New research reveals an unexpected remedy for anxiety and stress: 'Can improve mental health'

Feeling stressed or anxious? Research suggests a walk in the woods might be just what the doctor ordered.
An international study co-led by the University of Surrey and the University of Ghent has outlined how forests provide mental health benefits.
The institutions examined 164 forests across five European countries and detailed how different forest characteristics, such as canopy density and tree species diversity, can affect various health outcomes.
Specific features like a dense canopy were both good and bad. A high density offers shade and better air quality, but it can also increase the risk of ticks and the disease they carry.
While the type of forest has mixed effects, one clear takeaway emerged: forests benefit the mind.
The study, published in the journal Nature Sustainability, showed that a forest setting reduces anxiety and stress. Being in a forest also increases positive emotions. If people thought a forest was more biodiverse and natural, it was more beneficial for mental health.
The findings suggest our connection to nature plays a major role in our well-being, and it reinforces an intuitive truth: spending time in nature is restorative.
The study also covers physical health benefits. Dense canopies can reduce heat stress, and they can also improve air quality by trapping particulate matter, which is especially important in cities.
Increasing tree species diversity had a limited effect on health, but adding a variety of trees is still considered a beneficial practice for ecosystem health.
Dr. Melissa Marselle, an environmental psychology lecturer at the University of Surrey, described nature's medicine.
How often do you worry about toxic chemicals getting into your home?
Always
Often
Sometimes
Never
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
"Our study shows that forests generally provide a mental health benefit, reducing anxiety and stress, regardless of their biodiversity or structure," she said. "As one in six people in England experience anxiety and depression each week, this research suggests that simply being in a forest can improve mental health."
She noted that the United Kingdom should preserve urban forests for the benefit of its citizens, and she also suggested that time spent in green spaces should be prescribed by the country's National Health Service for people with mental health issues.
Telling someone to "touch grass" isn't just a meme anymore. The idea of "nature prescriptions" is gaining traction globally. The profound impact natural environments have on our health is a bare necessity.
When you need a mental reset, don't go doom-scrolling. Visit your nearest forest — science says it could do you a world of good.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

Let's celebrate: Today is the summer solstice, the longest day of the year

Editor's note: This story was first published on June 21, 2013 Welcome to the best day of the year. Today is the summer solstice, the longest day. In North Jersey, we'll get more than 15 hours of daylight. Go ahead and gloat — that's nearly an hour and a half more daylight than Key West, Florida, will get today. For those who like daylight — pretty much everyone save Dracula — today is a day to celebrate. In past eras, they actually did. "The summer solstice was a carnivalesque feast day," said Pamela H. Smith, a European history expert at Columbia University. "In England, there were bonfires, lots of beer drinking, cannons being fired off, masqueraders — people dressed up as devils and demons. "Days like the solstice were important for ancient peoples in terms of trying to find patterns in nature that were important for their livelihood, like knowing when to plant crops. All cultures had megaliths like Stonehenge," Smith said. The Earth's orbit around the sun is slightly elliptical, but not enough to cause the seasons, said Carlton Pryor, an astronomer at Rutgers University. In fact, at the summer solstice, the North Jersey region is 94.4 million miles from the sun. At the winter solstice, it's only 91.4 million miles away. The seasons are caused by the Earth's axis being tilted at a 23.5 degree angle. When the Northern Hemisphere is tilted toward the sun, the hemisphere receives sunlight more directly, for longer periods, increasing temperatures. More: Make one of these 10 books that are set in New Jersey your next beach read for summer 2025 In winter, the Northern Hemisphere is tilted away — even though it is closer to the sun in miles — so the light is less direct, more angled. The sun is lower in the sky and appears for fewer hours, causing cooler temperatures. On the summer solstice, the Earth's northern axis is tilted at its most extreme angle toward the sun. Today in North Jersey, the sun at its zenith will be at an angle of nearly 73 degrees above the horizon. On Dec. 21, it will be only 26 degrees above the horizon. The Earth's axis tilt also affects where the sun rises on the horizon. Conventional wisdom that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west is true only twice a year — at the spring and fall equinoxes. During the summer solstice, the sun rises at its northernmost point on the horizon. This morning in Hackensack, if you had faced due east, the sun would have risen about 32 degrees to the north (or to your left). At the winter solstice, it will rise 32 degrees to the south of due east (or to your right). Though the summer solstice once triggered celebrations, that's rarely the case anymore. After the Protestant Reformation in Europe, religious leaders started to call for an end to the celebrations. "A lot of Protestant pastors criticized midsummer night's eve, saying people were drinking too much, fighting," Smith said. Another reason we don't celebrate the solstice is the shift from an agrarian lifestyle. "We live in a more urban society, and we have colonized the night," said Sara Schechner, an expert on science history at Harvard University. "So we are not as bound to the cycles of nature in how we go about our lives." This article originally appeared on Summer solstice 2025 is here

Hamilton Spectator

4 hours ago

• Hamilton Spectator

‘The biggest betrayal': A year on, staff grieve Ontario Science Centre's snap closure

TORONTO - In the year since the abrupt closure of the Ontario Science Centre, the cost of a new site at Ontario Place has escalated, its opening date has been pushed back, there is no sign of a temporary location – and the old building's roof that was said to be at risk of collapse appears to be intact. Workers say they've dealt with a rodent and raccoon infestation at a building where science centre materials are stored, and the department that builds exhibits is at a virtual standstill. It's been a year of demoralizing changes, they say. Government officials announced midday on June 21, 2024, that the science centre at its original, east Toronto location would permanently close at the end of the day, citing an engineering report on the state of the building's roof. Critics have blasted the decision, noting that the report presented several options other than full closure, and have suggested the whole plan to move the science centre to a revamped Ontario Place was designed to lessen the heat a more controversial tenant — a waterpark and spa by European company Therme — has generated. Infrastructure Minister Kinga Surma has said she did not want to jeopardize anyone's safety with the science centre's roof panels at risk of collapse. The workers do not buy it. Toronto set a weather record in 2024 with 1,145 millimetres of precipitation, which included two 'once-in-a-century' storms that flooded thousands of homes last summer and the city's snowiest winter in years. 'And the science centre is still standing,' said Raluca Ellis, the president of Local 549 of the Ontario Public Service Employees Union. 'It just seems like it was a manufactured crisis and that's the biggest betrayal.' NDP infrastructure critic Jennifer French also takes issue with stated reason for the closure. 'The roof managed to get through winter snow loads and a lot of rain this spring, and the only thing falling apart is the government's plan for a new science centre,' she said. The opening of the science centre at Ontario Place has already been pushed back from 2028 to 2029. A report from the auditor general late last year found that the cost estimate for building and maintaining the new science centre has increased by nearly $400 million from the government's spring 2023 business case for relocating it. Meanwhile, the government has said it will look for a space to house a temporary science centre until the new one opens. A request for proposals seeking a temporary location was released just days after the abrupt closure. It said the government was working 'expeditiously' to find an interim site and wanted it to open no later than Jan. 1, 2026. No such location has yet been announced, nearly one year later. Jason Ash, of the group Save Ontario's Science Centre, said it is a shame children are missing out. 'The bottom line, one year out from the closure of the science centre on Don Mills Road, is that a generation of Ontario kids and youth are without a world-class institution to learn about STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) education,' he said. 'Regardless of any of the other aspects that enter into the story ... it's a real failure of the government's educational policy to have let down so many children.' The science centre is currently operating two pop-up exhibits at Harbourfront Centre and the CF Sherway Gardens mall in Toronto, and has had staff and small exhibits at various events around the city. The Ministry of Infrastructure said in a statement that it is working with the science centre to 'consider options' for a temporary location. As for the old building, the ministry said Infrastructure Ontario is managing it. 'IO has undertaken preventative measures to maintain integrity of the structure and roof since the facility was closed last year,' the ministry wrote. 'This includes managing snow load in the winter and rainwater and, mechanical repairs and system maintenance to ensure minimal heating and cooling levels.' As workers moved everything out of the old building last fall, one of the new storage locations presented a number of problems. All of the science centre's education materials were moved to a building by Highway 401 in Etobicoke. The building on Resources Road, which has become the science centre's official mailing address, is used as a warehouse of sorts where workers can gather experiments and small exhibits and other goodies for their visits to classrooms. That building had been vacant for more than a decade. Problems began immediately, said four employees with knowledge of what's been happening there. They asked not to be named for fear of repercussion. They said workers discovered mouse, and possibly rat, excrement throughout the basement and on the second floor of the building. And there were also signs of a raccoon infestation, they said. The workers found droppings and little hand prints that suggested a raccoon, or a family of raccoons, was living in the building. The building's manager laid out 'a ton' of rodent traps and one large raccoon trap after workers complained to science centre management, the sources said. There was no running water for a time, with very few power outlets and reams of extension cord snaking throughout the area, they added. Workers also discovered asbestos in the building. 'The entire ordeal moving to Resources Road has been very frustrating,' said one worker. 'The topper was the mouse and raccoon s—t.' The infestation was eventually fixed, the sources said, though it took months. The science centre declined requests for interviews with management, saying no one was available. It referred questions about the problems with the building to Infrastructure Ontario. The Ministry of Infrastructure statement said all pest control and maintenance issues were addressed promptly. 'Given the urgent requirement to find storage suitable for the Science Centre exhibits, artifacts and items in an extremely tight timeline, 101 Resources Road was identified as an available government-owned storage,' the ministry wrote. 'OSC continues to optimize operations, ensuring working conditions consistently meet all health and safety requirements.' The local union declined to discuss problems at the building. Ontario Science Centre CEO Paul Kortenaar pointed to ongoing pop-ups, special events and satellite locations for children to enjoy. 'Planning is underway for our new home at Ontario Place, with a competitive design process for our new flagship location on Toronto's waterfront,' Kortenaar said in a statement. Management is working on a 10-year master plan for the new science centre, he wrote. 'This work reflects our broader vision: we are reimagining what a science centre can be — not only a building, but a dynamic, provincewide platform for learning, discovery and connection.' The connection between management and workers has frayed since the closure. Working from home is not in the employees' DNA, said Ellis, the Local 549 president. 'We are not working in ideal conditions and many ask why we put up with this and the answer is because we love the science centre, but ever since we were shut down, we've lost that essence of what the science centre is,' she said. More than 20 union members have taken buyout packages over the past year, Ellis said, most due to the sudden change in job conditions. And the hope that workers could reunite in person at a new interim location was recently dashed. 'They told me the timeline for the interim location has been changed, that the process has paused and we don't know what the new timeline is,' Ellis said. For union steward Martin Fischer, who works in the education department, the loss of the original building has been 'heartbreaking.' 'It's been extremely difficult,' said Fischer, who describes himself and many colleagues as neurodivergent. 'I'm somebody who needs a physical workplace, I thrived in the environment at the science centre, being with classes a few hours a day, it could be kindergarten, it could be a high school class, it'd be adult and then I'd maybe go talk to the shops to help design and build stuff for the school program, but that's all gone now,' he said. He still goes to schools for presentations, but he also spends a lot of time at home in front of his computer. 'It's just not the same,' he said. Melis Tokgoz, vice president of the local union and an exhibit designer at the science centre, said she too has struggled since the closure. With the fabrication shop shuttered, there are far fewer designs to make, limited largely to the pop-up spots, she said. The science centre is looking at a few spots to restart designing and making exhibits for other science centres, but that work has largely stopped, Tokgoz said. 'We keep getting these reassurances that one day we'll be back in the business of designing exhibits, but again, it is really hard to build that trust when you have no evidence otherwise,' she said. That joie de vivre among employees is missing, she said. 'There's this sense of grief amongst many employees, missing what their jobs once were, missing the fulfilment, and I'm no different.' 'The energy has been sad and melancholic and a bit depressing the whole time.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 20, 2025.

The Hill

6 hours ago

• The Hill

Colorado River ‘water market' could bring security to farmers, fish and families: Study

Applying a market-based approach to Colorado River management could ensure more robust and reliable supplies for farmers, communities and the environment, a new study has found. Without considerable cutbacks in basin-wide water consumption, fish populations could face dire consequences for at least one month of the irrigation season, scientists warned in the study, published on Friday in Nature Sustainability. But if action were taken to deploy strategic water transactions among the basin's stakeholders, resultant reductions in usage could improve the situation of more than 380 miles of restorable segments, per the research. 'By strategically directing river water to the right places, even under drought conditions, fish can be saved with targeted restoration at nominal additional cost,' senior author Steven Gorelick, a hydrologist at Stanford University, said in a statement. The 1,450-mile Colorado River provides drinking water and agricultural irrigation to about 40 million people across seven U.S. states, 30 tribal nations and two states in Mexico. On the domestic side, the region is divided into the Upper and Lower basins: Colorado, Wyoming, Utah and New Mexico; and California, Nevada and Arizona. As the West becomes increasingly arid and a growing population consumes more water, this critical transboundary artery is dwindling. Meanwhile, the U.S. basin states are currently negotiating an update to the river's operational guidelines, which expire at the end of 2026. Stakeholders across the region adhere to a century-old Colorado River Compact that allocated 7.5 million acre-feet annually to each of the two basins. The average suburban household consumes about half an acre-foot of water per year. Also at play is a historic U.S. West 'water rights' system, a 'first in time, first in right' approach to water that stems from the mid-19th century homesteading and gold rush era. At the time, farmers and miners secured and diverted water according to their arrival, rather than their geographical position along the river — creating a prioritization structure that is still in effect today. But the authors of Friday's study stressed that climate change has since exacerbated the Colorado River's shortages, noting that recent research has indicated that the artery's flows are at their lowest in at least 2,000 years. 'Given the overallocation of the river water, we explored how the needs of people and the environment can both be served,' Gorelick said. With the goal of compensating for potential cutbacks, water users in the Lower Basin states have created systems for voluntary water market transactions, the authors explained. The Upper Basin states — which are responsible for fulfilling the Lower Basin's allocations — have also explored the idea of designing a water market. Such a market, the researchers continued, would involve proactive reductions that ensure downstream deliveries. Nonetheless, they stressed that existing programs generally do not prioritize water necessary to maintain critical fish habitats. To quantify the cost of improving these environments, the researchers simulated potential transactions and ecological effects at the river's headwaters in Colorado — the source of about a quarter of the artery's natural annual flow into the Lake Powell reservoir. Farmers, irrigation organizations, cities and other water sellers would lease senior water rights to both governments and nongovernmental organizations interested in protecting fish habitats, per the model. Those senior water rights, the authors contended, are critical to environmental protection because they are always fulfilled prior to any junior water rights claims. 'One key characteristic of water law across the western U.S. is our 'use it or lose it' principle,' lead author Philip Womble, who conducted the research as a Stanford graduate student, said in a statement. 'That can be a disincentive to water conservation,' added Womble, who is now an assistant professor at the University of Washington. Womble, Gorelick and their colleagues assessed six scenarios to understand possible outcomes amid future drought conditions. They compared the effects of a 'protected' market — in which newer uses would be legally barred from diverting restored flows — to an unprotected market with no such limits. Ultimately, they found that without decreases in water consumption, the consequences to fish would be devastating. But when strategic water transactions were in place, 380 miles of river segments stood to benefit, while hundreds more could enjoy at least partial improvements. 'Strategic environmental water transactions would simultaneously reduce water consumption and preserve fish habitat at the lowest cost to the buyer,' the authors wrote. Moderate reductions in water usage could be achieved with an investment of about $29 million in a protected market, while aggressive cuts could occur at a cost of about $120 million, according to the study. In an unprotected market, similar such decreases would require about 12 percent more money, per the research. The researchers suggested that one source of the necessary funds could be the increasing number of corporations seeking to offset water use from their operations. Even the lowest cost water-use reductions, as modeled in the study, would yield improvement over about a third of restorable river habitat, the authors found. But an investment that was just 8 percent more than the least-cost plan could triple the amount of restored habitat in a protected water market with aggressive usage reductions, according to the study. 'Rivers worldwide have been overallocated by society,' the authors concluded. 'While strategic approaches may cost marginally more, we show modest additional funding can have outsized ecological impacts.'