Data centers and their neighbors
QTS Data Centers in Hillsboro on Oct. 11, 2024. (Rian Dundon/Oregon Capital Chronicle)
Oregon has a big and (relatively) new kind of business it doesn't really know how to deal with. It should start soon to figure that out.
This new sector consists of its mass of data centers, more of which are likely to pop up in coming years. But the state has no overall strategy for dealing with them.
It should, because data centers, economically significant and technically important as they are, are a business unlike any other. Governments need a separate and specific set of policies to deal with them.
One reason the state (like many others) has been behind the curve may be inadequate information about the sector, but more is becoming available.
Organizations that track data centers aren't in agreement about exactly how many the state has: 131 according to Data Center Map, 84 according to datacenters.com. The timing of their surveys could have affected the difference in numbers, but so could questions about how you count them.
Data Center Map, for example, says that the largest grouping of centers in the state is at Boardman, with 30 centers listed. All, however, are Amazon AWX PDX, bunched in five different campuses. How many distinct units of these should be counted comes down to a matter of definition.
Regardless of the exact numbers, Oregon clearly is among the state leaders for data centers. It has fewer than California and about the same as Arizona, but more than any other state west of Texas. About 2,500 data centers are estimated to exist in the United States, so Oregon's share is above average per capita.
One attraction for the state is cheap hydropower: Most of the centers are located not far from the Columbia River. Oregon's moderate climate and relative safety from natural and human-caused disasters are pluses as well.
For some purposes, data centers are classified as large industrial operations, which they are — but they're also distinctive from most businesses in that category. They not only use unusually large amounts of electricity but water as well, and they employ far fewer people than most industrial businesses usually do.
The tracking site datacenters.com said 'Oregon, with its strategic geographical location, offers several advantages that make it an ideal choice for businesses looking to store their data. The state boasts a robust technology infrastructure, including reliable power supply and high-speed internet connectivity. Additionally, Oregon's temperate climate ensures optimal cooling conditions for data centers, reducing energy consumption and associated costs. These factors contribute to the overall efficiency and reliability of the colocation services available in the region.'
Several private data companies dominate the service provision in Oregon: Lumen Colocation appears to be the largest. But Google has a large center in The Dalles, Amazon in Boardman, Hermiston and Umatilla, and both Meta (Facebook) and Apple have substantial operations in Prineville.
Besides those well-known locations, Oregon has data centers in Portland, Eugene, Medford, Bend, Hillsboro, Corvallis, Baker City and Bandon. It's truly an industry with statewide reach.
They are significant economic players, but they have been walled off from much of the rest of the state's economic and social picture in ways most businesses are not. Their impact on the state and on their neighbors in the areas of electric power, water use, and much more may become large, and it's not entirely predictable. How should we interact with them? What should we fairly expect of them? That's a broad debate begging for a legislative airing.
The Oregon Citizens Utility Board, a consumer-oriented nonprofit, said that 'utility investments to serve data centers have been pushing up billing rates to residential, small business, and even other industrial customers. We've seen the dire impact of data centers' rapidly rising energy costs — in 2024, Oregon's for-profit utilities disconnected a record number of households because they could not afford their electricity bills.'
The Oregon Legislature has taken note of this specific issue..
This year's House Bill 3546, sponsored by Reps. Pam Marsh, Mark Owens, and Dacia Grayber and Sens. Janeen Sollman and Jeff Golden, covers a narrow though significant segment of data center impact: Electric power rates. It passed the Senate on June 3 and the House cleared amendments from the other chamber on June 5, in both cases with generally Democratic support and Republican opposition. The bill goes to the governor next for final action.
That bill raises sensible questions, but it should be the foot in the door to a broader discussion of how these centers should relate to the rest of us.
Data centers should be put in a new category by themselves, for utility, regulatory and service purposes. Working through that effort should be a long-term project starting now.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Boardman residents frustrated with messes left by fiber optic cable companies
BOARDMAN, Ohio (WKBN) — A group of people from one Boardman neighborhood told township trustees on Monday that more needs to be done to hold companies accountable for cleaning up after installing new fiber optic cables. Lawyer and Park Harbour neighborhood resident John Shultz addressed the problems he and his neighbors have had with companies installing fiber optic cables in the neighborhood, where a trencher sits parked on a cul-de-sac surrounded by utility line markers and piles of dirt next to curbs. 'There's one driveway that's almost completely gone at the bottom where it addresses the street, or where it merges right into the street. They have knocked out street lights. They have put holes in,' Shultz said. Boardman Administrator Jason Loree said there's little the township can do when it comes to fiber optic installations, as they're regulated by the Federal Communications Commission. 'They've had some issues in Canfield. They've had some issues in Poland,' Loree said. 'They basically can come in here and work on a right of way, and we really have no way to stop them.' But the township has hired a lawyer to determine if it can require the installation companies to post a bond before being allowed to do the work. 'To ensure that they come into a neighborhood, they leave it the way they found it, and if they don't, we can pull the bond,' Loree said. 'I do like the bond suggestion. I think that's a necessity,' Shultz said. Another complaint was that a second crew follows the installation crew to repair the landscaping damage instead of fixing it as they go. Plus, Loree said, residents should be able to know when the crews are coming. 'Now they're supposed to put it back the way they found it. It doesn't always happen,' Loree said. 'And we're also wanting to make sure that when they are coming in your neighborhoods, they should, out of courtesy, be posting door hangers.' 'We would impose upon you to be our spokesperson to say, 'Hey, not only in Park Harbour, but anywhere — off Glenwood Avenue, off Market Street — these neighborhoods don't deserve this type of treatment,'' Shultz said to the trustees. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
12-06-2025
- Yahoo
Oregon bill would make landlords give back rent deposit or pay fee if home found defective
Sen. Deb Patterson, D-Salem, at the Oregon Legislature on Feb. 12, 2024. (Jordan Gale/Oregon Capital Chronicle) Oregon rental applicants who haven't yet signed a lease could soon get their security deposits back if they find the home they've applied to is defective. House Bill 3521, now headed to Gov. Tina Kotek's desk, would let Oregon renters get their security deposits back if the home they've applied to has mold, unsafe electrical wiring or other defects making it uninhabitable. The bill already passed the Oregon House in a 33-18 vote in April, and on Thursday it passed the Oregon Senate in a 20-8 vote. Under the bill, landlords would have five days to return deposits or face a fee equivalent to the deposit they charged. Landlords would not face penalties if natural disasters or emergencies keep them from complying, and they could still choose to return deposits at their place of business rather than through mail. Rep. Annessa Hartman, D-Gladstone, spearheaded the bill after hearing from renters across Oregon who lost hundreds, sometimes thousands, of dollars to hold deposits for homes they couldn't move into because of mold, broken plumbing or pest infestations. Renters in Oregon represent 51% of all low-income households, according to Oregon Housing and Community Services. And nearly 37% of Oregonians rent their homes, according to the U.S. Census. That's higher than the national average, and renters are in the majority in cities including Eugene, Corvallis, Monmouth, Beaverton and Seaside. 'Landlords can still enter into whole deposit agreements, collect deposits and keep them when applicants back out without a good reason,' Senate sponsor Deb Patterson, D-Salem, said on the floor. 'That doesn't change. What does change is that applicants will have the right to walk away if the unit is substantially uninhabitable.' No senator debated against the bill on Thursday. If enacted, the bill would apply to deposits received on or after Jan. 1, 2026. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
12-06-2025
- Yahoo
Data centers and their neighbors
QTS Data Centers in Hillsboro on Oct. 11, 2024. (Rian Dundon/Oregon Capital Chronicle) Oregon has a big and (relatively) new kind of business it doesn't really know how to deal with. It should start soon to figure that out. This new sector consists of its mass of data centers, more of which are likely to pop up in coming years. But the state has no overall strategy for dealing with them. It should, because data centers, economically significant and technically important as they are, are a business unlike any other. Governments need a separate and specific set of policies to deal with them. One reason the state (like many others) has been behind the curve may be inadequate information about the sector, but more is becoming available. Organizations that track data centers aren't in agreement about exactly how many the state has: 131 according to Data Center Map, 84 according to The timing of their surveys could have affected the difference in numbers, but so could questions about how you count them. Data Center Map, for example, says that the largest grouping of centers in the state is at Boardman, with 30 centers listed. All, however, are Amazon AWX PDX, bunched in five different campuses. How many distinct units of these should be counted comes down to a matter of definition. Regardless of the exact numbers, Oregon clearly is among the state leaders for data centers. It has fewer than California and about the same as Arizona, but more than any other state west of Texas. About 2,500 data centers are estimated to exist in the United States, so Oregon's share is above average per capita. One attraction for the state is cheap hydropower: Most of the centers are located not far from the Columbia River. Oregon's moderate climate and relative safety from natural and human-caused disasters are pluses as well. For some purposes, data centers are classified as large industrial operations, which they are — but they're also distinctive from most businesses in that category. They not only use unusually large amounts of electricity but water as well, and they employ far fewer people than most industrial businesses usually do. The tracking site said 'Oregon, with its strategic geographical location, offers several advantages that make it an ideal choice for businesses looking to store their data. The state boasts a robust technology infrastructure, including reliable power supply and high-speed internet connectivity. Additionally, Oregon's temperate climate ensures optimal cooling conditions for data centers, reducing energy consumption and associated costs. These factors contribute to the overall efficiency and reliability of the colocation services available in the region.' Several private data companies dominate the service provision in Oregon: Lumen Colocation appears to be the largest. But Google has a large center in The Dalles, Amazon in Boardman, Hermiston and Umatilla, and both Meta (Facebook) and Apple have substantial operations in Prineville. Besides those well-known locations, Oregon has data centers in Portland, Eugene, Medford, Bend, Hillsboro, Corvallis, Baker City and Bandon. It's truly an industry with statewide reach. They are significant economic players, but they have been walled off from much of the rest of the state's economic and social picture in ways most businesses are not. Their impact on the state and on their neighbors in the areas of electric power, water use, and much more may become large, and it's not entirely predictable. How should we interact with them? What should we fairly expect of them? That's a broad debate begging for a legislative airing. The Oregon Citizens Utility Board, a consumer-oriented nonprofit, said that 'utility investments to serve data centers have been pushing up billing rates to residential, small business, and even other industrial customers. We've seen the dire impact of data centers' rapidly rising energy costs — in 2024, Oregon's for-profit utilities disconnected a record number of households because they could not afford their electricity bills.' The Oregon Legislature has taken note of this specific issue.. This year's House Bill 3546, sponsored by Reps. Pam Marsh, Mark Owens, and Dacia Grayber and Sens. Janeen Sollman and Jeff Golden, covers a narrow though significant segment of data center impact: Electric power rates. It passed the Senate on June 3 and the House cleared amendments from the other chamber on June 5, in both cases with generally Democratic support and Republican opposition. The bill goes to the governor next for final action. That bill raises sensible questions, but it should be the foot in the door to a broader discussion of how these centers should relate to the rest of us. Data centers should be put in a new category by themselves, for utility, regulatory and service purposes. Working through that effort should be a long-term project starting now. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
