US, Israel Attacks on Iran: 'Stop Netanyahu Before He Gets Us All Killed'

Jeffrey D. Sachs and Sybil Fares
For nearly 30 years, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has driven the Middle East into war and destruction. The man is a powder keg of violence. Throughout all the wars that he has championed, Netanyahu has always dreamed of the big one: to defeat and overthrow the Iranian Government. His long-sought war, just launched, might just get us all killed in a nuclear Armageddon unless Netanyahu is stopped.
Netanyahu's fixation on war goes back to his extremist mentors, Ze'ev Jabotinsky, Yitzhak Shamir, and Menachem Begin. The older generation believed that Zionists should use whatever violence–wars, assassinations, terror–is needed to achieve their aims of eliminating any Palestinian claim to a homeland.
The founders of Netanyahu's political movement, the Likud, called for exclusive Zionist control over all of what had been British Mandatory Palestine. At the start of the British Mandate in the early 1920s, the Muslim and Christian Arabs constituted roughly 87% of the population and owned ten times more land than the Jewish population. As of 1948, the Arabs still outnumbered the Jews roughly two to one. Nonetheless, the founding charter of Likud (1977) declared that 'between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty.' The now infamous chant, 'from the River to the Sea,' which is characterized as anti-Semitic, turns out to be the anti-Palestinian rallying call of the Likud.
The challenge for Likud was how to pursue its maximalist aims despite their blatant illegality under international law and morality, both of which call for a two-state solution.
In 1996, Netanyahu and his American advisors devised a 'Clean Break' strategy. They advocated that Israel would not withdraw from the Palestinian lands captured in the 1967 war in exchange for regional peace. Instead, Israel would reshape the Middle East to its liking. Crucially, the strategy envisioned the US as the main force to achieve these aims—waging wars in the region to dismantle governments opposed to Israel's dominance over Palestine. The US was called upon to fight wars on Israel's behalf.
The Clean Break strategy was effectively carried out by the US and Israel after 9/11. As NATO Supreme Commander General Wesley Clark revealed, soon after 9/11, the US planned to 'attack and destroy the governments in seven countries in five years—starting with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.'
The first of the wars, in early 2003, was to topple the Iraqi government. Plans for further wars were delayed as the US became mired in Iraq. Still, the US supported Sudan's split in 2005, Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 2006, and Ethiopia's incursion into Somalia that same year. In 2011, the Obama administration launched CIA Operation Timber Sycamore against Syria and, with the UK and France, overthrew Libya's government through a 2011 bombing campaign. Today, these countries lie in ruins, and many are now embroiled in civil wars.
Netanyahu was a cheerleader of these wars of choice–either in public or behind the scenes–together with his neocon allies in the U.S. Government including Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Victoria Nuland, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Richard Perle, Elliott Abrams, and others.
Testifying in the U.S. Congress in 2002, Netanyahu pitched for the disastrous war in Iraq, declaring 'If you take out Saddam, Saddam's regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region.' He continued, 'And I think that people sitting right next door in Iran, young people, and many others, will say the time of such regimes, of such despots is gone.' He also falsely told Congress, 'There is no question whatsoever that Saddam is seeking, is working, is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons.'
The slogan to remake a 'New Middle East' provides the slogan for these wars. Initially stated in 1996 through 'Clean Break,' it was popularized by Secretary Condoleezza Rice in 2006. As Israel was brutally bombarded Lebanon, Rice stated:
'What we're seeing here, in a sense, is the growing -- the birth pangs of a new Middle East and whatever we do we have to be certain that we're pushing forward to the new Middle East not going back to the old one.'
In September 2023, Netanyahu presented at the UN General Assembly a map of the 'New Middle East' completely erasing a Palestinian state. In September 2024, he elaborated on this plan by showing two maps: one part of the Middle East a 'blessing,' and the other–including Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Iran–a curse, as he advocated regime change in the latter countries.
Israel's war on Iran is the final move in a decades-old strategy. We are witnessing the culmination of decades of extremist Zionist manipulation of US foreign policy.
The premise of Israel's attack on Iran is the claim that Iran is on the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons. Such a claim is fatuous since Iran has repeatedly called for negotiations precisely to remove the nuclear option in return for an end to the decades of US sanctions.
Since 1992, Netanyahu and his supporters have claimed that Iran will become a nuclear power 'in a few years." In 1995, Israeli officials and their US backers declared a 5-year timeline. In 2003, Israel's Director of Military Intelligence said that Iran would be a nuclear power 'by the summer of 2004.' In 2005, the head of Mossad said that Iran could build the bomb in less than 3 years. In 2012, Netanyahu claimed at the United Nations that 'it's only a few months, possibly a few weeks before they get enough enriched uranium for the first bomb.' And on and on.
This 30-year-plus pattern of shifting deadlines has marked a deliberate strategy, not a failure in prophecy. The claims are propaganda; there is always an 'existential threat.' More importantly, there is Netanyahu's phoney claim that negotiations with Iran are useless.
Iran has repeatedly said that it does not want a nuclear weapon and that it has long been prepared to negotiate. In October 2003, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei issued a fatwa forbidding the production and use of nuclear arms—a ruling later officially cited by Iran at an IAEA meeting in Vienna in August 2005 and referenced since as a religious and legal barrier to pursuing nuclear weapons.
Even for those sceptical of Iran's intentions, Iran has consistently advocated for a negotiated agreement supported by independent international verification. In contrast, the Zionist lobby has opposed any such settlements, urging the US to maintain sanctions and reject deals that would allow strict IAEA monitoring in exchange for lifting sanctions.
In 2016, the Obama Administration, together with the UK, France, Germany, China, and Russia, reached the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with Iran—a landmark agreement to strictly monitor Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. Yet, under relentless pressure from Netanyahu and the Zionist lobby, President Trump withdrew from the deal in 2018. Predictably, when Iran responded by expanding its uranium enrichment, it was blamed for violating an agreement that the US itself had abandoned. The double standard and propaganda are hard to miss.
On April 11, 2021, Israel's Mossad attacked Iran's nuclear facilities in Natanz. Following the attack, on April 16, Iran announced that it would increase its uranium enrichment further, as bargaining leverage, while repeatedly appealing for renewed negotiations on a deal like the JCPOA. The Biden Administration rejected all such negotiations.
At the start of his second term, Trump agreed to open a new negotiation with Iran. Iran pledged to renounce nuclear arms and to be subject to IAEA inspections but reserved the right to enrich uranium for civilian purposes. The Trump Administration appeared to agree to this point but then reversed itself. Since then, there have been five rounds of negotiations, with both sides reporting progress on each occasion.
The sixth round was ostensibly to take place on Sunday, June 15. Instead, Israel launched a preemptive war on Iran on June 12. Trump confirmed that the US knew of the attack in advance, even as the administration was speaking publicly of the upcoming negotiations.
Israel's attack was made not only amid negotiations that were making progress but also days before a scheduled UN Conference on Palestine that would have advanced the cause of the two-state solution. That conference has now been postponed.
Israel's attack on Iran now threatens to escalate to a full-fledged war that draws in the US and Europe on the side of Israel and Russia and perhaps Pakistan on the side of Iran. We could soon see several nuclear powers pitted against each other and dragging the world closer to nuclear annihilation. The Doomsday Clock is 89 seconds to midnight, the closest to nuclear Armageddon since the clock was launched in 1947.
Over the past 30 years, Netanyahu and his US backers have destroyed or destabilized a 4,000-km swath of countries stretching across North Africa, the Horn of Africa, the Eastern Mediterranean, and Western Asia. They have aimed to block a Palestinian State by overthrowing governments supporting the Palestinian cause. The world deserves better than this extremism. More than 180 countries in the UN have called for a two-state solution and regional stability. That makes more sense than Israel bringing the world to the brink of nuclear Armageddon in pursuit of its illegal and extremist aims.
* Jeffrey D. Sachs is a University Professor and Director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University. Sybil Fares is a specialist and advisor in Middle East policy and sustainable development at SDSN. This article was originally published at https://www.commondreams.org/
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Citizen

2 hours ago

• The Citizen

Did the US strikes succeed, and how will Iran respond?

The US said the strikes 'devastated' Iran's nuclear programme, but some are skeptical of this. This satellite picture taken on June 22, 2025, shows a close-up view of craters after US strikes on Iran's Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP), northeast of the city of Qom. Picture: Satellite image 2025 Maxar Technologies / AFP The United States' strikes on Sunday on Iranian nuclear sites raised two major questions: how effective were they, and what will Iran do next? US President Donald Trump said the air raids 'totally obliterated' the main nuclear sites, calling them a 'spectacular military success'. So far, Tehran has given little away about its response, although Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the United States had 'crossed a very big red line'. ALSO READ: US joins Israel-Iran conflict with overnight bombing campaign AFP looks at the impact of the attacks and the possible next steps. What was the effect of the strikes? The United States targeted Iran's three main nuclear sites including Fordo, a uranium enrichment facility buried 90 metres underground. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said the strikes 'devastated the Iranian nuclear programme'. The extent of the damage has not been confirmed, but there is speculation nuclear material had already been moved away. Heloise Fayet, a nuclear expert at the Institut Francais des Relations Internationales, said satellite images showing activity around Fordo 'suggest enriched uranium stock may therefore have been transferred to sites not monitored by the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)'. 'We previously had knowledge, albeit imperfect, of the programme thanks to the agency's inspections; now no inspections are possible,' she told AFP. 'As for Iran's technical expertise, it cannot be destroyed, knowing that thousands of people have participated in Iran's nuclear programme.' Andreas Krieg, a senior lecturer at King's College London, called the US action a 'high-risk operation that delivers unpredictable outcomes', given the facility was deep underground. 'Trump has been using OSINT (open-source intelligence) accounts to say Fordo is gone while the Iranians claim there is only surface-level destruction.' ALSO READ: Iran threatens 'more devastating' response to Israel's attacks Ali Vaez, Iran project director for the International Crisis Group, said destroying Fordo 'won't necessarily end Iran's nuclear programme. 'Tehran has produced hundreds of advanced centrifuges in the past few years that are stored in unknown locations,' he said. What is Iran's next move? According to Krieg, Iran will seek a 'calibrated response – loud enough to resonate, but measured enough to contain'. Michael A. Horowitz, a geopolitics and security analyst, said its options included attacking US assets, closing the Strait of Hormuz – a vital conduit for the world oil trade – or even attacking energy facilities in the Gulf, which hosts several US military bases. 'None of those are good options that achieve anything – this is mostly about saving face,' he posted on X. 'The risks, on the other hand, are great.' However, Horowitz said there were other ways to respond, including a limited retaliation against the US before returning to strikes against Israel and finally negotiating a settlement. The Iranian government now realises its very existence is at stake, said Renad Mansour, senior research fellow at the Chatham House think-tank, casting it back to the days of the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war. 'It's survival mode,' he said, predicting 'more violence' in the short term with the prospect of a 'managed de-escalation' and eventual negotiations. ALSO READ: What Israel–Iran conflict means for South African economy Hamidreza Azizi, visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, said Iran might allow Trump a 'symbolic win' and retaliate against Israeli targets instead. 'This keeps Washington out of the war while intensifying pressure on Tel Aviv. The risk of drawing the US further in would now rest on Trump's next move,' he posted on X. 'If Trump continues to strike Iran without new provocation, it looks more like going to war on Israel's behalf. That's politically costly, given domestic opposition to war with Iran.' Meanwhile, Iran could deny knowledge of what happened to its enriched uranium, avoiding IAEA inspections, and later leave the Nuclear Non-Profiferation Treaty. 'Trump may have scored a tactical win, but if Iran plays this smart, they hand him a political grenade,' Azizi wrote. 'All while shifting the nuclear game into murkier, more dangerous territory.'

IOL News

6 hours ago

• IOL News

uMkhonto weSizwe Party criticises US military strikes on Iran

MK Party calls for global solidarity against US aggression in Iran Image: Atta Kenare / AFP The uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party has issued a stern condemnation of the United States' recent military assault on Iran's nuclear facilities, describing it as an unjustifiable act of aggression that threatens global peace and sovereignty. In a statement released on Sunday, the MK Party denounced the attack carried out overnight against strategic sites at Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow as a flagrant violation of international law and an escalation of unilateral military actions that undermine efforts toward diplomacy and stability. According to the MK Party, the US strikes, which involved Tomahawk missiles and GBU-57 bunker-busters, lacked authorisation from the United Nations Security Council. 'This reckless act is not defence; it is an outright declaration of war against the Iranian people,' the statement declared. 'It disregards Iran's sovereignty and the principles of peace, self-determination, and non-intervention that underpin international law.' The party highlighted the tragic irony of Western claims of 'deterrence,' pointing out that such military actions often mask imperial ambitions. 'This is not genuine security,' the MK Party stated. 'War disguised as diplomacy is an escalation that risks spiralling into broader regional conflict.' Drawing parallels to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the MK Party recalled how false intelligence-specifically, specifically the alleged weapons of mass destruction, was used to justify a devastating war that claimed millions of lives. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading 'Once again, we see Western powers manufacturing narratives to justify their imperial interventions,' said the party. 'Today, the target is Iran; tomorrow, it could be any nation that dares to challenge the global order dictated by the West.' The MK Party called on the international community, particularly African nations, BRICS, and the Non-Aligned Movement, to reject this new wave of militarism. 'Diplomacy must be prioritised over violence,' the statement urged. 'Iran has the right to self-defence under the UN Charter, and we must reopen diplomatic channels to seek peaceful solutions.' The party also urged accountability for the destruction and loss of civilian lives, adding that the ongoing violence threatens regional stability. 'As President Jacob Zuma once warned, 'The path of the powerful is not always the path of the just,'' the MK Party stated. 'We must stand against the arrogance of global powers who bomb nations under the guise of security while sowing insecurity everywhere.' Expressing deep concern, the MK Party affirmed its support for oppressed peoples worldwide, including Palestinians, Venezuelans, Cubans, Congolese communities, and South Africans. 'The recent attack on Iran is part of a broader pattern of foreign aggression,' the statement read. 'We stand in solidarity with those resisting imperial domination and call for a united front rooted in justice and mutual respect.' The MK Party warned of the dangers of escalation, including the potential disruption of vital trade routes and the threat of nuclear proliferation. 'This act could plunge the region- and the entire world- into deeper chaos,' it warned. 'Civilian casualties are inevitable, and prospects for peace are further diminished.' The party also condemned Western media's role in shaping narratives that justify such aggression. 'Weeks ago, South Africa's President Cyril Ramaphosa was falsely accused of 'white genocide,' a narrative pushed by the same interests now celebrating bombing Iran,' the statement pointed out. 'The same outlets demonised our land reform efforts and social progress, and now they vilify Iran-this is part of a pattern of distortion to justify imperial crimes.' The MK Party called for African nations to take a moral stand. 'Africa must rise with clarity of purpose, reject neocolonial aggression, and advocate for a multipolar world grounded in Ubuntu, justice, and mutual respect,' the statement declared. 'This is not just about Iran; it is about every nation's right to sovereignty and dignity.' The party reaffirmed its commitment to non-alignment, international law, and Pan-African diplomacy in pursuit of lasting peace. 'We pray for all innocent civilians caught in this conflict and for an end to the cycle of violence,' the statement concluded. 'The path forward is solidarity, resistance, and unwavering commitment to justice.' IOL Politics

The Citizen

9 hours ago

• The Citizen

US joins Israel-Iran conflict with overnight bombing campaign

The United States bombed three nuclear facilities in Iran with the latter responding with strikes on targets in Israel. Israeli security forces and first responders gather at the site of an Iranian strike that hit a residential neighbourhood in the Ramat Aviv area in Tel Aviv on June 22, 2025. AHMAD GHARABLI / AFP President Donald Trump said the US military carried out strikes Sunday on three Iranian nuclear sites and that Tehran 'must now agree to end this war', following days of speculation over whether the United States would join its ally Israel's bombing campaign. As the Iran-Israel war entered its 10th day, here are the latest developments: US intervention Trump said the US military carried out a 'very successful attack' on three Iranian nuclear sites, including the underground uranium enrichment facility at Fordo. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran,' Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform, referring to Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz. 'A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site,' Fordo, he said, adding the planes were safely out of Iranian airspace and on the way home. Iranian media said the Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites were hit. Ahead the US strikes, The New York Times and specialist plane tracking sites said American B-2 stealth bombers had left a base in the United States and flown across the Pacific. The B-2 can carry America's heaviest payloads, including the bunker-busting GBU-57 — the only weapon capable of destroying Iran's deeply buried nuclear facility in Fordo. Trump said that, after the strikes, Iran 'must now agree to end this war', insisting that under no circumstances should Iran possess a nuclear weapon. Israel raised its alert level after the strikes, permitting only essential activities until further notice, the military announced. Iran says US attacks 'outrageous' Iran's top diplomat, Abbas Araghchi, condemned the US attacks and said his country had the right to defend its sovereignty. 'The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences,' the foreign minister wrote on X, describing the attacks as 'lawless and criminal'. 'In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defence, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people.' Iran's foreign ministry said in a separate statement Washington 'will stop at no illegality or crime' to support Israel. Iran and Israel exchange missile salvos Iran's armed forces said they targeted multiple sites in Israel including Ben Gurion airport, after US attacks on key nuclear sites. The targets included the airport, a 'biological research centre', logistics bases and various layers of command and control centres, it said, quoted by Fars news agency. IRNA news agency said 40 missiles were fired in the '20th wave' of Iranian strikes. At least 23 people were hurt and police said at least three impacts were reported. 'Houses here were hit very, very badly,' Tel Aviv mayor Ron Huldai told reporters at the scene. 'Fortunately, one of them was slated for demolition and reconstruction, so there were no residents inside. 'Those who were in the shelter are all safe and well. The damage is very, very extensive, but in terms of human life, we are okay.' The Israeli military said it had launched its own fresh waves of strikes in western Iran and in Qom, south of Tehran, IRNA reported four Revolutionary Guard members were killed in strikes on a military base in the north of the city. UN nuclear watchdog says 'no increase' in radiation The UN's International Atomic Energy Agency said it had not detected any increase in radiation levels at key nuclear sites in Iran following the US strikes. 'Following attacks on three nuclear sites in Iran… the IAEA can confirm that no increase in off-site radiation levels has been reported as of this time,' the watchdog said on X. The UN body's head, Rafael Grossi, said the IAEA would hold an 'emergency meeting' at the organisation's headquarters in Vienna on Monday in response to the US strikes. © Agence France-Presse