Credibility crisis: White House reporters speak out on whether Biden's mental decline was deliberately hidden
White House reporters who covered the Biden administration are speaking out about whether they were duped into thinking the president was mentally fit for office and if West Wing staffers attempted to hide the truth from Americans.
CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios reporter Alex Thompson's "Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again," was released on Tuesday and has created plenty of chatter among the White House press corps while putting the issue back at the forefront. The book details Joe Biden's mental acuity concerns while in office, accusing the Biden White House of lying to reporters and voters.
Fox News senior White House correspondent Peter Doocy responded by posting multiple videos to X showing him questioning Biden and the White House about the then-president's cognitive decline, only to be quickly dismissed. Other White House reporters found it odd that CNN is tied to the book, while some had strong feelings about whether there was truly a "cover-up."
Fox News' Peter Doocy Reveals History Of Questioning Biden's Mental Fitness
One White House reporter truly believes the White House clearly tried to hide the truth from everyone.
"This was a cover-up by any definition, but a quixotic one for the Biden team to have undertaken, for at the end of the day, there is only so much a White House staff can do to shield the President of the United States from exposure to the press and public. The cover-up had both private and public-facing dimensions," the second White House reporter told Fox News Digital.
Read On The Fox News App
The reporter said the private dimensions included "secretive strategizing and decision-making," while the public strategy featured "brazen lies" such as video of Biden appearing confused being chalked up as "cheapfakes" and "the silencing of reporters who pressed the issue early on."
Doocy, and a handful of other bold reporters, were regularly shut down by press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre if they dared to ask about the president's fitness for office.
"The subject that was denounced as so rude and fringe-y to ask about back then eventually emerged as the defining issue of the Biden presidency," the White House reporter said.
Washington Post Urges Congress To Act To Prevent Another Cover-up Of President's Health Amid Biden Revelations
A second White House reporter echoed the thoughts of "The Daily Show" host Jon Stewart, who on Monday blasted CNN for relentlessly promoting "a book about news they should've told you was news a year ago for free."
"Sources are always more eager to talk after the fact, but it's not a good look that CNN -- a heavy hitter with plenty of weight to challenge the White House as the decline happened -- barely scratched the surface of the story that Tapper now reports," the second White House reporter told Fox News Digital.
"Late work still deserves half credit though," they added.
A third White House reporter initially believed the 82-year-old Biden was merely aging, or perhaps suffering from COVID side effects, and doesn't think the press is culpable.
"You know, it's one of those things; the guy is old. He speaks like an old person, and it's getting more pronounced as time goes by," the third White House reporter said of Biden.
"I noticed, personally, a dramatic difference between when he took office and the start of the second year. I suspected, and wondered, if it might be because of COVID and the aftereffects of COVID. He had it twice, I think… I know it's been reported that a brain fog kind of thing can happen after you've had it. I left it at that," they continued. "I remember a very different Joe Biden in 2014, 2015. He was a decade younger, so that makes sense."
Cbs News Reporter Says Wsj's 'Courageous' 2024 Report On Biden's Decline Should Have Won The Pulitzer
The third White House reporter "doesn't get" the notion that journalists should have been able to uncover the truth about his declining health at the moment.
"How? How exactly do you report that? If you're a White House reporter, you have responsibilities to explain what happened that day. Like in any White House, there is usually something happening every single day," they said, noting that reporting on Biden's mental acuity concerns would be a major enterprise story.
"People are not going to confirm medical stuff at all, not likely going to tell you what he's like in private… or in Wilmington, because it makes him look bad," they said. "Now, the Biden White House didn't leak. It just didn't, so if you want to go after that story, you're going to spend weeks on it, and you may not get anything. In the meantime, you're not doing other things."
That same White House reporter is "puzzled" that Jean-Pierre has taken so much heat for regularly insisting Biden was fit for office.
"To the extent that she says, 'He's more energetic than I am,' that's just silly, and she probably shouldn't have said that. On the other hand, to have her come out and say, 'Oh, no, no he's actually incapable of doing the job and ought to resign,' that's not realistic," the White House reporter said, adding that Jean-Pierre and other top Biden staffers had skin in the game.
"I mean, come on, you cannot expect the chief of staff to say, 'This guy cannot do the job,'" they said.
Former Biden Spokesperson Helping Lead Pr For Tapper-thompson Book On Biden's Decline
The third White House reporter isn't sure Biden's age impacted his job performance and believes a lot of his shortcomings were simply "policy issues."
"What would he have done much differently if he was younger? I don't know," they said. "Until you can show me that he did bad things because he wasn't up to the job at that moment, you know, I take it with a grain of salt."
Margaret Chadbourn covers the White House as a Cheddar correspondent, with a seat in the briefing room, and is a WHCA member. She believes the entire Biden saga has hurt trust in the media because Americans are asking what was missed, and why it was missed.
"Reporters need to do some soul-searching, maybe, perhaps, and question did they cover Biden the way they should have, through the lens they should have, asking the questions they should have, taking the facts and putting them together, or should they have looked for more facts," Chadbourn told Fox News Digital.
"Should they have done more research?," Chadbourn continued. "I just think there is a whole timeline that the media and reporters need to look through, not just Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson writing a book."
Chadbourn, who has been covering Biden on and off since 2005, said he was always affable and always "came alive interacting with voters." But as his legacy is defined, she believes there is anger among Americans over what people perceive as "misinformation about his health."
"Not as a media critic, but as a journalist, a political reporter, we need to see what was there that we perhaps missed," Chadbourn said.
The first White House reporter who spoke anonymously believes the truth will eventually come out.
"We will learn more about all this as time goes by: first, in aides' memoirs, where they will, for money, traffic the pitiable incidents and sad details they knew about at the time, and helped conceal; and secondly, through archival disclosure, as we get our hands on the White House memoranda, emails, and texts that will show the day-to-day mechanics of the cover-up—and maybe answer the question of who was running the country," the reporter told Fox News Digital.Original article source: Credibility crisis: White House reporters speak out on whether Biden's mental decline was deliberately hidden
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
37 minutes ago
- The Hill
House Democrat: Trump claims Iran strikes were successful ‘insane'
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, scoffed at President Trump's claims of success following U.S. strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites this weekend. In a Sunday interview on CNN's State of the Union, Himes said there's no way U.S. officials could have enough information yet to make that assessment. 'Look, that's insane. That's insane. You don't need to be an intelligence professional to know that we have no idea whether these strikes were successful,' the Democrat said, when asked about the Trump administration's claims of success and whether the world 'is a safer place' following the strikes. The bombs targeted three nuclear sites in Natanz, Esfahan and Fordow, located inside a mountain. Six 'bunker buster' bombs were reportedly dropped on Fordow, while more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles were launched at the other two sites. Trump announced the operation on Saturday evening, saying they were a 'spectacular military success,' and that 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' 'Now, if what you're looking for is a big boom and a large hole in the ground, I have very little doubt that our bunker-busters did a big boom and a very large hole in the ground,' Himes told anchor Kasie Hunt. 'But, Kasie, we don't know, sitting here right now, whether the highly enriched uranium was in the Fordow facility or in the Natanz facility. We have no idea,' he added. 'In the coming weeks, we will develop a more specific idea, but we have no idea in the world right now whether these strikes were in any way successful.' Himes raised the possibility that the Iranians could have moved some of the 60 percent-enriched uranium, in anticipation of a possible attack. 'Look, I think all three facilities are probably smoking rubble right now, but the Iranians are not dumb people, right? There's some chance that, given that this raid was telegraphed for a couple of days, that they might have thrown a couple hundred kilograms of 60 percent enriched uranium into the back of a truck and moved it somewhere else,' Himes said. If that's the case, he continued, 'you have got the possibility — and I will stress possibility here — that there's a lot of highly enriched uranium sitting underneath a hornet-mad regime that has decided that the only way we're going to forestall this in the future is to actually sprint towards a nuclear weapon.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt reiterated on Monday that the Trump administration has a 'high degree of confidence' that its strikes against Iran hit locations where enriched uranium was being stored amid questions about whether officials in Tehran had relocated the nation's stockpile. 'We are confident, yes, that Iran's nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated, as the president said in his address to the nation on Saturday night,' Leavitt said on ABC. 'And we have a high degree of confidence that where those strikes took place is where Iran's enriched uranium was stored,' she added. 'The president wouldn't have launched the strikes if we weren't confident in that. So this operation was a resounding success.' The New York Times reported there was evidence Iran had moved equipment and uranium from the Fordow site in recent days, citing two Israeli officials. The Times also cited text messages from the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency indicating Iran had moved its uranium stockpile.
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Americans in Qatar warned to 'shelter in place'
Qatar's Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani (R) and Minister of Foreign Affairs Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani (L), in Doha in Qatar in May. Photo by Qatari Amiri Diwan Office/ UPI. | License Photo June 23 (UPI) -- The U.S. Embassy in Qatar issued a security alert Monday urging American citizens to shelter in place due to the conflict between Israel and Iran. "Out of an abundance of caution we recommend American citizens shelter in place until further notice," the embassy said in a security alert. The alert did not offer more related details, but the U.S. State Department put out a security alert Sunday that warned that there's "potential for demonstrations against U.S. citizens and interests abroad." "The Department of State advises U.S. citizens worldwide to exercise increased caution," it continued. Qatar's Ministry of Foreign Affairs put out a press release Monday that "indicated that the advisory issued by a number of embassies to their citizens to take precautions or avoid certain locations in the State of Qatar are part of the general policies followed by a number of countries regarding travel advisories and security updates for their citizens around the world, and do not necessarily reflect the existence of specific threats." Qatar's Advisor to the Prime Minister and Minister and Spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Dr. Majed bin Mohammed Al Ansari noted in a statement to the press that "the security situation in the country is stable, and that the relevant authorities are closely monitoring the situation and are ready to take all necessary measures to ensure the safety of citizens, residents, and visitors, and that they will keep the public informed of any developments that require alerts or action, emphasizing the need to obtain information from official sources." As for any Americans attempting to exit Iran, the State Department announced Monday that as Iranian airspace has been closed due to "hostilities with Israel," any U.S. citizens looking to leave "should depart by land to Azerbaijan, Armenia, or [Turkey]," but only if they feel it can be done safely. The State Department has also begun organizing departure flights from Israel, and Americans can leave through Jordan via land crossings. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security put out a statement Sunday that warns of "a heightened threat environment in the United States," which can mean cyber-attacks are likely. "The likelihood of violent extremists in the homeland independently mobilizing to violence in response to the conflict would likely increase if Iranian leadership issued a religious ruling calling for retaliatory violence against targets in the Homeland," it said. "Multiple recent homeland terrorist attacks have been motivated by anti-Semitic or anti-Israel sentiment, and the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict could contribute to US-based individuals plotting additional attacks."
Time Business News
an hour ago
- Time Business News
Plastic-Free and Toxin-Free Living: A Safer Choice for You and Your Family
You may not know this, but we are all exposed to plastics and chemicals in our daily lives. Whether it's plastic bottles and containers for food, plastic pens, or even household cleaning spray, it's full of potentially dangerous chemicals. Each week, we consume about 0.1-5 grams of microplastics. That's the equivalent of one small bread crumb. According to the National Institutes of Health , 90% of Americans have BPA (a toxic chemical) in their bodies. Families have become concerned about these issues and have begun to eliminate plastics and toxic products in their homes to help support a healthy lifestyle. Parents especially want to make sure their children grow up in an environment that supports them. Even little changes, such as drinking out of a reusable water bottle or using natural cleaning products, help minimize the exposure to dangerous chemicals each day. Living this way means making choices that avoid plastic and harmful chemicals. This includes switching to glass, metal, or bamboo products, using natural fabrics, and reading labels carefully. Many plastics contain chemicals that can leak into food, water, or skin over time. It is not always easy to see or smell these chemicals, but they can still enter your body. In addition, many soaps, body sprays, or shampoos contain strong artificial ingredients that can irritate the skin or cause other problems. A safe option is to choose natural or organic products that are made with ingredients you can identify. The problem of plastic and toxic objects is not just about the environment – it also affects your health. According to the World Health Organization , some plastics used in packaging, baby bottles, and toys can release chemicals when they get hot or begin to break down. These chemicals can cause problems with growth, sleep, and memory. Toxins in household products such as air fresheners, washing remedies, and kitchen cleaners can also damage the lungs or skin, especially for young children and pets. Some common things to be careful with include: Non-stick cooking pans Plastic bottles Shower curtain made with PVC Artificial scents in spray or creams Making a big switch overnight is tough. But starting with a few steps can make a real difference. Here are simple actions anyone can take: Use glass or stainless steel containers instead of plastic for food storage. Choose wooden or metal toys for kids instead of plastic ones. Buy natural cleaning products or make your own with vinegar and baking soda. Switch to bar soaps that come in paper packaging instead of liquid soap in plastic bottles. Avoid buying food in plastic wrap when possible, and choose fresh produce or items in paper packaging. By doing these things, you lower the risk of touching or breathing in harmful chemicals every day. Switching to a plastic-free and toxin-free lifestyle helps to lower the number of chemicals that come into contact with your body every day. It can also help you feel better. Many families say that they breathe more easily, sleep better, and have fewer skin or allergy problems after switching. Other benefits include: Minor waste from disposable plastic Cleaner indoor air Longer-lasting home items More natural options in your diet and routine In the long term, it helps to choose safer products for both the family and the planet. Many people check food labels, but forget to look at what they use on their skin or in their homes. Creams, shampoo, and spray go straight into the body, and the skin can absorb many of the ingredients. Some clothing and bedding materials also have coatings that include strong chemicals. Switching to organic cotton, wool, or bamboo materials is a safer way to dress and rest. Look for brands that do not use bleach or artificial scents. This is especially useful for people with allergies or sensitive skin. Children and pets spend a lot of time on the floor, chewing or licking objects, or playing with toys. Because of this, they have a higher risk of touching plastic or unsafe objects. Young bodies are still growing, and their systems can be affected more than adults. Keeping your home safer does not mean using more. Reusable objects often last longer and reduce the need to continue to buy new ones. This can save money over time while also cutting down on garbage. Some online stores are working hard to help families live more safely. They make it easier to find household and personal items that don't have plastic or harmful substances. One such place is Ecolove, a shop that supports plastic-free and toxin-free living by offering safer alternatives for you and your home. From kitchen essentials to baby products, they focus on items that are healthier for people and better for the Earth. Buying from places that value safety and quality helps make a bigger impact. It also supports businesses that care about people, not just profit. Living safely doesn't have to be hard. By replacing plastic and chemical-filled products with safer ones, you can protect your family's health and help reduce waste in the world. Start small and build up from there. Simple swaps like using a bamboo toothbrush or carrying a metal water bottle can lead to lasting change. More and more people are choosing plastic-free and toxin-free living because they want a better future for their children. And every step in that direction counts. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
