Philippines Election Results 2025: Dutertes Assert Influence

Filipinos cast their votes for the Philippine midterm elections in Antipolo City on May 12, 2025. Credit - Ryan Eduard Benaid—NurPhoto/Getty Images
The Philippines' 2025 midterm election could have marked a moment of reckoning for the decades-old populist Duterte dynasty. Its patriarch, 80-year-old former President Rodrigo, had been arrested by the International Criminal Court in March for alleged crimes against humanity. His daughter and practical successor, current Vice President Sara Duterte-Carpio, was impeached by the House in February on charges including corruption and threatening to kill political rival President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. and faces a trial before the Senate later this year.
Instead, however, the election, in which tens of millions of Filipinos braved extreme heat to vote Monday for some 18,000 national and local offices across the archipelago, marked a resurgence for the Dutertes, according to preliminary results.
Rodrigo himself and his youngest son Sebastian were elected mayor and vice mayor of Davao City, where Rodrigo previously served as mayor for more than 22 years before becoming President in 2016 and where the family has long held power. Given that Rodrigo remains in detention in The Hague, Sebastian is expected to discharge the duties of the office.
In the Senate, where Sara's fate will be decided, key Duterte allies resoundingly won re-election, including Christopher Go, Rodrigo's former aide, who was the most-voted-for senator, and Ronald dela Rosa, the former national police chief at the height of Rodrigo's deadly drug war, who ranked third in the overall vote tally. The two, who also face potential arrest by the ICC, staunchly defended the drug war during their first terms in the Senate. Another Duterte-allied lawmaker from the lower legislative chamber, Rep. Rodante Marcoleta, snagged a Senate seat. Marcoleta previously said that he would defend Sara against impeachment.
While some opponents had hoped that an electoral defeat for the Dutertes, following the other blows they'd already faced in the run-up to the vote, might once and for all push the family out of relevance, the Dutertes have instead appeared to reassert their unprecedented influence, experts say. 'You're talking about a President who was more popular when he stepped out of office than when he assumed office,' says Aries Arugay, who chairs the department of political science at the University of the Philippines. Rodrigo's drug war, like similar ones in Colombia, Mexico, and Thailand, may have earned international criticism, but it also similarly won a significant amount of domestic support, says Arugay, 'because of their visuality and their ability to sow fear, which is often a proxy for effectiveness.'
Emily Soriano's family did not believe it at first when they heard of Rodrigo Duterte's shocking arrest on March 11. Like many other families in the Philippines, hers had held off on their sighs of relief until Duterte was flown to the Netherlands later that evening to face charges related to his brutal anti-drug campaign that human rights groups say killed more than 30,000 people.
Soriano's son, who was 15, was among seven people killed in Caloocan, Metro Manila, in December 2016, as part of that campaign. 'Since 2017 up until today, we've long called for an end to the killings, and for Duterte and the policemen to be held to account,' Soriano tells TIME tearily. 'That call hasn't gone to waste,' she added.
Indeed, Rodrigo's arrest was no certainty. For years, he and his allies had fought the ICC to avoid accountability. But as the Dutertes' rivalry with the powerful Marcoses, who have their own despotic family history, intensified—Rodrigo and Marcos Jr. have traded criticisms over foreign and domestic policy as well as accusations of drug use, and Sara has stepped up her interest in succeeding Marcos Jr. in the 2028 presidential election—the government led by the Marcoses and their allies proved less willing to protect the controversial Duterte family that it had once entered into a delicate alliance with to win the presidency in 2022.
But while Soriano waits for Rodrigo's ultimate fate to be decided before the ICC, she admits that back home the specter of a Duterte return to power looms. While some observers previously suggested that Rodrigo's arrest could mark the beginning of the end for the dynasty, the midterm election results appear to show otherwise.
'This is not the end,' Sara Duterte-Carpio said in a statement after the election. 'It's a renewed beginning.' The Vice President framed her family's and their allies' showing in the polls as the start of an opposition movement against the Marcos-led government. 'We will continue to hold the government accountable, advocate for the issues that matter, and work tirelessly to serve as a strong and constructive opposition,' she said.
For Marcos, the final years of his presidency will now likely be marked by further division and challenges. Once extremely popular, he has seen his approval ratings plummet partly due to his Administration's performance on addressing domestic issues, such as rising costs of living and concerns about corruption, but also in large part because of the rival dynastic feud. The Dutertes and their allies have claimed that Sara's impeachment and Rodrigo's arrest were politically motivated and used both to consolidate support, especially in the southern part of the Philippines, a historic Duterte stronghold.
Sara's public ratings went up after her father's arrest, while senatorial candidates allied with the Dutertes like Go and Dela Rosa also saw boosts in opinion polls. The Dutertes' supporters 'were not that noisy prior to the arrest,' says Arugay.
Richard Heydarian, a Manila-based political analyst who lectures at the University of the Philippines, says the boost could also be in part attributed to disinformation campaigns. Reuters reported in April that a network of social media accounts sprang up in the wake of Rodrigo's arrest, coordinating praise of the Dutertes and attacks on the ICC and Marcoses. Israel-based Cyabra, the tech firm that discovered the network, told Reuters the disinformation campaigns 'shaped the conversation' in the lead-up to the elections.
Still, neither the Dutertes nor the Marcoses have an easy path ahead. While the next electoral competition will be for the presidency in 2028, the most immediate battleground will be in the Senate, which will reconvene in June. And despite key electoral victories for the Dutertes—including Marcos Jr.'s own sister Imee, who broke with her family to back the Dutertes and also appears on track to win a Senate seat—Marcos allies appear to have retained six of the 12 seats up for election in the 24-member chamber.
Public opinion polls consistently show that Sara is most Filipinos' preferred candidate to succeed Marcos come 2028, but an impeachment conviction, which requires a two-thirds majority vote, would bar her from public office for good under local law.
For people like Soriano, however, the elections are about more than political stratagem and determining which family holds the most nominal power. It's about how they will wield it. In office, Duterte's lieutenants, she fears, 'are likely to continue what Duterte left behind.'
Contact us at letters@time.com.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Boston Globe

22 minutes ago

• Boston Globe

GOP tax bill would ease regulations on gun silencers and some rifles and shotguns

Advertisement Republicans who have long supported the changes, along with the gun industry, say the tax infringes on Second Amendment rights. They say silencers are mostly used by hunters and target shooters for sport. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'Burdensome regulations and unconstitutional taxes shouldn't stand in the way of protecting American gun owners' hearing,' said Clyde, who owns two gun stores in Georgia and often wears a pin shaped like an assault rifle on his suit lapel. Democrats are fighting to stop the provision, which was unveiled days after two Minnesota state legislators were shot in their homes, as the bill speeds through the Senate. They argue that loosening regulations on silencers could make it easier for criminals and active shooters to conceal their weapons. Advertisement 'Parents don't want silencers on their streets, police don't want silencers on their streets,' said Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. The gun language has broad support among Republicans and has received little attention as House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., work to settle differences within the party on cuts to Medicaid and energy tax credits, among other issues. But it is just one of hundreds of policy and spending items included to entice members to vote for the legislation that could have broad implications if the bill is enacted within weeks, as Trump wants. Inclusion of the provision is also a sharp turn from the climate in Washington just three years ago when Democrats, like Republicans now, controlled Congress and the White House and pushed through bipartisan gun legislation. The bill increased background checks for some buyers under the age of 21, made it easier to take firearms from potentially dangerous people and sent millions of dollars to mental health services in schools. Passed in the summer of 2022, just weeks after the shooting of 19 children and two adults at a school in Uvalde, Texas, it was the most significant legislative response to gun violence in decades. Three years later, as they try to take advantage of their consolidated power in Washington, Republicans are packing as many of their longtime priorities as possible, including the gun legislation, into the massive, wide-ranging bill that Trump has called 'beautiful.' 'I'm glad the Senate is joining the House to stand up for the Second Amendment and our Constitution, and I will continue to fight for these priorities as the Senate works to pass President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill,' said Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who was one of the lead negotiators on the bipartisan gun bill in 2022 but is now facing a primary challenge from the right in his bid for reelection next year. Advertisement If the gun provisions remain in the larger legislation and it is passed, silencers and the short-barrel rifles and shotguns would lose an extra layer of regulation that they are subject to under the National Firearms Act, passed in the 1930s in response to concerns about mafia violence. They would still be subject to the same regulations that apply to most other guns — and that includes possible loopholes that allow some gun buyers to avoid background checks when guns are sold privately or online. Larry Keane of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, who supports the legislation, says changes are aimed at helping target shooters and hunters protect their hearing. He argues that the use of silencers in violent crimes is rare. 'All it's ever intended to do is to reduce the report of the firearm to hearing safe levels,' Keane says. Speaking on the floor before the bill passed the House, Rep. Clyde said the bill restores Second Amendment rights from 'over 90 years of draconian taxes.' Clyde said Johnson included his legislation in the larger bill 'with the purest of motive.' 'Who asked for it? I asked,' said Clyde, who ultimately voted for the bill after the gun silencer provision was added. Clyde was responding to Rep. Maxwell Frost, a 28-year-old Florida Democrat, who went to the floor and demanded to know who was responsible for the gun provision. Frost, who was a gun-control activist before being elected to Congress, called himself a member of the 'mass shooting generation' and said the bill would help 'gun manufacturers make more money off the death of children and our people.' Advertisement Among other concerns, control advocates say less regulation for silencers could make it harder for law enforcement to stop an active shooter. 'There's a reason silencers have been regulated for nearly a century: They make it much harder for law enforcement and bystanders to react quickly to gunshots,' said John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety. Schumer and other Democrats are trying to convince the Senate parliamentarian to drop the language as she reviews the bill for policy provisions that aren't budget-related. 'Senate Democrats will fight this provision at the parliamentary level and every other level with everything we've got,' Schumer said earlier this month.

Boston Globe

31 minutes ago

• Boston Globe

GOP can't include limits on Trump lawsuits in megabill, Senate official rules

'Individual district judges -- who don't even have authority over any of the other 92 district courts -- are single-handedly vetoing policies the American people elected President Trump to implement,' Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, chairm of the Judiciary Committee, said in announcing the proposal in March. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Republicans are pushing their bill to carry out Trump's agenda through Congress using special rules that shield legislation from a filibuster, depriving Democrats of the ability to block it. But to qualify for that protection, the legislation must only include proposals that directly change federal spending and not add to long-term deficits. Advertisement The Senate parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, makes such judgments. She ruled that the measure did not meet the requirements, according to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. 'Senate Republicans tried to write Donald Trump's contempt for the courts into law -- gutting judicial enforcement, defying the Constitution, and bulldozing the very rule of law that forms our democracy,' Schumer said in a statement. 'It was nothing short of an assault on the system of checks and balances that has anchored this nation since its founding.' Advertisement Senate Republicans sought to target the preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders that often block administration policies. Republicans in the House passed a measure in their version of their party's major policy bill to impose limits on federal judges' power to hold people in contempt. The actions came as federal judges have opened inquiries about whether to hold the Trump administration in contempt for violating their orders in cases related to its aggressive deportation efforts. The decision on Sunday is part of a broader review MacDonough is conducting of the Republican-written legislation, which includes large tax cuts and reductions in social programs such as Medicaid and food stamps. She ruled that Republicans could include in their bill a divisive measure that would block states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., opposes that provision and has said he intends to introduce an amendment to try to kill the measure. MacDonough also rejected a GOP plan to push some of the costs of nutrition assistance, formerly known as SNAP, onto the states, a ruling that has sent Republicans back to the drawing board to find another strategy for covering tens of billions of dollars of the bill's cost. She was expected to work into the week evaluating the measure and instructing Republicans to strip out any provision she deems out of order, including whether they can use a budget trick that would make extending the 2017 tax cuts appear to be free. Advertisement If Republicans fail to remove the measures she deems out of order, Democrats could challenge the bill on the floor, forcing Republicans to muster 60 votes to advance it. That would effectively kill the legislation since Democrats are solidly opposed. This article originally appeared in

New York Post

2 hours ago

• New York Post

Teen girls among 145 stabbed with syringes across France at popular music festival, 12 sickos arrested

Nearly 150 concertgoers, many of them teenage girls, were jabbed with a syringe in a bizarre attack at a nationwide music festival in France Saturday, and a dozen suspects have been nabbed in connection with the disturbing barrage, according to officials. Local and national law enforcement are investigating the wave of deranged incidents in which suspects wielding syringes with unknown contents jabbed 145 victims at the popular Fêtes de la Musique, or World Music Day, celebrations across the country, causing several to be hospitalized. 3 Police in France are investigating a bizarre syringe attack at Saturday's Fêtes de la Musique, or World Music Day, celebrations on Saturday. POOL/AFP via Getty Images The first attack was reported to police at 9:15 p.m. on the Rue du Palais in Metz in northeastern France, according to Mayor François Grosdidie. Authorities received a report of a suspect involved in one of the attacks and used security footage to track him down, Grosdidie said. 'The municipal police identified him on Rue Serpenoise, arrested him, and made him available to the National Police and the Justice Department,' he added. 'I hope that the investigation, particularly through the examination of his cellphone, will lead to the identification of other attackers.' Firefighters responded promptly to each attack, deploying seven emergency vehicles and creating a staging area for the victims on Place d'Armes, Grosdidie said. French officials were anticipating unprecedented crowds for this year's Fêtes de la Musique, a free music festival held every year on the summer solstice. 3 Millions of people across France attended Saturday's Fêtes de la Musique. Abdullah Firas/ABACA/Shutterstock It showcases a mix of professional and amateur musicians who play at different venues, including parks and street corners in cities across the country. Officials estimated that 50,000 people attended the concerts in Metz while 'unprecedented crowds' descended upon Paris. Across France, there were millions of people who took to the streets Saturday evening for the festival, according to La Monde. None of them were deterred by posts on Snapchat and other social media sites warning of the bizarre syringe attack. The Interior Ministry said 145 victims across the nation reported being stabbed with needles, with Paris police officials probing 13 cases in the capital. Officials did not specify if the syringes were filled with date-rape drugs such as Rohypnol or GHB, used by sexual assailants to make women and girls vulnerable to sexual assault, La Monde reported. As of Sunday, at least three people reported feeling sick after getting jabbed by the syringe-wielding maniacs. 3 Police arrested 12 suspects whom they believe were involved in the twisted syringe attacks, the Interior Ministry said. AFP via Getty Images 'Some victims were taken to hospital for toxicological tests,' the ministry said. Police arrested 12 suspects whom they believe were involved in the twisted syringe attacks, the Interior Ministry said. The attackers are believed to have targeted around 50 victims, a police source told La Monde.