UK MPs Divided On Ban On Assisted Dying Adverts
Adverts about assisted dying should be banned if proposed UK legislation allowing terminally ill people to be helped to die becomes law, MPs were told Friday.
Protestors both for and against the bill gathered outside parliament, as lawmakers debated the contentious proposals for legalised euthanasia currently making their way through parliament.
Opening the debate, the legislation's sponsor MP Kim Leadbeater proposed an amendment to her bill which would require the government to introduce regulations banning advertisements promoting assisted dying services.
But bill opponent Paul Waugh, advocating his own tighter amendment to prevent ads, warned that unforeseeable "exceptions" could make Leadbeater's ban "worthless".
"Advertising works because we human beings are suggestible. Prone to messaging, visual clues and hints. Older people are bombarded with adverts for everything from stairlifts to care homes," he said.
"One person's advert, though, is another person's public information campaign," he added.
The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is at the report stage of the lengthy parliamentary process, where lawmakers can propose amendments.
The bill would allow assisted suicide in England and Wales for adults with an incurable illness who have a life expectancy of fewer than six months and are able to take the substance that causes their death by themselves.
Following a debate in parliament last November, MPs backed the proposed legislation by 330 to 275 votes.
Campaign group Dignity in Dying hailed that result as a "historic step towards greater choice and protection for dying people", but Christian Concern called it a "very Black Friday for the vulnerable in this country".
According to media reports some lawmakers who previously supported the bill could withdraw their backing over concerns around safeguards to protect vulnerable people who might feel pressured into assisted dying.
Medical opinion is also divided, with the two doctors' bodies -- the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) -- expressing concern.
Others remain supportive, including seven RCPsych members who wrote to MPs distancing themselves from their college and describing the bill as "workable, safe and compassionate".
Members will have a final vote at the bill's next stage -- the third reading. It would then face another vote in the Lords upper house.
Leadbeater's initiative is a so-called private members' bill and is not part of the government's agenda, although Prime Minister Keir Starmer voted in favour at the November reading.
A change in the law would see Britain emulate several other countries in Europe and elsewhere who allow some form of assisted dying.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
'Historic step': UK MPs back assisted dying; bill heads to House of Lords
AP photo Britain took a historic step toward legalising euthanasia on Friday as Members of Parliament (MPs) backed a controversial bill that would introduce assisted dying for terminally ill people. In the House of Commons, lawmakers voted 314 to 291 in favour of sending the proposal to the House of Lords for further consideration, following four hours of emotional debate. The outcome sparked celebrations among supporters gathered outside Parliament, who argued that legalising euthanasia would offer dignity and choice to people facing incurable illnesses at the end of their lives. At the same time, opponents at a nearby counter-protest voiced concerns that vulnerable individuals could be pressured into choosing death and called on lawmakers to instead prioritise improvements in palliative care. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would allow assisted suicide in England and Wales for adults diagnosed with less than six months to live. Under the proposed law, individuals would need to self-administer the life-ending medication, and their decision would require approval from two doctors and a panel of experts. If passed, the bill would bring Britain in line with several countries in Europe and elsewhere — such as Belgium and the Netherlands — that have already legalised some form of assisted dying. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Costco Shoppers Say This Wrinkle Cream Is "Actually Worth It" The Skincare Magazine Undo 'Heartbreaking stories' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who introduced the bill, told Friday's third reading debate that changing the law would 'offer a compassionate and safe choice' to terminally ill people. She argued that keeping the current ban in place would result in more 'heartbreaking stories' of 'pain and trauma, suicide attempts, PTSD, lonely trips to Switzerland, (and) police investigations.' However, Labour MP Vicky Foxcroft raised concerns that the bill did not include strong enough safeguards to protect disabled individuals. 'We have to protect those people who are susceptible to coercion, who already feel like society doesn't value them, who often feel like a burden to the state, society and their family,' she said. Outside Parliament, demonstrators held placards with messages such as 'Let us choose' and 'Don't make doctors killers.' David Walker, 82, shared his personal story of supporting the bill after witnessing his wife suffer for three years toward the end of her life. 'That's why I'm here, because I can't help her anymore, but I can help other people who are going through the same thing, because if you have no quality of life, you have nothing,' he told AFP. But Elizabeth Burden, a 52-year-old doctor, warned that the legislation could lead to a 'slippery slope' where eligibility for assisted dying might expand. 'Once we allow this. Everything will slip down because dementia patients, all patients... are vulnerable,' she told AFP. Public support MPs had initially backed an earlier version of the bill in November by 330 to 275 votes. Since then, several changes have been made, including a ban on advertising assisted dying and provisions allowing all healthcare workers to opt out of participating in the process. Lawmakers also added a safeguard to prevent eligibility 'solely as a result of voluntarily stopping eating or drinking,' effectively ruling out cases such as people with anorexia. Britain's medical community remains divided, and Prime Minister Keir Starmer's cabinet is also split. His health and justice secretaries have publicly opposed the proposed law. However, public support appears strong. A YouGov poll of 2,003 adults, conducted last month and published on Thursday, found that 73 per cent of respondents supported the introduction of an assisted dying law. The bill now moves to the House of Lords, which must approve the legislation before the end of the current parliamentary year, likely in the autumn, or it will lapse. If passed and granted royal assent, the law would take approximately four years to implement before assisted dying services become available. A government impact assessment published this month estimated that between 160 and 640 assisted deaths could take place in the first year, potentially rising to 4,500 annually within a decade. Assisted suicide is currently illegal in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, carrying a maximum prison sentence of 14 years. Meanwhile, a separate assisted dying bill is progressing through the devolved Scottish Parliament. In March, the Isle of Man became the first British territory to pass an assisted dying bill.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
UK lawmakers back bill to allow terminally ill adults to end their lives
UK lawmakers on Friday backed a bill to allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales to choose to end their lives in a historic vote in Parliament that takes it a step nearer to becoming law. Members of Parliament voted 314-291 to back the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill following an impassioned and respectful debate. The bill now goes to the unelected House of Lords , which can amend or delay policy, though it can't overrule the lower chamber. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Simple Morning Habit for a Flatter Belly After 50! Lulutox Undo The bill would allow terminally ill adults over age 18 in England and Wales, who are deemed to have less than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death . The terminally ill person would have to be capable of taking the fatal drugs themselves.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
U.K. lawmakers back bill to allow terminally ill adults to end their lives
U.K. lawmakers on Friday (June 20, 2025) backed a bill to allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales to choose to end their lives in a historic vote in Parliament that takes it a step nearer to becoming law. Members of Parliament voted 314-291 to back the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill following an impassioned and respectful debate. The bill now goes to the unelected House of Lords, which can amend or delay policy, though it can't overrule the lower chamber. The bill would allow terminally ill adults over age 18 in England and Wales, who are deemed to have less than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death. The terminally ill person would have to be capable of taking the fatal drugs themselves. Proponents of the bill argue those with a terminal diagnosis must be given a choice at the end of their lives. However, opponents say the disabled and older people could be at risk of being coerced, directly or indirectly, into ending their lives to save money or relieve the burden on family members. Others have called for improvements in palliative care and greater investments in hospices to ease suffering as a better and more moral alternative. Diane Abbott, a veteran left-wing Labour lawmaker, urged MPs to 'speak up for the voiceless one more time, because there is no doubt that if this bill is passed in its current form, people will lose their lives who do not need to, and they will be amongst the most vulnerable and marginalized in our society.' Passions were running high outside of Parliament where hundreds of people gathered to make their voices heard. Supporters were dressed in clothing emblazoned with the phrase 'Campaign for Dignity in Dying,' while opponents held up banners urging lawmakers not to make the state-run National Health Service the 'National Suicide Service.' The vote is potentially the biggest change to social policy since abortion was partially legalized in 1967.
