Flood project now on hold in Scranton
SCRANTON, LACKAWANNA COUNTY (WBRE/WYOU) — A long-awaited flood project that would prevent damage to homes has hit a major roadblock in one local community. People living in Scranton's Green Ridge section have been dealing with damage from the crumbling Meadow Brook waterway for decades.
While the project was supposed to begin soon, it's not going anywhere until property owners give their approval.
The two-mile stretch of waterway cuts through parts of Dunmore and Scranton to provide flood relief during heavy rains.
Much of it, though, runs beneath homes, 47 homes to be exact.
In order for the $12,000,000 state-funded project to begin, people living there need to sign easement agreements giving temporary or permanent access to their land.
But so far, only three have signed, leaving the project stuck in limbo.
'It's pretty important. If a pipe is crumbling underneath your property, I believe by us replacing it, the city replacing it, it will increase the value of your property,' said Scranton Council President Gerald Smurl.
The issue of property value is, apparently, a major factor when it comes to the challenges the city faces in getting these signatures.
GED program returns to Lackawanna County prison
Lackawanna County's recent tax reassessment has boosted the appraised value of many homes in the area, leading some residents to look for more compensation for the easements.
'It's an easement. We're not taking the property from them, and this is just to fix something that's broken under your property,' Smurl added.
Smurl believes the longer it takes to begin the project, the higher the risk of a collapse under one of the affected properties.
One resident 28/22 News spoke with who hasn't yet signed, says he's fine with the amount the city will compensate him, but he has a few conditions that must be met first.
'I want the property put back the way it is right now, with a new wall in the backyard, which they are going to replace when they come through,' Scranton resident Albert Young said.
He says he will sign the easement once he has these conditions in writing from the city, ensuring that his carport and blacktop will be replaced and that his property has the proper drainage to prevent flooding.
'Everyone should take a look at what is offered, and let's just get this project finished,' Young added.
Until all 47 property owners sign the easement agreements, the project won't get underway.
Smurl tells 28/22 New that even if this project gets the green light, it will take around two years to finish.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Vance: Trump ‘may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment'
Vice President Vance weighed in Tuesday as the Trump administration debates its next steps in the conflict between Israel and Iran. In a lengthy post on the social platform X, Vance laid out the administration's issues with Iran enriching uranium and argued the president has shown 'remarkable restraint' thus far. 'He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the president,' the vice president wrote. 'And of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy. 'But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue,' Vance continued. 'And having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish American people's goals.' He said Trump had in recent months 'encouraged his foreign policy team to reach a deal with the Iranians' to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Vance also argued Iran had enriched uranium 'far above the level necessary for any civilian purpose.' The post marked Vance's most extensive comments at a precarious moment in the conflict in the Middle East. The vice president was one of several top officials expected to meet with Trump in the Situation Room on Tuesday. Trump departed the Group of Seven meeting in Canada late Monday, one day earlier than expected, because he wanted to be back in Washington as Israel and Iran traded missile strikes. The president said during the flight back to Washington he was looking for 'an end, a real end, not a ceasefire, a real end.' He later described what he was seeking as a 'complete give-up' by Iran. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump: ‘I don't care' that Tulsi Gabbard said Iran wasn't close to having nuclear weapon
President Trump rejected his own director of national intelligence's assessment of Iran's nuclear capabilities in remarks as he returned from the Group of Seven summit in Alberta, Canada, a day early to weigh America's response to escalating airstrikes between Israel and Iran. Tulsi Gabbard testified before Congress in March that while Iran had an 'unprecedented' stockpile of weapons-grade uranium, the country did not appear to be building a nuclear weapon. 'I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having one,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One in the wee hours of Tuesday morning in response to a direct question about Gabbard's testimony. Live updates: Trump weighs US role in Israel-Iran conflict The intelligence community, Gabbard said in March, 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.' 'In the past year, we've seen an erosion of a decades-long taboo in Iran on discussing nuclear weapons in public, likely emboldening nuclear weapons advocates within Iran's decisionmaking apparatus,' Gabbard said. 'Iran's enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.' CNN reported Tuesday that American intelligence assessments continued to say Iran was not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon and was up to three years out from being able to launch one. Israel has claimed Iran was approaching a crucial tipping point for developing nuclear capabilities as justification for its airstrikes. Trump's remarks come as the White House weighs whether to wade into the conflict. While the United States could assist Israel in other ways, American 'bunker-buster' bombs are believed to be necessary to significantly damage a key Iranian uranium enrichment plant that Israel is targeting. Gabbard insisted to reporters on Capitol Hill on Tuesday that her testimony in March was consistent with Trump. 'What President Trump is saying is the same thing I said in my annual threat assessment in March to Congress,' she said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Leavitt: Trump to decide on Iran action in next 2 weeks
President Trump is expected to make a decision about whether to take direct action against Iran in the next two weeks, he said Thursday in a message delivered through his spokesperson. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at a briefing that she had a message directly from Trump in response to speculation about whether he would get directly involved in the conflict between Iran and Israel. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiation that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go in the next two weeks,' Trump said in a statement read aloud by Leavitt. Leavitt said correspondence between the U.S. and Iran 'has continued' as the two sides engage in negotiations, though she would not provide specifics about whether they were direct or through intermediaries. Iran must agree to no enrichment of uranium, and Tehran must not be able to achieve a nuclear weapon as part of any diplomatic agreement, Leavitt said. Trump was noncommittal Wednesday morning about a potential strike against Iran's nuclear facilities: He dodged a question about whether he's moving closer to ordering a strike against Iranian nuclear facilities. 'I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do,' Trump told reporters. 'I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble. And they want to negotiate. And I say, 'Why didn't you negotiate with me before all this death and destruction?'' The president has met each day since Tuesday with his national security team in the Situation Room. Trump has throughout his political career repeatedly fallen back on a two-week timeline to decide on policy decisions, including in recent weeks when he said he would know in roughly two weeks whether Russian President Vladimir Putin was interested in negotiating an end to the war in Ukraine. Asked if he would stick to his two-week timeline in the case of Iran, Leavitt did not directly answer but described the situation in the Middle East and the war in Ukraine as 'two very different, complicated global conflicts.' Some of Trump's allies, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), have cautioned against engaging in a war with Iran, arguing it would contradict his campaign rhetoric not to get the U.S. involved in foreign wars. Others, like Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), have pushed for more aggressive action against Iran, insisting Tehran poses a grave security threat. 'The president hears all voices across the country, and he makes decisions based on his instincts. And he has always said diplomacy is his first option,' Leavitt said Thursday. Updated at 2:07 p.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
