Deputies: License plate readers will be used solely for investigations
ROCHESTER, N.Y. (WROC) — It's been almost a week now since Monroe County announced that the legislature has approved automatic license plate readers for the county.
Thursday, News 8's Adelisa Badzic sat down with Chief Deputy Michael Fowler with the sheriff's office on how these will work.
He said these are strictly for investigations and are not red-light cameras.
'If we need information, if we're looking for a certain vehicle for whatever the reason, a missing person, or maybe a criminal that just drove off from a robbery scene, we go into the computer type in the plate number, and it shows us when and where that picture was taken,' Fowler said.
This would help shave off investigation time and get to an outcome quicker.
He also added that the system does not contain personal information. Also worth noting: the system to search a license plate is monitored closely and secure. Deputies will need a specific reason to search a number and there is an audit trail. Chief Deputy Fowler said they have to enter their reason in the software, which will be recorded, and they plan to follow up to make sure everyone has legitimate purposes.
He said they plan to put in 150 to 160 cameras in about 80 locations throughout the county. The hope to start with hotspots first. Monroe County is one of the last major counties in New York State to get this technology.
'Buffalo, Syracuse, Albany, New York City, they've got them all over, and they've had them all over for years, and they've been reaping the success for years,' Fowler said. 'This is a great tool for law enforcement. It solves crimes, and it saves lives.'
On the Senate level: there have been critics against ALPR's. Legislation to address privacy and mass data collection concerns have been brought up several times in Albany.
One bill sponsored by Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a democrat, is in the current session. It states, 'New York currently does not have uniform standards in place governing the use of ALPRs'
If passed, it would create guidelines for the use of plate readers technology.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
GOP's food stamp plan is found to violate Senate rules. It's the latest setback for Trump's big bill
WASHINGTON -- In another blow to the Republicans' tax and spending cut bill, the Senate parliamentarian has advised that a proposal to shift some food stamps costs from the federal government to states — a centerpiece of GOP savings efforts — would violate the chamber's rules. While the parliamentarian's rulings are advisory, they are rarely, if ever, ignored. The Republican leadership was scrambling on Saturday, days before voting is expected to begin on President Donald Trump's package that he wants to be passed into law by the Fourth of July. The loss is expected to be costly to Republicans. They have been counting on some tens of billions of potential savings from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP, to help offset the costs of the $4.5 trillion tax breaks plan. The parliamentarian let stand for now a provision that would impose new work requirements for older Americans, up to age 65, to receive food stamp aid. 'We will keep fighting to protect families in need,' said Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, the top Democrat on the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, which handles the SNAP program. 'The Parliamentarian has made clear that Senate Republicans cannot use their partisan budget to shift major nutrition assistance costs to the states that would have inevitably led to major cuts,' she said. The committee chairman, Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark., said in a statement that his team is examining options that would comply with Senate rules to achieve savings and "to ensure SNAP serves those who truly need it while being responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars.' The parliamentarian's ruling is the latest in a series of setbacks as staff works through the weekend, often toward midnight, to assess the 1,000-page proposal. It all points to serious trouble ahead for the bill, which was approved by the House on a party-line vote last month over unified opposition from Democrats and is now undergoing revisions in the Senate. At its core, the goal of the multitrillion-dollar package is to extend tax cuts from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire if Congress fails to act. It also adds new ones, including no taxes on tips or overtime pay. To help offset the costs of lost tax revenue, the Republicans are proposing cutbacks to federal Medicaid, health care and food programs — some $1 trillion. Additionally, the package boosts national security spending by about $350 billion, including to pay for Trump's mass deportations, which are running into protests nationwide. Trump has implored Republicans, who have the majority in Congress, to deliver on his top domestic priority, but the details of the package, with its hodgepodge of priorities, is drawing deeper scrutiny. All told, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package, as approved by the House, would add at least $2.4 trillion to the nation's red ink over the decade and leave 10.9 million more people without health care coverage. Additionally, it would reduce or eliminate food stamps for more than 3 million people. The parliamentarian's office is tasked with scrutinizing the bill to ensure it complies with the so-called Byrd Rule, which is named after the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, and bars many policy matters in the budget reconciliation process now being used. Late Friday, the parliamentarian issued its latest findings. It determined that Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee's proposal to have the states pick up more of the tab for covering food stamps — what Republicans call a new cost-sharing arrangement — would be in violation of the Byrd Rule. Many lawmakers said the states would not be able to absorb the new requirement on food aid, which has long been provided by the federal government. They warned many would lose access to SNAP benefits used by more than 40 million people. Initially, the CBO had estimated about $128 billion in savings under the House's proposal to shift SNAP food aid costs to the states. Cost estimates for the Senate's version, which made changes to the House approach, have not yet been made publicly available. The parliamentarian's office rulings leave GOP leaders with several options. They can revise the proposals to try to comply with Senate rules or strip them from the package altogether. They can also risk a challenge during floor voting, which would require the 60-vote threshold to overcome. That would be unlikely in the split chamber with Democrats opposing the overall package. The parliamentarian's latest advice also said the committee's provision to make certain immigrants ineligible for food stamps would violate the rule. It found several provisions from the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, which is led by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, to be in violation. They include one to provide $250 million to Coast Guard stations damaged by fire in 2025, namely one on South Padre Island in Texas. Still to come are some of the most important rulings from the parliamentarian. One will assess the GOP's approach that relies on 'current policy' rather than 'current law' as the baseline for determining whether the bill will add to the nation's deficits. Already, the parliamentarian delivered a serious setback Thursday, finding that the GOP plan to gut the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which was a core proposal coming from the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, would be in violation of the Byrd Rule. The parliamentarian has also advised of violations over provisions from the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee that would rollback Environmental Protection Agency emissions standards on certain vehicles and from the Senate Armed Services Committee to require the defense secretary to provide a plan on how the Pentagon intends to spend the tens of billions of new funds. The new work requirements in the package would require many of those receiving SNAP or Medicaid benefits to work 80 hours a month or engage in other community or educational services.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Sunday shows preview: GOP megabill faces ‘big, beautiful' road bumps; all eyes turn to Trump on Iran
Congress remains at a standstill in regard to President Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill touted as a rite of passage for tax cuts, child credits and the country's future, and the clock is ticking on Trump's timeline for a decision on whether the U.S. will involve itself in the Iran-Israel conflict. These topics are among those likely to be a focus of this week's Sunday shows. House Republicans are tied to their legislative text, which outlines a three-year boost for child tax credit at $2,500 per child, while senators are considering a more modest approach marked at $2,200 per child. However, the GOP stands divided by standards for state and local tax deductions. The House's proposed cap at $40,000 per household with incomes of less than $500,000 is facing scrutiny from senators who are pushing for the cap to stay at $10,000. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.), who sits on the Subcommittee on Taxation and IRS Oversight, will likely address his proposed change to the bill during an appearance on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures.' Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) will also likely lobby for the bill's passage during an appearance on Fox News's 'Fox News Sunday.' Lee has lauded portions of the bill that would include the sale of public land as Western conservatives urge leaders to cede lands to local control. 'Washington has proven time and again it can't manage this land. This bill puts it in better hands,' Lee said last Thursday. However, his colleagues in the House have pushed back on the measure amid the Senate's proposed rollback of green energy tax credits and other environmental clauses. 'My main takeaway for you guys is this bill, as the Senate has produced it, is definitely dead if it were to come over to the House in anything resembling its current form,' Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), a vocal member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, told reporters on a press call. His comments detail a shaky future for the legislation Republicans have set an objective to pass before the Fourth of July. Still, amid the clamor, the Trump administration has worked to gain traction with citizens across the country by promoting the bill's 'Trump account' caveat, which ensures an investment account funded by the Treasury Department. However, Senate Democrats are stifled by Medicaid cuts expanded in the bill's new text authored by the upper chamber. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) will likely speak to party members' concerns during show appearances on CBS' 'Face the Nation' and Fox News 'Fox News Sunday.' Kaine is also likely to draw attention to the Pentagon's decision to rename several military bases across the country, including those in his home state. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is also likely to chime in on the bill which is slated to increase manpower for immigration operations at the southern border. Noem has been at the helm of the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigrants, an effort which has stemmed protests and outrage in cities like Los Angeles. Trump sent thousands of National Guard soldiers and hundreds of Marines to Los Angeles against the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D). Their long-embroiled rivalry heated up when Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was forcibly removed from Noem's presser last week where he was handcuffed and wrestled to the ground. Padilla is one of several Democratic lawmakers to either be handcuffed, detained or arrested amid a broader push to conduct oversight on immigration policies. Noem may speak to Democrats' repeated run-ins with federal authorities during an appearance on CNN's 'State of the Union' and Fox News' 'Fox News Sunday.' The home front clashes come during Trump's potential involvement in Middle Eastern discourse between Iran and Israel. Israeli officials confirmed numerous strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities Saturday and throughout the week resulting in the deaths of top commanders and engineers furthering their effort to shut down the development of larger weapons. Iran has pledged not to back down from war with the American ally and retaliated against bombings with a series of UAV attacks on Friday night. Israel said many of their drones were intercepted and ultimately ineffective due to Iron Dome technology. Trump is considering advancing U.S. involvement in the war and has issued a two-week timeline for a decision to intervene. The Pentagon reportedly moved B-2 bombers to the island of Guam on Saturday for standby operations as the president weighs the outcome of strikes on Iran. See the full list of Sunday shows below: NewsNation 'The Hill Sunday:' Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.); Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) ABC's 'This Week:' Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) CNN's 'State of the Union:' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem; Sen. Adam Schiff, (D-Calif.); Israeli President Isaac Herzog; former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton; Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson NBC's 'Meet the Press:' Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) CBS' 'Face the Nation:' Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.); Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leiter; Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.); Thomas Massie (R-Ky.); retired Gen. Frank McKenzie, former commander of U.S. Central Command Fox News'Fox News Sunday:' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem; Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.); Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) Fox News 'Sunday Morning Futures:' Tom Homan, Border Czar; Matthew Whitaker, U.S. Ambassador To NATO; Gov. Ron Desantis (R-Fla.), Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.)
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
GOP's food stamp plan is found to violate Senate rules. It's the latest setback for Trump's big bill.
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'We will keep fighting to protect families in need,' said Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, the top Democrat on the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, which handles the SNAP program. Advertisement 'The Parliamentarian has made clear that Senate Republicans cannot use their partisan budget to shift major nutrition assistance costs to the states that would have inevitably led to major cuts,' she said. The committee chairman, Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark., said in a statement that his team is examining options that would comply with Senate rules to achieve savings and 'to ensure SNAP serves those who truly need it while being responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars.' Advertisement What's at stake in the big bill The parliamentarian's ruling is the latest in a series of setbacks as staff works through the weekend, often toward midnight, to assess the 1,000-page proposal. It all points to serious trouble ahead for the bill, which was approved by the House on a party-line vote last month over unified opposition from Democrats and is now undergoing revisions in the Senate. At its core, the goal of the multitrillion-dollar package is to extend tax cuts from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire if Congress fails to act. It also adds new ones, including no taxes on tips or overtime pay. To help offset the costs of lost tax revenue, the Republicans are proposing cutbacks to federal Medicaid, health care and food programs — some $1 trillion. Additionally, the package boosts national security spending by about $350 billion, including to pay for Trump's mass deportations, which are running into protests nationwide. Trump has implored Republicans, who have the majority in Congress, to deliver on his top domestic priority, but the details of the package, with its hodgepodge of priorities, is drawing deeper scrutiny. All told, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package, as approved by the House, would The Senate's strict 'Byrd Rule' The parliamentarian's office is tasked with scrutinizing the bill to ensure it complies with the so-called Byrd Rule, which is named after the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, and bars many policy matters in the budget reconciliation process now being used. Advertisement Late Friday, the parliamentarian issued its latest findings. It determined that Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee's proposal to have the states pick up more of the tab for covering food stamps — what Republicans call a new cost-sharing arrangement — would be in violation of the Byrd Rule. Many lawmakers said the states would not be able to absorb the new requirement on food aid, which has long been provided by the federal government. They warned many would lose access to SNAP benefits used by more than 40 million people. Initially, the CBO had estimated about $128 billion in savings under the House's proposal to shift SNAP food aid costs to the states. Cost estimates for the Senate's version, which made changes to the House approach, have not yet been made publicly available. More questions and decisions ahead The parliamentarian's office rulings leave GOP leaders with several options. They can revise the proposals to try to comply with Senate rules or strip them from the package altogether. They can also risk a challenge during floor voting, which would require the 60-vote threshold to overcome. That would be unlikely in the split chamber with Democrats opposing the overall package. The parliamentarian's latest advice also said the committee's provision to make certain immigrants ineligible for food stamps would violate the rule. It found several provisions from the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, which is led by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, to be in violation. They include one to provide $250 million to Coast Guard stations damaged by fire in 2025, namely one on South Padre Island in Texas. Still to come are some of the most important rulings from the parliamentarian. One will assess the GOP's approach that relies on 'current policy' rather than 'current law' as the baseline for determining whether the bill will add to the nation's deficits. Advertisement Already, the parliamentarian delivered a serious setback Thursday, finding that the GOP plan to gut the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which was a core proposal coming from the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, would be in violation of the Byrd Rule. The parliamentarian has also advised of violations over provisions from the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee that would rollback Environmental Protection Agency emissions standards on certain vehicles and from the Senate Armed Services Committee to require the defense secretary to provide a plan on how the Pentagon intends to spend the tens of billions of new funds. The new work requirements in the package would require many of those receiving SNAP or Medicaid benefits to work 80 hours a month or engage in other community or educational services. Associated Press writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.
