedestrians and cyclists,' she said.
'We'd hate to see the Government and our local authorities sort of sitting back now and thinking they've done all they can, because they really haven't.'
Like the two sections in Marybank and Wakefield, NZTA undertook targeted consultations and reviews for 14 other sections of state highway around the country that were otherwise slated to automatically increase in speed.
Only three of the 16 sections will increase in speed.
NZTA's announcement comes after SH6 between Nelson and Blenheim reverted to 100kmh on Monday, including sections in Nelson where local leaders and the community had preferred retaining lower speed limits.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
Government, Opposition Scrap Over Common Infrastructure Ground
Article – RNZ Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop has agreed to work with his counterparts on the 30-year plan, but the discussion got heated. A reference to $250,000 was corrected to $250 million in this story. Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop has committed to working directly with the Opposition, when putting together the Government's response to the 30-year infrastructure plan due out next week. He says that co-operation comes on the proviso that infrastructure decisions are always political in nature – and it did not stop the discussion from repeatedly descending into a fingerpointing tit-for-tat over which government was to blame for what. Labour housing, infrastructure and public investment spokesperson Kieran McAnulty kicked off the scrutiny week select committee hearing on Thursday afternoon, making an effort to 'start on a positive note' on how bipartisanship could work for infrastructure policy, suggesting that would provide more certainty to the sector. 'I agree,' Bishop said. 'That's part of the reason why we campaigned on a 30-year national infrastructure plan being developed in government.' The plan has been developed independently by the Infrastructure Commission since late 2023 and is due to be launched at Parliament next week, with the government required to respond within six months. Bishop said he planned a Parliamentary debate, so all the political parties' views could be included in that response, but McAnulty wanted more. 'At the moment, frankly, the attitude of some ministers of bipartisanship is, 'We'll work with you, if you agree with us', and I don't think that's good enough,' he said, garnering an emphatic 'yeah' from Green MP Julie Anne Genter. Bishop said completely depoliticising infrastructure was not possible, which was to be expected in a democracy. 'You know, if we all agreed, this would be a fairly boring place,' he said. McAnulty agreed with an agreement to disagree. 'We think some of the things you've done are stupid… what I would like to see is a commitment,' he said. 'There's an opportunity there to work with the other side to actually identify where there is broad agreement and include that in your response.' More than just a debate, he wanted the response to include an explanation of which infrastructure projects the government and opposition parties agreed on. Bishop: 'I'm happy to commit to that now. Just making the obvious point … we may not always agree. 'For example, you guys have got to figure out where you're at on PPPs, for example, because you've had about nine different positions. McAnulty: 'We know where we're at with that.' Bishop: 'You sure?' McAnulty: 'Yes, I am actually… this is one of the things that I'm actually trying to avoid, right, is that we can't help ourselves. 'This is the game we're in. We talk about bipartisanship, but we also take every opportunity to have a crack at each other.' Bishop: 'Well, you just said some of the stuff we've done was stupid.' McAnulty: 'Exactly my point, we can't help ourselves.' Bishop said parties could agree on a lot, when it came to infrastructure, and 'sometimes there's a bit more heat than light in this debate'. McAnulty said he did not think the public would know that. The minister pressed on, deferring to Infrastructure Commission chief executive Geoff Cooper to explain the projects expected across the country from about 110 organisations, including all but 14 of the country's councils. The result was a list showing investment worth $206 billion, broken down by region and sector, which Cooper said started to paint a much clearer picture of investment. 'The point is to have… almost a single source of truth for what's in the pipeline,' Bishop said. Committee chair Andy Foster – a former Wellington mayor – said the information should be included in councils' long-term plans and they should be contributing. Bishop had an easy solution. 'Well, if they don't do it, we can just mandate that they do it – but I'd rather not, because that takes time and money,' he said. 'I'd rather they just do it.' 'Enough of those mandates for councils,' interjected Labour local government spokesperson Tangi Utikere. 'We make them do all sorts of things for the right reasons and this would be the same thing,' Bishop responded. Clashes over cancellations While the first half hour was not entirely bonhomie, unicorns and rainbows, the verbal finger pointing was surely on show in the second half of Bishop's appearance. McAnulty asked if the minister accepted cancelling projects across successive governments had affected sector confidence. 'Depends exactly what you're talking about,' Bishop said. 'I accept that, after 2017, the radical change in direction of the National Land Transport Plan at the time had a significant impact.' 'So you're willing to say that one government cancelled projects that had an effect, but you're not willing to concede that you guys cancelling projects has?' McAnulty responded. Bishop said it showed the limits of bipartisanship. 'Our view was that they're the wrong projects for the country, he said. 'Depends which one, but generally too expensive, not good value for money, in some cases undeliverable. 'It was the right thing to do to say, 'You know what, we're actually just not going to proceed with that'.' Genter said many council projects were also defunded under the coalition and the iReX ferry replacement could have been rescoped, rather than dumped. Predictably, this kicked off a four-minute cancellation-measuring contest – which government cancelled more projects? Who cancelled more projects that were already contracted? 'You can have an intention to do something, it doesn't mean it will end up happening,' Bishop concluded – or seemed to. 'The last government lived in fiscal fantasy land.' 'Only because your government made a decision to give billions of dollars to landlords,' Genter fired back. Foster was eager to move on, asking Bishop about whether Kāinga Ora had managed to bring social housing build costs down to the same level as private developers – a topic well traversed in the last scrutiny week in December. The minister did not have the latest numbers, 'because this is not the vote Housing and Urban Development estimates', but the agency was making 'good progress' and would report back on that publicly. He and Utikere then argued some more over the roughly $250 million allocated for cancellation of the ferries contract – whether that was part of Bishop's responsibilities – with Bishop saying it belonged to Rail Minister Winston Peters and Utikere saying, when they'd asked Peters, he'd referred it to Bishop. Utikere: 'And the minister doesn't even know … that's very disappointing.' Bishop: 'Yes. So's your behaviour.' Utikere: 'No, it's not actually, minister, my behaviour is about scrutinising the executive – that is our responsibility. 'It is disappointing that you don't know the answer to just over a quarter of a billion dollars' worth of taxpayers money that has been set aside in your Budget.' Foster stepped in again, suggesting Bishop's answer was that it was best for his ministerial staff to provide an answer and they did. Treasury deputy secretary Leilani Frew said negotiations for the ferry contract exit were still continuing, as well as wind-down costs. The discussion soon wound down too – after a series of patsy questions and a discussion about the causes of 15,000 fewer people being employed in construction. Bishop argued it was an expected side-effect of bringing down the official cash rate, which would – in turn – have the biggest effect on reinvigorating the sector, McAnulty argued housing could be an avenue for stimulating growth. In the end, the public got a commitment to bipartisanship. Whether it lasts remains to be seen, but investors watching this scrappy select committee may be hesitant to bet the house on it.
Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
Government, Opposition Scrap Over Common Infrastructure Ground
A reference to $250,000 was corrected to $250 million in this story. Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop has committed to working directly with the Opposition, when putting together the Government's response to the 30-year infrastructure plan due out next week. He says that co-operation comes on the proviso that infrastructure decisions are always political in nature - and it did not stop the discussion from repeatedly descending into a fingerpointing tit-for-tat over which government was to blame for what. Labour housing, infrastructure and public investment spokesperson Kieran McAnulty kicked off the scrutiny week select committee hearing on Thursday afternoon, making an effort to "start on a positive note" on how bipartisanship could work for infrastructure policy, suggesting that would provide more certainty to the sector. "I agree," Bishop said. "That's part of the reason why we campaigned on a 30-year national infrastructure plan being developed in government." The plan has been developed independently by the Infrastructure Commission since late 2023 and is due to be launched at Parliament next week, with the government required to respond within six months. Bishop said he planned a Parliamentary debate, so all the political parties' views could be included in that response, but McAnulty wanted more. "At the moment, frankly, the attitude of some ministers of bipartisanship is, 'We'll work with you, if you agree with us', and I don't think that's good enough," he said, garnering an emphatic "yeah" from Green MP Julie Anne Genter. Bishop said completely depoliticising infrastructure was not possible, which was to be expected in a democracy. "You know, if we all agreed, this would be a fairly boring place," he said. McAnulty agreed with an agreement to disagree. "We think some of the things you've done are stupid... what I would like to see is a commitment," he said. "There's an opportunity there to work with the other side to actually identify where there is broad agreement and include that in your response." More than just a debate, he wanted the response to include an explanation of which infrastructure projects the government and opposition parties agreed on. Bishop: "I'm happy to commit to that now. Just making the obvious point ... we may not always agree. "For example, you guys have got to figure out where you're at on PPPs, for example, because you've had about nine different positions. McAnulty: "We know where we're at with that." Bishop: "You sure?" McAnulty: "Yes, I am actually... this is one of the things that I'm actually trying to avoid, right, is that we can't help ourselves. "This is the game we're in. We talk about bipartisanship, but we also take every opportunity to have a crack at each other." Bishop: "Well, you just said some of the stuff we've done was stupid." McAnulty: "Exactly my point, we can't help ourselves." Bishop said parties could agree on a lot, when it came to infrastructure, and "sometimes there's a bit more heat than light in this debate". McAnulty said he did not think the public would know that. The minister pressed on, deferring to Infrastructure Commission chief executive Geoff Cooper to explain the projects expected across the country from about 110 organisations, including all but 14 of the country's councils. The result was a list showing investment worth $206 billion, broken down by region and sector, which Cooper said started to paint a much clearer picture of investment. "The point is to have... almost a single source of truth for what's in the pipeline," Bishop said. Committee chair Andy Foster - a former Wellington mayor - said the information should be included in councils' long-term plans and they should be contributing. Bishop had an easy solution. "Well, if they don't do it, we can just mandate that they do it - but I'd rather not, because that takes time and money," he said. "I'd rather they just do it." "Enough of those mandates for councils," interjected Labour local government spokesperson Tangi Utikere. "We make them do all sorts of things for the right reasons and this would be the same thing," Bishop responded. Clashes over cancellations While the first half hour was not entirely bonhomie, unicorns and rainbows, the verbal finger pointing was surely on show in the second half of Bishop's appearance. McAnulty asked if the minister accepted cancelling projects across successive governments had affected sector confidence. "Depends exactly what you're talking about," Bishop said. "I accept that, after 2017, the radical change in direction of the National Land Transport Plan at the time had a significant impact." "So you're willing to say that one government cancelled projects that had an effect, but you're not willing to concede that you guys cancelling projects has?" McAnulty responded. Bishop said it showed the limits of bipartisanship. "Our view was that they're the wrong projects for the country, he said. "Depends which one, but generally too expensive, not good value for money, in some cases undeliverable. "It was the right thing to do to say, 'You know what, we're actually just not going to proceed with that'." Genter said many council projects were also defunded under the coalition and the iReX ferry replacement could have been rescoped, rather than dumped. Predictably, this kicked off a four-minute cancellation-measuring contest - which government cancelled more projects? Who cancelled more projects that were already contracted? "You can have an intention to do something, it doesn't mean it will end up happening," Bishop concluded - or seemed to. "The last government lived in fiscal fantasy land." "Only because your government made a decision to give billions of dollars to landlords," Genter fired back. Foster was eager to move on, asking Bishop about whether Kāinga Ora had managed to bring social housing build costs down to the same level as private developers - a topic well traversed in the last scrutiny week in December. The minister did not have the latest numbers, "because this is not the vote Housing and Urban Development estimates", but the agency was making "good progress" and would report back on that publicly. He and Utikere then argued some more over the roughly $250 million allocated for cancellation of the ferries contract - whether that was part of Bishop's responsibilities - with Bishop saying it belonged to Rail Minister Winston Peters and Utikere saying, when they'd asked Peters, he'd referred it to Bishop. Utikere: "And the minister doesn't even know ... that's very disappointing." Bishop: "Yes. So's your behaviour." Utikere:"No, it's not actually, minister, my behaviour is about scrutinising the executive - that is our responsibility. "It is disappointing that you don't know the answer to just over a quarter of a billion dollars' worth of taxpayers money that has been set aside in your Budget." Foster stepped in again, suggesting Bishop's answer was that it was best for his ministerial staff to provide an answer and they did. Treasury deputy secretary Leilani Frew said negotiations for the ferry contract exit were still continuing, as well as wind-down costs. The discussion soon wound down too - after a series of patsy questions and a discussion about the causes of 15,000 fewer people being employed in construction. Bishop argued it was an expected side-effect of bringing down the official cash rate, which would - in turn - have the biggest effect on reinvigorating the sector, McAnulty argued housing could be an avenue for stimulating growth. In the end, the public got a commitment to bipartisanship. Whether it lasts remains to be seen, but investors watching this scrappy select committee may be hesitant to bet the house on it.
Scoop
12 hours ago
- Scoop
Nelson Parent's Relief As NZTA Keeps Lower Speed Limit
State Highway 6 through Marybank in northern Nelson will remain at 60km/h after the community rallied to keep the lower speed limit, much to the relief of locals. The New Zealand Transport Agency confirmed the decision on Thursday afternoon. The 1.8km section of SH6/Atawhai Drive was slated to return to a mix of 80 and 100km/h speeds as part of the Coalition Government's automatic reversals of Labour-era speed limit reductions. The change would have saved 13 seconds of travel time. But a massive grassroots campaign, led by local parents, opposed the changes and eventually prompted Transport Minister Chris Bishop to backpedal, asking NZTA to engage with the community. NZTA subsequently undertook a targeted review of that specific stretch of highway which has now resulted in the speed limit remaining unchanged from 60km/h. Parents for Active Transport Atawhai member Femke Meinderts has been driving the 'Keep it 60' campaign. She said she was 'very relieved' after hearing the announcement. 'We're really happy for the kids, I feel like this is partly their victory as much as it is the community's, and we know this is the right thing for them. But relief is the word, because we just didn't really know what was going to happen.' Keeping the existing speed limit achieved widespread support, with 76% of submitters saying the lower speed had positive impacts. 'The community actually really does care about kids getting to school safely and actively. That's been awesome, but it's also been a lot of hard work,' Meinderts said. Nelson's Labour MP Rachel Boyack was 'delighted and relieved' the road was staying at 60km/h. 'This is a good decision today, but we shouldn't even have been put in this position. It has led to a lot of frustration and a lot of wasted money.' She echoed previous comments from Mayor Nick Smith that speed limits had become too politicised. 'We have to make good decisions based on good evidence, not people's reckons. I think there are lessons to be learned for everybody about how these reviews are conducted.' Smith said the Atawhai community should 'take a bow' for their effective campaign. 'It's not easy to reverse a government decision, but they have been successful. I'm pleased that the government has listened.' He added that speed limits were a 'localised issue' and the 'right decisions' could only be made by looking at each section of highway's unique circumstances. That was echoed by Nelson's Atawhai liaison councillor James Hodgson, a self-professed advocate of taking a 'thoughtful and bespoke approach' to policy. He said the issue was the result of two successive governments making 'big blanket' changes to speed limits but was pleased to see a 'common sense' decision had been made. 'I'm stoked to see that a community had a concern, and they raised it, and a good outcome was achieved. That's the best you can hope for.' Chair of the region's joint transport committee, Tasman's deputy mayor Stuart Bryant was 'pleased' by the result for Marybank and acknowledged the efforts of the community. 'Their voices have well and truly been heard.' But Marybank wasn't the only section of SH6 in the region that had been facing an increase in speed. An 800-metre stretch of Whitby Road in northern Wakefield, about 20km south of Nelson, will also stay at 60km/h after it had been slated to return to 70km/h. That change would have saved 3 seconds of time. Feedback on retaining that 60km/h speed was mixed, with 49% of submitters saying the lower speed had positive impacts, but NZTA opted to keep the lower speed. The agency noted that the lower speed made it easier for residents to cross the road, and that a 60km/h limit mitigated safety hazards well in an area that had shifted from rural to residential. Bryant, who lives in Wakefield, additionally said he had 'no issues' with the retention of the slower speed. 'People are well used to that … people can feel confident coming in and out of their driveways.' Wakefield Community Council chair Julian Eggers said NZTA had made the 'right decision'. 'The community is going to start growing soon, so there'll be more cars on the road. It's more of a safety concern.' He added that the work involved to make the change didn't match the small effects for a short stretch of road. 'To put the speed up for that and change the signs and all … the costs that are involved for that – it doesn't make sense.' But even though the speed limits won't change, Nelson parent Femke Meinderts and Parents for Active Transport Atawhai will continue campaigning for safety improvements in their area. 'We're not done. This was never really a fight we wanted to fight anyway; we're glad that we won, but we want to keep going with what we originally really were trying to fight for, which was just overall improvements in safety for the pedestrians and cyclists,' she said. 'We'd hate to see the Government and our local authorities sort of sitting back now and thinking they've done all they can, because they really haven't.' Like the two sections in Marybank and Wakefield, NZTA undertook targeted consultations and reviews for 14 other sections of state highway around the country that were otherwise slated to automatically increase in speed. Only three of the 16 sections will increase in speed. NZTA's announcement comes after SH6 between Nelson and Blenheim reverted to 100kmh on Monday, including sections in Nelson where local leaders and the community had preferred retaining lower speed limits.
