Wright-Patterson base debuts new chamber for research on Tuesday
Previous coverage on the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base is above.
DAYTON, Ohio (WDTN) – The Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) held a ribbon-cutting ceremony on Tuesday for its new Research Environmental Chamber (REC).
The ceremony was held at 10 a.m. in Building 33 on Wright-Patterson Air Force Base's Area B.
Brig. Gen. Robert K. Bogart, 711th Human Performance Wing commander, spoke at the ceremony alongside others about the AFRL. It is the primary scientific research and development center for the Department of the Air Force.
WPAFB water treatment plants flunk EPA's new test for PFAS
The REC is now a part of the many pieces of the base's hub for physiology research. Other pieces include AFRL's Research Altitude Chamber centrifuge, and the Naval Medical Research Unit Dayton's $19 million 'Kraken' and Darwin Chamber.
'By leveraging these cutting-edge research capabilities, AFRL aims to understand performance limitations of warfighters and the equipment they use in extreme operational environments,' wrote WPAFB. 'By effectively using resources, AFRL is developing mitigation strategies to ensure mission success in challenging operational settings like the Arctic and Pacific regions.'
To learn more about the Air Force Research Laboratory, click here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Gray whale numbers decline to lowest since early 1970s, according to new data
The number of Pacific gray whales decreased significantly during the most recent count to the lowest numbers since the 1970s, while the number of whale calves also hit its lowest numbers on record. Gray whales, known for their migrations along the Oregon Coast in winter and spring, dropped to an estimated 12,900 adults and 85 calves in the latest data taken by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. It was a sharp decline from a year ago, when the number of gray whales was estimated at 19,260 for 2023-2024, and calf numbers were estimated at 221 in 2024 and 412 in 2023. "Our main concern and question is why the population does not appear to be demonstrating the same resilience as it has in rebounding from previous downturns," Sarah Mesnick, ecologist and science liaison with NOAA, said. The new data reversed hope from scientists that gray whales were rebounding after they endured an 'unusual mortality event' from 2019 to 2023 and worried instead that whales may be struggling to keep up with a changing environment. "The environment may now be changing at a pace or in ways that is testing the time-honored ability of the population to rapidly rebound while it adjusts to a new ecological regime,' said David Weller, director of the marine mammal turtle division at the NOAA Science Center and an authority on gray whales. Researchers in Mexico reported numerous dead gray whales early in 2025 in and around coastal lagoons as well as few gray whale calves. This suggests that many female whales may not be finding enough food in the Arctic to reproduce. So far in 2025, 47 gray whales have stranded dead on the West Coast, up from 31 in 2024 and 44 in 2023, the last year of the UME. While some of the stranded whales appeared skinny or emaciated, others did not. 'The lead scientists point out that this new estimate stands out because it reflects an extended downward trend in a population that has demonstrated short-term resilience in the past,' Mesnick said. 'The populations have previously rebounded quickly from downturns, including earlier previous UMEs, and we are going to continue to monitor the population.' According to NOAA and under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, UME "involves a significant die-off of any marine mammal population; and demands immediate response." Causes of UME are attributed to infectious disease, biotoxins, ecological factors, human interactions and other undetermined factors. The gray whale population was large, at about 27,430 between 2015-2016. In the following years, a decline started from 2019-2023 to below 15,000 that was considered as unusual mortality event. It appeared that whales might by rebounding after 2023, but the latest numbers dispute that notion. Scientists attributed the die-off to localized ecosystem changes that affected the Subarctic and Arctic feeding grounds. The changes in these areas contributed to malnutrition, reduced birth rates and increased mortality. The migration routes, specifically the California Current ecosystem and the Arctic ecosystem, have experienced significant changes in recent decades as well, officials said. The current research shows a connection between gray whale numbers and changes in sea ice in the Arctic, where most gray whales feed during the summer, NOAA concluded. 'They're migrating from Mexican reproductive ground, or nursery grounds, to foraging grounds in the Arctic,' Mesnick said. 'It's one of the longest migrations on the planet.' Ecosystem changes in the Arctic feeding areas the whales depend on to put on weight and maintain fitness are likely the root cause, Weller said. Decline in calf numbers has been linked to sea ice cover in the Bering and Chukchi seas. In May 2024, a juvenile gray whale washed ashore on a beach in Bandon along the southern Oregon Coast. In 2023, four reported gray whales washed ashore Oregon beaches, one being a calf. Mariah Johnston is an outdoors journalism intern at the Statesman Journal. Reach her at mjohnston@ This article originally appeared on Salem Statesman Journal: Gray whales decline to lowest numbers since 1970s
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Satellite streaks block out the Arctic sky
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. From intelligence gathering to internet usage to navigation, satellites are used daily across the globe. However, their activity is causing serious issues. In February, a team of researchers from Western University in Canada, in collaboration with the organization Defense Research and Development Canada, trekked into the high Arctic to try to measure the activity of satellites orbiting across the pole. Using 14 low-cost cameras, the researchers were able to track satellites passing overhead on the evening of Feb. 22, 2025, compiling them into a long-exposure image to show the total activity for the evening. Each streak of white in the image shows the satellite's path in the sky. Their system was inspired by meteor tracking, with cameras pointed in various angles to catch the entire night sky. This photo was taken in Eureka, in the Canadian territory of Nunavut. This novel satellite system has allowed the researchers to produce the first ever full year of satellite tracking data over Canada, according to Western University. The system is currently deployed at four sites across Canada to monitor satellite activity including: Eureka, Osoyoos, British Columbia, and Lucky Lake, Saskatchewan. With the 14-camera setup, the researchers could track objects in the sky over 11.8 inches (30 cm) in size. To date, the system has found over 17,000 unique satellites and clocked nearly half a billion observations, according to the press release. While the system gives a more detailed way to monitor satellite activity, it also reveals just how full our skies are with these devices. Not only are satellites chemically polluting our atmosphere with heavy metals, but they are becoming a growing issue for astronomers trying to look deep into our universe. With more launches planned to add new satellites, the question to be asked is: when will the sky be too full? You can read more about Earth's satellite activity and growing satellite pollution problem.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Drinking water map shows where toxic ‘forever chemicals' are found in the UK
Traces of a chemical that researchers fear could harm human reproduction have been found in dozens of Britain's rivers, a new study has warned. Researchers from York University found trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in 98% of locations in 32 rivers in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. TFA is one of a family of more than 14,000 man-made chemicals known as perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAs), which have been used since the 1940s in everything from waterproof clothing to non-stick frying pans, as well as cosmetics and food packaging. The chemicals can accumulate in people's bodies (as well as in the water we drink) and can lead to serious health issues including cancer, liver damage and harm to unborn children. The UK government launched an inquiry this year into the issue - but campaigners say not enough is being done. Natalie Sims, from the Royal Society of Chemistry, told Yahoo News: 'There is more that could be being done, and that is why we are calling for action.' The Royal Society of Chemistry has mapped levels of the chemicals in Britain's drinking waters, and is calling for the public to take action to raise the issue. 'The public can be really powerful, and I think we have seen that when we look at tackling sewage overflows, that's really been pushed up the government agenda, because the public is also pushing for it," Sims says. 'That's why we really want to take action now, and that's why there's been much more push for it from organisations like ourselves or others. In addition to developing alternative materials, we urgently need stronger, more robust controls to prevent further pollution and reduce our exposure to harmful substances in the environment.' PFAs are a group of thousands of chemicals that don't occur in nature and are extremely hard to get rid of. They also also toxic, even in small quantities. They have been used in manufacturing and consumer products since the 1940s. 'We've used them so extensively, really since the 1940s they found our way in so many different consumer products," Sims explains. "For example, in your waterproof coat, anything waterproofing, school children's clothing, anything stain resistant. PFAs have some desirable properties, and are so good at what they do in terms of that heat resistance, that water and oil resistance, stain resistance, durability, often a lot of the things that makes it very useful in products. 'Because they're so persistent, they obviously found their way into the environment, into our food, into our water. They are also used in jet engines, medical devices, refrigeration systems, the construction industry and electrical devices. In the environment, they can last for extremely long periods: hundreds or even thousands of years. They also accumulate in human bodies. 'Forever chemicals' have been phased out of some consumer products - but are still used in products such as non-stick frying pans and some packaging, although manufacturers tend to be reluctant to say exactly where they are used. The dangers attached to PFAs often comes when they are used industrially, or when products containing PFAs are disposed of inadequately, meaning they enter the water supply. In the UK, PFAs are most likely to be found in water near industrial sites including airports and areas that produce products which use PFAs. The Royal Society of Chemistry warns that contamination is likely near landfill sites where liquid contaminated with PFAs can leak out of the site, or near incinerators which often are not hot enough to fully burn chemicals can also be found near where firefighting foam is routinely used, including airports, military sites and fire-training areas. Some airports, including Heathrow, have already switched to using foam which does not contain PFAs. Wastewater sites can also leech PFAs into the water. The chemicals have been linked to serious health issues including liver damage, some cancers and harm to unborn children, thyroid disease and fertility issues. Large-scale studies have shown that PFAs in drinking water correlates with increased levels of cancer in multiple parts of the body. A review in the journal eBioMedicine linked PFAs exposure to decreased efficiency in vaccines, premature birth, increased severity of COVID-19, along with cancer, reduced immune function and developmental delays in children. Water companies in England and Wales must monitor and regulate 48 types of PFAs, despite there being thousands of varieties, with many remaining untested. But this Drinking Water Inspectorate ruling actually goes further than EU legislation. Individual PFAs concentrations in drinking water cannot exceed 100 nanograms per litre (ng/L). This is 10 times higher than the Drinking Water Inspectorate's own 'low risk' threshold of 10 ng/L. In the US, there are limits of 4 ng/L for each of PFOS and PFOA, two of the most common PFAs, and the EU states that 20 widespread PFAs must collectively not exceed 100 ng/L. The Royal Society of Chemistry has called for new limits on the amounts of PFAs permissible in drinking water. Specifically the RSC has called for a new limit of 10 ng/L for individual PFAs. The RSC has also called for stricter controls over the sources of PFAs including in industrial discharges, with a national chemicals regulator to monitor and regulate discharges. Sims says: 'An RSC survey of more than 4,000 UK adults, carried out by YouGov in August showed nine in ten Britons believe it's 'very important' to keep PFAS out of our food, water and environment. The public do want action on this, which I think is really powerful when it comes to speaking to the government. 'In terms of industry, having them push to develop alternatives, because they've had these chemicals that they've been allowed to use for so long, in terms of because they're so good at what they do, it's trying to transition that away into more, safer and sort of sustainable alternatives. Sims says that it's also vital that British people have a clearer picture of the chemicals in the water they drink. She says: 'PFAS are contained in many products and ingredients that are made or imported to the UK for use across many industries. However, we do not have a full picture of how PFAS enter and move within the supply chain. 'It's likely that the exposure you have on the everyday is going to be quite low, but it's that long term build up where, for one thing, it can be really challenging to pinpoint where those adverse effects could come from.'
