AI Therapy Is Helping Our Wallets, But Is It Helping Our Minds?
Within just three minutes of using ChatGPT as a therapist, it had told me to 'go low or no contact' with my family. This is something a real therapist might suggest where appropriate after multiple sessions. That should scare us.
In a new Harvard Business Review report into how we're using AI today, therapy and companionship came out top. Last year, these things ranked second, and now firmly in first place, they're joined by ' organising my life ' and 'finding purpose' in second and third place respectively. Where content creation and research used to feature heavily near the top, those uses of AI have dropped in favour of emotional uses. We're turning to AI as if it were a friend, confidant or trained professional with our best interests at heart. The BBC has reported on this trend in China specifically, where people use DeepSeek for therapy and get to see the AI's 'thought process' as well as the response. But AI being used in place of healthcare professionals is happening worldwide. When therapy can typically cost £40-100 for one session in the UK, and ChatGPT can be accessed day or night for free, it's no wonder the draw of that is strong.
As a journalist, I never think to use ChatGPT. It's like turning up to the house of someone that has promised to shoot me one day. This is unlike my friends in science or data based jobs, who use it for everything, in place of Google or to help plan their holiday itineraries. Having witnessed them do this multiple times, I've come to realise my resistance to AI isn't the norm. And so it won't come as a surprise that I've never used AI as a therapist, though I have done actual therapy in the past.
With a quick scroll on TikTok, I can see ChatGPT therapy is popular and a frequent resource for people. Especially young people who predominantly use the app, who might have less disposable income. There are videos with people joking about their AI 'therapists', through to comments giving advice on how to get your ChatGPT voice to become more personal. Lee (surname withheld), 42, from Texas, has been using AI in place of therapy for the last eight months, ever since dating again after a six year hiatus. 'I was confused when some old thought patterns started popping up [as I began dating]. I'd already used ChatGPT for other things and decided to run some problems by him that I was having in dating and family life,' Lee says. 'Him', because Lee's ChatGPT calls itself Alex and says he's a feminist. 'I found it very helpful and cannot think of any instances where it fell short — if anything it exceeded my expectations.' Lee has even made 'progress' in her boundaries regarding a particular family dynamic. Previously, Lee had spent anything from $60 to $150 per appointment on therapy, but at the time she felt she could benefit from it again (and started using ChatGPT), she didn't have access to healthcare so that wasn't a viable option.
While there's concern about the efficacy of AI in place of therapy (more on that later), we can't overlook where people feel it has helped them, people who otherwise wouldn't be able to afford and access therapy. Lee has a glowing review of her experience so far. 'I have never had a therapist know me as well as ChatGPT does,' she says. 'Alex is always available, doesn't flinch at the hard stuff, and has actually been more consistent than some therapists I've seen. Therapists are trained, but they're still human, and if they haven't lived anything close to what you've been through, it can feel like something is missing in the room.'
However, AI, though it isn't human, has learned from humans — and it hasn't lived. In fact, research shows, and spokespeople have said on the record, that AI can tell you what you want to hear and end up mirroring your own opinions. There have even been cases where AI has been linked to deteriorating a person's mental health, with one mum convinced it contributed to her son's suicide. More recently, the New York Times reported on how AI chatbots were causing users to go down 'conspiratorial rabbit holes'. To get a sense of what Lee and the plenty of other people turning to AI for mental health support are experiencing, I started speaking to ChatGPT to see how it would respond to questions around anxiety and family dilemmas.
The first thing that struck me was how quickly you can be inundated with information — information that it would take several weeks of therapy to receive. While ChatGPT did tell me it wasn't a licensed therapist and that if I'm in crisis I should seek out a mental health professional, in the same breath it reassured me that it can 'definitely provide a supportive, nonjudgmental space to talk through things'. It also said it could offer CBT-based support, which in the UK is the bog standard form of therapy people get when they go to the GP. I was pretty surprised to then see, within a few minutes of using the chat, that it offered to help me work through 'deeper issues happening since childhood'. I had asked hypothetical questions to see its response, some of which centred on family. A CBT practitioner will often tell you this form of therapy isn't the best suited to deep work (I know, because I've been told this first-hand numerous times, and the therapists I've interviewed for this piece agree), because CBT typically isn't designed for long-term deep unpicking. A lengthier, costlier form of therapy is better suited, and with good reason.
And yet, ChatGPT was up for the challenge. Caroline Plumer, a psychotherapist and founder of CPPC London, took a look at my conversation with AI and found parts of it 'alarming'. 'There's definitely information in here that I agree with,' she says, 'such as boundary setting not being about controlling others behaviour. Overall, though, the suggestions feel very heavy-handed, and the system seems to have immediately categorised you, the user, as 'the good guy' and your family as 'the bad guys.' Oftentimes with clients there is a need to challenge and explore how they themselves may also be contributing to the issue.' Plumer adds that when exploring dysfunctional family issues, it can take 'weeks, months, or even years of work' — not, a matter of minutes. She also thinks, getting all of this information in one go, could be overwhelming for someone. Even if it's seemingly more economic, a person might not be able to handle all of the suggestions let alone process and action them, when they're given at rapid fire speed. Plumer says it isn't helpful having an abundance of generic suggestions that aren't truly accounting for nuance or individuality. At least, not in the same way a therapist you'd see over a period of time can do. On top of this, the environmental impact of AI is huge. 'I appreciate that lots of people don't have the privilege of having access to therapy. However, if someone is really struggling with their mental health, this might well be enough to set them off down an even more detrimental and potentially destructive path.'
Liz Kelly, psychotherapist and author of This Book Is Cheaper Than Therapy, thinks the suggestion I consider low or no contact with certain family members is reflective of how commonly discussed cutting people off now is, almost as if ChatGPT is playing on social media buzzwords. This worries her, too. 'You could potentially make a hasty, reactive decision that would be difficult to undo later,' Kelly says, citing the role of the therapist to help someone emotionally regulate themselves before making any big decisions. When it's just you and a laptop at home, no one is checking in on that.
'I certainly wouldn't jump straight to these suggestions after one short snippet of information from the client,' is Plumer's conclusion after reading my transcript with AI. 'Ideally you want to help a client to feel supported and empowered to make healthier decisions for themselves, rather than making very directive suggestions.' Kelly feels that while some helpful information and advice was provided, the insight was lacking. 'As a therapist, I can ask questions that my clients haven't thought of, challenge them to consider new perspectives, help connect the dots between their past and present, assist them in gaining insight into their experiences, and support them in turning insight into action. I can assess which therapeutic interventions are most suitable for my clients, taking into account their individual histories, needs, and circumstances. A therapeutic modality that works for one client may be entirely inappropriate for another.'
While AI can 'learn' more about you the more you speak to it, it isn't a replacement for therapy. But at the same time, in this financial climate, people clearly are going to keep turning to it — and you're going to need greater discernment on where to take and leave the advice if you do.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AMD Runs Circles Around Intel With Helios Rack-Scale AI Systems
Intel has largely given up on selling AI accelerators directly and is focusing on rack-scale solutions. The AI strategy is still in flux, though, as new CEO Lip-Bu Tan revamps the company. Meanwhile, AMD is set to roll out its new Helios rack-scale AI solution next year, likely beating Intel to market. 10 stocks we like better than Intel › Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) made a run at the artificial intelligence (AI) accelerator market with its Gaudi line of chips, which came with the company's $2 billion acquisition of Habana. Unlike the graphics processing units (GPUs) from Nvidia and AMD (NASDAQ: AMD), Gaudi featured a different type of architecture that excelled in certain workloads. While Gaudi 3 wasn't up to par with Nvidia's leading AI accelerators when it launched, Intel offered attractive pricing as a way to lure customers. While Gaudi 3 won some high-profile customers, namely IBM for its watsonx platform, the chip was mostly a bust. Intel set a $500 million AI accelerator sales target for 2024, already a fraction of what Nvidia and AMD sell annually, and failed to meet it. While Gaudi's pricing was attractive, an immature software ecosystem, an unfamiliar architecture, and a complicated roadmap from Intel conspired to keep customers away. Intel later abandoned Falcon Shores, which was expected to be a traditional GPU that integrated some of Gaudi's features and was set to launch in 2025. Falcon Shores will no longer be a commercial product, and the new plan is to use its successor, Jaguar Shores, as the base for rack-scale AI solutions. This strategy makes sense. As AI infrastructure companies scale up data centers to include more densely packed accelerators, rack-scale solutions, which integrate GPUs, central processing units (CPUs), and other hardware across an entire server rack, can help solve thorny problems that are holding GPU clusters back. Essentially nothing is known about what Intel's rack-scale solutions are going to look like. With CEO Lip-Bu Tan taking over just a few months ago and ready to shake up the struggling company, it's not even clear whether Intel's AI strategy will change again. Tan installed a new chief technology officer (CTO) and AI chief in April who's in charge of Intel's overall AI strategy and product roadmap. Jaguar Shores almost certainly won't be ready until 2026, so any rack-scale solutions likely won't be either. Given all the changes going on at Intel, including upcoming layoffs meant to streamline the company, it could take Intel quite some time to land on a viable AI strategy and actually get competitive products and solutions to market. Meanwhile, competitor AMD is firing on all cylinders. AMD announced its next-generation Helios rack-scale AI solution earlier this month. Set for a 2026 launch alongside its powerful MI400 AI accelerator family, AMD plans to combine up to 72 GPUs with Venice EPYC CPUs that feature as many as 256 cores each, all tied together with UALink, an open interconnect standard. Helios will also feature AMD's Volcano AI networking cards from Pensando, which AMD acquired in 2022. These high-throughput network interface cards (NICs) will help with data transfer across large-scale AI deployments. AMD already has Oracle as a customer for its current rack-scale solution, which features the company's MI355X GPUs. Additionally, OpenAI is planning to use AMD's upcoming MI400 chips, according to CEO Sam Altman. While AMD remains in a distant second place behind Nvidia in the AI chip market, interest in its solutions seems to be picking up. By the time Intel manages to launch rack-scale AI solutions of its own, AMD may already have gained a significant foothold. That will make Intel's job harder as it tries to land on an AI strategy that works. While Intel is struggling to build an AI chip business of its own, the company's foundry business could ultimately be a major beneficiary of the AI chip boom. The Intel 18A process is going into volume production later this year, and the company's advanced packaging technology is getting plenty of interest from potential customers. In just a few years, Intel has staged an incredible comeback in manufacturing, closing the performance and efficiency gap with TSMC. If AI chip demand continues to boom, Nvidia, AMD, and the slew of tech giants designing custom AI chips could all seriously consider Intel for manufacturing. While Intel has failed to make a dent in the AI chip market so far, its foundry business could still allow it to participate in the AI boom. Before you buy stock in Intel, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Intel wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Timothy Green has positions in Intel. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Intel, Nvidia, Oracle, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: short August 2025 $24 calls on Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. AMD Runs Circles Around Intel With Helios Rack-Scale AI Systems was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
I tested Perplexity vs Google AI overview with 7 prompts — the results were shocking
Search is undergoing a profound change. For decades, Google has dominated the web search world, with some 90% of all searches funnelled through the massive Google machine. But suddenly, with the arrival of artificial intelligence, things are starting to change, and seriously so. Not only are people increasingly using AI products like ChatGPT as their default search tool, but companies like Perplexity are also building businesses around search services. The idea is to combine the power of AI analysis with the huge amount of conventional search data available at the end of a cursor. But Google is fighting back. The company has recently released an advanced search function called AI Overviews, which aims to bridge the two disciplines and deliver the kind of informed search results the market demands. It's a new kind of search on steroids. So how do the two approaches compare in everyday use? We take a look at Google's new AI Overviews and compare the results to Perplexity AI, to see which gives a better bang for the buck. Prompt: Summarize the key contributions of John McCarthy, Geoffrey Hinton and Noam Shazeer to the development of artificial intelligence. We thought we'd start with something close to home - a look at the architects of AI from the past. First impressions are that Google delivers a competent but fairly traditional results page from this request. Its answer of 238 words covers all the basic points and gives a good overview of the points as you'd expect. Perplexity delivers over 400 words, but it's more than just the quantity that's impressive. It's the fact that the results are laid out in a much more engaging manner, with the user being encouraged to explore additional information in a variety of different ways. They can explore related data, look directly at the sources and even regenerate the results to get a different perspective. Where Google seems to do the bare minimum, Perplexity really seems to add user value. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Google 4/10 Perplexity 7/10 Prompt: Create a 3-day itinerary for a first-time visitor to Tokyo on a modest budget. The user is interested in Japanese culture and food, but wants to avoid tourist traps. This is a real kicker, a stark example of the old versus the new. Google completely fails to deliver any meaningful response, but instead retreats to a standard Google search. The answer merely features a selection of third-party websites offering tour advice. This is obviously beneficial to Google as it will no doubt allow it to earn ad revenue. Perplexity, on the other hand, delivers a glorious 1000 words of real down-to-earth itinerary. This includes gorgeous photos, maps and itemized costings, which will be more than enough for the user to get a great idea of the proposed experience. Google 2/10 Perplexity 9/10 Prompt: What is the technology behind noise cancelling headphones? Once again we can see the difference between traditional search results and new style AI analysis, although in this case the difference is not so great. Google's results are very credible with 186 words of explanation, along with a useful YouTube video. Perplexity, however, takes it to a more advanced level. The explanation is roughly the same, but the prose is much more accessible to a layperson. Instead of using the word 'inverse', for example, the app chooses to use simpler English to explain how sound is cancelled. It's a subtle but important use of 500 words to achieve a more understandable answer. Google 6/10 Perplexity 8/10 Prompt: Explain the 'double-dig' method of garden bed preparation and contrast it to no-till farming This is quite an obscure test, involving little-known agricultural techniques. But for gardeners it's a very important topic. Google's response is very workmanlike and informative, and uses 260 words to deliver a good answer to the question. The use of Reddit and the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) are also great sources, which add authority to the answer. Unfortunately for Google, Perplexity once again matches and exceeds in response quality. The RHS and Reddit are also mentioned, as is YouTube. But two things really make this answer stand out. First, the use of a great table to explain the differences at a glance and, most importantly, a conclusion, which gives a clear indication as to why no-dig is increasingly considered the better solution. Google 7/10 Perplexity 8/10 Prompt: What are the primary compliance challenges for a US-based tech startup under the EU's AI Act? This request pushes search to the limits of topicality and obtuse legal documents. Surprisingly, Google's results are very lackluster. The search engine offers up a 57 word March 2025 'featured snippet' from an obscure third-party publication, and that's it. It shows no interest in digging deeper into the topic for the user. Yet again Perplexity tries harder. We're talking 600 words set in a beautiful bullet point format, running through the main challenges and issues surrounding compliance. Along with 9 easily accessible sources and a handful of related subject matter links. Masterful. Google 2/10 Perplexity 8/10 Prompt: What does the history and potential future of blockchain and cryptocurrency look like? This prompt clearly demonstrates why Google's AI Overview is unfortunately not really ready for prime time. The original prompt was something like 'explain cryptocurrency to a fifth grader', but when tested Google couldn't handle it and served up a lame Quora snippet. It's only when we changed the prompt to this one that AI Overview kicked into action, and delivered a reasonable result. It's obvious there's not that much AI involved in AI Overview yet. Interestingly though, this was probably Google's best result. We got 400 words of densely packed information covering the topic clearly and succinctly. Perplexity was also good, providing 600 words and a nice table. Not much to choose between the two then. Google 8/10 Perplexity 8/10 Prompt: What kind of cat is this? For the final prompt we thought we'd go with something a little more exotic. Both search platforms support image upload, so what better than to upload a friendly looking cat to get some more information? Google takes the uploaded image as a prompt to display a page full of similar images, which aligns with its original image matching search. But a re-prompt of 'what kind of cat is this' then delivered a very short four line answer which, although correct, was not super helpful. Perplexity's response was 246 words, with bullets points, covering coat pattern, fur, and the breed. Even a fun fact (calico cats are almost always female). Engaging and informative. Google 3/10 Perplexity 7/10 The king is dead, long live the king? Based on this showing, the rumors could indeed be true. The mighty Google may in fact be on the way to losing its grip on the world's search traffic. Is this the end of an era? Time will tell. However if there's one thing we've learned over the years, it's never to discount the ability of the Google empire to strike back. Uniquely in the world, the company has the compute power, the data and the legendary AI pedigree to surprise us all. Test Notes. It should be noted that we did not use any of the advanced Perplexity functions, but kept to the basic default service. Which make the results even more impressive. It's also important to recognize the fact that AI can get things wrong. Both services feature disclaimers which stress that users should not assume AI search responses are factually correct. This is an early technology finding its feet, users should take care.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
2 No-Brainer Stocks to Profit Off the AI Boom
Oracle is experiencing accelerating growth in its cloud business, sending the stock to new highs. Broadcom is benefiting from the growing demand for semiconductors and networking switches for advanced AI workloads in data centers. 10 stocks we like better than Oracle › Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to promise great returns for long-term investors in companies putting it to use in their businesses. Every industry is exploring how this technology can boost efficiency and innovation. This is expected to boost the global economy by trillions of dollars in the coming years. Here are two top tech stocks to buy that benefit from growing investment in AI services and hardware. Oracle (NYSE: ORCL) stock recently surged to a new high following an impressive earnings report for its fiscal fourth quarter. The stock has had an incredible run over the past few years, but its accelerating growth in cloud services makes the stock a compelling buy even at these all-time highs. Oracle is a leader in offering applications and database services for enterprise. Its competitive moat is based on a comprehensive suite of services that work well together, and this integration of services is driving strong demand for its cloud and AI offerings. Cloud revenue grew 27% year over year last quarter, and it's expected to accelerate. Management projects fiscal 2026 cloud revenue growing over 40% compared to fiscal 2025. This is causing analysts to raise their full-year earnings estimates. Earnings per share are now projected to reach $6.75 for fiscal 2026 and climb to $9.92 by fiscal 2028. Oracle is in a strong competitive position because it offers companies the ability to use their own data with popular AI large language models while maintaining security. Revenue from cloud infrastructure services grew 52% over the year-ago quarter, and management expects this business to accelerate over the next year. Its involvement in the Stargate project with OpenAI, which promises to build $500 billion worth of AI infrastructure in the U.S. over the next four years, supports attractive growth prospects. Oracle stock looks expensive from a valuation perspective, with the stock trading at a high multiple of earnings. But it's also seeing accelerating growth. The stock should climb higher over the next few years as it rides the wave of investment pouring into AI cloud services. Strong demand for top cloud providers is good news for Broadcom (NASDAQ: AVGO), which supplies semiconductors, software, and networking products for data centers. It also supplies chips for other markets, including smartphones. Broadcom has a great record of delivering strong growth and returns to shareholders. Over the last 10 years, revenue and earnings grew at an annualized rate of 28%. This reflects management's strategy of investing in the most attractive opportunities that offer profitable long-term growth. Right now, it's focusing on the demand for AI infrastructure. Broadcom's custom AI silicon, including application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) and eXtreme processing units (XPUs), is seeing robust demand. AI semiconductor revenue grew 46% year over year last quarter, reaching $4.4 billion, or 30% of the company's total revenue. Data centers are aggressively investing in chips and networking to prepare for the shift from AI training to inferencing, where models make predictions from new data. Management expects this shift to lead to accelerating demand for XPUs through 2026. Broadcom's networking products for AI delivered even higher growth, surging 170% year over year. Its new Tomahawk 6 Ethernet switch can deliver 102.4 terabits per second of data capacity. This will drive higher performance in training the next wave of cutting-edge AI models. The stock usually trades at an expensive-looking earnings multiple. The average price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is 55 since 2020. On a forward earnings basis, the forward P/E currently sits at 37. This suggests that there is more upside for the stock over the next year, barring a severe recession or anything that might disrupt spending in the semiconductor industry. Given Broadcom's history of delivering strong growth, it should be a solid stock to profit from the AI boom. Before you buy stock in Oracle, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Oracle wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 John Ballard has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Oracle. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 No-Brainer Stocks to Profit Off the AI Boom was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
