Think you're tough? Arnold Schwarzenegger has 4 fitness tests that might just predict your ‘expiration date'
You think 'bodybuilding' and Arnold Schwarzenegger immediately springs to mind — he's the kingpin of the sport, after all. Now you can test yourself against four fitness tests designed to predict longevity and overall health without expensive tests or kit.
These tests are totally free of charge and available via Arnold's The Pump app. Yep, he's gone and put the tests in front of the app's paywall, the legend.
During each test, you'll focus on a different area of health, which can indicate your overall potential longevity. Expect push-ups, sit-to-stand ability, grip strength and balance to all go under the microscope.
Here's how you can take the tests, and what they mean for your health.
'The Arnold Fitness Tests are backed by published research,' Arnie's team writes. 'Each takes less than a minute. And they provide instant feedback to help you understand if you're in the danger zone — or in peak condition.'
For example, the push-up test score may indicate your risk of heart disease, while the grip strength test is a 'powerful indicator of overall mortality.'
Sit-to-stand testing checks in with your overall coordination, functional strength and mobility, then the one-leg balance test is 'associated with brain health and longevity.'
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
To take the tests, simply:
Are you ready?
According to the team, the one-minute push-up test 'could tell you more about your heart health and longevity than a treadmill stress test.'
The aim is to do as many push-ups as you can without stopping in 60 seconds. If you pause, drop to your knees, or lose form, you must stop and record your score.
This test is based on a Harvard study published in JAMA Network Open.
Learn how to do a push-up step-by-step first, ensuring your hips stay aligned with your shoulders and your chest reaches the ground with every rep — no half or quarter reps. This will set you up for success while completing the fitness test.
Looking to score high? Incredibly, the study found a 96% lower risk of heart disease in those completing 40 or more reps compared to those finishing with 10 or fewer.
There's a fair whack of research that shows grip strength can predict longevity; those with weaker grip have shown across different ages and sexes to have a higher risk of mortality.
For this one, you'll need a set of dumbbells — I recommend adjustable dumbbells so that you can scale the weights accordingly — or use kettlebells, or a grip dynamometer.
Using a neutral grip (palms facing your sides), lift the heaviest weight you can using one hand, then hold it at your side. Squeeze the handle as hard as possible for five seconds. There should be no other body part helping you to maintain your grip at any time.
Increase the weight to the heaviest possible you can hold without dropping the weight or losing control. Remember to give it a good squeeze and hold still.
Balance can tell you a surprising amount about your health. One study published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine found that a 10-second one-leg balance test could help predict longevity, and it remains one of the strongest mortality predictors around for older people.
In theory, this test is simple: stand on one leg for as long as you can without wobbling, stepping your foot down, or hopping about. No holding on to anything for support or opening your eyes, either!
Arnie's team recommends holding your phone in one hand and putting your free arm across your chest. Start a timer, then lift one leg so that your thigh is perpendicular to your torso, like you're marching. Close your eyes and try to hold. Once you fall, log your score, then repeat on the opposite leg.
Sitting down and standing up seem easy, right? But it can tell you a lot about your functional strength and mobility. You just need a chair or a bench for this test.
Sit in the chair and cross your arms over your chest. Next, start the timer, then stand up and sit back down as many times as possible in 30 seconds. Count your reps and record them at the end.
Avoid using any assistance, which includes the arms of the chair. Keep your arms crossed and make sure you fully extend at your hips and knees as you stand, then fully touch the chair with your butt as you sit — avoid the 'touch-and-go' by fully sitting each rep.
Although a dated study, a piece of research published in 2012 found this test to be a "significant predictor of mortality" in those over 50, and many medical institutions still use similar tests during health exams.
Although these types of tests have been around for a while, now you can test yourself under the guidance of Arnie. All you need to do is download the app!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
DNA could be preventing you from shedding pounds: Study
Add genetic makeup to the reasons you can't lose weight. New research from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Ben Gurion University in Israel revealed that one-third of people who followed a healthy diet didn't lose any weight, although they did experience health benefits. The study's participants exhibited 'significant improvements' in cardio-metabolic markers, such as cholesterol, lower levels of hunger hormone leptin and less visceral fat, which is found 'deep inside' the abdominal cavity, according to a news release, per the New York Post. The research findings were published in the European Journal of Preventative Cardiology. The study analyzed changes in weight and health for 761 individuals in Israel who had abdominal obesity. During three trials, participants were assigned to specific healthy diets, including low-fat, low-carb, Mediterranean and green-Mediterranean diets, for 18 to 24 months. Across all the clinical trials, 36% of participants achieved 'clinically significant' weight loss, while 36% achieved moderate weight loss. Meanwhile, 28% lost no weight or even gained weight. Those who were resistant to weight loss, mostly older individuals and women, showed the same health improvements as the participants who lost weight. 'We have been conditioned to equate weight loss with health, and weight-loss-resistant individuals are often labeled as failures,' lead study author Anat Yaskolka Meir, postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Epidemiology at Harvard Chan School, wrote in a statement. The study, which was funded by the German Research Foundation, did have some limitations. Most participants were men, researchers said, adding that similar studies should focus on women in the future. Dr. Philip Rabito, an endocrinologist and weight-loss specialist in New York City, told Fox News Digital in an interview that the study findings support what he's experienced in his own practice. 'There are likely genetic factors that affect an individual's ability to lose weight,' said Rabito, who wasn't involved in the study. 'Simply stated, despite similar efforts, caloric restriction and lifestyle interventions, some patients lose more weight than others.' Some individuals will not respond 'as robustly' to interventions like others, although this can be overcome with correct guidance, Rabito said. 'With proper counselling, dedication and adherence to a lifestyle program, all patients should be able to appreciate weight loss,' he said. 'Even if there is minimal or no weight loss, the study shows that there are still improvements in health parameters just from participating in a weight-loss program.' For those who don't lose weight with traditional weight-loss programs, prescription medications may be an option, he added. Manoel Galvao Neto, M.D., director of bariatric research at Orlando Health Weight Loss and Bariatric Surgery Institute, agreed that DNA can influence weight loss. 'It is a true combination of genetic factors, and it affects the metabolism, appetite, fat storage and response to diet and exercise,' he said in a separate interview with Fox News Digital. Based on emerging research, Neto said that obesity treatment can be more easily personalized, allowing those with genetic setbacks to achieve their fitness goals. 'If you have the marker for 'hungry brain,' and you take the GLP-1, you maximize your weight loss by up to 20%,' the doctor said. 'Obesity is a disease that is chronic, it is progressive, and so far, we don't have a cure, but we are getting more and more information to help control it in a personalized way.' Women 45 and older could have better weight-loss success: Study Carbonated water could be beneficial to weight-loss efforts: Study
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Weight loss in your 40s and 50s can help slash your chronic disease risk, researchers say
Working to lose weight in your 40s and 50s may help to reduce your risk of developing a chronic disease, a new study reveals. Researchers based in the U.K. and Finland say they found health benefits in people who lost an average of 6.5 percent of their body weight in early middle age and maintained that weight loss throughout a period of 12 to 35 years. Those benefits especially include a lessened risk for cardiovascular disease and diabetes as well as an overall lower risk of death from chronic disease. 'The benefits of lifestyle-based weight management are widely discussed even though studies have found it surprisingly difficult to demonstrate health benefits beyond the prevention of diabetes,' University of Helsinki professor Dr. Timo Strandberg said in a statement. Strandberg was the lead author of the study which was published recently in the journal JAMA Network Open, the open-access journal of the American Medical Association. To reach these conclusions, the study tracked and analyzed the health of 23,000 white Europeans who were between the ages of 30 and 50 years old using data from three studies, conducted from 1985 to 1988, from 1964 to 1973, and between 2000 and 2013. They sorted the participants into four groups: people with persistent healthy weight, people who were overweight but became a healthy weight, people who were healthy and became overweight, and people who were overweight the entire time. 'Measurement of weight and height was conducted at a time when surgical and pharmacological weight-loss interventions were nearly nonexistent,' the authors noted. The cause of weight loss was not assessed, but given the age of the participants and lack of diagnosed disease, it was more likely intentional than caused by severe chronic conditions or frailty.' In one study, a reduction in body mass from overweight to normal weight over six years in mid-life was tied to a lower risk of developing chronic diseases. There was also a 48 percent lower risk for chronic illness compared to those who remained overweight, which largely held even after excluding participants who developed diabetes during follow-up. Another study showed a 57 percent risk for chronic illness. A third study, with the longest follow-up period, showed that weight loss in mid-life was associated with a 19 percent reduction in overall mortality. 'I'm certain that overall prevention of overweight and obesity starting in early life is absolutely the best thing to do,' Stranberg told The Independent. 'Our study indirectly proves this by showing that persistent healthy weight over the life-course is best.' He said that he hopes the findings will inspire people to see that lifestyle changes can lead to a longer life. 'This is particularly important today as more people are overweight than when the collection of our research data began 35 years ago,' he said in the statement.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Harvard researcher's work gives ‘hope' for Parkinson's. But the feds cut his funding
When Bence Ölveczky came to the U.S. from Hungary at the age of 28, it was the first place he didn't feel like a foreigner. 'This is a unique country because it's a country of immigrants. And that's why I felt at home; because nobody cared,' he told MassLive, during a recent interview in his office. The U.S. drew him because of its 'unparalleled scientific infrastructure' and collaboration between the government and its universities. However, it feels like the climate is changing. 'It's made America great,' Ölveczky, who holds a Ph.D. , said. 'And now we are sort of willingly giving up on that. That's the tragic part of this.' As a professor of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology at Harvard University, he is feeling the ways the Trump administration is attacking not only the institution where he works but also his research. " The research that we are doing — it is not Harvard research," he said. ' We are doing government research.' The Trump administration has frozen or cut nearly $3 billion in federal funding to Harvard, citing antisemitism at the university. The administration has claimed the university failed to protect Jewish students, particularly in the wake of the war in Gaza. Read more: Federal judge delays decision over Trump admin barring Harvard foreign students At the same time, the federal government has revoked most of the institutions' research grants. This has a significant impact on Ölveczky's lab, which uses rats to better understand how the brain learns new motor skills and generates more complex behaviors. It also has the potential to affect an entire generation of researchers who may decide not to come to the U.S. or to Harvard because of the federal government's actions, he said. Two of his federal grants were terminated by the National Institutes of Health in May. His lab focuses on addressing the function of the basal ganglia, which goes awry in people with Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease, according to a court filing in an ongoing lawsuit against the Trump administration. With more time, his work could help inform rehabilitation therapeutics for people with those diseases or even those who have had strokes, he said. 'It's an inspiration to me that we could help in the treatment of these,' he said. Taking an elevator to the basement in a Harvard building, passing through white door after white door, there are several rooms filled with rats. Some are kept in clear cages behind closed cabinets. Opening one of the cabinets, two black and white rats in separate cages appear. One with wires attached to its head immediately walks to the front of its clear cage to put its nose and minuscule teeth through a hole at the front. Other rats are stacked high, while not undergoing testing or recuperating from surgery, sometimes even doubled up in a cage for socialization, snuggled up next to each other. Each rat is taught a task. One task is pressing down on a joystick at a certain angle for a reward. 'Some of these animals have been in their training for a year or more,' Ölveczky said. The rats do these tasks so the researchers can better understand how complex behaviors are generated by the brain. However, the lab is also researching how autism affects brain function and behavior. They had planned to apply for federal funding for this work, which has been privately funded that is ending this year. Read more: As federal funding cuts hit Harvard, a private investment firm and other donors step up In collaboration with the University of Washington, Stanford University and the Salk Institute, the lab has also created a virtual rodent controlled through an artificial neural network, according to Ölveczky's court affidavit. It is able to be trained to mimic the behavior of real animals and has the potential to transform how researchers study the brain by comparing hypothesis testing through the virtual rodent and juxtaposing it to experiments in real animals, he said. By studying rats at the Ölveczky Lab, it is also ultimately about giving families who are struggling with Parkinson's or stroke hope for recovery, he said. 'To some degree, knowing that there are people out there working on the mechanisms that underlie the disease, particularly for neurodevelopmental disorders like autism or childhood disorders ... I think give folks hope,' he said There is so much more that could be learned in the lab, Ölveczky said. Nobody knew that studying the saliva of a lizard would lead to the 'most revolutionary obesity drug,' he said, referring to Ozempic. 'The bargain this country made was to invest in basic research and understand that the rewards are going to accumulate over time. And this is also why normal tax-paying Americans won't necessarily feel the immediate effects of any of these funding cuts,' he said. 'What you would have to do is compare the alternative reality — the reality when there was no research — versus the reality where there is research, and those two are very different. But that would become apparent in some years from now," he said. Ölveczky has been looking for non-federal funding. However, that is even more difficult as other institutions are experiencing a scaling back of funding as well. The lab may not be able to finish its experiments, analyze its data or write publications without federal funding, according to Ölveczky's affidavit. Slashing research funding isn't about saving money for the U.S., Ölveczky said. In fact, it has the opposite effect, he said. 'This is the most wasteful thing that's happened to biomedical research. You build up a research enterprise, and it takes an incredible amount of money to gain the trust of the world, frankly. Everybody's coming here,' he said. 'The fact that this is done in the name of sort of eliminating waste is just absurd,' he said. Using 'rainy day' funds given to him from his promotion a decade ago, he has been able to keep staff on — but these funds will dry up within the year, he said. He runs a lab with 10 to 12 people. His grants largely funded the salaries of postdoctoral students and technicians, reagents, animal care costs, instruments and publication costs. Being forced to let them go would be devastating, as they have institutional knowledge about the lab and how it works. Even if he were to later find funding, those people would be difficult to replace, and ultimately it would take time and more money to get them up to speed, he said in an affidavit. Read more: 'Far reaching consequences' — UMass Amherst sounds the alarm amid federal uncertainty In addition to potential layoffs, around 100 rats would also have to be killed because the lab won't have the funding to keep going. He said he refuses 'to believe that people in Congress don't see' the impact the funding cuts will have on research. 'I hope we can reverse course, but the worry I have is when will some of these things become irreversible?' he said. Even if the cuts at Harvard don't happen, the proposed cuts at the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation through President Donald Trump's budget are going to be 'devastating,' Ölveczky said. 'There are two things going on — Harvard being targeted for political reasons and the whole scientific enterprise across the country being decimated. And that's going to have incredibly negative effects on the prosperity and the ability to push innovation and grow,' he said. It isn't like the United States is alone in its scientific progress; other countries like the U.K., Portugal, Sweden and Denmark are able to provide similarly enriching research environments, he said. It is challenging to encourage students and researchers to come to Harvard right now. 'Fundamentally, my biggest concern with this whole situation is that we're losing a generation of scientists,' Ölveczky said. There are postdoctoral students in his lab who are 'sacrificing a lot' to be in his lab, when they could work in the private research space and make more money. 'They're really devoted to pushing the frontiers of science,' he said. 'And those guys are being discouraged.' Read more: As Trump cuts funding, these Harvard scholars consider leaving US — and academia That is especially true for international students at Harvard, as the Trump administration has attempted to block Harvard international students from entering the country or enrolling at the institution. 'I have an incoming graduate student from Taiwan, who's phenomenal by all accounts, and I can't encourage him about this situation because the degree of uncertainty and anxiety associated with this whole situation is not something that I would necessarily want for myself if I had other options,' Ölveczky said. He is settled in the U.S. now as an American citizen. However, only a few short years ago, that wasn't the case. If he were 28 years old again and making the move again out of Hungary for his doctoral degree, he said there would be 'no chance' of him coming to the U.S. These US colleges are among the top 100 best global universities, US News says 'Far reaching consequences' — UMass Amherst sounds the alarm amid federal uncertainty MIT joins group of universities suing the DOD over funding cuts As federal funding cuts hit Harvard, a private investment firm and other donors step up 20 NIH grants restored to UMass system after judge rules against Trump admin Read the original article on MassLive.
