Vaccine experts removed by Trump health chief sound the alarm

The Trump administration dismissed all 17 members of a key US advisory panel, citing alleged financial conflicts of interest. (AP pic)
WASHINGTON : Vaccination experts recently fired by Donald Trump's administration sounded the alarm in a Monday editorial, saying they were 'deeply concerned' by the actions of a US health secretary known for his vaccine skepticism.
Last week Robert F Kennedy Jr dismissed all 17 members of a key advisory committee, accusing them of financial conflicts of interest.
Two days later, he announced the appointment of eight new members, including several vaccine critics, such as a biochemist who became the darling of the anti-vax movement.
The unprecedented measure was roundly criticised by the Democratic opposition, as well as by several renowned experts and health authorities who expressed concern it represented an attack on medical expertise.
The 17 former members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), who advised the country's main health agency, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), published an editorial in the JAMA medical journal saying the ACIP was 'at a crossroads.'
'The abrupt dismissal of the entire membership of the ACIP… the appointment of 8 new ACIP members just 2 days later, and the recent reduction of CDC staff dedicated to immunisations have left the US vaccine programme critically weakened,' they warned.
'These actions have stripped the programme of the institutional knowledge and continuity that have been essential to its success over decades,' they added, denouncing the recent changes to Covid-19 vaccine policy announced by Kennedy on social media and which 'appear to have bypassed the standard, transparent, and evidence-based review process.'
'As former ACIP members, we are deeply concerned that these destabilising decisions, made without clear rationale, may roll back the achievements of US immunisation policy, impact people's access to lifesaving vaccines, and ultimately put US families at risk of dangerous and preventable illnesses.'
RFK Jr in recent years has relayed numerous conspiracy theories about Covid vaccines and alleged links between vaccination and autism, notably through the Children's Health Defense organisation he co-founded, which have long been debunked.
Since becoming head of the US department of health and human services in February, he has initiated a major overhaul of health policy.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Malay Mail

2 hours ago

• Malay Mail

Clock ticking: Debt fears, Medicaid cuts stall Trump's US$2.8t ‘Big Beautiful Bill' ahead of July 4 deadline

Trump, US Senate Republicans face test as 'Big Beautiful Bill' deadline looms Republicans face resistance over tax-cut bill due to debt concerns Senate parliamentarian's decision crucial for bill's passage Medicaid cuts in bill opposed by some Senate Republicans WASHINGTON, June 23 — US President Donald Trump and his allies in the Senate face a political free-for-all over passage of his sweeping tax-cut and spending legislation, which Republican congressional leaders hope to enact in coming days despite growing resistance from different party factions. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, House Speaker Mike Johnson and administration officials are pressing Republican lawmakers to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act so Trump can sign it into law before the July 4 US Independence Day holiday. But hardline Republicans have redoubled their push for additional spending cuts after an official forecast that the bill would add at least US$2.8 trillion (RM12 trillion) to the US$36.2 trillion US debt. Other lawmakers, looking to minimise the impact of cuts on social programmes including Medicaid, have also voiced adamant opposition to the bill's language. Republicans control the Senate by a 53-47 majority and the House by 220-212. One Republican from each chamber has opposed the legislation from the beginning due to the debt. Thune aims to begin Senate action by the middle of this week and complete passage by the weekend, sending the bill back to the House for final approval. Trump is expected to turn up the heat on senators this week, according to Republican lawmakers who view him as 'the closer.' 'Great unity in the Republican Party, perhaps unity like we have never seen before. Now let's get the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill done,' Trump said in a social media post on Sunday. Lawmakers are still waiting for the Senate parliamentarian, the chamber's nonpartisan gatekeeper, to decide whether the legislation qualifies for the privileged status needed to circumvent Democrats and the 60-vote Senate filibuster and pass it with only 51 votes. 'The Senate Republican bill is, simply put, bigger cuts, bigger betrayal,' Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said. 'It makes even deeper cuts to healthcare. It destroys American clean energy. It raises costs on working and middle-class families. And it rewards those at the very top,' he said. Pushback Some Republicans are pushing back on Thune's schedule in hopes of gaining more time to negotiate bigger savings. 'There's no way. There's no way,' Senator Ron Johnson, a leading fiscal hawk who wants to cut federal spending back to pre-Covid pandemic levels, said when asked if he could support the bill this week. The Wisconsin Republican said he is coordinating with fellow hardline Senators Mike Lee and Rick Scott, who want to glean additional savings from green tax credits and the Medicaid healthcare programme for lower-income Americans, respectively. 'If we had all the money in the world, why would you make a change? We don't. We're running US$2 trillion deficits,' Scott told reporters. The legislation has yet to pass muster with the Senate parliamentarian, a nonpartisan referee who has said Republican efforts to restrict food assistance, curtail the ability of judges to block government policies, slash funding for financial watchdogs and reverse Biden vehicle policy, violate budgetary rules. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said last week the House version of the bill could lead to a US$2.8 trillion increase in the federal deficit over the next decade. The deficit hike would reach a total of US$3.4 trillion, if the cost of rising interest payments due to increased borrowing needs were included, according to the agency, which took into account the bill's potential impact on economic activity. The report contradicted Republican claims that tax cuts would lead to buoyant economic growth and pay for themselves by generating higher revenues from increased business activity. In a Senate floor speech last week, Thune cited a White House Council of Economic Advisers projection the legislation would increase federal revenue by US$4.1 trillion, saying it would more than offset the CBO's deficit estimate. Medicaid hit A revised Senate version of the legislation would reduce Medicaid provider taxes from 6 per cent to 3.5 per cent by 2031 in states that expanded the programme to able-bodied recipients under the Affordable Care Act. That provision is opposed by several Senate Republicans who say it would undercut funding for rural hospitals. 'They cannot defund rural hospitals,' said Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican who has positioned himself in the debate as a champion of Medicaid. But Republicans signaled the time for negotiations would soon come to an end and predicted that wavering members would ultimately support the legislation. 'Some people are going to have to settle for a ham and egg sandwich without the ham. That's just the way it is,' said Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana. — Reuters

Free Malaysia Today

2 hours ago

• Free Malaysia Today

DeepSeek aids China's military and evaded export controls, says US official

US lawmakers said DeepSeek transmits American users' data to China through 'backend infrastructure' connected to China Mobile. WASHINGTON : Artificial intelligence (AI) firm DeepSeek is aiding China's military and intelligence operations, a senior US official told Reuters, adding that the Chinese tech startup sought to use Southeast Asian shell companies to access high-end semiconductors that cannot be shipped to China under US rules. Hangzhou-based DeepSeek sent shockwaves through the technology world in January, claiming its AI reasoning models were on par with or better than US industry-leading models at a fraction of the cost. 'We understand that DeepSeek has willingly provided and will likely continue to provide support to China's military and intelligence operations,' a senior state department official told Reuters in an interview. 'This effort goes above and beyond open-source access to DeepSeek's AI models,' the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity in order to speak about US government information. The US government's assessment of DeepSeek's activities and links to the Chinese government have not been previously reported and come amid a wide-scale US-China trade war. Among the allegations, the official said DeepSeek is sharing user information and statistics with Beijing's surveillance apparatus. Chinese law requires companies operating in China to provide data to the government when requested. However, the suggestion that DeepSeek is already doing so is likely to raise privacy and other concerns for the firm's tens of millions of daily global users. The US also maintains restrictions on companies it believes are linked to China's military-industrial complex. US lawmakers have previously said that DeepSeek, based on its privacy disclosure statements, transmits American users' data to China through 'backend infrastructure' connected to China Mobile, a Chinese state-owned telecommunications giant. DeepSeek did not respond to questions about its privacy practices. 'The company is also referenced more than 150 times in procurement records for China's People's Liberation Army and other entities affiliated with the Chinese defense industrial base,' said the official, adding that DeepSeek had provided technology services to PLA research institutions. Reuters could not independently verify the procurement data. The official also said the company was employing workarounds to US export controls to gain access to advanced US-made chips. The US conclusions reflect a growing skepticism in Washington that the capabilities behind the rapid rise of one of China's flagship AI enterprises may have been exaggerated and relied heavily on US technology. 'DeepSeek has access to 'large volumes' of US firm Nvidia's high-end H100 chips,' said the official. Since 2022 those chips have been under US export restrictions due to Washington's concerns that China could use them to advance its military capabilities or jump ahead in the AI race. 'DeepSeek sought to use shell companies in Southeast Asia to evade export controls, and DeepSeek is seeking to access data centres in Southeast Asia to remotely access US chips,' the official said. The official declined to say if DeepSeek had successfully evaded export controls or offer further details about the shell companies. DeepSeek also did not respond to questions about its acquisition of Nvidia chips or the alleged use of shell companies. When asked if the US would implement further export controls or sanctions against DeepSeek, the official said the department had 'nothing to announce at this time'. China's foreign ministry and commerce ministry did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. 'We do not support parties that have violated US export controls or are on the US entity lists,' an Nvidia spokesman said in a prepared statement, adding that 'with the current export controls, we are effectively out of the China data centre market, which is now served only by competitors such as Huawei'. Access to restricted chips DeepSeek has said two of its AI models that Silicon Valley executives and US tech company engineers have showered with praise – DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1 – are on par with OpenAI and Meta's META.O most advanced models. AI experts, however, have expressed skepticism, arguing the true costs of training the models were likely much higher than the US$5.58 million the startup said was spent on computing power. Reuters has previously reported that US officials were investigating whether DeepSeek had access to restricted AI chips. DeepSeek has H100 chips that it procured after the US banned Nvidia from selling those chips to China, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters, adding that the number was far smaller than the 50,000 H100s that the CEO of another AI startup had claimed DeepSeek possesses in a January interview with CNBC. Reuters was unable to verify the number of H100 chips DeepSeek has. 'Our review indicates that DeepSeek used lawfully acquired H800 products, not H100,' an Nvidia spokesman said, responding to a Reuters query about DeepSeek's alleged usage of H100 chips. In February, Singapore charged three men with fraud in a case domestic media have linked to the movement of Nvidia's advanced chips from the city state to DeepSeek. China has also been suspected of finding ways to use advanced US chips remotely. While importing advanced Nvidia chips into China without a license violates US export rules, Chinese companies are still allowed to access those same chips remotely in data centres in non-restricted countries. The exceptions are when a Chinese company is on a US trade blacklist or the chip exporter has knowledge that the Chinese firm is using its chips to help develop weapons of mass destruction. US officials have not placed DeepSeek on any US trade blacklists yet and have not alleged that Nvidia had any knowledge of DeepSeek's work with the Chinese military. Malaysia's ministry of investment, trade and industry said last week that it was investigating whether an unnamed Chinese company in the country was using servers equipped with Nvidia chips for large language model training and that it was examining whether any domestic law or regulation had been breached.

New Straits Times

4 hours ago

• New Straits Times

Turning 80, UN faces fresh storm of doubts

WITH its influence discredited and its budget in tatters, the United Nations is weathering a firestorm of criticism as it celebrates its 80th anniversary – and tries to convince a polarized and conflict-wracked world it is more vital than ever. The UN's 193 member states will mark Thursday the signing of the organisation's foundational treaty, the UN Charter, on June 26, 1945 in San Francisco. After ratification, the United Nations came into being on October 24. The anniversary comes as the world body faces a multi-faceted crisis that has raised questions about its future. "Since the end of the Cold War, we have seen the organisation struggle in cases from the Rwandan genocide to the Iraq war," Richard Gowan, an analyst at the International Crisis Group, told AFP. "When each big crisis comes, commentators announce that the UN is finished. And yet it still survives," he added. "That said, this is an especially bad moment," Gowan acknowledged, pointing to numerous countries that are "deeply frustrated" by the UN Security Council's failure to act on major conflicts like those in Ukraine and Gaza. That inaction is largely due to the veto power of the council's five permanent members – Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States – which have competing interests. "The UN system as a whole has a credibility crisis, and it is not clear that the organisation's members have the resources or political energy to rescue it," Gowan told AFP. For Romuald Sciora, a research fellow at the French Institute for International and Strategic Affairs, the credibility issue can only result in the virtual disappearance of an organisation that is already a political "dwarf" on the world stage. "I'm not sure the UN will cease to exist, even by its 100th anniversary," Sciora told AFP. "I see a slow vanishing, and the UN becoming a bit of a ghost," like "these old organisations whose names we have forgotten." But experts say while the UN desperately needs to enact tough reforms, not all of its problems come from within, and it has become an easy scapegoat for its divided membership. Gissou Nia of the Washington-based Atlantic Council think tank says she fears that "the approach of might is right... is what is taking hold, and it brings us further and further away from the ideals" that led to the UN's founding as World War II ended. Nia, a human rights lawyer, says she hopes enough people will remain committed to the set of ideals and values "that will keep the UN alive," but still worries about the constant questioning of those values, notably from US ally Israel. "The constant berating from some very loud voices about the UN either being anti-Semitic, or the UN being a waste of funding, or the UN propping up dictators, actually has an impact," Nia told AFP. In a world devastated by the largest number of ongoing conflicts since 1945, and ravaged by major humanitarian crises, "the United Nations has never been more needed," Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said recently. "Our values have never been more relevant. And the needs have never been greater." Funding has nevertheless grown scarce as donors – especially the United States under President Donald Trump – pull back. Given the financial constraints, Guterres launched the UN80 initiative in a bid to streamline operations. Those changes could include thousands of positions being cut. For Gowan, "the UN is a very big organisation, and of course it suffers from a variety of bureaucratic problems, just as almost all big organisations do. (...) So of course it deserves scrutiny and criticism." But, he added, "I think we have gotten a bit too accustomed to having this system at our service, and tend to spend too much time grumbling about its flaws and not enough time acknowledging its successes." The United Nations remains a place where arch-rivals and enemies still sit at the same table to air grievances, and where the smallest member state can have its voice heard. The UN also does important work on the ground, from the World Food Programme bringing needed supplies to more than 100 million people in 120 countries last year, to the thousands of peacekeepers protecting civilians in conflict zones. "The UN was a magnificent tool," Sciora said. "Obviously, it would be worse if it were to disappear from one day to the next."