States of Guernsey to axe IT provider
The States of Guernsey is set to axe its contract with IT infrastructure company Agilisys by the end of July - half way through its 10-year tenure.
It follows a critical report of Agilisys' digital services across a range of government departments, published earlier this year.
The move will see IT provided by multiple providers which the States said would improve accountability and the reliability of services for islanders.
Agilisys has been approached for comment.
The Policy & Resources Committee (P&R) said the decision to terminate the current contract was unanimous and in the "best interests of the States, and the wider community which relies on the many IT systems we have for the effective delivery of public services".
Boley Smillie, chief executive and head of the public service, said the move would ensure better value for money for taxpayers.
Mr Smillie said switching to a "multi-vendor model" would deliver better specialist services.
He said: "We must keep pace with digital solutions that the community not only expects but deserves, solutions that make our services more efficient, and responsive to the needs of the Bailiwick."
Agilisys signed a £200m contract for the delivery of the majority of States IT services in 2019 but faced major IT outages and concerns over the number of staff with technical expertise to deliver service.
Gé Drossaert, The States' chief digital and information officer, said: "This new model will increase supplier accountability to deliver, unlike the current model where we have been reliant on one provider only, as we will have relationships with a range of providers."
The States said it was currently in discussions behind the scenes with a range of providers to take on the work and this would be announced at a later date.
Follow BBC Guernsey on X and Facebook. Send your story ideas to channel.islands@bbc.co.uk.
'Serious mistakes' in handling of IT contract
Old kit and lack of maintenance behind IT outages
Policy & Resources Committee
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
The Living Wage a Family of Four Needs in All 50 States
If you're raising a family of four in 2025, you'll need a six-figure income in 26 states. That's more than half of America where you'll need to earn $100,000 or more annually to budget for and comfortably raise a family. Check Out: Learn More: GOBankingRates surveyed annual living expenses for a family of four across the United States using data from the 2023 Consumer Expenditure Survey and for a married couple with children from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 'Living wage' is defined as the income required to cover 50% necessities, 30% discretionary spending and 20% for savings. Using the 50-30-20 budget rule, the study doubled the total annual expenditure on necessities to determine the 'living wage' for a family of four in each state. Ranked in order from states from the lowest to highest earnings, here's how much living wage is necessary for families of four. Living wage for a family of four: $82,338 Annual cost of housing: $13,454 Annual cost of groceries: $5,731 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,465 Also See: Discover More: Living wage for a family of four: $87,564 Annual cost of housing: $15,846 Annual cost of groceries: $6,750 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,373 Explore More: Living wage for a family of four: $87,607 Annual cost of housing: $15,670 Annual cost of groceries: $6,675 Annual cost of healthcare: $6,949 Living wage for a family of four: $87,944 Annual cost of housing: $15,517 Annual cost of groceries: $6,610 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,141 Living wage for a family of four: $88,312 Annual cost of housing: $16,504 Annual cost of groceries: $7,030 Annual cost of healthcare: $6,617 Living wage for a family of four: $90,659 Annual cost of housing: $16,394 Annual cost of groceries: $6,984 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,658 Living wage for a family of four: $91,667 Annual cost of housing: $16,548 Annual cost of groceries: $7,049 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,458 Find Out: Living wage for a family of four: $91,669 Annual cost of housing: $17,250 Annual cost of groceries: $7,348 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,064 Living wage for a family of four: $92,179 Annual cost of housing: $18,172 Annual cost of groceries: $7,741 Annual cost of healthcare: $6,756 Living wage for a family of four: $93,349 Annual cost of housing: $17,075 Annual cost of groceries: $7,274 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,820 Living wage for a family of four: $93,544 Annual cost of housing: $16,965 Annual cost of groceries: $7,227 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,535 Living wage for a family of four: $93,807 Annual cost of housing: $17,228 Annual cost of groceries: $7,339 Annual cost of healthcare: $6,987 See More: Living wage for a family of four: $94,102 Annual cost of housing: $17,448 Annual cost of groceries: $7,432 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,820 Living wage for a family of four: $94,682 Annual cost of housing: $17,382 Annual cost of groceries: $7,404 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,550 Living wage for a family of four: $94,752 Annual cost of housing: $17,514 Annual cost of groceries: $7,461 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,152 Living wage for a family of four: $95,480 Annual cost of housing: $18,523 Annual cost of groceries: $7,891 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,342 Living wage for a family of four: $95,763 Annual cost of housing: $17,843 Annual cost of groceries: $7,601 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,319 Read More: Living wage for a family of four: $96,130 Annual cost of housing: $18,633 Annual cost of groceries: $7,937 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,105 Living wage for a family of four: $96,640 Annual cost of housing: $17,623 Annual cost of groceries: $7,507 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,090 Living wage for a family of four: $96,870 Annual cost of housing: $18,567 Annual cost of groceries: $7,909 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,450 Living wage for a family of four: $98,082 Annual cost of housing: $18,962 Annual cost of groceries: $8,078 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,203 Living wage for a family of four: $98,427 Annual cost of housing: $18,326 Annual cost of groceries: $7,806 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,072 Read Next: Living wage for a family of four: $98,585 Annual cost of housing: $18,040 Annual cost of groceries: $7,685 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,110 Living wage for a family of four: $99,453 Annual cost of housing: $19,226 Annual cost of groceries: $8,190 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,488 Living wage for a family of four: $100,000 Annual cost of housing: $19,686 Annual cost of groceries: $8,386 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,805 Living wage for a family of four: $100,332 Annual cost of housing: $18,479 Annual cost of groceries: $7,872 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,758 Living wage for a family of four: $100,750 Annual cost of housing: $19,774 Annual cost of groceries: $8,423 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,751 Find More: Living wage for a family of four: $104,582 Annual cost of housing: $20,981 Annual cost of groceries: $8,938 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,044 Living wage for a family of four: $107,042 Annual cost of housing: $21,179 Annual cost of groceries: $9,022 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,828 Living wage for a family of four: $107,324 Annual cost of housing: $21,618 Annual cost of groceries: $9,209 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,128 Living wage for a family of four: $107,412 Annual cost of housing: $21,749 Annual cost of groceries: $9,265 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,820 Living wage for a family of four: $111,303 Annual cost of housing: $22,781 Annual cost of groceries: $9,704 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,198 Explore Next: Living wage for a family of four: $112,401 Annual cost of housing: $23,637 Annual cost of groceries: $10,069 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,350 Living wage for a family of four: $112,828 Annual cost of housing: $23,615 Annual cost of groceries: $10,060 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,982 Living wage for a family of four: $112,965 Annual cost of housing: $23,439 Annual cost of groceries: $9,985 Annual cost of healthcare: $6,486 Living wage for a family of four: $123,298 Annual cost of housing: $25,107 Annual cost of groceries: $10,695 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,260 Living wage for a family of four: $123,863 Annual cost of housing: $25,502 Annual cost of groceries: $10,864 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,506 For You: Living wage for a family of four: $126,753 Annual cost of housing: $25,722 Annual cost of groceries: $10,957 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,661 Living wage for a family of four: $128,484 Annual cost of housing: $28,465 Annual cost of groceries: $12,126 Annual cost of healthcare: $6,925 Living wage for a family of four: $131,024 Annual cost of housing: $27,807 Annual cost of groceries: $11,845 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,977 Living wage for a family of four: $131,102 Annual cost of housing: $29,848 Annual cost of groceries: $12,715 Annual cost of healthcare: $6,918 Living wage for a family of four: $131,824 Annual cost of housing: $28,904 Annual cost of groceries: $12,313 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,637 Trending Now: Living wage for a family of four: $131,996 Annual cost of housing: $29,211 Annual cost of groceries: $12,444 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,738 Living wage for a family of four: $134,990 Annual cost of housing: $30,331 Annual cost of groceries: $12,920 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,229 Living wage for a family of four: $135,943 Annual cost of housing: $29,804 Annual cost of groceries: $12,696 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,707 Living wage for a family of four: $136,990 Annual cost of housing: $25,854 Annual cost of groceries: $11,013 Annual cost of healthcare: $11,290 Living wage for a family of four: $155,738 Annual cost of housing: $37,354 Annual cost of groceries: $15,912 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,607 Discover More: Living wage for a family of four: $188,269 Annual cost of housing: $45,891 Annual cost of groceries: $19,549 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,213 Living wage for a family of four: $199,671 Annual cost of housing: $49,600 Annual cost of groceries: $21,129 Annual cost of healthcare: $10,033 Living wage for a family of four: $258,918 Annual cost of housing: $66,412 Annual cost of groceries: $28,290 Annual cost of healthcare: $9,540 Heather Taylor contributed to the reporting for this piece. Methodology: GOBankingRates surveyed annual living expenses for a family of four in all 50 states, using the 2023 Consumer Expenditure Survey (latest available) data for a married couple with children (oldest child 6-17) from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The itemized costs of living evaluated were housing, groceries, utilities, healthcare and transportation, collectively termed 'necessities.' Based on each state's respective cost-of-living index for each category, sourced from the Missouri Economic Research and Information Center's 2024 Q3 Cost of Living Data Series, the study calculated the annual cost of each necessity and summed them up to find total annual expenditure on necessities. Using the 50-30-20 budget rule, which allocates 50% of income for necessities, the study doubled the total annual expenditure on necessities in order to determine the 'living wage' for a family of four in each state. 'Living wage' is defined as the income required to be able to cover 50% necessities, 30% discretionary/luxury spending and 20% for savings. All data was collected on and is up to date as of Dec. 11, 2024. More From GOBankingRates 5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on The Living Wage a Family of Four Needs in All 50 States Sign in to access your portfolio
Washington Post
2 days ago
- Washington Post
Purdue Pharma's $7B opioid settlement plan could get votes from victims and cities
OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma 's $7 billion-plus plan to settle thousands of lawsuits over the toll of opioids will go before a judge Friday, potentially setting up votes on whether to accept it for local governments, people who became addicted to the drug and other groups. This month, 49 states announced they have signed on to the the proposal. Only Oklahoma, which has a separate settlement with the company, is not involved.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
How artificial intelligence controls your health insurance coverage
Over the past decade, health insurance companies have increasingly embraced the use of artificial intelligence algorithms. Unlike doctors and hospitals, which use AI to help diagnose and treat patients, health insurers use these algorithms to decide whether to pay for health care treatments and services that are recommended by a given patient's physicians. One of the most common examples is prior authorization, which is when your doctor needs to receive payment approval from your insurance company before providing you care. Many insurers use an algorithm to decide whether the requested care is 'medically necessary' and should be covered. These AI systems also help insurers decide how much care a patient is entitled to — for example, how many days of hospital care a patient can receive after surgery. If an insurer declines to pay for a treatment your doctor recommends, you usually have three options. You can try to appeal the decision, but that process can take a lot of time, money and expert help. Only 1 in 500 claim denials are appealed. You can agree to a different treatment that your insurer will cover. Or you can pay for the recommended treatment yourself, which is often not realistic because of high health care costs. As a legal scholar who studies health law and policy, I'm concerned about how insurance algorithms affect people's health. Like with AI algorithms used by doctors and hospitals, these tools can potentially improve care and reduce costs. Insurers say that AI helps them make quick, safe decisions about what care is necessary and avoids wasteful or harmful treatments. But there's strong evidence that the opposite can be true. These systems are sometimes used to delay or deny care that should be covered, all in the name of saving money. Presumably, companies feed a patient's health care records and other relevant information into health care coverage algorithms and compare that information with current medical standards of care to decide whether to cover the patient's claim. However, insurers have refused to disclose how these algorithms work in making such decisions, so it is impossible to say exactly how they operate in practice. Using AI to review coverage saves insurers time and resources, especially because it means fewer medical professionals are needed to review each case. But the financial benefit to insurers doesn't stop there. If an AI system quickly denies a valid claim, and the patient appeals, that appeal process can take years. If the patient is seriously ill and expected to die soon, the insurance company might save money simply by dragging out the process in the hope that the patient dies before the case is resolved. This creates the disturbing possibility that insurers might use algorithms to withhold care for expensive, long-term or terminal health problems , such as chronic or other debilitating disabilities. One reporter put it bluntly: 'Many older adults who spent their lives paying into Medicare now face amputation or cancer and are forced to either pay for care themselves or go without.' Research supports this concern – patients with chronic illnesses are more likely to be denied coverage and suffer as a result. In addition, Black and Hispanic people and those of other nonwhite ethnicities, as well as people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender, are more likely to experience claims denials. Some evidence also suggests that prior authorization may increase rather than decrease health care system costs. Insurers argue that patients can always pay for any treatment themselves, so they're not really being denied care. But this argument ignores reality. These decisions have serious health consequences, especially when people can't afford the care they need. Unlike medical algorithms, insurance AI tools are largely unregulated. They don't have to go through Food and Drug Administration review, and insurance companies often say their algorithms are trade secrets. That means there's no public information about how these tools make decisions, and there's no outside testing to see whether they're safe, fair or effective. No peer-reviewed studies exist to show how well they actually work in the real world. There does seem to be some momentum for change. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, which is the federal agency in charge of Medicare and Medicaid, recently announced that insurers in Medicare Advantage plans must base decisions on the needs of individual patients – not just on generic criteria. But these rules still let insurers create their own decision-making standards, and they still don't require any outside testing to prove their systems work before using them. Plus, federal rules can only regulate federal public health programs like Medicare. They do not apply to private insurers who do not provide federal health program coverage. Some states, including Colorado, Georgia, Florida, Maine and Texas, have proposed laws to rein in insurance AI. A few have passed new laws, including a 2024 California statute that requires a licensed physician to supervise the use of insurance coverage algorithms. But most state laws suffer from the same weaknesses as the new CMS rule. They leave too much control in the hands of insurers to decide how to define 'medical necessity' and in what contexts to use algorithms for coverage decisions. They also don't require those algorithms to be reviewed by neutral experts before use. And even strong state laws wouldn't be enough, because states generally can't regulate Medicare or insurers that operate outside their borders. In the view of many health law experts, the gap between insurers' actions and patient needs has become so wide that regulating health care coverage algorithms is now imperative. As I argue in an essay to be published in the Indiana Law Journal, the FDA is well positioned to do so. The FDA is staffed with medical experts who have the capability to evaluate insurance algorithms before they are used to make coverage decisions. The agency already reviews many medical AI tools for safety and effectiveness. FDA oversight would also provide a uniform, national regulatory scheme instead of a patchwork of rules across the country. Some people argue that the FDA's power here is limited. For the purposes of FDA regulation, a medical device is defined as an instrument 'intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease.' Because health insurance algorithms are not used to diagnose, treat or prevent disease, Congress may need to amend the definition of a medical device before the FDA can regulate those algorithms. If the FDA's current authority isn't enough to cover insurance algorithms, Congress could change the law to give it that power. Meanwhile, CMS and state governments could require independent testing of these algorithms for safety, accuracy and fairness. That might also push insurers to support a single national standard – like FDA regulation – instead of facing a patchwork of rules across the country. The move toward regulating how health insurers use AI in determining coverage has clearly begun, but it is still awaiting a robust push. Patients' lives are literally on the line. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Jennifer D. Oliva, Indiana University Read more: Artificial intelligence in medicine raises legal and ethical concerns How can Congress regulate AI? Erect guardrails, ensure accountability and address monopolistic power Beyond AI regulation: How government and industry can team up to make the technology safer without hindering innovation Jennifer D. Oliva currently receives funding from NIDA to research the impact of pharmaceutical industry messaging on the opioid crisis among U.S. Military Veterans. She is affiliated with the UCSF/University of California College of the Law, San Francisco Consortium on Law, Science & Health Policy and Georgetown University Law Center O'Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law.
