Final two men charged over Liam Payne's death WILL stand trial after ‘selling tragic star drugs before his balcony fall'
LIAM TWIST Final two men charged over Liam Payne's death WILL stand trial after 'selling tragic star drugs before his balcony fall'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
TWO men accused of supplying Liam Payne with cocaine just hours before he fell to his death from a Buenos Aires hotel will face trial, Argentine prosecutors confirmed.
Waiter Braian Nahuel Paiz and ex-hotel worker Ezequiel David Pereyra have been behind bars since January, charged over the One Direction star's death last October.
Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter
Sign up
3
Two men accused of supplying cocaine to Liam Payne's will stand trial
Credit: Instagram
3
Paiz pictured with the tragic 1D star
3
The pair will be put on the stand and could face up to 15 years in prison if convicted of drugs offences.
Prosecutors also revealed Liam had snorted and smoked cocaine in his room at the CasaSur Palermo Hotel 'up to a few minutes before his death.'
In a lengthy statement, Argentina's public prosecution service said: 'At the request of the head of the National Criminal and Correctional Prosecutor's Office No. 14, Andres Esteban Madrea, the two defendants remanded in custody as part of the court investigation into the circumstances surrounding Liam James Payne's death, will go on trial accused of the crime of selling drugs.
"They are Braian Nahuel Paiz, 25, who met Payne while working as a waiter in a restaurant in Puerto Madero, and Ezequiel David Pereyra, 24, who was an employee at the Hotel CasaSur Palermo where the former One Direction member died eight months ago after falling from the balcony of room 310, in a proven state of intoxication with cocaine, alcohol and psychotropic drugs."
The statement added: 'The autopsy showed Liam's death was caused by polytrauma and internal and external haemorrhaging and it was also determined he had ethyl alcohol in a concentration of up to 2.7 grams per litre as well as cocaine, methylecgonine, benzoylecgonine, cocaethylene and sertraline.
'The forensic medical specialists who performed the autopsy indicated toxicology results showed the dead man consumed cocaine via his nose as well as inhaling it by smoking the drug.
'Consumption took place at least 72 hours prior to his death and up to a few minutes before his death.'
The alleged drug dealers are the only two suspects who will end up on the stand.
Three other men initially charged over Liam's death were told in February the case against them had been dropped.
The tragic singer's close friend Rogelio Nores, hotel receptionist Esteban Grassi and hotel head of security Gilda Martin were accused of Liam's manslaughter by a lower court judge before reversing her decision on appeal.
No date has yet been set for the Paiz and Pereyra trial although it is expected to kick off shortly.
Former waiter Paiz, who has previously protested his innocence after being accused of selling Liam cocaine on two separate occasions in the run-up to his death, repeated an earlier claim last night from prison that he had shared drugs with the artist but hadn't committed the serious offence of selling him narcotics.
The 25-year-old, who got chatting to Payne in a restaurant the former One Direction singer ate at and swapped contact details with him, whined in an interview with Argentinian media outlet Infobae from his jail cell at a Buenos Aires police station: 'I don't know what I'm doing here, I'm a good person.
'I shared drugs with Liam but I didn't sell them.'
Describing himself as a drug user who started smoking marihuana as a youngster, he added: 'All I want to do is start studying again and leave jail to work, like I was doing before.
'I regret now giving Liam my Instagram because it all spiralled from there.
'If I hadn't I'd probably be working today, I'd be studying, I'd be doing videos because before meeting Liam I'd participated in the filming of a videoclip for YouTube for a singer and other videos for TV.
'I miss the freedom I had, I miss work, I miss my family, my mum and my sisters.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edinburgh Live
2 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
Notorious Scottish child killer slammed by crime partner behind bars in verbal attack
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A Scottish notorious child killer has slammed her partner in crime in an outspoken attack. Rachel Trelfa has accused former civil partner Nyomi Fee of being a 'master manipulator', the Daily Record reports. The pair were convicted of murdering Trelfa's son Liam in 2014 who suffered fatal heart injuries similar to those found on road crash victims. Trelfa wrote: 'My ex, Nyomi Fee, abused me and is a master manipulator and lies through her teeth. She messed my head up big time.' Liam was badly neglected and spent the last few days of his life in agony from an untreated broken leg and fractured arm. At the couple's trial, Nyomi Fee was described as 'domineering' and it was claimed she was the 'main actor' in Liam's murder. Fee got a sentence of 24 years and Trelfa was given just six months less for her appalling part in allowing and contributing to the murder of her son. Trelfa's condemnation of her ex came in a character reference she wrote for her prison pal, killer Jayney Sutherley. Trelfa believes Fee manufactured accusations against Sutherley, who was cleared in court of waging a homophobic and transphobic vendetta against Fee and her trans lover Alex Stewart – who was known as Alan Baker when jailed for murder in 2013. Hairdresser Sutherley – who killed a man with scissors – had been accused of persecuting Fee and Stewart. Trelfa wrote about Fee: 'She messed my head up big time but Jayney has been there and supported me. 'I can say, hand on heart, that Jayney is not homophobic in any way or ever insulted me. She is a lovely person who will help anyone. She adds: 'I would just like to say I have a very nice friendship with Jayney. She has taken me for me and taken me under her wing. She is so supportive with me.' Trelfa says she is also in a relationship with another woman despite being behind bars. She said: 'I am gay and in a relationship with a woman. Janey has been there for me if I have any problems. 'We work together in the hairdresser's and she has taught me so much. I have a lot of time for her.' Rachel Trelfa and Nyomi Fee moved from Ryton, near Newcastle-upon-Tyne, to Fife in December 2011, after Trelfa left baby Liam's father. Their trial at the High Court in Livingston in 2016 heard how Fee tried to blame Liam's death on another child. Doctors found Liam had suffered a ruptured heart from a blow or blows to his body. They also discovered double fractures of his thigh bone and arm. In total they counted more than 30 injuries on his body. Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community her eand get the latest news sent straight to your messages. The evil pair locked two other boys in a makeshift cage, part of which was kept under their mattress. Jayney's trial in May heard how she was accused of being transphobic, largely because she insisted on calling Stewart – who has full male biology – a man. Sheriff Millar found the charges not proven. It emerged the charge had prevented Sutherley from applying for parole for more than a year. Sutherley, now 51, stabbed 40-year-old Alistair MacFadyen through the heart at a flat in Fairway Avenue, Glenburn, Paisley, in June 2019. She was sentenced to six years and eight months after pleading guilty to culpable homicide. She was originally accused of murder. The Crown accepted the reduced plea on the basis of provocation. The victim had been out of prison for two days when he was stabbed. In 2013 Baker invited John Weir, 36, into his home in Bonhill, West Dunbartonshire, before stabbing him at least 16 times. He claimed self-defence but was convicted of murder. After identifying as a woman, the killer was transferred from a male prison to HMP Greenock, where they became involved in a relationship with Fee. The couple are believed to be engaged. The relationship has caused fury among other prisoners, who claim the couple have been given freedoms that others cannot enjoy. The Sutherley trial heard claims that the couple had sex in prison showers, were granted time alone in each other's cells and fumbled with each other in public areas in the jail.
Daily Mirror
17 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Beauty and the Geek star forced to deny she is involved in grisly murder case
Beauty and the Geek star, Kiera Johnstone, has taken to social media, refuting allegations she is involved in a murder case, which was reported in Australia last week The winner of dating show, Beauty and the Geek, has vehemently denied her involvement in a grisly murder in New South Wales, Australia. Kiera Johnstone, 26, who appeared on the Australian version of the series in 2021, insisted she has nothing to do with the shocking case after reports surfaced on Friday that a woman who starred in the reality TV show had been charged with a murder in Port Lincoln. A man's body was discovered in a home in the coastal town in Australia after emergency services were called to a property at about 3:25pm local time on Thursday following reports of a small fire. When crews arrived, they found a man dead inside the residence. A 34-year-old woman was arrested at the scene and later charged with murder. A suppression order preventing the publication of any information that could identify the woman, the victim, or the specific details surrounding the man's death was issued. However, after the news broke, speculation surfaced online attempting to link Keira with allegations stemming from the police report. Telling her followers there were rumours she had been involved in the murder for "reasons beyond my understanding", the reality star took to her Instagram Stories today. Insisting she wanted to be "absolutely clear", Keira said: "Hi everyone. A former contestant from Beauty and the Geek has been charged with a very serious crime. "Although no names have been released, for reasons beyond my understanding, there has been speculation online suggesting that I am involved. "Let me be absolutely clear: I am not involved in any way. I have not been charged with a crime. I have literally never even had a parking fine. The allegations being discussed have nothing to with me, and the fact that I even need to says this is incredibly upsetting. "It's deeply disturbing to see people spreading false information, making assumptions and sharing screenshots. I understand the internet can be quick to judge, but this kind of speculation is damaging and invasive and is something I take very seriously." Asking anyone 'fuelling the gossip' to "please stop", she continued: "If you are part of the group fuelling this - sharing, gossiping or silently watching - I ask you to please stop. "This is not entertainment. This is a serious situation, that involves real victims. you're literally sick if you think this is at all funny. "As this has nothing to do with me, this will be the only time I speak on the matter. Thank you to those who reached out with kindness and common sense." It comes after The Courier Mail reported on Friday that the woman arrested for the alleged murder was once a contestant on reality show Beauty and the Geek. South Australia Police have confirmed the victim and the accused knew each other and had been in a relationship. The woman was refused police bail and remains in custody. Assistant Commissioner Parrott said a cause of death had not yet been established and no further details could be released, as the victim's family had not yet been notified. The woman did not apply for bail and has been detained under the Mental Health Act. She is expected to return to court in December. The suppression order regarding the accused's identity is set to be reviewed by the court next week.
Spectator
a day ago
- Spectator
When did divorcing parents become so toxic?
A friend remembers how, growing up in Ceausescu's Romania, she and her classmates were encouraged by teachers to spy on their parents for dissenting opinions or unpatriotic behaviour. Such monstrous behaviour would never be countenanced here, right? Wrong. In the poisonous atmosphere of the family courts, quarrelling parents are known to plant devices on their children to covertly record their rows to then put before a judge as evidence. The practice has become so routine it prompted the Family Justice Council to issue guidance against it last month. The majority of divorcing rows focus on money The phenomenon of parents using children as pawns in divorce proceedings is neither new nor rare: In 2023, there were 80,000 children caught up in family court proceedings, according to court statistics. Although fewer couples are divorcing, more of them are having to go through the courts to sort out their acrimonious split. Divorce is widely recognised as an adverse childhood experience (ACE), which is why recent findings about almost half (45 per cent) of teenagers living with one parent alarmed children's charities. Some of those teens will have witnessed a civilised separation, but too many will now suffer through their parents' bitter divorce: analysis by the Ministry of Justice found that 10,300 financial remedy orders were contested in the family courts last year – a 66 per cent rise over two years. Julia Margo, director at the domestic violence advocacy group Fair Hearing, has mentored more than 100 mothers through their family court hearings. 'Family court' sounds like a kind and gentle annexe of our justice system, where benevolent magistrates dot the i's and cross the t's of domestic arrangements. In reality these courts are battlegrounds where warring parents tear strips off each other, usually about who will have care of the children and sometimes who can have any contact with them. Julia herself was dragged through the courts 37 times by her ex-partner who, despite being a convicted paedophile, sought unsupervised contact with their children. She warns: Even when there are no allegations of domestic abuse, many parents now struggle to negotiate separation and co-parenting without a court order: in the UK, more than 10 per cent of separating families end up in the family courts, far higher than in previous decades. The acrimony she has found in court exposed couples incapable of conflict resolution, emotional articulacy, or just plain respect. This has no resemblance to the 'conscious uncoupling' of Gwyneth Paltrow – whose friendly take on separation strikes one as the wisdom of Solomon by contrast. The majority of divorcing rows focus on money. But new ingredients – online pornography addiction, cost of living stress, surging infertility – also risk fraying relationships in an unprecedented way. Our 'selfie' culture has infected too many parents, who regrettably share their psychodramas on X, Instagram and TikTok. Once it goes public, it goes nuclear, with families torn apart and children (even grown up ones) traumatised. Worse, they risk re-enacting the relational model they grew up with. Families function as petri dishes where children first experiment with relationships. They learn whether their tears bring parents rushing over to comfort them or have no impact on the grown-up glued to their phones. They learn, too, whether screaming obscenities at each other over an unpaid bill or coming to blows over an affair is the best way to resolve an argument. Children's copy-cat behaviour makes the latest Office for National Statistics figures – one in four women and one in five men have been subject to domestic abuse – truly alarming: how many of the younger generation will abuse their partners? Or, as one senior judge explains, anyone who has sat as a judge for more than 20 years will find themselves at some point face-to-face in court with a domestic abuse perpetrator whom they recognise from years before: the child of an abusive parent, taken into care. Carey Philpott, CEO of the Kent-based charity SATEDA, says that 'Breaking these cycles is a key focus for our specialist interventions'. The SATEDA programme is one-on-one, or in small groups, offered in schools, to pupils referred to the charity by parents, teachers or specialist organisations. Julia argues: Given parents' inability to forge healthy relationships and the detrimental impact this has on children, instilling relationship skills in the next generation feels like a national priority. This chimes with young people's own wishes. When the Children's Commissioner ran her recent 'Big Ask' national survey of children and young people 4 to 17, they put 'family' as their number one priority and poor family relationships as the root of their unhappiness. Parents' separation too often exposes villains and victims – and those victims too often are their children. Even when they are not tasked with spying on a parent, children risk an emotional tug of war that for some casts a long shadow over their lives. No one would wish to return to the days when two people would stay locked in a bitter, sometimes abusive, relationship. 'For the sake of the children' is no reason to stay bound to a vicious spouse or partner, but those children's welfare should be at the heart of family relationships – when they break down as well as when they stay strong. Those who ask a child to spy on their other parent seem to forget this. We are not living in the era of Nicolae Ceausescu, thank goodness, so let's not adopt any of that dictator's strategies.
