How Evolving Regulation is Enabling Overdue Investment in Payment Hubs
Christina Fransson, Senior Business Development Manager, Enterprise & Instant Payments, FIS Global in her FinextraTV interview at NextGen Nordics discusses the history of centralised payment factories and how they have grown into the modern payment hubs, . From Fransson's perspective, evolving regulation has been a much-needed push for banks to invest in a centralised system like payment hubs and the holistic abilities they provide. She details why this is important and what to expect from the future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
3 hours ago
- Finextra
Inside AI Assisted Software Development and why tools are not enough (Part 1): By John Adam
The recent squeeze on funding and margins is by no means only being felt in the financial services and fintech sectors. But it's fair to say the pinch is particularly hard and the necessity to quickly and effectively innovate is simultaneously more pressing than ever. The good news is, new AI tools can speed up delivery and improve the quality of software projects without adding to headcount. But even if that general statement is true, just using tools is not enough. Especially in a regulated industry like financial services. If there is no pre-approved list of tools and how and where they are applied in an SDLC (software development lifecycle), organisations have governance, observability, measurability and consistency issues. If 'real' gains are not measured by benchmarking against 'before', do they really exist? Tree falling in a forest metaphor. Certainly not in a way that can be scaled across or up an organisation. There is no clear business case, just intuition. Are tools and where and how they are being used compliant with organisational policy and regulatory frameworks? Has anyone read the privacy policies? I'm personally convinced that a big AI company having its Facebook/Cambridge Analytica moment falls under 'when, not if'. And when the first big AI privacy scandal does break, you don't want your organisation published in a list in a newspaper. To benefit from and scale the gains of an AI-assisted SDLC, organisations need a framework for structured, consistent integration + governance, observability and measurability. Just tools isn't enough. Realistic gains from an AI-assisted SDLC It's important to note that at the time of writing, we are in a period of rapid change in AI tooling. A good framework operates at a level or two higher than specific tools and allows for them to be interchangeable with upgrades. The market most of us operate in is at a point in its cycle where resources are at a premium. Most of the organisations I work with are expected to deliver more with less compared with pre-2023. In that context, banking the productivity gains achievable with AI tooling is non-negotiable. Organisations are demanding it in the demand for greater, better output despite fewer resources. Getting it right is also non-negotiable and that means marrying increased productivity with measurability, observability and governance, which I cover in-depth in Part 2 of this article. As an introduction to building a proper framework, I'll start by explaining the realistic improvements AI can provide to each stage of the SDLC: Product prototyping Developers use prototypes to test idea viability and functionality, and to gather user and investor feedback. Historically, the average prototype required 2 to 6 weeks of teamwork to complete. But by amplifying developers' work via low-code/no-code prototyping and AI-generated code and other AI tools, a clickable prototype can now be completed in days or even hours. UX/UI design UX (user experience) and UI (user interface) designers collaborate closely with developers to design website and app interfaces. Using AI tools that can quickly generate multiple design mock-ups and UI components based on foundational style guides and example concepts, designers can visualise ideas and user flows in various contexts to improve design clarity and direction long before designs touch a developer's desktop. Clarity improves the quality of initial designs and reduces designer-developer back-and-forth, meaning larger projects that took 4 to 6 months to complete now require far less effort and time. Even UXR (User Experience Research) is accelerated and refined. User interviews are, by necessity, long and complex, and result in large, qualitative datasets. AI tools can highlight patterns and repetition in datasets and transcripts in seconds—shining a spotlight on insights, false positives or even biased questions that human researchers may have overlooked. Architecture Software architects plan higher-level design, bridging technical and business requirements. Their diagrams include the sum of a products' components and their respective interactions; until recently, the initial design phase alone took 1 to 2 weeks. Using AI, architects can quickly draw up diagrams to easily visualise these relationships and standardise dependency versions across services. AI can also be trained to use PR comments to report architectural violations, and libraries can be unified to encourage stability across features. Better consistency and immediate feedback mean architects can work faster and create fewer iterations of a product before diagrams meet stakeholder expectations. Coding AI-powered tools for coding have a variety of use cases. My team uses a mix of tools and GenAI to: ensure comprehensive project documentation, automate code documentation and README generation, scan for duplicate code and suggest improvements, improve understanding of complex, inconsistent or unfamiliar code bases, unify code styles and standards across different microservices, and perform code completion and check for bugs and inconsistencies based on defined standards. Paired with manual oversight to catch any mistakes, we've accelerated writing and testing code by a minimum of 20% across projects. GenAI makes complex codebases easily understandable—meaning team members can flexibly move to work on unfamiliar projects and diminish time spent on internal comms by about 25%. One tool we use is SonarQube, which reviews code without executing it. It runs automatically in GitLab CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery and Deployment) pipeline to find bugs, report security vulnerabilities, and enforce code standards to unify style and mitigate potential misunderstandings down the line with better code readability. Testing and QA (Quality Assurance) As they write code, developers write and run unit tests to detect initial bugs and security issues that eat up between 10% and 20% of their time. The SDLC is slowed further by code reviews and PRs, or feedback from experienced colleagues. Tests are postponed by days, sometimes weeks, if various code reviews are required and dependent on busy colleagues. GenAI can augment developers' efforts by writing unit tests, conducting code reviews and PRs in real time, and automatically generating and solving for edge cases to overcome bottlenecks like a lack of expertise or teammates' availability. AI augmented QA can reduce redundancy, unify access to code, and consolidate fragmented knowledge across a project to make a QA team more efficient. And AI-driven tools like Selenium, for example, can automate web app test writing and execution, accelerating product releases and improving product reliability. Automated testing is especially compelling in the context of projects with tight deadlines and few resources. For example, my team's AI toolkit for QA testing includes Llama 3.3 LLM to generate test cases and analyse code and Excel-based legacy documents, IntelliJ AI Assistant to automatically standardise test case formatting, and GitLab to run and test scripts automatically in the CI/CD pipeline. QA is one of the most impactful applications of AI tools in the SDLC and can commonly slash the resources required by up to 60%, while increasing test coverage. Deployment When a product is deployed to end users, AI can be added to the CI/CD to forecast use patterns and improve caching strategies, as well as automatically prioritise and schedule tasks for parallel execution. With AI oversight, the number of repetitive tasks is automatically reduced and resource allocation anticipated, improving latency and product release cycles without added manual effort. And AI-driven caching accelerates and simplifies rollbacks (reverting a newly deployed system to a more stable version of itself) by analysing previous deployments and predicting the necessary steps, reducing further manual effort by DevOps teams, for instance. My team uses Dytrance during deployment, which monitors and analyses system status, and sends self-healing recommendations in real time. Maintenance and Monitoring At this stage, teams work to fix bugs, keep the system secure and functioning well, and make improvements based on user feedback, performance data and unmet user needs. AI can automatically perform root cause analysis for error monitoring, and suggest solutions for maintenance and debugging. Tools my team uses include AWS Cloud Watch and Azure Monitor with AIOps, which automatically collect, analyse, and suggest responses based on monitoring data, accelerating issue response and system updates by 10x. The big picture The acceleration of the individual stages of software development is incentive enough for some teams to add tools and GenAI models to their workflows; especially at stages like QA and coding, where use cases are various and results potent. But by taking a step back and considering AI's impacts on the SDLC holistically, the argument in favour of AI implementation can be turned into a real business case. A business case that can be used to accelerate AI transformation across an organisation: Backed by a strong framework, organisations implementing AI across their SDLC see a 30%+ acceleration across projects in the first 6 months. The keyword being 'strong.' Organisations need a framework that guides leadership to select tools and govern their use, measures outcomes to understand the amount of value different tools offer, and encourages adoption in teams' workflows. Without it, teams are unable to measurably extract the full potential from new tools and efforts, and risk breaching internal and third-party governance in areas such as data privacy. Keeping my word count and your patience in mind, I split my deep dive into a framework for AI governance, measurement and adoption into a separate article: Here is Inside an AI-assisted software development framework: using tools is not enough Part 2.
Finextra
17 hours ago
- Finextra
Finmo releases AI co-pilot for treasury teams
Finmo has launched MO AI Co‑Pilot, a conversational AI assistant designed to revolutionize how treasury teams manage financial operations. 0 From real-time cash visibility to forecasting and global payments, MO AI co‑pilot acts as an intelligent partner for finance professionals. MO AI enables finance professionals to handle complex, multi-entity, multi-currency workflows using simple, natural language. From retrieving account balances and initiating transactions to analysing cross-border payments and generating reports, MO AI delivers instant, contextual responses, transforming fragmented workflows into a unified, real-time experience. David Hanna, CEO, Finmo said, 'MO AI reflects the kind of meaningful innovation we aim for at Finmo - solving real-life treasury challenges with intelligent, usable tech. Our team has combined automation, AI, and deep financial insight to deliver tools that empower finance professionals to operate more strategically.' At the core of MO AI is a custom-built architecture that goes beyond traditional AI assistants. It combines real-time data integration, contextual financial understanding, and action execution via Finmo's proprietary Model Context Protocol. This foundation enables MO AI Co‑Pilot to interpret finance-specific language, support enterprise-grade authorisation flows, and securely execute transactions with full traceability. Raj Vimal Chopra, Co-founder & Chief Technology Officer, Finmo said 'We built MO AI as a domain-specific AI system to tackle the operational complexities of global treasury management. By fusing generative AI, advanced large language models (LLMs), and Finmo's high-fidelity treasury infrastructure, MO delivers deep intelligence with real-world utility. It understands treasury nuances, enforces strict access controls, and executes real-time actions with full auditability, ensuring security, compliance, and explainability at every step' Unlike generic AI applications, MO AI was trained on years of real financial transaction data and decision-making patterns. Its foundation blends generative AI with domain specific intelligence to respond to the pace and precision finance teams require. The MO AI co-pilot enhances day-to-day treasury workflows by automating tasks like payment approvals and forecasting. Akhil Nigam, Co-founder & Chief Product Officer, Finmo said 'We build products to solve real treasury problems. MO AI has been designed to think like a CFO function. It's built to understand the urgency, structure, and decision logic behind every action. Our goal was to move beyond automation and create an intelligent partner; one that helps finance teams shift from reactive to proactive execution.' As finance operations grow more complex, the MO AI co-pilot is positioned to be the intelligent companion treasury teams need. Finmo sees MO AI as a foundational leap toward a new era of intelligent finance. The roadmap includes predictive capabilities aligned with market conditions, complete workflow automation, integrations across the financial tech stack, and adaptive learning tailored to individual user roles. By shifting from static reporting to intelligent decision-making, MO AI Co‑Pilot positions finance teams to lead strategically in a dynamic, global economy.
Finextra
17 hours ago
- Finextra
How Evolving Regulation is Enabling Overdue Investment in Payment Hubs
Christina Fransson, Senior Business Development Manager, Enterprise & Instant Payments, FIS Global in her FinextraTV interview at NextGen Nordics discusses the history of centralised payment factories and how they have grown into the modern payment hubs, . From Fransson's perspective, evolving regulation has been a much-needed push for banks to invest in a centralised system like payment hubs and the holistic abilities they provide. She details why this is important and what to expect from the future.
