‘I'm a millionaire fleeing Britain – a Reeves U-turn would stop me leaving'
I have a spreadsheet open in front of me on my computer, detailing the exact number of days I have left to stay in the UK this tax year. The reason? Labour's changes to non-doms inheritance tax rules.
The changes are so costly that they have forced me to reconsider where I live. When my days in the UK run out, I will not spend time in some tax haven; I'll just go back home to South Africa and work out the next steps.
If Rachel Reeves reverses the inheritance tax change for non-doms, I would unequivocally stay and grow my venture capital business in the UK.
I know so many other millionaires in my situation. Many have left but still have properties here and have not yet completely settled in their new homes.
Half of these people would rush back if the rules around paying inheritance tax on worldwide assets changed, because we are all upset to leave and feel forced.
But the Chancellor must act quickly before it is too late.
I want to keep investing in growth companies like I did with quantum computing start-up Oxford Ionics, which last week sold for $1.1bn (£820m) to a US firm.
But after raising £500m to invest in Britain's most exciting start-ups since I arrived here in 2019, my future investment will now be elsewhere.
This money will likely help grow companies in mainland Europe instead. It is a shame, as Oxford and Cambridge are where the most exciting cutting-edge projects are happening.
But I am sadly certainly not going to bring any more money to the UK if I cannot stay.
I know people will say: 'It's just inheritance tax. What does it matter if you are dead?'
My businesses are my life's work. I want them to secure my sons' futures.
I grew up with very little, fleeing communist Poland as a child refugee with my parents and two siblings when the country started running out of food in the early 1980s.
The only way to get out was to flee with fake papers.
We spent the whole of 1981 in a migrant camp in Austria, where my parents applied to countries accepting refugees.
We ended up in South Africa without knowing anything about the country or the apartheid regime. We didn't speak English and had $500 to our name.
In the next years, we were just about surviving. I studied actuarial science at university because that was the only way to get a bursary, and we had no money for schooling.
After working for a couple of insurance companies, I realised I'm not diplomatic enough to be a corporate employee.
So I ended up in the world of start-ups and decided to start my own company. I gambled everything on it, putting my house up as collateral.
It is today one of South Africa's large financial services groups.
I came to the UK for security reasons in 2019, after speaking out against corruption in Jacob Zuma's government and being left fearing for my life.
London has become my home. I had hoped to live here for the rest of my life. Being forced to leave for reasons outside my control feels much like grief.
The impact goes beyond just my own personal circumstances. I have had to let 12 casual household staff go – gardeners, cleaners, builders.
While I still have a venture capital firm, Braavos, in Britain, I will not hire anyone new here. Over time, I may have to think about relocating it.
I put my flat in Kensington on the market five months ago, but because so many like me are leaving there are hardly any buyers.
I'm considering putting my house that I love up for sale too, but for now I am holding out for a miracle.
If there is none, I will be forced to go once my 90 days in Britain this tax year are up. I'm leaving on the strong advice of my tax advisers, as the new rules around inheritance are unworkable for me.
For one, South Africa has foreign exchange controls. That means if I were to die under current rules, South Africa may refuse to release the funds to settle a huge inheritance tax bill in Britain.
Even ignoring the difficulty of getting the money out, my wealth is mainly held in the form of shares in the financial services company Sygnia, which I founded and built in South Africa.
My sons would be forced to sell those shares quickly. If you want to sell anything fast, you'll have to do so with a big discount, which would devalue the company.
How can this be good for the economy?
If Reeves changes her mind, I would immediately cancel my plans to leave. I could rehire all of my household staff, take my property off the market and focus on raising funds for another investment fund to boost British growth companies.
My message to the Chancellor is this: you came into power to fix the economy, so don't destroy growth by putting politics before economics.
As told to Eir Nolsøe
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK MPs to hold crunch vote on assisted dying
British lawmakers could take a major step towards legalising euthanasia on Friday when they hold a knife-edge vote on whether to allow assisted dying for terminally ill people. MPs will either progress the legislation to the House of Lords upper chamber for further scrutiny or end it entirely following several hours of impassioned debate. Protesters both for and against the contentious bill are expected to gather outside parliament as the so-called third reading -- the MPs' last chance to debate its contents -- takes place inside. "It is about real people facing the prospect of a painful and undignified death either for themselves or a loved one," the legislation's proposer, MP Kim Leadbeater, told AFP in a statement. "The injustice and inhumanity of the status quo means we cannot wait any longer to offer them the hope of a better death." The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would allow assisted suicide in England and Wales for adults with an incurable illness who have a life expectancy of fewer than six months. They would have to be able to administer themselves the life-ending substance, and any patient's wish to die would have to be signed off by two doctors and a panel of experts. A change in the law would see Britain emulate several other countries in Europe and elsewhere that allow some form of assisted dying. - Advert ban - Supporters say euthanasia would give the terminally ill greater protections and choice at the end of their lives, but critics worry that vulnerable people could be coerced into dying. The Royal College of Psychiatrists said last month that it had "serious concerns" about the safeguarding of people with mental illness and said it cannot support the bill in its current form. MPs backed the proposed legislation by 330 to 275 votes at an initial vote in parliament last November. Since then the bill has undergone several changes, including applying a ban on adverts for assisted dying and allowing all health workers to opt out of helping someone end their life. Several lawmakers in the 650-seat parliament have subsequently switched positions, and parties are not telling them how to vote, making the outcome difficult to predict. An ITV News tracker of around half the parliamentarians estimates that 153 MPs plan to vote for changing the law, with 141 against. Some 21 remain undecided with another 21 due to abstain. Both the House of Commons and the House of Lords need to approve the legislation before the end of the current parliamentary year, likely sometime in the autumn, or the bill will fail. If it passes and receives royal assent, then it would be four years before an assisted dying service is implemented. A government impact assessment published this month estimated that approximately 160 to 640 assisted deaths could take place in the first year, rising to a possible 4,500 in year 10. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to vote in favour but several of his top ministerial team, including the health and justice secretaries, have publicly opposed changing the law. Assisted suicide currently carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Separate legislation is going through the devolved Scottish parliament, while the Isle of Man at the end of March became the first British territory to pass an assisted dying bill. pdh/jkb/gv/sco
News24
40 minutes ago
- News24
Which way for the NPA?
EDITORIAL: Which way for the NPA? The National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP), Shamila Batohi, faced an expectedly challenging appearance before the justice portfolio committee this week. While the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) could draw some solace from last week's Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) ruling in its favour in the Nulane case, significant concerns remain. Key issues include the NPA's mishandling of the rape case involving pastor Timothy Omotoso, as well as the Free State High Court's decision that the extradition of Moroadi Cholota - accused alongside former Free State Premier Ace Magashule in the asbestos corruption case - was unlawful. Adding to these concerns is the slow progress in prosecuting state capture cases, a point of criticism that continues to linger. With just six months remaining in Batohi's term before her expected retirement next year, questions are being raised about what lies ahead for the NPA. Notably, there has been little clarity or action from the Presidency on when the process to appoint her successor will begin. In this week's Friday Briefing, we examine the state of the NPA under Batohi's leadership. Has she delivered on her promises for reform since stepping into the role? News24's legal journalist, Karyn Maughan reflects on two cases where she argues the failure of NPA leadership to put out legal fires before they imploded fundamentally compromised the administration of justice. Casac's Lawson Naidoo explains why he believes the NPA has made some headway under Batohi's tenure. Additionally, News24's parliamentary reporter, Jan Gerber, evaluates Parliament's role in the NPA's challenges, including the impact of funding shortages on the institution. We also feature a Q&A with DA MP and former advocate Glynnis Breytenbach on what must be done to reshape the institution and restore its credibility. Lastly, advocate Lauren Kohn from the Law and Governance Academy of Southern Africa delves into the recent SCA Nulane judgment, shedding light on what it reveals about the current state of our judiciary. You can explore these perspectives and contributions in full below. Set up to fail or maliciously incompetent? What NPA losses tell us Despite high-profile court losses, prosecutions boss Shamila Batohi insists the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is doing a 'fantastic job'. But, Karyn Maughan writes that stance does not recognise how NPA leadership failures have jeopardised criminal accountability. here. Rebuilding justice: Nulane judgment offers redemption for the NPA While the NPA has issues that need addressing, it is difficult to agree with those who wish to portray the NPA as an institution in crisis, in need of a root and branch overhaul, argues Lawson Naidoo. Read the full contribution here. NPA crisis: A chronicle of a snafu foretold If you have been paying close attention to the National Prosecuting Authority's appearances before Parliament, as Jan Gerber has done, you wouldn't be surprised that the pawpaw has hit the fan at the prosecuting body. Read the full contribution here. Q&A with Glynnis Breytenbach | Saying NPA is 'doing a fantastic job' is 'bullsh*t' As scrutiny on the NPA intensifies after it bungled a number of high-profile cases, in-depth writer Muhammad Hussain speaks to DA MP and former prosecutor Glynnis Breytenbach on what it will take to turn the leaky ship around. Read the full contribution here. SCA Nulane judgment vindicates the rule of law and NPA's important work The real impediment to justice and equity was an affront to the rule of law perpetrated not by the National Prosecuting Authority in the Thabete case, but rather by the guardian of the rule of law itself, the judiciary – an affront that is now embodied for posterity in the Free State High Court's shockingly incorrect legal findings as set out in its judgment, writes Lauren Kohn.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
World Bank urges 'radical' debt transparency for developing countries
By Libby George LONDON (Reuters) -The World Bank is urging "radical" debt transparency for developing countries and their lenders to stave off future crises, it said in a report released on Friday. The Bank wants to broaden the depth and detail of what sovereign countries disclose regarding new loans, as more of them enter complex, off-budget borrowing deals due to global market turmoil. "When hidden debt surfaces, financing dries up and terms worsen," World Bank senior managing director Axel van Trotsenburg said in a statement, adding: "Radical debt transparency, which makes timely and reliable information accessible, is fundamental to break the cycle." The Bank wants countries to make legal and regulatory reforms that mandate transparency when signing new loan contracts and to share more granular debt data. It also wants more regular audits, the public release of debt restructuring terms, and for creditors to open their loan and guarantee books. It is calling for better tools for international financial institutions to detect misreporting. The World Bank and other multilateral banks have been pressing for years to improve lending transparency. The proportion of low-income countries reporting some debt data is now above 75%, up from below 60% in 2020. But only 25% of them disclose loan-level information. As financing costs spike due to trade wars and geopolitical risk, more countries are using arrangements such as central bank swaps and collateralized transactions that complicate reporting. Senegal has used private debt placements as it negotiates with the International Monetary Fund over misreporting of its previous debts, and Cameroon and Gabon have also used what are known as "off-screen" deals. Angola recently had to pay a $200-million margin call after a rout in its bond prices. In Nigeria, the central bank disclosed in early 2023 that billions of U.S. dollars of its foreign exchange reserves were tied up in complex financial contracts negotiated by the previous leadership. The Bank said broader loan coverage and deeper loan-by-loan disclosures would enable the international community to fully assess public debt exposure. (Reporting By Libby GeorgeEditing by Rod Nickel) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
