Can We End Racism by Ending the Idea of Race Itself?

The Raceless Antiracist: Why Ending Race Is the Future of Antiracism, by Sheena Michele Mason, Pitchstone Publishing, 256 pages, $17.95
Is race real? In The Raceless Antiracist, a follow-up to her 2022 book Theory of Racelessness, Sheena Michele Mason argues not only that it isn't, but that trying to stop racism while keeping the concept of race is like fighting "a flood by pouring water on it."
Mason, a literature professor at SUNY Oneonta, suggests that these futile approaches fall into two categories: "anti-racist resistance" and "color-blindness." While the first reifies race by making it the key to understanding most social phenomena, the second reifies it by treating it as a real thing that ought to be ignored, thus downplaying the reality of the racism that relies on it.
The Raceless Antiracist asks us to do something very uncomfortable: to adopt a new mental model, to think in a completely different set of categories. It doesn't deserve a snap judgment. It's a book for chewing on and wrestling with. It may puzzle or even disturb you.
Mason notes that our ancestors migrated at levels that most people grossly underestimate, leading to far more genetic mixing than people typically assume. She points out that our current understanding of DNA undermines a lot of assumptions that arose from observing external traits, such as skin color, nose shape, and eye shape, since such traits can arise from the same genetic allele but be inherited from entirely different people. Furthermore, thanks to the random genetic recombination that happens with every new generation, 75 percent of your genetic makeup is attributable to only 5 percent of your ancestors. A 23andMe test will tell you about only 8 percent of your ancestors, because they're the only ones left represented in your DNA today. In fact, it's possible that two dark South Africans can be more genetically divergent from one another than one of them is from a white Swede.
Even if race is a biological fiction—and I think Mason makes a strong case that it is—it could be real in the sense that money is real: constructed by us but constrained in its "nature" by the purpose it serves. People treat it as real, particularly the people who created the category as a rationale for dehumanizing those they oppress; and that, one might argue, makes it a social fact.
Mason rejects even this argument. We can build franchises, merchandise empires, and little girls' dreams out of princesses who create ice castles, but that does not mean those princesses themselves exist. So too, race is simply imaginary. It is racism that is the social construct: a social hierarchy based on an imagined category.
Mason sees this as an important difference, because she believes that people trapped in the ideology of race are fated never to actually end racism. We cannot beat the sin by embracing its core mistake.
The word trapped is instructive here. Think of how defining one's blackness as resistance to whiteness just prioritizes whiteness. What happens if the "whiteness" of Whiteness Studies programs—that is, the association of peach-colored people with legal and economic privilege—were actually to disappear? Would the meaning and purpose found in celebrating gospel music or soul food or the Civil Rights Movement disappear too? Obviously not! Those "black" things are not a celebration of race at all; they're a celebration of a culture shared by a particular ethnic group from a particular part of the U.S. who underwent a particular set of historical circumstances that shaped them in important ways.
Mason calls this "translation": Once one embraces racelessness, she says, one must translate what people really mean when they talk about "race" into actual insights about culture, ethnicity, class, or other categories. Consider Denzel Washington's comment when he was asked about why it mattered that the director of Malcolm X be a black man. "It's not about color," he replied: "It's about culture." He then went on to describe how a certain group of people know how the smell of a hot iron on their woolly hair makes them think of Sunday mornings and getting ready to go to a certain kind of church service. Martin Scorsese could make a great film out of the story of Malcolm X too. Just not that film.
By reifying race, thinkers like Ibram X. Kendi create a trap in which black Americans only matter as a group that's oppressed. By constantly referring to the disparate effects of this or that policy on "black and brown" people, when what we actually mean is poor people, we reinforce the false idea that black and brown people are all poor. By homing in on black men shot by police even though more white men are shot by police (here, Mason cites the work of Harvard economist Roland Fryer), the media reinforce a fear of being gunned down by police that far, far outstrips its statistical likelihood and could itself lead to dangerous consequences. Mason believes her framework will help people avoid such adverse outcomes without downplaying actual instances or effects of racism.
In an environment like ours, where racial categories are ubiquitous, this constant work of translation will require a toolbox—something Mason calls the togetherness wayfinder. Here, Mason's tone shifts from a prominently philosophical one to a literary one. She leans heavily on writers, from the African-American novelist Toni Morrison to the Chinese-American author Maxine Hong Kingston, from the Jim Crow–era black conservative George Schuyler to the 19th century poet Walt Whitman, as she offers ways to break out of false dichotomies, to refuse assigned categories, and to remember how complex and storied our identities really are.
Mason also argues, I think rightly, that many of our struggles with questions of identity, uniqueness, and belonging are grounded in our ability to receive and give love. In a deeply moving section, she relates her experience of being beaten with a broomstick handle by her adoptive mother, as well as being rejected emotionally and called a devil, despite her constant attempts to please through perfect grades and acts of service to her parents. I found it interesting that Mason does not relate whether her adoptive parents are white or black (or, as she would say, "racialized as white or black"). The experience of being abused and rejected by one's parents is, sadly, found in every society, every class, and every ethnicity. But it can undermine one's ability to love oneself in ways that send one searching for something to identify with, to be proud of, and to fight for. Much of that comes out as hatred—from racists, from anti-racists, from anti-anti-racists. It can be conquered by love, but only through an internal healing that every person must pursue for themselves.
I can quibble with much in this book. While Mason is politically independent and draws on a number of heterodox thinkers, she is ultimately a leftist and I a classical liberal; when she calls for fighting hierarchical oppression, she isn't necessarily imagining the same hierarchies that I do. But she is vague enough in those concerns that they have little effect on how I respond to her theory of racelessness. If she's right about the ways the concept of race traps us into multiple iterations of the same boring, and ultimately despairing, conversations, then it's worth working together to "translate" that race talk into something more precise—into insights about economic circumstances, ethnic heritage, or culture—and to jettison the rest. After that, the arguments we might have about economics and public policy can look to what's actually happening rather than what we merely imagine.
The post Can We End Racism by Ending the Idea of Race Itself? appeared first on Reason.com.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Chicago Tribune

a day ago

• Chicago Tribune

NWI groups concerned about plastic waste share ideas

Environmentalists from Highland, Michigan City, East Chicago, Hobart and Valparaiso gathered Wednesday at Valparaiso University to start working together on ways to address the proliferation of plastic waste. 'There are others locally that are in the fight with us, that are interested in fighting with us and sharing resources,' said Ellen Kapitan, an organizer of the Plastic Reduction Alliance of Northwest Indiana. Unlike many other materials, plastic waste can be problematic because of 'forever chemicals' that don't biodegrade. 'All this plastic is really harming our health,' said VU chemistry professor Julie Peller, a local expert on plastics. There have been various efforts across the country to address plastic waste, but industry lobbyists have been effective in blocking them, she said. In Indiana, for example, an industry-friendly state law zip-ties local governments' hands when it comes to attempting to restrict the use of plastic bags. That doesn't stop local nongovernmental groups from asking stores to offer discounts to people who bring their own bags, however. Peller showed an image of plastic netting being used to hold grass seeds in place. Using plastic isn't necessary, she said. 'We're seeing a lot of neurodevelopment problems in children,' Peller said. 'We need to stop exposing our children to plastics and their additives.' Plastic has been found in various human organs, she said. 'What we're finding is what we haven't encountered before,' Peller said. 'There's about seven grams of plastic in our brains,' researchers have found. That's equivalent to a standard single-use water bottle without a bottle cap, she said. 'While recycling is part of the answer, it's not the main solution we need,' Peller said. The 'reduce, reuse, recycle' mantra puts 'recycle' in third place for a reason. Even the labeling of plastics is problematic, VU chemistry lecturer Christina Davis said. The numbers that identify various types of plastic are surrounded by a triangle of arrows that would seem to indicate they can be recycled. But that's not always true, she said. Davis has led teams of students to Marquette Park in Gary and Indiana Dunes State Park in Chesterton to gather samples of plastic waste. Last year, it took just 15 minutes to gather 1,500 pieces of plastic at Marquette Park. This year's haul, gathered June 5, is still being counted. 'In a short time, we were able to gather a year's worth of plastic to do research on,' Davis said. There was enough of the waste to fill at least three Mason jars and much of a fourth one. 'We found so many nurdles this year compared to last year. It was a huge increase,' she said. Nurdles are the tiny pellets sold to plastics manufacturers to be melted down to form various products made at the factories. The students gathered about 10 grams of nurdles in that short visit, Davis said. VU senior Emily Broniewicz, of Hickory Hills, Illinois, helped with the collection, using a 5-micrometer sieve to let the sand drop away from the larger plastic waste being gathered. She took Peller's introductory environmental justice course her first semester and was hooked. The group gathered Wednesday discussed various ways to work together on addressing plastic waste. 'What can we brainstorm and do collectively?' Peller asked. Perhaps the solid waste districts in Lake, Porter and LaPorte counties could work together on a campaign to reduce the use of plastic bags. Perhaps farmers' markets could be encouraged to reduce their use. Various other ideas were thrown out, too. 'We're all about partnering and learning to grow together,' Peller said. Sarah Tubbs, vice president of the alliance, said there will be a community cleanup of a 2-mile stretch of Porter County Road 600 N between Ind. 2 and County Road 400 E. 'We'll have cute little vests for you to wear to keep you safe,' she said. Cleanups along roadsides typically gather waste in plastic trash bags to be picked up and disposed of afterward.

Yahoo

09-06-2025

• Yahoo

Construction continues on Project NePTWNE water research lab at Blasco Library

Gannon University's Center for Lake Erie Education and Research is taking shape inside the Blasco Library on the bayfront. Construction continues on the center, which is part of Gannon University's Project NePTWNE. Hagen History Center receives $100K grant to restore Watson-Curtze Mansion windows It will consist of public spaces educating visitors and locals alike about Lake Erie and its native species. It will also be a hub that can show off weather patterns, shipping routes and welcome educators and scientists for hands-on research. ANNA Shelter, Community Blood Bank team up for Paws and Pints event 'This is really about helping us to get people out into the water to help them to do science in the public interest, engage with our environment, and to understand what all of the data means. It's helped us to communicate science in the public interest in a really interactive and fun way,' said Dr. Sherri Mason, director of Project NePTWNE at Gannon University. Dr. Mason said people will be welcome to join researchers, giving them the chance to help collect data. The center is expected to open in the fall. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Yahoo

04-06-2025

• Yahoo

Why Redwire Stock Is Rocketing Higher Today

Redwire's suite of tools designed for construction on the moon and Mars were cleared by NASA. The company appears likely to play a key role in NASA's planned exploration of outer space, but the timeline for that exploration remains very much in doubt. 10 stocks we like better than Redwire › Space technology company Redwire (NYSE: RDW) said its lunar and Martian manufacturing technology has passed a key review, meaning it can be involved in future NASA projects. Investors are reaching for the stars, sending Redwire shares up as much as 21% at the open Wednesday and up 16% as of 11 a.m. Eastern. If the future does involve humanity setting up shop on the moon and exploring Mars, Redwire hopes to make the infrastructure that makes those endeavors possible. On Wednesday, the company said its Mason tool suite had passed NASA's Critical Design Review test and can now be used in future missions. Mason tools, designed to operate on the moon and Mars, can be used to build berms, landing pads, and roads. The approval is part of a $12.9 million NASA award to prototype Mason for moon activities. "We are proud to have successfully completed this exciting milestone and bring Mason one step closer to launch," Tom Campbell, Redwire's president of space missions, said in a statement. "Leveraging Redwire's unmatched in-space manufacturing experience, Mason technology is critical to enabling sustainable operations on the Moon and Mars surface." The announcement comes one day after Redwire announced a separate contract to conduct space-based research on a new cancer treatment using the company's in-space laboratory tech. There's every reason to be excited about Redwire. We appear headed toward a new golden age of space exploration, and unlike in the 1960s, private companies, including space stocks like Redwire, are likely to play a leading role. But there is also ample reason for caution. Redwire reported just $61.4 million in revenue in its most recent quarter, but it's valued by the market at more than $1.3 billion. Much of that valuation is based on potential, but Redwire is going to need a lot to go right, not all of which it can control. Among the potential questions: Will SpaceX and other contractors meet deadlines to build the rockets needed to make repeated visits to the moon possible? For those excited by the opportunity, it would be wise to make Redwire a small part of a well-diversified portfolio. Before you buy stock in Redwire, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Redwire wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $656,825!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $865,550!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Lou Whiteman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Redwire Stock Is Rocketing Higher Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data