AI Tracking of Homeless Camps: Crucial Resource or Civil Rights Nightmare?
In March of 2024, two men, disillusioned by traditional methods of combating homelessness, developed and released Nomadik: a ground-breaking app that uses AI to detect and track homeless encampments across the city of Austin, Texas.
Nomadiks developers touted the app as a way to "[harness] the power of collective intelligence," by involving everyday people in the process of documenting homelessness in the city. But critics pointed out that "even well-intentioned efforts can lead to unintended consequences and further stigmatization."
Now, just over a year since its release, the question is: Is Nomadik helping the homeless, or does it open the door for more sinister AI use down the road?
Trevor Sorrells, co-founder and CEO of Nomadik, believes that the app is a crucial element in understanding and solving the homelessness problem.
"Our tool isnt for surveillance," he stressed. "Its purpose is to take traditionally underfunded and understaffed organizations and give them the tools they need to apply their resources where they will have the biggest impact on both the clients and the community as a whole."
When a user downloads the app, the first screen that appears is a camera, which can be used to photograph homeless encampments. The user can also toggle to a map with encampments outlined in red, and "info drop" what is happening in the area. The user can report things like hazardous waste, drug paraphernalia, and the scale of debris in the area. Another section on the app asks questions about whether the user is experiencing homelessness, domestic violence, etc., to determine what resources the user may need.
Sorrells explained to RCP that the app is meant to expand access to care by creating a "pattern of life" so that service providers know where and whom to focus on. He added that since resources are limited, the app helps providers distribute care "based on the expected impact they will have."
The Argument Against Nomadik
The expanding use of AI tools like Nomadik in cities like Dallas, Waco, San Jose, and San Diego reflect the growing optimism of Sorrells and others that AI could be the key to ending homelessness. Yet Albert Fox Cahn, executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, is concerned that people have not fully thought through where such technology could lead.
This type of AI use is, in his words, a "civil rights nightmare." Cahn pointed out that treating homelessness like crime rather than a humanitarian issue is already a popular practice in many cities. Just because AI technology is used for benign reasons today does not mean that it couldnt be used to "arrest people tomorrow, or even deport them," he stressed.
Cahn told RCP that the idea of using AI to track homeless encampments is born out of a false understanding of what drives homelessness. AI tracking of homeless camps does not solve the problem of homelessness, he pointed out. It simply documents it.
One of Sorrells primary arguments for Nomadik is that its documentation of homelessness allows service providers to better understand a communitys needs and tailor their efforts accordingly. But Cahn dismissed the idea that better data is what is most needed and argues that we should be more focused on prevention.
"[AI] tracking can help police put unhoused folks behind bars, but how can it put a roof over their head?" Cahn asked. If we are to use AI at all, Cahn said, we should be using it to prevent homelessness through tracking "predatory landlord practices," for example.
While Sorrells agrees with Cahn that there are many root causes of homelessness, including the opioid epidemic, mental health struggles, and other systemic challenges, he maintains that AI is part of the solution. Sorrells is not afraid that the technology could be misused and is instead enthusiastic about the ways in which it can streamline outreach and resource distribution.
The broader question still lingers, with no satisfactory answer: Is Nomadik a help or a danger to one of the U.S. most vulnerable populations? Homelessness still remains high in Austin, and continues to rise throughout the U.S. It is unclear how much the app has helped, if at all, but it is clear that Nomadik and other AI advancements will remain a point of controversy as state and federal legislators try to keep pace with AIs constantly evolving technology.
Madelynn McLaughlin is an intern at RealClearPolitics. She graduated from Liberty University in 2025 with a degree in Government: Politics and Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11-06-2025
- Yahoo
AI Tracking of Homeless Camps: Crucial Resource or Civil Rights Nightmare?
In March of 2024, two men, disillusioned by traditional methods of combating homelessness, developed and released Nomadik: a ground-breaking app that uses AI to detect and track homeless encampments across the city of Austin, Texas. Nomadiks developers touted the app as a way to "[harness] the power of collective intelligence," by involving everyday people in the process of documenting homelessness in the city. But critics pointed out that "even well-intentioned efforts can lead to unintended consequences and further stigmatization." Now, just over a year since its release, the question is: Is Nomadik helping the homeless, or does it open the door for more sinister AI use down the road? Trevor Sorrells, co-founder and CEO of Nomadik, believes that the app is a crucial element in understanding and solving the homelessness problem. "Our tool isnt for surveillance," he stressed. "Its purpose is to take traditionally underfunded and understaffed organizations and give them the tools they need to apply their resources where they will have the biggest impact on both the clients and the community as a whole." When a user downloads the app, the first screen that appears is a camera, which can be used to photograph homeless encampments. The user can also toggle to a map with encampments outlined in red, and "info drop" what is happening in the area. The user can report things like hazardous waste, drug paraphernalia, and the scale of debris in the area. Another section on the app asks questions about whether the user is experiencing homelessness, domestic violence, etc., to determine what resources the user may need. Sorrells explained to RCP that the app is meant to expand access to care by creating a "pattern of life" so that service providers know where and whom to focus on. He added that since resources are limited, the app helps providers distribute care "based on the expected impact they will have." The Argument Against Nomadik The expanding use of AI tools like Nomadik in cities like Dallas, Waco, San Jose, and San Diego reflect the growing optimism of Sorrells and others that AI could be the key to ending homelessness. Yet Albert Fox Cahn, executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, is concerned that people have not fully thought through where such technology could lead. This type of AI use is, in his words, a "civil rights nightmare." Cahn pointed out that treating homelessness like crime rather than a humanitarian issue is already a popular practice in many cities. Just because AI technology is used for benign reasons today does not mean that it couldnt be used to "arrest people tomorrow, or even deport them," he stressed. Cahn told RCP that the idea of using AI to track homeless encampments is born out of a false understanding of what drives homelessness. AI tracking of homeless camps does not solve the problem of homelessness, he pointed out. It simply documents it. One of Sorrells primary arguments for Nomadik is that its documentation of homelessness allows service providers to better understand a communitys needs and tailor their efforts accordingly. But Cahn dismissed the idea that better data is what is most needed and argues that we should be more focused on prevention. "[AI] tracking can help police put unhoused folks behind bars, but how can it put a roof over their head?" Cahn asked. If we are to use AI at all, Cahn said, we should be using it to prevent homelessness through tracking "predatory landlord practices," for example. While Sorrells agrees with Cahn that there are many root causes of homelessness, including the opioid epidemic, mental health struggles, and other systemic challenges, he maintains that AI is part of the solution. Sorrells is not afraid that the technology could be misused and is instead enthusiastic about the ways in which it can streamline outreach and resource distribution. The broader question still lingers, with no satisfactory answer: Is Nomadik a help or a danger to one of the U.S. most vulnerable populations? Homelessness still remains high in Austin, and continues to rise throughout the U.S. It is unclear how much the app has helped, if at all, but it is clear that Nomadik and other AI advancements will remain a point of controversy as state and federal legislators try to keep pace with AIs constantly evolving technology. Madelynn McLaughlin is an intern at RealClearPolitics. She graduated from Liberty University in 2025 with a degree in Government: Politics and Policy.
Yahoo
27-03-2025
- Yahoo
Telling 23andMe to delete personal data may not entirely protect your genetic information
On March 23, 2025, genetic testing company 23andMe announced it filed for bankruptcy — sparking a firestorm of articles and online posts advising consumers to delete their personal data in order to protect it from ending up in a new, unknown owner's hands. Major news outlets, including NPR, CNN and The Washington Post, published stories about this; the Post column's headline read "Delete your 23andMe data right now." The Post story said that "unless you take action, there is a risk your genetic information could end up in someone else's hands — and used in ways you had never considered." State attorneys general also issued alerts on social media and government websites calling on users to delete their private information. Calls for users to delete their genetic information from 23andMe's databases actually began months earlier, prompted by signs of trouble at the company. However, some online voiced skepticism that 23andMe's process for users to delete their data would actually protect their information. "Until I see HOW they handle data deletion, it's not deleted," one Redditor said; an X user said deleting accounts "may or may not" protect privacy. In the company's letter announcing its bankruptcy sale, it said customers "still have the ability to delete their data and 23andMe account" and "the filing does not change how we store, manage, or protect customer data." However, privacy and data experts said it is impossible to verify whether the company's data deletion process is secure — meaning that simply requesting that the company delete your account and destroy DNA samples doesn't mean your information is 100% protected in the case of a sale. Still, experts recommend consumers request 23andMe delete their data using the company's processes, as it is the only method of protection available as of this writing. The company's bankruptcy sale letter said 23andMe will "look to secure a partner who shares in its commitment to data privacy." 23andMe's privacy statement notes that if the company is "involved in a bankruptcy, merger, acquisition, reorganization, or sale of assets, your Personal Information may be accessed, sold or transferred as part of that transaction." 23andMe did not respond to a request for comment as of this writing. Instructions for directing 23andMe to delete personal data are available on the company's website and in a consumer alert issued in March by California Attorney General Rob Bonta. Following these instructions is "harm reduction," said Albert Fox Cahn, an attorney and director of the privacy rights group Surveillance Technology Oversight Project. "There's no reason not to do it, but it only gives me very modest peace of mind," Cahn said. Privacy laws vary state by state — but Cahn said the company would be risking "serious litigation" if it deliberately kept people's data after a deletion request. What's more likely, he said, is an accidental situation, like data leaking during a transfer to another owner or deletion requests falling through the cracks. Mike Cobb, chief information officer and director of engineering at data recovery company DriveSavers, agreed. "This type of sensitive data changing hands has a real chance of human error," Cobb said. He added that the only thing consumers can do at the moment, however, is trust that the company will delete their personal information when directed. Cobb said there are certain controls companies can use to ensure a "very good chance" that sensitive data doesn't end up in the wrong hands, including audits conducted by independent entities, storing server information in-house and automating the deletion process, rather than having a human manually delete accounts. 23andMe did not respond to detailed questions about its privacy controls; the company does use a third-party auditor but it is unclear if it only audits its finances, not its privacy protections. "We would hope that they have been responsible, and they continue to be responsible with the customer's very, very private information," Cobb said, adding: "But it is a private company, and you just — there are some times you're not going to know until there's an event that proves otherwise." The company has already dealt with data leaks before; in 2023, hackers stole information users chose to share with their DNA matches, affecting millions of people. The hack appeared to target users with Ashkenazi Jewish and Chinese heritage; lawmakers raised concerns that it "could be used by foreign governments, hate groups, and other bad actors to discriminate and target minority groups." 23andMe's reported website crash could also exacerbate chances for human error, Cobb said. Cobb and Cahn also warned that third parties may already have access to information voluntarily shared by consumers and the company. "We already know that there's already been so much genetic data that's accessed — not just through 23andMe but through things like GEDmatch, which pulls on 23andMe and other DNA data sources," Cahn said, referencing a DNA comparison database used by consumers and law enforcement. "To some extent, the genetic horse is out the barn." In 23andMe's full privacy statement, the company said it shares personal information with service providers and contractors who help the company with order fulfillment, processing and analyzing samples, customer care support, cloud storage, marketing and analytics, and more. Consumers may direct the company to share personal information with anyone, including third party services like social networks, applications and services like GEDmatch. 23andMe warns consumers that if they do choose to share information with a third party, they may use the information "differently than we do under this Privacy Statement." 23andMe also has an opt-in research program, in which customers may share genetic information with scientists, nonprofit organizations, pharmaceutical companies and more. While genetic data shared in this fashion is supposed to be shared without any identifying information, 23andMe's research consent page notes there is "a very small risk that someone could get access to your Personal Information (information that can be used to identify you) without your permission in the event of a privacy breach." Even if the genetic data shared is stripped of "identifying information," as 23andMe said, according to Cahn, it is incredibly difficult to make a DNA profile truly anonymous. Cahn compared trying to anonymize DNA to supposedly anonymous GPS data — just taking someone's name off their location data, for example, does not hide the fact that the person is moving from their home address, work address and other places they frequent. "There's not much folks can do if this data gets out. When you're dealing with a security breach, when you're dealing with a hacker, you can change your social security number, you can even change your name. You can't change your DNA," Cahn said. "Biometric data breaches pose a truly unique threat, because there isn't really a way to mitigate the harm." 23andMe. "Addressing Data Security Concerns." 23andMe Blog, 7 Oct. 2023, Accessed 26 Mar. 2025. ---. "An Open Letter to 23andMe Customers." 23andMe Blog, 24 Mar. 2025, Accessed 26 Mar. 2025. ---. "Privacy Statement." 14 Mar. 2025, Accessed 26 Mar. 2025. ---. "Research Consent Document." Accessed 26 Mar. 2025. "Attorney General Bonta Urgently Issues Consumer Alert for 23andMe Customers." State of California - Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General, 21 Mar. 2025, Accessed 26 Mar. 2025. "Attorney General Tong Issues Inquiry Letter to 23andMe Following Data Breach." - Connecticut's Official State Website, 31 Oct. 2023, Accessed 26 Mar. 2025. Cahn, Albert Fox. "S.T.O.P. - the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project." S.T.O.P. - the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, 5 Apr. 2023, Accessed 26 Mar. 2025. Cobb, Mike. "Mike Cobb | Director of Engineering at DriveSavers Data Recovery." LinkedIn, Accessed 26 Mar. 2025. "How to Upload Your 23andMe DNA to GEDmatch: Step-By-Step Guide | GEDmatch." GEDmatch - Comprehensive Solutions for Genetic Genealogy and Family Tree Reseach, 15 Aug. 2022, Accessed 26 Mar. 2025. "Investor FAQs | 23andMe, Inc." 23andMe, Accessed 26 Mar. 2025. McElhaney, Alicia. "23andMe Site Went down as Customers Struggled to Delete Data." WSJ, The Wall Street Journal, 25 Mar. 2025, Accessed 26 Mar. 2025. "Ranking Member Cassidy Raises Concerns over 23andMe Data Leaks, Potential Targeting of Minority Groups | the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions." Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, 20 Oct. 2023, Accessed 26 Mar. 2025. "What's in Your Account Settings?" 23andMe Customer Care, Accessed 26 Mar. 2025.
Yahoo
20-11-2024
- Yahoo
Rapid7 Expands Exposure Command with Support for AWS Resource Control Policies
Rapid7 Launch partnership offers Rapid7 customers centralized visibility and control over access permissions, accounts, resources, and services across their hybrid environment BOSTON, Nov. 20, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rapid7, Inc. (NASDAQ: RPD), a leader in extended risk and threat detection, today announced that its Exposure Command solution now supports Amazon Web Services (AWS) Resource Control Policies (RCPs). As a launch partner for this powerful feature, Rapid7 now provides additional visibility, insights, and best practices that guide customers in addressing complex enterprise Identity and Access Management (IAM) challenges across the modern attack surface. As businesses rapidly scale their AWS environments, they need additional visibility and tighter security controls in managing proliferating identities, resources, and their corresponding permissions. RCPs facilitate this by giving AWS customers more granular control over access at the resource level. Rapid7's Exposure Command empowers organizations to implement a zero-trust approach that seamlessly integrates with their existing AWS cloud infrastructure, including AWS Service Control Policies (SCPs), which set permissions at the principal level. Through the addition of RCP support, Rapid7 enables customers to achieve a higher level of control, ensuring that resources and data remain protected, even as environments scale rapidly. 'We're proud to partner with AWS for their RCP launch, as we believe it underscores our organizations' shared commitment to advancing cloud security,' said Craig Adams, chief product officer at Rapid7. 'Now, our combined support for RCPs and SCPs in Exposure Command significantly reduces identity-based risk for our customers, ensuring they have the tools needed to enforce zero-trust policies, manage cloud permissions, and confidently drive innovation at scale.' Exposure Command combines the power of 360-degree attack surface visibility with high-fidelity context enrichment, aggregating findings from Rapid7's native exposure detection capabilities as well as third-party enrichment sources from customers' existing technology ecosystem. This situational awareness enables teams to quickly zero in on the exposures attackers have in their sights, with the threat-aware risk context needed to assess, prioritize, and remediate vulnerabilities more efficiently and effectively. Key Benefits of Exposure Command's New RCP Support: Centralized RCP Monitoring and Governance : Exposure Command offers a single, unified view of RCP usage, making it easy for security teams to monitor and manage policies across their AWS environments. Enhanced Identity and Access Controls : RCP support extends Rapid7's existing identity analysis capabilities, allowing organizations to automatically refine permissions organization-wide, prevent excessive access, and enforce least-privilege access (LPA) across AWS resources. Proactive Best Practice Recommendations : Rapid7 provides expert guidance on implementing RCPs effectively, enabling customers to align security controls with business objectives and regulatory requirements. Comprehensive AWS Coverage: In addition to RCPs and SCPs, Exposure Command offers a wide range of tools to protect AWS resources, including automated scanning and identification of vulnerabilities; real-time threat alerts for suspicious activities; and visibility and protection for AI and machine learning resources. Story Continues As cloud adoption continues to grow, Rapid7 remains committed to delivering the tools and insights organizations need to reduce risk, maintain compliance, and innovate securely alongside AWS. Learn more about Rapid7, Exposure Command, and the company's complete line of products for AWS customers on Amazon Marketplace: About Rapid7 Rapid7, Inc. (NASDAQ: RPD) is on a mission to create a safer digital world by making cybersecurity simpler and more accessible. We empower security professionals to manage a modern attack surface through our best-in-class technology, leading-edge research, and broad, strategic expertise. Rapid7's comprehensive security solutions help more than 11,000 global customers unite cloud risk management with threat detection and response to reduce attack surfaces and eliminate threats with speed and precision. For more information, visit our website, check out our blog, or follow us on LinkedIn or X. Rapid7 Media Relations Stacey Holleran Sr. Manager, Global Communications press@ (857) 216-7804 Rapid7 Investor Contact Elizabeth Chwalk Sr. Director, Investor Relations investors@ (617) 865-4277
