Q&A: Canadian Energy Minister Tim Hodgson
OTTAWA — Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney enlisted his former Goldman Sachs colleague, Tim Hodgson, to fight an 'economic war' with the United States.
Hodgson, a 64-year-old rookie politician but a seasoned C-suiter, is staring down a hefty to-do list as Canada's new minister of energy and natural resources.
Carney and Hodgson have pledged to transform Canada into an 'energy superpower' that depends less on American customers. That means balancing the demands of an oil-patch hungry for new customers and growing renewable energy sectors.
Advertisement
As he got his feet wet in the political arena, Hodgson found inspiration in the most Canadian of ways: a stressful hockey game.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
No One Warned Millennials That Being Single Could Be So Expensive. It's Becoming One Of The 'Biggest Financial Barriers No One Talks About'
It turns out, being single in your 30s and 40s isn't just emotionally isolating for some—it's financially punishing, too. A recent Reddit post in r/Millennials sparked a wide-ranging discussion, with many users pointing out that the economic system just isn't built for individuals. 'I can't buy food in bulk because on average it would spoil before I could get through it,' the original poster wrote. 'So buying smaller portions is not cheaper but somehow more expensive in the end.' Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can Many agreed that groceries were only a fraction of the problem. 'I'm less concerned about bulk food shopping and more about paying an entire mortgage on my own,' one person replied. 'Spinach going bad before I eat it all is not the thing killing my budget.' As one person explained, their mortgage would have been one-third the cost of their current rent—if only their original plans hadn't fallen through due to family circumstances. Others noted that being able to split rent and bills would completely change their financial standing. The conversation quickly expanded to cover a wide range of financial stressors faced by single people: rent, mortgage, home repairs, car maintenance and the inability to split costs. 'It's super painful to pay alone. My life would be lavish if I could halve my expenses,' one commenter said. Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . Several people pointed out that even having a roommate isn't always a good fix. 'For me, the peace of not having to deal with another person is worth not having that extra $1,000 a month,' one wrote. Another added, 'Having a roommate can unfortunately be a case of financial Russian Roulette.' Others admitted that the risks and emotional drain of living with strangers just aren't worth the savings: 'I am an introvert. I've had roommates I adored, but even just existing in the same space as another person is exhausting,' one person shared. 'Home should be my sanctuary.' The bulk of responses echoed the idea that the current economic model is more suitable for couples. "Society was not designed for single people and it's not sustainable long term," one commenter wrote. Others pushed back, saying it can be done—but only with a high income or extreme discipline. 'Sure, you can freeze food, meal prep and shop sales,' one person said, 'but not everyone has the time, energy, space or mental bandwidth to do that every week.'Several comments referenced what's often called the 'single tax'—not an actual tax, but the lack of financial perks enjoyed by couples. "When my partner and I met, moved in together and combined finances, all my money concerns disappeared," one person wrote. Another said, 'I work with couples who each make twice what I make. They live in a world with four times the income and half the expenses.' For many Millennials, the price of independence is higher than anyone warned. And while living alone offers freedom, it often comes with a financial penalty that's quietly reshaping how people think about adulthood and stability. Read Next: Many are using retirement income calculators to check if they're on pace —Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article No One Warned Millennials That Being Single Could Be So Expensive. It's Becoming One Of The 'Biggest Financial Barriers No One Talks About' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
The Strait Of Consequences: World Braces For Potential Energy Shock
ANKARA, TURKIYE - JUNE 17: An infographic titled "Strait of Hormuz" created in Ankara, Turkiye on ... More June 17, 2025. Connects oil and LNG production in the Middle East to global markets via the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean. (Photo by Murat Usubali/Anadolu via Getty Images) There are several important energy chokepoints around the world, but none is more significant and vulnerable than the Strait of Hormuz. Now, following the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday, the Iranian Parliament has reportedly voted to close this important energy transit chokepoint. Such a move could severely disrupt the world's energy markets. While the final decision still rests with Iran's Supreme National Security Council--and Iran has failed to follow through on previous threats to close the Strait--the vote signals intent to weaponize one of the world's most economically sensitive maritime corridors. If carried out, the consequences would be swift, severe, and global. Let's take a closer look at how we got here—and why the stakes are so high. Background On June 21, the United States launched coordinated airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. The strikes marked the most serious U.S.–Iran escalation in over a decade. The campaign featured B-2 stealth bombers and submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles. In his remarks following the strike, President Trump struck a conciliatory tone, stating, 'Now is the time for peace.' Iran, unsurprisingly, interpreted it differently. Within hours, the Iranian parliament voted to close the Strait of Hormuz—a move the U.S. would certainly interpret as a major escalation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Fox News, "If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours." Why the Strait of Hormuz Matters The accompanying picture illustrates why the Strait of Hormuz is so vital. At just 21 miles wide at its narrowest point--and significantly bordered by Iran--the Strait of Hormuz handles the transit of nearly 20% of global oil supply. But that's only part of the story. It is also a critical artery for liquefied natural gas (LNG) transit. Many important energy-producing countries rely on the Strait of Hormuz to get these products to market. There are three major global LNG producers, each with about 20% of the global market: The U.S., Qatar, and Australia. Qatar ships around 77 million metric tons of LNG annually, most of it passing through the Strait. Its customers include energy-hungry economies such as Japan, South Korea, China, and India, as well as parts of Europe. If Qatar is cut off, those nations lose part of their energy supply almost overnight. And LNG isn't as fungible as oil. While oil can be rerouted and drawn from strategic reserves, LNG infrastructure is far more rigid. Ships must be able to dock at specially equipped terminals, and production and liquefaction aren't easily shifted. The LNG market is fragile, and supply shocks can ripple fast and violently. Consequences of a Closure If Iran follows through with closing the Strait of Hormuz, the impact on global energy markets would be immediate and far-reaching. Energy prices would spike across the board. Oil could surge past $90 per barrel, and LNG spot prices—particularly in Asia and Europe—could return to levels not seen since 2022. For countries that rely heavily on imported natural gas, the consequences would be renewed inflation, worsening energy insecurity, and even the possibility of fuel rationing as winter approaches. Shipping and insurance markets would be thrown into disarray. Tanker traffic through the Persian Gulf would grind to a halt. Maritime insurers may suspend coverage for vessels transiting the Strait or demand prohibitively high war-risk premiums. Some shipping companies would avoid the region altogether, forcing longer routes and tighter global shipping capacity—raising costs not just for energy, but for commodities and consumer goods across the board. Strategic petroleum and gas reserves would likely be tapped as immediate substitutes. Countries like Japan, South Korea, and India—heavily dependent on Persian Gulf energy flows—would be among the first to draw from their stockpiles. But those reserves are limited, and a prolonged closure of the Strait would quickly strain their ability to buffer continued supply disruptions. Broader economic consequences would follow. As energy prices rise, so do input costs for key sectors like transportation, chemicals, and heavy manufacturing. Inflation would reaccelerate globally, putting renewed pressure on central banks and undermining recent progress in stabilizing prices. Some emerging economies, which lack the finances to subsidize rising energy costs, would be hit hardest, but developed economies would feel the squeeze too. Finally, a sustained disruption would accelerate the global energy realignment already underway. Policymakers would move quickly to diversify energy sources—fast-tracking LNG terminals, expanding storage capacity, and increasing imports from more stable suppliers like the U.S. It would also strengthen the case for more long-term investments in nuclear power and renewables, both of which offer insulation from the geopolitical volatility that continues to define fossil fuel markets. A Risky Game Closing the Strait would also damage Iran's own economy, which relies heavily on maritime exports. But history shows that governments under pressure don't always act rationally—especially when nationalism and survival are in play. Tehran may view the closure as a way to rally domestic support, push back against the West, or extract concessions in future negotiations. But it is a high-stakes move with no easy exit. The U.S. has made clear that such an act would be seen as hostile—and not just by Washington. Many of the world's major economies have a vested interest in keeping the Strait open, and a multinational response is more than likely. Bottom Line The world is watching closely. Energy companies are reviewing contingency plans, and governments are dusting off emergency protocols. Even in the absence of direct military escalation, the growing geopolitical risk is already being priced into oil and LNG futures. But it's worth noting that the Strait of Hormuz has never been fully closed in modern history—not even during periods of intense regional conflict. The closest call came during the Iran–Iraq War of the 1980s, particularly during the 'Tanker War,' when both countries targeted commercial shipping and laid mines throughout the Persian Gulf. Despite the violence, the Strait remained open—albeit under heavy military escort and with soaring insurance costs. Iran has issued similar threats before—most notably in 2011–2012 and again in 2019—in response to sanctions and military pressure. In each case, the threat alone was enough to shake global energy markets, even without an actual blockade. This time may be no different. But markets are rightly on edge, because the Strait of Hormuz isn't just a shipping lane—it's a pressure point for the entire global economy. And right now, that pressure is building.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘When In Doubt, Zoom Out': This Investing Strategy Could Earn You $1 Million
Investing expert and influencer Austin Hankwitz may be young, but he's already got more than $1 million invested in the stock market, and a strategy for others who desire success like his. Explore More: Read Next: Hankwitz shared to TikTok his three-step plan for anyone who hopes to thrive at investing, and it's pretty simple. First of all, Hankwitz warned his viewers not to treat the stock market as a 'casino,' and suggested you need to think strategically, not just try to put money in and pull it back out again hoping for a big payout. He began by recommending you construct your investment portfolio as follows: The majority of your portfolio — upwards of 75% — should be invested in index funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs), and not the well-known blue chip single stocks like Berkshire Hathaway, Amazon and Google. Unlike a single stock, which is essentially a small piece of ownership in a large company, an ETF is a collection of securities packaged and sold in a single basket, or fund. Some funds he recommended included: VOO: Vanguard S&P 500 ETF VTI: Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF SCHD: Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF SPYI: Neos S&P 500(R) High Income ETF (SPYI) QQQ: Invesco ETF For You: Next up,think about diversification, which is probably the most popular buzzword in investing. What it means is you invest beyond just stocks and index funds so as to vary both risk and growth levels. Hankwitz recommended including such things as real estate, international funds, precious metals and even 'fine wines and whiskey.' Additional investments include: VNQ: Vanguard real estate index fund GLD: SPDR gold shares SLV: iShares silver trust VXUS: Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF CSHI: NEOS Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF It's common for newer investors to think they can 'time' the market by putting money in or pulling it out when stocks go up or down. That strategy, however, doesn't work. Hankwitz also said rather than panicking at a short-term stock market downturn, you need to think long term. 'When in doubt, zoom out,' he said. In other words, just because it's down now, doesn't mean it will stay that way. He pointed out that while the stock market is currently down, over the last 15 years, it's been up 400%. Stay invested, invest consistently and avoid panicking. Better yet, meet with an investing advisor or financial planner with some understanding of how these things work so that you're not going it alone. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years 6 Popular SUVs That Aren't Worth the Cost -- and 6 Affordable Alternatives This article originally appeared on 'When In Doubt, Zoom Out': This Investing Strategy Could Earn You $1 Million Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
