Rivian and VW's new $22,500 car proves cheap EVs don't have to be low-tech, the Tesla rival's software boss says
Rivian is teaming up with Volkswagen to make the German brand's cheapest ever EV: the $22,500 ID.EVERY1.
Its software boss told BI it's proof that cut-price electric cars don't need to be "low-tech."
The race to build more affordable EVs is heating up, with Slate Auto recently launching a $25,000 electric truck.
Rivian and VW are teaming up to build more affordable EVs, but that doesn't mean they're planning to skimp on high-tech features.
The Tesla rival is partnering with Volkswagen to develop a $22,500 electric car, and Wassym Bensaid, the company's chief software officer, said the upcoming EV won't compromise on tech despite its ultra-low price point.
VW and Rivian announced a deal last year that will see the German car giant invest over $5 billion in the startup and form a joint company to develop next-generation software and EV technology, with Bensaid and VW exec Carsten Helbing as co-CEOs.
In March, VW unveiled the ID.EVERY1, a compact electric hatchback that will be the first VW vehicle to include software developed by the joint venture.
The 13-foot-long, four-seater EV is set to go on sale in Europe by 2027 for around 20,000 euros ($22,500). VW has not said whether it has any plans to bring it to the US.
"It's something which is extremely close to my heart because it's a way to bring that technology into many more cars," Bensaid told BI.
"Inexpensive cars shouldn't have low technology, and this is the beauty of the setup that we're enabling through the joint venture," said the Rivian executive, who spoke to BI on the sidelines of The Financial Times' Future of the Car conference.
Bensaid said the affordable hatchback would leverage Rivian's software architecture to cut costs.
Rather than use individual computers to control components like seats, lights, and doors, all the ID.EVERY1's features will be handled by a central computer built on Rivian's technology, which Bensaid would allow VW to save money by using fewer parts and simplifying the design.
The ID.EVERY1 will not be the first vehicle to use technology developed by the Rivian-VW joint venture — that will be Rivian's R2, which is set to launch next year — but it is a huge step for both companies.
A lack of affordable EVs remains one of the main reasons customers are reluctant to go electric, and VW is betting that its cheapest ever battery-powered offering will help fill that gap.
They're not the only ones making that bet. Startup Slate Auto caused a stir last month when it unveiled a $25,000 pickup truck, which is set to go on sale in the US in 2026.
The Slate truck has bucked the trend of vehicles becoming more computerized and packed with smart technology.
The base model lacks power windows, a radio, and any kind of built-in infotainment system, with Slate's CEO telling BI that the company had focused on simplicity to keep the price as low as possible.
So far, consumers haven't seemed that bothered by the lack of bells and whistles, with the Jeff Bezos-backed startup receiving 100,000 refundable $50 reservations in just two weeks.
When asked about Slate's approach, Bensaid said Rivian welcomes more competition in the EV market but has made a "different choice" in how it approaches making electric cars more affordable.
"Inexpensive cars shouldn't be cars with limited features," he said, adding that Rivian believed it was possible to deliver a "rich user experience" at a low price point by making vehicle technology more efficient.
"That is our approach. We would like to enable choice for customers, but without such severe compromise in terms of the overall experience," Bensaid said.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Options Traders Wrestle With Stocks' Muted Reaction to War Risk
(Bloomberg) -- The stock market's recent calm in the face of rising geopolitical threats had left options traders with a conundrum: sell volatility and risk being blindsided should the Middle East conflict escalate; or buy it and bleed away premiums as actual moves stay subdued. That tension is set to ratchet even higher after the US attacked Iranian nuclear sites. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports While the oil market is still likely to have the biggest reaction to the escalating conflict, equities may see an initial jump in volatility as traders try to digest the risks. Oil has surged 11% since Israel launched airstrikes on Iran a little more than a week ago, with crude volatility soaring to levels not seen since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. By contrast, the S&P 500 Index is down just 1.3%. 'Markets will react, but probably still modestly in equity markets,' said Anthi Tsouvali, a strategist at UBS Global Wealth Management. 'Investors will also have to think about the impact of higher oil on inflation.' Some traders may be growing numb to Donald Trump's flip-flops, or just tired of chasing the headlines: In six months, markets have gone from 'Buy America' to 'Sell America' to now something murkier. They've learned to snap back quickly whenever risks subside — and that could happen again with the latest oil spike, which threatens to keep US inflation higher and slow Federal Reserve rate cuts. It's a dilemma facing volatility traders like Gareth Ryan, the founder and managing director of investment firm IUR Capital. 'Selling volatility at current levels inherently carries the risk of a volatility event, but paying out premiums with the expectation of a spike higher in vol also means holding a wasting asset,' Ryan said last week. For the options market, this environment has led to a muddied picture. On the one hand, implied volatility has dropped significantly from a high two months ago. But on the other, premiums aren't cheap: The collapse of realized swings on major equity gauges is making them look expensive. As of Friday, the Cboe Volatility Index was near its highest level since April relative to actual S&P 500 volatility. The trend was similar trend for European stocks and Chinese equities traded in Hong Kong. While the options market was underpricing moves ahead of Liberation Day — making some volatility structures very profitable during the 'gamma shock' it triggered — the environment is different now that headline risk has a smaller impact. As the July 9 tariff deadline approaches, some strategists are saying a long gamma positioning is unlikely to yield the kind of bumper profits seen in April. 'On the more tactical side there is a general lack of scalable opportunities across the board on repo, correlation and volatility — historic dislocations are just not there at the moment,' Antoine Porcheret, head of institutional structuring for the UK, Europe, Middle East and Africa at Citigroup Inc., said last week. 'But that is part of a deeper long-term trend, notably in retail structured products, which historically was the main supplier of derivatives risks.' JPMorgan Chase & Co. strategists, who noted on June 11 that investors' fatigue has set in after the many Trump U-turns, say the July 9 deadline could be postponed, which would create further uncertainty and make it difficult to trade with conviction. Dealing has already shifted to near-term maturities: S&P 500 options volume has dropped since May, with the share of zero-days to expiry contracts reaching a new peak of 59%, a separate JPMorgan report showed last week. One sign that there is a bit more concern among equity traders: The Cboe VVIX Index, measuring the volatility of the VIX, has increased to the higher end of its range over the past year, signaling more interest in buying options for portfolio protection against drastic swings. The conflict, and the muted reaction in stocks, has driven implied volatility for the US Oil Fund relative to the SPDR S&P 500 ETF to the highest level since the early days of Covid in 2020. That's led banks to pitch more dual-binary hybrid trades between oil and equities. 'In such geopolitical and macro environment, hybrids have been a natural tool to use, with recent activity around the oil theme played versus equities (and FX) through directional and volatility trades,' said Alexandre Isaaz, head of EMEA equities derivatives sales and structuring at Bank of America Corp. To reduce risk while keeping their views, some buy-side investors are using strategies such as stock replacement — when an equity position is put on with options instead. One trader alone spent as much as $3 billion in premium on 2027 calls across a slew of large-cap US companies in recent months. 'I don't sense much fatigue from hedge funds, they are still actively looking for opportunities. On the vol carry side within the QIS space there is still demand,' said Porcheret. 'The market is generally underinvested, so the pain trade remains to the upside.' --With assistance from Bernard Goyder and Sagarika Jaisinghani. Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Options Traders Wrestle With Stocks' Muted Reaction to War Risk
(Bloomberg) -- The stock market's recent calm in the face of rising geopolitical threats had left options traders with a conundrum: sell volatility and risk being blindsided should the Middle East conflict escalate; or buy it and bleed away premiums as actual moves stay subdued. That tension is set to ratchet even higher after the US attacked Iranian nuclear sites. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports While the oil market is still likely to have the biggest reaction to the escalating conflict, equities may see an initial jump in volatility as traders try to digest the risks. Oil has surged 11% since Israel launched airstrikes on Iran a little more than a week ago, with crude volatility soaring to levels not seen since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. By contrast, the S&P 500 Index is down just 1.3%. 'Markets will react, but probably still modestly in equity markets,' said Anthi Tsouvali, a strategist at UBS Global Wealth Management. 'Investors will also have to think about the impact of higher oil on inflation.' Some traders may be growing numb to Donald Trump's flip-flops, or just tired of chasing the headlines: In six months, markets have gone from 'Buy America' to 'Sell America' to now something murkier. They've learned to snap back quickly whenever risks subside — and that could happen again with the latest oil spike, which threatens to keep US inflation higher and slow Federal Reserve rate cuts. It's a dilemma facing volatility traders like Gareth Ryan, the founder and managing director of investment firm IUR Capital. 'Selling volatility at current levels inherently carries the risk of a volatility event, but paying out premiums with the expectation of a spike higher in vol also means holding a wasting asset,' Ryan said last week. For the options market, this environment has led to a muddied picture. On the one hand, implied volatility has dropped significantly from a high two months ago. But on the other, premiums aren't cheap: The collapse of realized swings on major equity gauges is making them look expensive. As of Friday, the Cboe Volatility Index was near its highest level since April relative to actual S&P 500 volatility. The trend was similar trend for European stocks and Chinese equities traded in Hong Kong. While the options market was underpricing moves ahead of Liberation Day — making some volatility structures very profitable during the 'gamma shock' it triggered — the environment is different now that headline risk has a smaller impact. As the July 9 tariff deadline approaches, some strategists are saying a long gamma positioning is unlikely to yield the kind of bumper profits seen in April. 'On the more tactical side there is a general lack of scalable opportunities across the board on repo, correlation and volatility — historic dislocations are just not there at the moment,' Antoine Porcheret, head of institutional structuring for the UK, Europe, Middle East and Africa at Citigroup Inc., said last week. 'But that is part of a deeper long-term trend, notably in retail structured products, which historically was the main supplier of derivatives risks.' JPMorgan Chase & Co. strategists, who noted on June 11 that investors' fatigue has set in after the many Trump U-turns, say the July 9 deadline could be postponed, which would create further uncertainty and make it difficult to trade with conviction. Dealing has already shifted to near-term maturities: S&P 500 options volume has dropped since May, with the share of zero-days to expiry contracts reaching a new peak of 59%, a separate JPMorgan report showed last week. One sign that there is a bit more concern among equity traders: The Cboe VVIX Index, measuring the volatility of the VIX, has increased to the higher end of its range over the past year, signaling more interest in buying options for portfolio protection against drastic swings. The conflict, and the muted reaction in stocks, has driven implied volatility for the US Oil Fund relative to the SPDR S&P 500 ETF to the highest level since the early days of Covid in 2020. That's led banks to pitch more dual-binary hybrid trades between oil and equities. 'In such geopolitical and macro environment, hybrids have been a natural tool to use, with recent activity around the oil theme played versus equities (and FX) through directional and volatility trades,' said Alexandre Isaaz, head of EMEA equities derivatives sales and structuring at Bank of America Corp. To reduce risk while keeping their views, some buy-side investors are using strategies such as stock replacement — when an equity position is put on with options instead. One trader alone spent as much as $3 billion in premium on 2027 calls across a slew of large-cap US companies in recent months. 'I don't sense much fatigue from hedge funds, they are still actively looking for opportunities. On the vol carry side within the QIS space there is still demand,' said Porcheret. 'The market is generally underinvested, so the pain trade remains to the upside.' --With assistance from Bernard Goyder and Sagarika Jaisinghani. Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Porsche's $290K Collector Car Just Had a Very Human Error
Launched in 2023 to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the legendary 911, the Porsche 911 S/T is one of the most exclusive modern Porsches ever built. With just 1,963 units produced – a nod to the model's debut year – the S/T is a purist's and collector's dream. It pairs the 911 GT3 RS engine with a six-speed manual transmission, and thanks to weight-saving measures, it stands as one of the lightest 911s of the 992 generation. Its base price of $290,000 didn't stop well-heeled collectors from optioning theirs up well past that mark. For collectors, part of the appeal lies in the limited-run serial plaque that comes with each unit, serving as a tangible reminder of exclusivity. But that sense of uniqueness has been shaken after a pair of 911 S/Ts were spotted online – both bearing the same production number: 1,724 of 1,963. Located in Guatemala, one of the cars was finished in Shore Blue launch. It was shared on an enthusiast Instagram page nearly a year ago, clearly showing its dash badge. The second car, a Sonderwunsch commission in a custom Rose Red finish, recently appeared at a German Porsche dealership. In a video, its badge also reads "1,724 of 1,963." Porsche has confirmed the manufacturing glitch in a statement to CarBuzz. A representative from the brand confirmed that the duplication of the plaques was an accident. The automaker also assured that it is now working with the customer with the incorrect plaque. However, it was not confirmed which of the two 911 S/Ts had the wrong identifier. While unusual, the good news is that the mix-up seems confined to the serial number plaque, which is just a cosmetic feature. Both vehicles still retain their unique VINs, which are the actual legal identifiers for the cars. In all likelihood, the problem stems from a simple assembly line or parts inventory error. Still, when it comes to highly personalized cars like the 911 S/T, especially ones involving Porsche's bespoke Sonderwunsch program, a duplicated plaque is the sort of detail that makes owners raise an eyebrow, even if it doesn't affect the car's mechanical integrity or value. Manufacturing mistakes aren't new, even for brands with reputations as sterling as Porsche's. From misapplied badges to much more serious issues like powertrain defects or faulty airbags, human error is part of production reality. In this case, the error is largely harmless – an amusing footnote in the car's history rather than a safety concern. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
