Turkey to supply African country with combat helicopters
Turkey will supply Somalia's navy with T129 Atak helicopters as part of a defence agreement signed earlier this year, according to sources familiar with the deal.
Turkey will supply Somalia with T129 Atak helicopters under a defense agreement to enhance naval capacity.
The delivery is part of Turkey's 10-year pact to support Somali military readiness against threats such as al-Shabaab.
The collaboration underscores Turkey's broader strategic expansion in the Horn of Africa through defense and economic initiatives.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump's Iran strike opens the door to a new era of Mideast peace and prosperity
As the aftershocks of Operation Midnight Hammer play out, Arab nations have the chance for an entirely new Middle East — at peace and headed to mass prosperity. Iran's nuclear threat is off the table, its chief proxies devastated and its allies either out of power or conspicuously failing to offer the regime any concrete support in its hour of direst need. And if the Islamic Republic should attempt any kind of retaliation, such as trying to close the Strait of Hormuz, it must expect a devastating US response that can only add to the risk that the Iranian people will rise up to dislodge the entire clerical regime. This leaves the Arab world poised for a new future: The leftist vision of 'pan-Arabism' bottomed out decades ago in the dead-end tyrannies of Moammar Khadafy and Saddam Hussein; the obsession with destroying Israel has only poured out lives and treasure on the sand while radicalizing populations that could be building prosperity. And a century of Europeans' advice and agendas for the Middle East has proved even less useful than the prior century of European imperialism. Whereas the Abraham Accord approach — friendship with America and Israel — is already enriching the nations that have signed on, allowing investment and progress that builds peace and stability. Rescued from the threat of Persian hegemony, Arab leaders could decide to fall back on the failed approaches of the past — but why repeat those tragedies? It's quite telling that Syria's new leadership — with all their past ties to al Qaeda and its death-cult prescriptions — seems to have responded to President Donald Trump's early outreach with interest and openness. Added cause for hope is how they last week declared their airspace open to Israel's defense against Iran's missiles and drones: The greatest menace they now face comes from Turkey, whose ruler is still playing the 'secure my power by blaming everything on the Jews' game. Iran's decision to give Hamas the green light for the Oct. 7, 2023, atrocities in Israel was plainly intended to both provide a distraction as Tehran made its final sprint to becoming a nuclear power and to head off any public Saudi-Israeli entente. That move has now proved an utter disaster for Iran on the first front; the results now open the door to Riyadh joining the Abraham Accords. If Democrats still held the White House, they'd side with the feckless Europeans in insisting that Middle East peace can't come until the question of Palestinians' future is completely resolved — when the truth has always been that those issues will only be settled by a region whose other powers can cooperate. Team Trump moved to finish off Iran's nuclear program purely to eliminate that one existential threat, not to force regime change there nor to remake the region's balance of power. But clarity about Washington's intentions, with humility about what America can accomplish unilaterally and an unmistakable US policy of achieving peace through strength, are sure looking like a pretty good recipe for making the Middle East great again.
Business Insider
9 hours ago
- Business Insider
I was laid off from Microsoft after 23 years, and I'm still going into the office. I feel responsible for my team and customers.
This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Freddy Kristiansen, a 59-year-old former Principal Product Manager at Microsoft's Denmark office who was laid off in May 2025. Business Insider has verified Kristiansen's employment. The following has been edited for length and clarity. A couple of weeks ago, after 23 years at Microsoft, I was laid off. Yet here I am, back in the office. It might sound strange to show up at the office after being let go, but I still feel committed to the products, the people using them, and my colleagues. I was laid off in May, and per Danish law as an employee of over nine years, I have a six-month notice period. I've been relieved of my duties, but I am still officially an employee until the end of November. I'm also entitled to three months of severance pay after my notice. I didn't plan to stay at Microsoft for two decades I was originally hired by Navision in 2002. I saw it as a job I'd stay in for a year or two, but shortly after I joined, Microsoft acquired Navision. From then on, I was a Microsoft employee. That's when I thought, "Maybe this could actually be something long-term." Indeed, it ended up being my professional home for the next 23 years. Over the years, I have held a variety of roles, from group program management to technical evangelist. Although I never had an official developer title, I have been developing products throughout. My last major project was AL-Go for GitHub — a tool that helps our partners use DevOps, a software development approach, in their daily work without needing to understand the complex technical details. I didn't expect to feel relieved when I got laid off I've found the work fulfilling, but around five years ago, I started dreaming of my own business. During the last round of Microsoft layoffs in 2023, I submitted an anonymous question during an all-hands asking if they would consider voluntary redundancies. If the option came up in the future, I might volunteer. It never did. One morning in May this year, I got an invite to a one-on-one meeting with my manager. I said to my wife, "This is it. I'm pretty sure I'm going to be laid off." I thought I might feel upset, but, in reality, it was kind of a relief. Some of my colleagues were devastated. They are worried about what the future might hold. But I'm nearing 60. For the past decade, I've worked very hard and put in long hours. However, I'm at the stage of life where I'm no longer interested in working 60-hour weeks. It felt like the right time to finally pursue my long-overdue dream of doing work on my own terms. During that layoff call with my manager and HR, I wasn't sad; I was already thinking about what I wanted to do next. I believe this new chapter will be good for me. I'll be able to take more time for myself, and hopefully I'll be less stressed as I can set my own hours. Starting a business is my silver lining My focus is now on figuring out a business plan that will allow me to deliver the most value to partners and customers in the least amount of time. I plan to offer CTO services, project management, and maybe even some motivational speaking, while squeezing in travel and getting back into a regular exercise routine. Since the layoffs, I've been reminding myself that every cloud has a silver lining. In Danish, we say, "Nothing is so bad that it isn't good for something." In this case, the upside was the severance package. If I'd quit, I'd have received nothing. Because I was laid off after so many years of service, I was entitled to at least nine months of pay. I can use this package as a foundation to build toward my future plans. I still am going into the office for talks and office hours I still have an office access card and my company laptop, at the latest until December when I'm officially terminated. In the meantime, I'm still keen to be helpful. I went into the office today because we had a call with our AL-Go for GitHub product users. Over the years, I introduced this tool to many customers and partners at conferences and in blog posts. I feel a responsibility not only to maintain the product but also to reassure them that they are in safe hands. I'm also in touch with my former team. If they need my help, I'll answer questions, share guidance, or whatever else helps. There's no reason to stop doing that. Next month, I'll be hosting a session for current staff — a kind of motivational talk about my career at Microsoft and the good, bad, and not-so-fun decisions I made. One of those decisions was working my butt off for years. Nobody told me to spend 20 hours on weekends or to work as hard as I did, but I did it because it felt like the right thing to do. I did it because I genuinely felt a connection to our partners, our customers, and my colleagues. And, honestly, I still do.
Time Magazine
17 hours ago
- Time Magazine
Alexandr Wang on AI's Potential and Its ‘Deficiencies'
On June 12, Alexandr Wang stepped down as Scale's CEO to chase his most ambitious moonshot yet: building smarter-than-human AI as head of Meta's new 'superintelligence' division. As part of his move, Meta will invest $14.3 billion for a minority stake in Scale AI, but the real prize isn't his company—it's Wang himself. Wang, 28, is expected to bring a sense of urgency to Meta's AI efforts, which this year have been plagued by delays and underwhelming performance. Once the undisputed leader of open-weight AI, the U.S. tech giant has been overtaken by Chinese rivals like DeepSeek on popular benchmarks. Although Wang, who dropped out of MIT at 19, lacks the academic chops of some of his peers, he offers both insight into the types of data Meta's rivals use to improve their AI systems, and unrivaled ambition. Google and OpenAI are both reportedly severing deals with Scale AI over the Meta deal. Scale declined to comment, but interim CEO has emphasized that the company will continue to operate independently in a blog post. Big goals are Wang's thing. By 24, he'd become the world's youngest self-made billionaire by building Scale into a major player labeling data for the artificial intelligence industry's giants. 'Ambition shapes reality,' reads one of Scale's core values—a motto Wang crafted. That drive has earned him admiration from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who lived in Wang's apartment for months during the pandemic. But his relentless ambition has come with trade-offs. He credits Scale's success to treating data as a 'first-class problem,' but that focus didn't always extend to the company's army of over 240,000 contract workers, some of whom have faced delayed, reduced, or canceled payments after completing tasks. Lucy Guo, who co-founded Scale, but left in 2018 following disagreements with Wang, says it was one of their 'clashing points.' 'I was like, 'we need to focus on making sure they get paid out on time,'" while Wang was more concerned with growth, Guo says. Scale AI has said instances of late-payment are exceedingly rare and that it is constantly improving. The stakes of this growth-at-all-costs mindset are rising. Superintelligent Al 'would amount to the most precarious technological development since the nuclear bomb,' according to a policy paper Wang co-authored in March with Eric Schmidt, Google's former CEO, and Dan Hendrycks, the director of the Center of AI Safety. Wang's new role at Meta makes him an important decision maker about this technology that leaves no room for error. TIME spoke to Wang in April, before he stepped down as Scale's CEO. He discussed his leadership style, how prepared the U.S. is for AGI and AI's 'deficiencies.' This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity. Your leadership style has been described as very in-the-weeds. For example, it's been reported you would take a 1-1 call with every new employee even as headcount reached into the hundreds. How has your view of leadership evolved as Scale has grown? Leadership is a very multifaceted discipline, right? There's level one—can you accomplish the things that are right in front of you? Level two is: are the things that you're doing even the right things? Are you pointing the right direction? And then there's a lot of the level three stuff, which is probably the most important—what's the culture of the organization? All that kind of stuff. I definitely think my approach to leadership is one of very high attention to detail, being very in-the-weeds, being quite focused, instilling a high level of urgency, really trying to ensure that the organization is moving as quickly and as urgently towards the critical problems as possible. But also layering in, how do you develop a healthy culture? How do you develop an organization where people are put in positions where they're able to do their best work, and they're constantly learning and growing within these environments. When you're pointed at a mission that is larger than life, then you have the ability to accomplish things that are truly great. Since a trip to China in 2018, you've been outspoken about the threat posed by China's AI ambitions. Now, particularly in the wake of DeepSeek, this view has become a lot more dominant in Washington. Do you have any other takes regarding AI development that might be kind of fringe now, but will become mainstream in five years or so? I think, the agentic world—one where businesses and governments are increasingly doing more and more of their economic activity with agents; that humans are more and more just feeling sort of like managers and overseers of those agents; where we're starting to shift and offload more economic activity onto agents. This is certainly the future, and how we, as a society, undergo that transition with minimum disruption is very, very non-trivial. I think it definitely sounds scary when you talk about it, and I think that's sort of like an indication that it's not going to be something that's very easy to accomplish or very easy to do. My belief is, I think that there's a number of things that we have to build, that we have to get right, that we have to do, to ensure that that transition is smooth. I think there's a lot of excitement and energy put towards this sort of agentic world. And we think it touches every facet of our world. So enterprises will become agentic enterprises. Governments will become agentic governments. Warfare will become agentic warfare. It's going to deeply cut into everything that we do and there's a few key pieces, both infrastructure that need to be built, as well as key policy decisions and key decisions [about] how it gets implemented within the economy that are all quite critical. What's your assessment of how prepared and how seriously the U.S. government is taking the possibility of 'AGI' [artificial general intelligence]? I think AI is very, very top of mind for the administration, and I think there's a lot of trying to assess: What is the rate of progress? How quickly are we going to achieve what most people call AGI? Slower timeframe, faster timeframe? In the case where it's a faster timeframe, what are the right things to repair? I think these are major conversations. If you go to Vice President JD Vance's speech from the Paris AI action Summit, he speaks explicitly to this, the concept that the current administration is focused on the American worker, and that they will ensure that AI is beneficial to the American worker. I think as AI continues to progress—I mean, the industry is moving at a breakneck speed—people will take note and take action. One job that seems ripe for disruption is data annotation itself. We've seen in-house AI models used for the captioning of the dataset OpenAI's Sora, and at the same time, reasoning models are being trained on synthetic self-play data on defined challenges. Do you think those trends pose a threat of disruption to Scale AI's data annotation business? I actually think it's quite the opposite. If you look at the growth in the AI related jobs around contribution to AI data sets—there's a lot of words for this, but we call them 'contributors,'—it's grown exponentially over time. There's a lot of conversation around whether as the models get better does the work go away. The reality is that the work is continuing to grow many fold, year over year and you can see this in our growth. So my expectation actually is, if you draw a line forward, towards an agentic economy, more people actually end up moving towards doing what we'd currently consider AI data work—that'll be an increasingly large part of the economy. Why haven't we been able to automate AI data work? Automating AI data work is a little bit of a tautology, because AI data work is meant to make the models better, and so if the models were good at the things they were producing data for, then you wouldn't need it in the first place. So, fundamentally, AI data is all focused on the areas where the models are deficient. And as AI gets applied into more and more places within the economy, we're only going to find more deficiencies there. You can stand back and squint and the AI models seem really smart, but if you actually try to use it to do any of a number of key workflows in your job, you'd realize that's quite deficient. And so I think that as a society, humanity will never cease to find areas in which these models need to improve and that will drive a continual need for AI data work. One of Scale's contributions has been to position itself as a technology company as much as a data company. How have you pulled that off and stood out from the competition? If you take a big step back, AI progress fundamentally relies on three pillars: data, compute and algorithms. It became very clear that the data was one of the key bottlenecks of this industry. Compute and algorithms were also bottlenecked, but data was sort of right there with them. I think before Scale, there weren't companies that treated data as the first-class of a problem it really is. With Scale, one of the things that we've really done is treat data with the respect that it deserves. We've really sought to understand, 'How do we solve this problem in the correct way? How do we solve it in the most tech-forward way?' Once you have these three pillars, you can build applications on top of the data and the algorithms. And so what we've built at Scale is the platform that first, underpins the data pillar for the entire industry. Then we've also found that with that pillar, we're able to build on top, and we're able to help businesses and governments build and deploy AI applications on top of their incredible wealth of data. I think that's really what set us apart.
