Case of mother who died during forced sterilisation in Peru to be heard in court
The case of a forced sterilisation carried out in Peru in the 1990s will be heard by an international court on Thursday, 28 years after the procedure – one of many thousands – resulted in a woman's death.
Celia Ramos was 34 when she died in 1997, 19 days after surgery for a tubal ligation caused respiratory failure. The mother of three was 'harassed' into accepting the procedure, which was part of a nationwide family planning programme.
The mass sterilisation of hundreds of thousands of largely poor, rural and Indigenous women in the 1990s is regarded as one of the country's most flagrant and widespread violations of human rights under the late former president Alberto Fujimori, but neither the leader nor his health ministers have ever been prosecuted for the campaign, which lasted years.
In 2024, the UN committee on the elimination of discrimination against women urged Peru to compensate women who were forcibly sterilised in the 1990s, ruling that the state policy could constitute a 'crime against humanity'.
Marisela Monzón Ramos, 38, was just 10 years old when her mother died. The eldest of Ramos's three daughters, she was in Guatemala City for Thursday's hearing at the inter-American court of human rights.
'This is a huge step for us, considering the years of struggle. It has been nearly three decades since my mother died,' she told the Guardian before the hearing.
'[This hearing] gives us the opportunity that we have not had in our country.
'We are looking for justice. The Peruvian state should be held responsible for the death of our mother, who was completely healthy,' she said.
While this is the first case of a forced sterilisation in Peru to reach the inter-American court, the Celia Ramos case is representative of thousands of others, says Carmen Cecilia Martínez, an associate director at the Center for Reproductive Rights.
'The court's decision could force the Peruvian state to make reparations to the victims of this case and open the way to justice for others,' she said.
Demus, a Peruvian NGO for women's rights, presented the Celia Ramos case to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) in 2010. Eleven years later, an IACHR report declared that the Peruvian state was responsible for the violation of Ramos' rights and recommended the adoption of measures of reparation and non-repetition. However, as Peru made no progress in complying with the recommendations, the commission sent the case to the inter-American court in June 2023. The legal representation was bolstered by the regional Center for Justice and International Law (Cejil) and the Center for Reproductive Rights, which joined in the same year.
Martínez says successive health ministers under Fujimori turned the forced sterilisations into public policy, offering financial incentives to medical workers for each woman who was subjected to the procedure.
'The objective was very clear: to recruit women from poor areas, Indigenous, rural peasant women and eliminate their reproductive capacity, violating, among other rights, their right to reproductive autonomy,' Martínez said.
The legal team's hope, she explained, is for the court to declare the policy a crime against humanity, which would eliminate any statute of limitations on opening investigations.
'There is a very clear causal link between the violation of [Ramos's] informed consent and her death,' Martínez said.
Monzón, a biologist, says the whole family, who lived in Peru's northern Piura region, were left 'devastated' by her mother's death. 'Our life was cut short,' she said. She and her younger sister recall how nurses repeatedly put pressure on their mother, who initially refused the procedure.
'She was a young woman, a very joyful woman, full of life,' she said. 'She was a complete mother, a devoted wife, a lady who took care to be attentive for the good of all the beings she loved.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Hot-air balloon crash kills at least eight people in Brazil
A hot-air balloon caught fire in the state of Santa Catarina on Saturday morning. Renan Fernandes, of the Santa Catarina fire brigade, said: 'Twenty-one people were present, eight of whom died and 13 survived.' According to the fire department, 13 survivors were transported to nearby hospitals.
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
Asylum seekers allowed to stay because of high blood pressure
An elderly Sri Lankan couple won the right to stay in the UK after claiming that treatment for high blood pressure in their home country was 'inadequate'. The unnamed husband and wife, who are in their late 60s, came to Britain to visit their daughter and son-in-law in 2022. But two months later they claimed asylum, and when this was denied by the Home Office they successfully appealed. The husband told an immigration tribunal he was suffering from depression, severe anxiety, hypertension and diabetes and suggested he was 'unwilling' to access care in the South Asian nation. An asylum judge agreed that sending them back would breach their human rights. The Home Office challenged the ruling that they could stay because of poor quality medical treatment in Sri Lanka by arguing the first judge had not shown that the husband was 'seriously ill'. But the Upper Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber disagreed and ruled in favour of their claim. The hearing was told that the couple, who were granted anonymity by the court, entered the UK in May 2022. In July that year the husband made a claim for asylum with his wife as a dependent, alleging a fear of persecution due to threats made by the family of another son-in-law. They then brought further claims on protection and human rights grounds that were rejected by the Home Office in February last year. The husband appealed the decision at a First-tier Tribunal, where he confirmed they were not challenging the protection or asylum decisions, just the human rights claim. He made his argument under Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), respectively covering inhumane or degrading treatment and the right to a family life. The husband submitted that he would not be able to get adequate care in Sri Lanka for his depression, severe anxiety, high blood pressure and diabetes. The couple also claimed there was a 'real risk' they could commit suicide if they were forced to return to their home country based on their mental state and 'subjective fear'. Their appeal was granted by the First-tier Tribunal. The Home Office chose to appeal the asylum tribunal's findings, arguing that 'inadequacy' of treatment is not the same as someone being unable to access it. Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Stuart Neilson found that there was no legal error by the First-tier tribunal. The judge dismissed the Home Office's appeal, meaning the First-tier Tribunal's decision stands and the couple will be allowed to remain in the UK. He said: 'Finally on the issue of the First-tier Tribunal referencing both the 'inadequacy' of the treatment and the 'willingness' of the respondent to undertake any treatment in Sri Lanka I do not consider that the use of this language in the determination represents an error of law. 'The inadequacy of the treatment may amount to absence of appropriate treatment and depending upon the circumstances both 'willingness' and the 'inadequacy' of the treatment may have some relevance to the issue of access.'
Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
WOAH considers Brazil bird flu outbreak on commercial farm resolved
SAO PAULO, June 20 (Reuters) - The World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) considers a bird flu outbreak on a commercial farm in Brazil as "resolved," a page detailing the case on WOAH's website showed on Friday. Earlier this week, Brazil, the world's largest poultry exporter, declared itself free of bird flu in commercial flocks after observing a 28-day period without any new commercial farm outbreaks.
