Boston Marathon runner makes miraculous journey from paralyzation to finishing the race
Boston Marathon runner makes miraculous journey from paralyzation to finishing the race
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Runner makes miraculous recovery from hospital bed to Boston Marathon
After battling a rare autoimmune disease that left her paralyzed, Alex Mayer defied the odds by running and finishing the 2025 Boston Marathon.
For runner Alex Mayer, competing in the Boston Marathon was about more than just reaching the finish line.
In January 2023, Alex woke up in a hospital bed with no idea how she got there. Confused and unable to move, with no short-term memory and cognitively impaired, Alex was soon diagnosed with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). This rare autoimmune disease can attack the nervous system, making the victim unable to process information or perform basic tasks without support.
"It was difficult to come to terms with the fact that not only could I not walk or move, but also my identity had been altered," Alex recalled.
The recovery process was slow. Alex had to relearn basic skills. She also had to accept a new reality and face fresh challenges, including physical therapy, isolation, and a drastically altered college experience.
"The hardest part of my recovery was trying to accept that this had happened," said Alex. "I was forever changed, and not everyone around me would be able to understand what that was like."
Once she started physical therapy, she began setting new goals, like standing on one foot, closing her eyes without falling over, walking without a cane, and eventually running.
Inspired by watching the Boston Marathon in 2024, she targeted running the marathon herself as her ultimate goal.
Watch this runner's journey from being unable to walk to finishing The Boston Marathon below.
Alex trained hard!
"Every time I didn't want to run, I reminded myself that I am so lucky to be here and I remembered the girl in the hospital bed begging to be let out," she said.
Her training paid off! With friends and family supporting her every step of the way, she achieved her goal of running the marathon and proudly crossed the finish line with an overwhelming sense of gratitude.
"Yes, she ran a marathon," said Claire Rose, one of Alex's best friends. "But more importantly, the whole weekend felt like a celebration of how far she had come, both physically and mentally."
Humankind is your go-to spot for good news! Click here to submit your uplifting, cute, or inspiring video moments for us to feature. Also, click here to subscribe to our newsletter, bringing our top stories of the week straight to your inbox.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Refinery29
2 days ago
- Refinery29
AI Therapy Is Helping Our Wallets, But Is It Helping Our Minds?
Within just three minutes of using ChatGPT as a therapist, it had told me to 'go low or no contact' with my family. This is something a real therapist might suggest where appropriate after multiple sessions. That should scare us. In a new Harvard Business Review report into how we're using AI today, therapy and companionship came out top. Last year, these things ranked second, and now firmly in first place, they're joined by ' organising my life ' and 'finding purpose' in second and third place respectively. Where content creation and research used to feature heavily near the top, those uses of AI have dropped in favour of emotional uses. We're turning to AI as if it were a friend, confidant or trained professional with our best interests at heart. The BBC has reported on this trend in China specifically, where people use DeepSeek for therapy and get to see the AI's 'thought process' as well as the response. But AI being used in place of healthcare professionals is happening worldwide. When therapy can typically cost £40-100 for one session in the UK, and ChatGPT can be accessed day or night for free, it's no wonder the draw of that is strong. As a journalist, I never think to use ChatGPT. It's like turning up to the house of someone that has promised to shoot me one day. This is unlike my friends in science or data based jobs, who use it for everything, in place of Google or to help plan their holiday itineraries. Having witnessed them do this multiple times, I've come to realise my resistance to AI isn't the norm. And so it won't come as a surprise that I've never used AI as a therapist, though I have done actual therapy in the past. With a quick scroll on TikTok, I can see ChatGPT therapy is popular and a frequent resource for people. Especially young people who predominantly use the app, who might have less disposable income. There are videos with people joking about their AI 'therapists', through to comments giving advice on how to get your ChatGPT voice to become more personal. Lee (surname withheld), 42, from Texas, has been using AI in place of therapy for the last eight months, ever since dating again after a six year hiatus. 'I was confused when some old thought patterns started popping up [as I began dating]. I'd already used ChatGPT for other things and decided to run some problems by him that I was having in dating and family life,' Lee says. 'Him', because Lee's ChatGPT calls itself Alex and says he's a feminist. 'I found it very helpful and cannot think of any instances where it fell short — if anything it exceeded my expectations.' Lee has even made 'progress' in her boundaries regarding a particular family dynamic. Previously, Lee had spent anything from $60 to $150 per appointment on therapy, but at the time she felt she could benefit from it again (and started using ChatGPT), she didn't have access to healthcare so that wasn't a viable option. While there's concern about the efficacy of AI in place of therapy (more on that later), we can't overlook where people feel it has helped them, people who otherwise wouldn't be able to afford and access therapy. Lee has a glowing review of her experience so far. 'I have never had a therapist know me as well as ChatGPT does,' she says. 'Alex is always available, doesn't flinch at the hard stuff, and has actually been more consistent than some therapists I've seen. Therapists are trained, but they're still human, and if they haven't lived anything close to what you've been through, it can feel like something is missing in the room.' However, AI, though it isn't human, has learned from humans — and it hasn't lived. In fact, research shows, and spokespeople have said on the record, that AI can tell you what you want to hear and end up mirroring your own opinions. There have even been cases where AI has been linked to deteriorating a person's mental health, with one mum convinced it contributed to her son's suicide. More recently, the New York Times reported on how AI chatbots were causing users to go down 'conspiratorial rabbit holes'. To get a sense of what Lee and the plenty of other people turning to AI for mental health support are experiencing, I started speaking to ChatGPT to see how it would respond to questions around anxiety and family dilemmas. The first thing that struck me was how quickly you can be inundated with information — information that it would take several weeks of therapy to receive. While ChatGPT did tell me it wasn't a licensed therapist and that if I'm in crisis I should seek out a mental health professional, in the same breath it reassured me that it can 'definitely provide a supportive, nonjudgmental space to talk through things'. It also said it could offer CBT-based support, which in the UK is the bog standard form of therapy people get when they go to the GP. I was pretty surprised to then see, within a few minutes of using the chat, that it offered to help me work through 'deeper issues happening since childhood'. I had asked hypothetical questions to see its response, some of which centred on family. A CBT practitioner will often tell you this form of therapy isn't the best suited to deep work (I know, because I've been told this first-hand numerous times, and the therapists I've interviewed for this piece agree), because CBT typically isn't designed for long-term deep unpicking. A lengthier, costlier form of therapy is better suited, and with good reason. And yet, ChatGPT was up for the challenge. Caroline Plumer, a psychotherapist and founder of CPPC London, took a look at my conversation with AI and found parts of it 'alarming'. 'There's definitely information in here that I agree with,' she says, 'such as boundary setting not being about controlling others behaviour. Overall, though, the suggestions feel very heavy-handed, and the system seems to have immediately categorised you, the user, as 'the good guy' and your family as 'the bad guys.' Oftentimes with clients there is a need to challenge and explore how they themselves may also be contributing to the issue.' Plumer adds that when exploring dysfunctional family issues, it can take 'weeks, months, or even years of work' — not, a matter of minutes. She also thinks, getting all of this information in one go, could be overwhelming for someone. Even if it's seemingly more economic, a person might not be able to handle all of the suggestions let alone process and action them, when they're given at rapid fire speed. Plumer says it isn't helpful having an abundance of generic suggestions that aren't truly accounting for nuance or individuality. At least, not in the same way a therapist you'd see over a period of time can do. On top of this, the environmental impact of AI is huge. 'I appreciate that lots of people don't have the privilege of having access to therapy. However, if someone is really struggling with their mental health, this might well be enough to set them off down an even more detrimental and potentially destructive path.' Liz Kelly, psychotherapist and author of This Book Is Cheaper Than Therapy, thinks the suggestion I consider low or no contact with certain family members is reflective of how commonly discussed cutting people off now is, almost as if ChatGPT is playing on social media buzzwords. This worries her, too. 'You could potentially make a hasty, reactive decision that would be difficult to undo later,' Kelly says, citing the role of the therapist to help someone emotionally regulate themselves before making any big decisions. When it's just you and a laptop at home, no one is checking in on that. 'I certainly wouldn't jump straight to these suggestions after one short snippet of information from the client,' is Plumer's conclusion after reading my transcript with AI. 'Ideally you want to help a client to feel supported and empowered to make healthier decisions for themselves, rather than making very directive suggestions.' Kelly feels that while some helpful information and advice was provided, the insight was lacking. 'As a therapist, I can ask questions that my clients haven't thought of, challenge them to consider new perspectives, help connect the dots between their past and present, assist them in gaining insight into their experiences, and support them in turning insight into action. I can assess which therapeutic interventions are most suitable for my clients, taking into account their individual histories, needs, and circumstances. A therapeutic modality that works for one client may be entirely inappropriate for another.' While AI can 'learn' more about you the more you speak to it, it isn't a replacement for therapy. But at the same time, in this financial climate, people clearly are going to keep turning to it — and you're going to need greater discernment on where to take and leave the advice if you do.


San Francisco Chronicle
5 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Nina Kuscsik, marathon pioneer and first (official) winner of Boston women's race, has died
BOSTON (AP) — Nina Kuscsik, who campaigned for women's inclusion in long-distance running and then won the Boston Marathon the first year that they were officially allowed to enter into the race, has died. She was 86. An obituary for the A.L. Jacobsen Funeral Home in Huntington Station, New York, said Kuscsik died June 8 of respiratory failure after a long battle with Alzheimer's disease. 'Nina was more than a pioneer, determined women's running advocate, and celebrated icon within the sport. To us, she was a friend who will always be remembered for her kindness, joyful laugh and smile,' the Boston Athletic Association said on Instagram. 'Nina held the distinct honor of winning the 1972 Boston Marathon, and recognized the platform that came with that triumphant moment, inspiring thousands of women to reach their own goals and finish lines in the decades since. The BAA extends heartfelt condolences to Nina's family, friends, and all in the running community who were touched by her grace.' According to the obituary, Kuscsik graduated from high school at 16, studied nursing for two years and received her license at 18 after petitioning to change a New York law that required nurses to be 21. She won state championships in speed skating, roller skating and cycling – all in the same year -- before turning to running when her bicycle broke. She ran the Boston Marathon four times from 1968-71 — before women were officially welcomed, a period retroactively recognized as the Pioneer Era — and then won the first official women's race in 1972. She was also the first woman to enter the New York race, in 1970, and was one of the 'Six who Sat' – six women who refused to start the '72 New York City Marathon for 10 minutes to protest an Amateur Athletic Union rule that the women's race had to be separate from the men's. She won that year and the next year as well. She later served on AAU and USA Track and Field committees drafting rules for women's running. Kathrine Switzer, who entered the 1971 Boston Marathon using her initials and became the first woman to official compete, called Kuscsik 'one of our greatest leaders.' 'Nina was not only a champion runner, but was instrumental in the official acceptance of women and distance running because she did years of tough work of changing rules, regulations and submitting medical evidence to prove women's capability," said Switzer, who started alongside Kuscsik and six other women who met the qualifying time for the the 1972 Boston race. 'Eight of us registered, eight of us showed up, and all eight of us finished,' she said. 'It was a stunning moment — and a blistering hot day — but appropriately enough, Nina won.' In addition to the more than 80 marathons she ran over her lifetime, Kuscsik set the American record for the 50-mile run in 1977 and won the Empire State Building Run-Up three straight years from 1979–81.


Chicago Tribune
5 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
Nina Kuscsik, a marathon pioneer and 1st official winner of Boston women's race, dies at 86
BOSTON — Nina Kuscsik, who campaigned for women's inclusion in long-distance running and then won the Boston Marathon the first year they were officially allowed to enter the race, has died. She was 86. An obituary for the A.L. Jacobsen Funeral Home in Huntington Station, N.Y., said Kuscsik died June 8 of respiratory failure after a long battle with Alzheimer's disease. 'Nina was more than a pioneer, determined women's running advocate and celebrated icon within the sport. To us, she was a friend who will always be remembered for her kindness, joyful laugh and smile,' the Boston Athletic Association said on Instagram. 'Nina held the distinct honor of winning the 1972 Boston Marathon and recognized the platform that came with that triumphant moment, inspiring thousands of women to reach their own goals and finish lines in the decades since. The BAA extends heartfelt condolences to Nina's family, friends and all in the running community who were touched by her grace.' According to the obituary, Kuscsik graduated from high school at 16, studied nursing for two years and received her license at 18 after petitioning to change a New York law that required nurses to be 21. She won state championships in speed skating, roller skating and cycling — all in the same year — before turning to running when her bicycle broke. She ran the Boston Marathon four times from 1968-71 — before women were officially welcomed, a period retroactively recognized as the Pioneer Era — and then won the first official women's race in 1972. She was also the first woman to enter the New York race in 1970 and was one of the 'Six Who Sat' — six women who refused to start the '72 New York City Marathon for 10 minutes to protest an Amateur Athletic Union rule that the women's race had to be separate from the men's. She won that year and the next year as well. She later served on AAU and USA Track and Field committees drafting rules for women's running. Kathrine Switzer, who entered the 1971 Boston Marathon using her initials and became the first woman to officially compete, called Kuscsik 'one of our greatest leaders.' 'Nina was not only a champion runner but was instrumental in the official acceptance of women in distance running because she did years of tough work of changing rules, regulations and submitting medical evidence to prove women's capability,' said Switzer, who started alongside Kuscsik and six other women who met the qualifying time for the the 1972 Boston race. 'Eight of us registered, eight of us showed up and all eight of us finished. It was a stunning moment — and a blistering hot day — but appropriately enough, Nina won.' In addition to the more than 80 marathons she ran over her lifetime, Kuscsik set the American record for the 50-mile run in 1977 and won the Empire State Building Run-Up three straight years from 1979-81. She was inducted into the Long Distance Running Hall of Fame in 1999.