US Resumes Student Visas With Stricter Social Media Vetting
The State Department announced new vetting requirements on June 18, including social media screening for all student visa applicants.
'The State Department is committed to protecting our nation and our citizens by upholding the highest standards of national security and public safety through our visa process. A U.S. visa is a privilege, not a right,' the State Department said in a press release.
While student visa interviews—previously paused as the government reviewed its visa policy—have resumed, applicants will now be expected to set their social media profiles to 'public' to allow screening by U.S. diplomatic officials. Failure to do so could be interpreted as an effort to hide certain online activity.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that those who may cause trouble for the United States or its allies, including violence or harassment against certain ethnic groups or supporting designated terrorist groups, could have their student visa applications rejected.
'Every visa adjudication is a national security decision,' the State Department said. 'The United States must be vigilant during the visa issuance process to ensure that those applying for admission into the United States do not intend to harm Americans and our national interests, and that all applicants credibly establish their eligibility for the visa sought, including that they intend to engage in activities consistent with the terms for their admission.'
The development comes roughly three weeks after a senior State Department official confirmed to The Epoch Times that it had ordered American embassies worldwide to pause student visa interviews as the agency works to enhance its vetting process.
In an internal cable signed by Rubio and leaked to the media on May 27, the agency said it was considering making strict social media vetting a requirement for all foreign students applying to study in the United States.
On Wednesday, ahead of the announcement, The Epoch Times learned that student visa interviews had resumed with the new rules in place.
Consular officers are also directed to review social media activity for signs of the applicant having possible disdain for the United States and its government, citizens, culture, founding principles, or institutions.
These changes will affect any applicants for the student (F), vocational (M), and exchange visitor (J) visas and are intended to bolster national security.
When the State Department paused student visa interviews late last month, agency spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said the Trump administration takes 'very seriously the process of vetting who it is that comes into the country.'
'We've always vetted people trying to come in. We've always looked at visas seriously,' she said. 'Whether they be students, or if you're a tourist who needs a visa, or whoever you are, we're going to be looking at you.'
The very next day, Rubio announced that the United States would begin revoking visas for Chinese students, including any with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in 'critical fields.'
In a short statement, the State Department confirmed that it would work with the Department of Homeland Security to 'aggressively revoke' the visas while revising visa criteria to 'enhance scrutiny of all future visa applications' from China and Hong Kong.
The State Department has accused the Chinese regime of monitoring its students abroad and mobilizing them through the Chinese Students and Scholars Association. Some of that group's U.S. branches have openly admitted to being directed, supported, or financed by Chinese consulates.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Insider
2 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Alarming Fox Report Says Tactical Nukes 'Not Off The Table' For Trump's Iran Response
The Pentagon's Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) has reportedly informed American officials that destroying Iran's heavily fortified Fordow nuclear facility might require the use of a nuclear weapon, based on The Guardian . Officials, briefed on the limitations of the GBU-57 — a 30,000-pound conventional bunker-buster bomb — are worried that even if President Trump give the order it may not be powerful enough to reach and destroy the deeply buried site. The report described that conventional bombs might have to be used to soften the terrain, followed by the dropping of a tactical nuclear weapon from a B-2 stealth bomber. The latest reporting has sought to clarify that President Trump is not considering the nuclear option, nor has it yet to be formally presented to him by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. From fresh 'anonymous' White House statement present contradictory information. So very quickly, here we are … there's prominent public discourse about the 'possibility' or eventual 'necessity' of a nuclear bomb. As the Quincy Institute's Eli Clifton observes: It's disturbing but not surprising how the entire Executive Branch communications apparatus can be activated into total war-hysteria mode seemingly overnight. Israel is urging the US under Trump to target Fordow with whatever it takes, given it lacks the capability to carry out such a strike. But at least it's 'comforting' that a tactical nuke is off the table, for now… or wait: 'none of the options are off the table' – a fresh FOX report claims, citing a senior White House official. Heinrich on Iran: An article stated that Trump was not considering a tactical nuke— that it was not one of the options that was presented to him. I was just told by a top official here that none of that report is true— that none of the options are off the table — Acyn (@Acyn) June 19, 2025 All this is premised on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's claim that Iran is in fact pursuing a nuclear weapon. Dangerously the White House seems to be siding with Israeli intelligence over the assessment of the US intelligence community, as presented by DNI Tulsi Gabbard, who may have already been sidelined in White House Situation Room discussions. * * * The Publication Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists are meanwhile warning that it's possible that the Fordow enrichment facility could be destroyed and yet still it won't make the Iranian nuclear threat go away … If the Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear program, started on June 13, is to prove successful in preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons, then a necessary—but not sufficient—step will involve the elimination of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant. At the Fordow plant, located near the city of Qom, the Iranians have enough centrifuges (including IR-6s, their more advanced type) and uranium hexafluoride gas to produce several nuclear weapons. They could probably produce enough weapon-grade (90 percent) enriched uranium for one nuclear weapon within five to six days. Perhaps more important, Fordow itself is a hardened facility, built within a mountain and protected from many forms of attack. It could—in theory—continue to operate even after other nuclear facilities in the country have been destroyed, with its material then fueling nuclear weapons to be produced clandestinely. If Israel decides to continue down the military path against Iran's nuclear program, it has no choice but to ensure that the Fordow enrichment plant no longer poses a threat.
Daily Tribune
3 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Iranian foreign minister says Israel attack ‘betrayal' of diplomacy with US
Iran's foreign minister yesterday condemned the Israeli attacks against the Islamic republic as a 'betrayal' of diplomatic efforts with the US, saying Tehran and Washington had been due to craft a 'promising agreement' on the Iranian nuclear programme. 'We were attacked in the midst of an ongoing diplomatic process,' Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva ahead of a crunch meeting with European foreign ministers. Araghchi, making his first trip abroad since the strikes began, denounced Israel's attack as an 'outrageous act of aggression'. US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff had planned to meet Araghchi in Oman on June 15 but the meeting was cancelled after Israel began the strikes days before. 'We were supposed to meet with the Americans on 15 June to craft a very promising agreement for peaceful resolution of the issues fabricated over our peaceful nuclear programme,' said Araghchi. 'It was a betrayal of diplomacy and unprecedented blow to the foundations of international law,' he said. Israel began its campaign yesterday saying the operation was aimed at halting Tehran from obtaining an atomic bomb, an ambition Iran denies having. Araghchi described the attacks by Israel as an 'unjust war imposed on my people' that had killed 'hundreds'. Pointing to the risk of radiation after strikes on atomic plants, he said: 'Attacks on nuclear facilities are grave war crimes.'
Gulf Insider
7 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
US Resumes Student Visas With Stricter Social Media Vetting
The State Department announced new vetting requirements on June 18, including social media screening for all student visa applicants. 'The State Department is committed to protecting our nation and our citizens by upholding the highest standards of national security and public safety through our visa process. A U.S. visa is a privilege, not a right,' the State Department said in a press release. While student visa interviews—previously paused as the government reviewed its visa policy—have resumed, applicants will now be expected to set their social media profiles to 'public' to allow screening by U.S. diplomatic officials. Failure to do so could be interpreted as an effort to hide certain online activity. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that those who may cause trouble for the United States or its allies, including violence or harassment against certain ethnic groups or supporting designated terrorist groups, could have their student visa applications rejected. 'Every visa adjudication is a national security decision,' the State Department said. 'The United States must be vigilant during the visa issuance process to ensure that those applying for admission into the United States do not intend to harm Americans and our national interests, and that all applicants credibly establish their eligibility for the visa sought, including that they intend to engage in activities consistent with the terms for their admission.' The development comes roughly three weeks after a senior State Department official confirmed to The Epoch Times that it had ordered American embassies worldwide to pause student visa interviews as the agency works to enhance its vetting process. In an internal cable signed by Rubio and leaked to the media on May 27, the agency said it was considering making strict social media vetting a requirement for all foreign students applying to study in the United States. On Wednesday, ahead of the announcement, The Epoch Times learned that student visa interviews had resumed with the new rules in place. Consular officers are also directed to review social media activity for signs of the applicant having possible disdain for the United States and its government, citizens, culture, founding principles, or institutions. These changes will affect any applicants for the student (F), vocational (M), and exchange visitor (J) visas and are intended to bolster national security. When the State Department paused student visa interviews late last month, agency spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said the Trump administration takes 'very seriously the process of vetting who it is that comes into the country.' 'We've always vetted people trying to come in. We've always looked at visas seriously,' she said. 'Whether they be students, or if you're a tourist who needs a visa, or whoever you are, we're going to be looking at you.' The very next day, Rubio announced that the United States would begin revoking visas for Chinese students, including any with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in 'critical fields.' In a short statement, the State Department confirmed that it would work with the Department of Homeland Security to 'aggressively revoke' the visas while revising visa criteria to 'enhance scrutiny of all future visa applications' from China and Hong Kong. The State Department has accused the Chinese regime of monitoring its students abroad and mobilizing them through the Chinese Students and Scholars Association. Some of that group's U.S. branches have openly admitted to being directed, supported, or financed by Chinese consulates.
