Court awards 7yr-6 month jail term to woman over fake FIR of gang rape
: The court of the special judge SC/ST Act on Monday awarded a seven years and six months prison term to a woman for lodging a fake FIR of gang rape against two men.
Imposing a fine of ₹2.1 lakh on the woman, aged around 24 years, the court directed the state government to recover ₹2 lakh compensation that was given to the woman after the gang rape FIR was lodged in June 2021.
This was the first installment of the ₹8 lakh total compensation which is awarded to a Scheduled Caste victim of gang rape.
The court also suggested several measures to the state government to ensure such cases of fake FIR are not repeated.
'Instances of lodging fake FIR by misusing the special sections of the SC/ST Act are increasing,' the court said in the order.
Both the victims Rajesh Kumar and Bhupendra Kumar Vishwakarma had to spend three months in jail. During the course of the trial, Vishwakarma died.
Additional district judge Vivekanand Saran Tripathi, who is also special judge SC/ST Act, passed the order on Monday.
Government advocate Arvind Kumar Mishra represented the state government in court.
The court awarded two sentences to the woman. The first prison term is of six months under Section 182 of the IPC and a fine of ₹1000. This section is related to giving false information to a public servant with an intent to cause them to use their lawful power against any person.
The court awarded a second sentence of seven years under Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code and a fine of ₹2 lakh. This section deals with falsely initiating criminal proceedings against an individual.
'Both the prison terms will run separately and a fine of ₹2.1 lakh has been imposed,' the court said.
The court also suggested that the government should not award first instalment of the total compensation of ₹2 lakh to the victim after she lodges the rape FIR.
The court suggested that 50% compensation must be awarded to the victim after the police validates the crime and files a chargesheet in court, said Manoj Tripathi, district government counsel (criminal) .
THE CASE
The woman lodged an FIR at Zaidpur police station in Barabanki district on June 29, 2021.
In the FIR, she accused Rajesh Kumar and Bhupendra Kumar Vishwakarma of gang raping her in the adjoining Bakshi Ka Talab area on several occasions between January 2021 and June 2021.
As Bakshi Ka Talab (BKT) falls in Lucknow district, the case was transferred to the BKT police station on May 9, 2022.
Naveena Shukla, the then circle officer, BKT, started the probe on July 14, 2022. She submitted the final report in the court on September 7, 2022, closing the case stating that the gang rape charges were fake.
She suggested in the report that the woman had levelled fake gang rape charges and also suggested action against her.
However, the woman challenged the final report in court.
Thereafter, the trial began in the court which ended this month and the final order was delivered on Monday.
SUGGESTIONS BY COURT
When an FIR of rape/ gang rape is lodged, the police must also mention that how many such FIRs the complainant or her family members have lodged against anyone.
The police must also mention whether any application related to rape charges has also been given by the victim in any police station.
Police must provide such details to the court during the trial of the case.
Police should also take the help of AI tools in finding such facts.
No compensation should be given to the victim after lodging an FIR. The compensation should only be given after the chargesheet is filed in court.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Life term for rapist after girl, 8, testifies
Representative Image AGRA: A Pocso court in Aligarh sentenced a man, in his late 30s, to life imprisonment for raping and physically assaulting an eight-year-old girl on Nov 16, 2020, near a brick kiln, where he worked and the survivor's family lived. Court found Shailesh Manjhi, of Bihar's Nalanda district, guilty under IPC sections 376 (rape), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and Pocso Act. It also imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on him, reports Mohammad Dilshad. The survivor, who was eight at the time, testified that she was playing when Manjhi lured her with a story about burying toffees. He took her under a neem tree, removed her clothes, and "did bad things", she told the court. When she screamed, he punched her in the face, injuring her eyes, and strangled her before fleeing.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Auto driver sentenced to life imprisonment for dowry death
Bengaluru: The stable statements from witnesses, police investigation, and circumstantial evidence corroborated helped in clinching life imprisonment for a 30-year-old auto driver, facing charges of abetting the suicide of his wife, a homemaker through dowry harassment. The convict is Anil N alias Anil Kumar of Maralawadi Town in Kanakapura. Harohalli police had arrested Anil in May 2020 after his wife, R Ashwini, 23, died by suicide. A mother of three children, including a special child, Ashwini married her long-time friend Anil Kumar despite her family's opposition. However, Anil started harassing Ashwini for dowry. He was also accused of having an affair with another woman. Anil was beating up Ashwini regularly over trivial issues. Depressed over his harassment, Ashwini hung herself inside her house on May 14, 2020. The previous night, Ashwini's neighbours had called her parents, saying Anil was badly beating her over dowry issues. Ashwini's father, Rajanna, a farmer, filed a complaint, stating: "Already we gave the couple over 70 grams of gold ornaments. Still, Anil was beating her up for more dowry." Harohalli cops arrested Anil after booking him under the IPC section 304B (dowry death). While submitting the chargesheet to court, police added statements from individuals who had, on many occasions, advised Anil not to ill-treat Ashwini and beat her up for dowry. Public prosecutor MK Roopalakshmi told TOI that the chargesheet witnesses, who had seen Ashwini's ordeals, stood firm during the trial. "Ashwini's parents, her neighbours, and others made statements during the entire trial. Also, the circumstantial evidence mentioned by the police during investigation played a vital role in convicting Anil," she said. Another police officer said they explained to the court how Anil neglected his three children after Ashwini's death. "The children are looked after by Ashwini's parents. Not even one day did Anil visit them or enquired about them. This matter was brought to the court's notice to explain Anil's attitude," he said. Anil, who was out on bail, was present in the court when Judge Kumar HN from additional district and sessions court, Ramanagar, passed the orders. Also, the court slapped a fine of Rs 35,000. Anil is shifted to the district prison.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Man sent to 4-yr RI for abetting suicide of former married lover
Mumbai Observing that the act of the accused and his continued course of conduct created a situation that left the victim with no choice, a sessions court last week sentenced a 30-year-old man to four years of rigorous imprisonment for abetting the suicide of his former lover, a married woman with children, in 2020. The accused, Panvel-based Sachin Phadke, pressured the victim to leave her husband and also threatened to kill her family if she did not relent. Rohini died by jumping off Khopate Bridge in Navi Mumbai on July 28, 2020, leaving her chappals and purse with an identification card behind, leading police to suspect that she had taken the extreme step. Her body was found a day later. In a 26-page judgment copy, Additional Sessions Judge Santosh R Chavan noted that from audio recordings of phone conversations, it was evident that the victim realised her mistake and requested the accused to forgive her. However, the accused continuously pressurised her for marriage. In the recordings, the victim also said she would give her life but would not marry the accused. "The accused had threatened to spoil the deceased's matrimonial life and cause injury to her family. The accused knew that the deceased was a married woman having two daughters; his marriage with the deceased was not possible. Despite this, he was continuously pressurising her for marriage and threatening her. The accused knew the consequences of his act. There is instigation on the part of the accused," the judge said. The judge found a "direct and proximate link between the accused's act of abetment and the decision of the deceased to die by suicide". The judge found him guilty under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code relating to abetment to suicide. The maximum sentence attracted was 10 years of imprisonment. Initially, the reason for the victim's suicide was unknown, and no complaint was filed. However, after the victim's last rites, her brother discovered call recordings on her mobile phone. These recordings revealed conversations between her and Phadke, indicating a relationship. It also showed that Phadke was mentally and physically harassing her, pressuring her for marriage, and threatening to defame her and harm her family. Subsequently, after a chance encounter at a petrol pump, where the victim's daughter recognised the accused and informed her uncle who accompanied her, the family filed a complaint with the Uran police station in Oct 2020. The daughter told the uncle the accused had turned up at their home once and beaten the victim. The accused was arrested and released on bail on Sept 16, 2022. The prosecution examined 10 witnesses, including the victim's minor daughter, husband, brothers and father. They iterated the version that she died due to the harassment of the accused. All denied the defence lawyer's suggestion that she was depressed due to marital woes and her husband's drinking. "After careful examination, I am convinced that she (the minor daughter) was neither tutored nor used for manipulation by the prosecution; hence, her testimony is admissible. Her evidence corroborates with the evidence of other witnesses," the judge said. The judge found the delay in the police complaint adequately explained due to the family's grief.
