Sunscreen may have kept ancient humans alive during a polar reversal
Despite the sunscreen misinformation you might see online, ancient humans did face problems from the sun's harmful rays. Ancient Homo sapiens about 40,000 years ago may have even benefited from some of the same technologies that we use to avoid sunburns today–mineral sunscreen, tailored clothes, and using caves for shade and shelter. These advances may have been particularly advantageous when Earth's magnetic poles switched a bit, according to a study published April 16 in the journal Science Advances.
Earth's magnetic field is created by its rotation, as well as the rotation of our planet's core. The core, which is made up of molten iron, generates electrical currents. These currents extend a sort of halo around the globe that helps protect Earth from cosmic radiation. This radiation thins Earth's ozone layer and lets in more ultra violet (UV) and the interaction of these particles with the Earth's magnetic field also results in aurora.
Currently, this magnetic field has a north and south orientation in the form of Earth's North and South poles. This is why you typically see auroras in regions close to the poles, where magnetic fields are the strongest.
Occasionally, these poles wander from their traditional geographic positions. These are called geomagnetic excursions. This natural process has occurred roughly 180 times over our planet's 4.5 billion-year geological history. Scientists believe that it is caused by some instability in the processes that generate Earth's magnetic field.
The most recent geomagnetic excursion is called the Laschamps excursion and occurred about 41 to 42,000 years ago, when the magnetic North Pole began to shift over Europe. During this reversal, the magnetic field weakened, causing aurora over most of the globe and allowed more harmful UV light to come in from space.
[ Related: A geomagnetic curveball 42,000 years ago changed our planet forever. ]
Around this same time, archeological evidence shows that Homo sapiens were likely making tailored clothing for themselves and using a pigment called ochre with greater frequency. Ochre itself has some sun-protective properties when applied to the skin and may have helped ancient humans spread throughout present-day Europe and Asia as the Neanderthal population was declining.
'In the study, we combined all of the regions where the magnetic field would not have been connected, allowing cosmic radiation, or any kind of energetic particles from the sun, to seep all the way in to the ground,' study co-author Agnit Mukhopadhyay, a space physicist at the University of Michigan, said in a statement. 'We found that many of those regions actually match pretty closely with early human activity from 41,000 years ago, specifically an increase in the use of caves and an increase in the use of prehistoric sunscreen.'
The team built models of the interaction of space particles and Earth's magnetic field using the Space Weather Modeling Framework. Mukhopadhyay developed a model that predicts how this plasma system will interact with Earth's magnetic field–ultmately forming an aurora.
Working with Sanja Panovska from Germany's GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Mukhopadhyay created a 3D reconstruction of Earth's geospace system. They combined three separate models: a global model that reconstructs the geomagnetic field during the Laschamps excursion, one model of the space plasma environment around Earth, and another model that predicted what Earth's aurora looked like at the time. The resulting 3D model showed where charged particles were able to slip through Earth's geomagnetic field.
During the Laschamps excursion, Earth's magnetic field reduced in size to about 10 percent of its current strength. As a result, Earth's magnetic poles drooped down near the equator and the magnetic field lines expanded. This expansion meant the aurora could have been visible all over Europe and into northern Africa.
When the team laid their 3D map of Earth's space system over the world, they found that the time period of the Laschamps excursion coincided with periods of change for groups of humans living on the planet
Homo sapiens and Neanderthals coexisted in Europe beginning roughly 56,000 years ago. However, Neanderthals were no longer identified as a species in Europe by about 40,000 years ago.
'What some of the differences are between these species, between Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans, that might account for that disappearance has been a major anthropological question for decades,' study co-author and University of Michigan anthropologist Raven Garvey, said in a statement.
Garvey suggests that clothing itself might have been a major difference between the species. The technological means of making clothing that fitted to the body have been discovered at archaeological sites associated with anatomically modern humans, but not necessarily sites where Neanderthals lived.
Archaeologists have found scrapers used in hide production, as well as needles and awls needed for sewing at sites associated with anatomically modern humans. According to Garvey, tailored clothing like this was significantly warmer. This added warmth meant that people could travel farther to find food and provided protection from sun damage, she said.
[ Related: Ice age humans made needles from animal bones, archeologists discover. ]
Because there are multiple detrimental effects of solar radiation, including potentially increased infant mortality, 'having protection against solar radiation would also have conferred significant advantage to anyone who possessed it,' Garvey said.
Additionally, ancient humans may have ramped up their use of ochre. This naturally occurring pigment is composed of iron oxide, clay, and silica and has been used by several species of hominins for thousands of years. People used it to paint objects, on cave walls and even to decorate their bodies.
'There have been some experimental tests that show it has sunscreen-like properties. It's a pretty effective sunscreen, and there are also ethnographic populations that have used it primarily for that purpose,' Garvey said. 'Its increased production and its association primarily with anatomically modern humans (during the Laschamps) is also suggestive of people's having used it for this purpose as well.'
According to the team, while these findings are not definitive, they offer a new way to look at already existing data.
'I think it's important to note that these findings are correlational and (ours is a) meta analysis, if you will,' Garvey said. 'But I think it is a fresh perspective on these data in light of the Laschamps excursion.'
The 3D model offers us a way to predict how future excursions might affect us. If a reversal like this were to occur today, we could see complete blackouts with communication satellites not working, telecommunications in disarray. These types of events have already happened, even during smaller space weather events.
This work also highlights that humans were still able to survive on a planet whose atmosphere looked a lot different than ours does today.
'Many people say that a planet cannot sustain life without a strong magnetic field,' Mukhopadhyay said. 'Looking at prehistoric Earth, and especially at events like this, helps us study exoplanetary physics from a very different vantage point. Life did exist back then. But it was a little bit different than it is today.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Americans who live near coastlines and lakefronts may face heightened ALS risk
If you live near bodies of water frequently impacted by harmful algal blooms, you may be at an increased risk of dying from ALS, new research reveals. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, the debilitating neurodegenerative disease commonly known as 'Lou Gehrig's Disease,' is influenced by genetics and environmental factors. It dramatically slashes the patient's life expectancy, with people typically passing away within two to five years of diagnosis. Some 5,000 are diagnosed with ALS each year in the U.S., and there are approximately 15 new cases each day. Recently, Grey's Anatomy star Eric Dane announced he was battling the disease and told Good Morning America that his body's right side had 'completely stopped working.' Now, researchers at the University of Michigan Medicine say toxins produced by algal blooms in lakes and along American coasts could influence disease progression. 'While there is still limited research into the mechanism by which cyanobacteria toxins affect neurodegenerative diseases, our findings suggest that living near or participating in activities in these water bodies may influence the progression of ALS,' Dr. Stephen Goutman, the school's Harriet Hiller research professor, director of the Pranger ALS Clinic, and associate director of the ALS Center of Excellence, said in a statement. Goutman is the senior author of the study which was published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Specifically, the researchers have found a toxin produced by the bloom cyanobacteria in brain and spinal fluid cerebral spinal fluid samples of people with ALS. It's known as ß-methylamino-L-alanine. Increasingly driven by human-caused climate change and nutrient pollution, the blooms are caused when cyanobacteria grows dense and out of control. Cyanobacteria produce several toxic agents that are linked neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. They surveyed participants who were seen at the University of Michigan Pranger ALS Clinic, many of whom lived within three miles of a harmful algal bloom. They measured the duration and extent of their exposure using satellite data from the Cyanobacteria Assessment Network and their residential and health histories. Ultimately, they found that living near blooms -- especially if swimming or boating -- was associated with dying of ALS nearly one year sooner. The people with the most significant exposures both lived near harmful blooms and used a private well as their water source. People in the Midwest may be particularly threatened partially due to pervasive industrial and agricultural productions in the region. Michigan's Lake Erie is frequently impacted by these blooms. 'If exposure to cyanobacteria toxins is a meaningful risk factor for ALS, the large number of inland lakes from to such bacteria in the Midwest may partly explain why the disease incidence is much higher than other parts of the country,' Dr. Stuart Batterman, first author and professor of environmental health sciences at the university's School of Public Health, said.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Neanderthal extinction: a space physicist reopens the debate
Neanderthals have long been the subject of intense scientific debate. This is largely because we still lack clear answers to some of the big questions about their existence and supposed disappearance. One of the latest developments is a recent study from the University of Michigan, published in the journal Science Advances. It proposes that Neanderthals went extinct for astrophysical reasons. The work was led by Agnit Mukhopadhyay, an expert in space physics, a discipline that studies natural plasmas, especially those found within our own solar system. Plasma is the state of matter that dominates the universe: the Sun and stars are huge balls of plasma, as are the northern lights. Mukhopadhyay's research suggests that a shift in the Earth's magnetic poles around 41,000 years ago, known as the Laschamp event, may have contributed to the extinction of Neanderthals. According to his work, the extreme weakening of the Earth's magnetic field during that event allowed for greater penetration of cosmic and ultraviolet radiation. This would have generated more aggressive environmental conditions that Neanderthals could not withstand, giving our own species, Homo sapiens, an edge. In this context, sapiens would have had an advantage over Neanderthals thanks to their presumed use of close-fitting clothing, ochre – a mineral with protective properties against the sun – and taking shelter in caves. Caves which, by the way, on numerous occasions were inhabited by both Neanderthals and our own species. The hypothesis is interesting, and is based on innovative three-dimensional models of the Earth's geospatial system during this period. However, as with many hypotheses that attempt to explain complex phenomena on the basis of a single variable, its scope and some of the assumptions on which it is based need to be examined more closely. One of the pillars of this hypothesis is that Neanderthals did not wear tight-fitting clothing, and would therefore have been more exposed to the harmful effects of solar radiation. It is true that sewing needles have not been definitvely linked to Neanderthals. The first needles documented in Eurasia are associated with either Denisovan or sapiens populations around 50,000 years ago, and in western Europe they did not appear until around 23,000 years ago. But this does not mean that Neanderthals did not wear clothing. In fact, the Homo sapiens who lived during episodes of extreme cold (such as the Heinrich 4 event, which occurred some 39,600 years ago) did not have sewing needles either, but they did have enough technology to make garments, and possibly tents and footwear. There is ample archaeological evidence of Neanderthals processing hides, such as the systematic use of scrapers and other tools associated with the tanning process. However, the use of fur or clothing has much older origins. In fact, the genetic study of lice has revealed that humans were already wearing clothing at least 200,000 years ago. Furthermore, in cold environments such as those they inhabited in Europe, it would have been unfeasible to survive without some form of body protection. Even if they did not have needles, it is very plausible that they used alternative systems such as ligatures or bone splinters to adapt animal hides to the body. The absence of needles should not be confused with the absence of functional clothing. The study also highlights the use of ochre by Homo sapiens, which it says offered protection against solar radiation. Although experiments have been carried out to demonstrate certain blocking capacities of ochre against ultraviolet (UV) rays, its use by human populations is not limited to a single group. In fact, evidence of pigment use during the same period has been found in Africa, the Near East and the Iberian Peninsula, and among different human lineages. The use of ochre has been documented in Neanderthal contexts for more than 100,000 years, both in Europe and in the Levant. Its application may have had multiple purposes: symbolic, therapeutic, cosmetic, healing, and even an insect repellent. There are no solid grounds for claiming that its use for protective purposes was exclusive to Homo sapiens, especially when both species shared spaces and technologies for millennia. Nor can we be sure that it was used as a protective sunscreen. Leer más: One of the most significant factors may have been the marked difference in population size. There were fewer Neanderthals, meaning they would have been assimilated by the much more numerous populations of Homo sapiens. This assimilation is reflected in the DNA of current populations, suggesting that, rather than becoming extinct, Neanderthals were absorbed into the evolutionary process. Technology also played a part– as far as we know, Neanderthals did not use hunting weapons at a distance. The invention and use of projectiles associated with hunting activities – first in stone and later in hard animal materials – appear to be an innovation specific to Homo sapiens. Their development may have given them an adaptive advantage in open environments, and a greater capacity to exploit different prey and environments. Leer más: Associating the Neanderthal 'extinction' to their supposed failure to adapt to increased solar radiation during the Laschamp excursion oversimplifies a phenomenon that remains the subject of heated debate. Put simply, the archaeological record does not support Mukhopadhyay's hypothesis. There is no evidence of an abrupt demographic collapse coinciding with this geomagnetic event, nor of a widespread catastrophic impact on other human or animal species. Moreover, if solar radiation had been such a determining factor, one would expect high mortality also among populations of sapiens that did not wear tight clothing or live in caves (in warm regions of Africa, for instance). As far as we know, this did not happen. When trying to explain the disappearance of Neanderthals, it is vital that we integrate multiple lines of archaeological, paleoanthropological and genetic evidence. These humans were not simply victims of their own technological clumsiness or of a hostile environment that they failed to cope with. They were an adaptive and culturally complex species that, for more than 300,000 years, survived multiple climatic changes – including other geomagnetic shifts such as the Blake event, which occurred about 120,000 years ago. Neanderthals developed sophisticated tools, dominated vast territories and shared many more traits with us than was assumed for decades. So did the magnetic reversal of the Earth's magnetic poles wipe out the Neanderthals? The answer is: probably not. Este artículo fue publicado originalmente en The Conversation, un sitio de noticias sin fines de lucro dedicado a compartir ideas de expertos académicos. Lee mas: Neanderthals: the oldest art in the world wasn't made by Homo sapiens Modern human DNA contains bits from all over the Neanderthal genome – except the Y chromosome. What happened? How Neanderthal language differed from modern human – they probably didn't use metaphors Las personas firmantes no son asalariadas, ni consultoras, ni poseen acciones, ni reciben financiación de ninguna compañía u organización que pueda obtener beneficio de este artículo, y han declarado carecer de vínculos relevantes más allá del cargo académico citado anteriormente.
Hamilton Spectator
3 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Lawyers say plea deal is being pursued for Chinese scientist charged in US toxic fungus case
DETROIT (AP) — Lawyers for a Chinese scientist charged with conspiring to nurse a toxic fungus at a University of Michigan lab already are in talks to try to resolve the case, according to a court document filed Tuesday. 'The parties are currently engaged in plea negotiations and request this additional time so that they can continue engaging in plea negotiations,' a prosecutor and defense attorneys said in a joint filing. Yunqing Jian, 33, was a researcher at the University of Michigan when she was arrested on June 3. She's accused of helping her boyfriend, another Chinese scientist, try to work with a pathogen known as Fusarium graminearum, which can attack wheat, barley, maize and rice. Zunyong Liu, 34, was was turned away at the Detroit airport in July 2024 and sent back to China after red plant material was discovered in his backpack, the FBI said. After first denying it, Liu acknowledged that he was carrying different strains of Fusarium graminearum, investigators said. The university had no federal permits to work with the material. Jian's Boston-based lawyers have declined to comment. She remains in custody without bond. Federal authorities say the case presents national security concerns, though they have not alleged that the scientists had a plan to unleash the fungus. Fusarium graminearum is already prevalent in the U.S., and scientists have been studying it for decades. Jian was a postdoctoral scholar at Zhejiang University in Hangzhou, China, before being granted a visa to conduct research at a Texas university. She has been working in Michigan since summer 2023. Separately, another scientist headed to the University of Michigan was arrested June 8 at Detroit Metropolitan Airport after arriving on a flight from China. She is charged with shipping biological material to the U.S. without a permit. The material is related to worms. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
