US lawmakers call for Congress to review Trump's Iran actions
FILE PHOTO: U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) looks on, after President Donald Trump delivered remarks on tariffs, in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo
WASHINGTON - Some Democratic and Republican lawmakers on Sunday called on Congress to rein in President Donald Trump's use of military force in Iran and prevent U.S. involvement in a deepening Middle East conflict.
With Republican leaders in the Senate and House of Representatives strongly backing the U.S. attacks on key Iranian nuclear sites, it seemed unlikely any resolution that asserts the power of Congress to declare war and restricts Trump's actions could pass both chambers.
U.S. Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia said he expects to force the Senate to vote this week on his measure requiring Trump to terminate hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war from Congress. Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California said they want a vote on similar legislation they introduced in the House.
"This is the U.S. jumping into a war of choice at Donald Trump's urging, without any compelling national security interest for the United States to act in this way, particularly without a debate and vote in Congress," Kaine told CBS' "Face the Nation" program.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the criticism from lawmakers.
House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune were both notified of the U.S. military action ahead of time, according to sources familiar with the matter. Members of Congress are expected to be briefed on Tuesday.
Thune's office declined to comment on Kaine's measure.
The attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities on Saturday divided Trump's populist MAGA movement, with some leaders rallying behind the president and others calling for an end to hostilities after so-called U.S. "forever wars" in Iraq and Afghanistan following the September 11, 2001, attacks on U.S. soil.
"I represent part of the coalition that elected President Trump. We were tired of endless wars," Massie told CBS. "We were promised that we would put our veterans, our immigration policies and our infrastructure first."
Massie and Kaine each said there was no urgency requiring Trump to act unilaterally.
"There was no imminent threat to the United States," Massie said. "We haven't been briefed."
Intelligence reports and analysts have reached different conclusions on how close Iran was to building a nuclear bomb. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Friday that the U.S. had intelligence that should Iran decide to do so, it could build a nuclear weapon in weeks or months. U.S. officials say they do not believe Iran had decided to make a bomb.
Iran claims its nuclear ambitions are peaceful and focused on energy production and medical research. But its program, which began in the late 1950s with U.S. support, has fallen under suspicion in recent years, with Tehran ramping up enrichment to 60%, just below the weapons-grade of 90%, and restricting the access of international inspectors to its sites.
Trump vowed on Sunday to support Massie's primary challenger in the 2026 midterm elections, saying the Kentucky congressman's criticism of the Iran attack and opposition to Trump's legislative efforts proved he was not aligned with the party's new base.
"MAGA is not about lazy, grandstanding, nonproductive politicians, of which Thomas Massie is definitely one," Trump posted to Truth Social.
REPUBLICANS VOICE DIFFERING VIEWS
Another Trump loyalist, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, also criticized Trump's decision on Sunday, but insisted she was not being disloyal.
"I can also support President Trump and his great administration on many of the great things they are doing while disagreeing on bombing Iran and getting involved in a hot war that Israel started," the Georgia Republican wrote on X.
Other Trump allies pushed back on claims that his actions against Iran violated the U.S. Constitution and a federal law that restricts unilateral action by a president to conditions involving an attack on the United States.
"He had all the authority he needs under the Constitution. They are wrong," said Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch Trump ally who has long been a leading voice on U.S. foreign policy matters in Congress.
"If you don't like what the president does in terms of war, you can cut off the funding," the South Carolina Republican told NBC's "Meet the Press" program.
The attacks on Iran generally drew accolades from Republican lawmakers who declared that the operation set back Iran's ability to obtain a nuclear weapon.
"The President made the right call, and did what he needed to do," Johnson said in a post on X late Saturday. "The Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act."
The U.S. Constitution divides war powers in the federal government by making the president the commander-in-chief of the armed forces but leaving sole authority to declare war to Congress. The balance has shifted, with Congress relinquishing the use of military power to presidents of both parties in recent years.
But Democrats said it was too early to tell whether the mission had succeeded, warning that Iran could have moved its nuclear material to other sites far from U.S. targets.
"The tragedy in this country is that we keep entering these overseas wars. We triumphantly declare the mission is accomplished the day after, and then we're left with Americans bearing the consequences for decades," Khanna told CBS. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
10 minutes ago
- Straits Times
‘We're all in shock': Iranians react to US attack on nuclear sites
The Israel-Iran war that broke out over the past week has already upended life for Iran's 90 million people. PHOTO: EPA-EFE Follow our live coverage here. TEHRAN - The Israel-Iran war that broke out over the past week has already upended life for Iran's 90 million people, killing more than 400 and injuring more than 3,000, according to the country's Health Ministry. Countless others have fled to safety in the countryside or neighbouring states. Now, after a direct American attack on three of Iran's nuclear facilities, many Iranians said in phone interviews that they faced an uncertain and frightening future. 'We're all in shock – none of us expected that, within six or seven days, we'd reach this point,' said Peyman, a 44-year-old business executive who asked that his last name not be used because of concern over reprisals from the authorities. After Israel launched its military assault last week, a missile hit nearby on his commute to work, and he decided to escape Tehran. Now his immediate family, parents, in-laws and brother's family are all sheltering in one house in northern Iran. His primary concern is for his 9-year-old daughter. 'I grew up in war, so the sound of bombardment doesn't scare me, but I left because of my daughter,' he said. 'I fear soon we're going to have a shortage of water and food.' Iranians awoke to the news of the American attack June 22 feeling a combination of sorrow and anger. 'I really hope there's a ceasefire, because this is not OK,' said Dr Parsa Mehdipour, 29, a general practitioner in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, who flew home to Tehran for a visit in late May and has been trapped there since the war began and flights into and out of Iran were suspended. Dr Mehdipour said he had no idea how he would get back to Dubai. His options include travelling by road and then taking a ship across the Persian Gulf or crossing into a neighbouring country where he can catch a flight. 'These tensions will cause a lot of problems for civilians,' he said. 'This is honestly a breach of international law,' he said, adding that attacking nuclear facilities 'could have catastrophic consequences for the people.' One 44-year-old mother of two, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect her family from reprisals, described how she and her children left everything behind after Israel began its military campaign and Iranian authorities issued an evacuation order for her neighbourhood in Tehran. They packed a few small bags, locked the door and left, travelling on a pothole-filled road to the border and crossing into Armenia, where they have been staying in hotels. By day, her sons live a normal life. But as night falls their crying and nightmares begin, and they awaken at the slightest sound, she said. When she mentioned that they were on a vacation, her 7-year-old son corrected her, saying that he knew that they had escaped from a war. The woman said that leaving Iran was the worst feeling, but that she had lived through the Iran-Iraq War and did not want her children to experience the same trauma. She does not care about the nuclear sites, she said, but feels sad for regular Iranians who are stuck between two fronts: their own government, and the countries attacking them. Since the Israeli attacks, which appeared to have involved intelligence breaches deep inside Iran's government, Iranian news media have reported that officials have cracked down on people they accuse of being 'collaborators' with Israel. Iranian authorities arrested 53 people who they said were linked to Israel and charged them with disturbing public opinion, possessing and operating drones, filming sensitive locations and sending that footage to 'hostile media outlets,' Fars, an Iranian news agency affiliated with Iran's Revolutionary Guard, reported on June 22. Iranian authorities also arrested a European citizen accused of espionage in the western province of Kermanshah, the Tasnim news agency, which is closely affiliated with the government, reported Sunday. The report did not say what country the person was from. The New York Times was not able to independently verify the Iranian news media reports. Peyman, the executive, said that he was no fan of President Donald Trump or Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – 'not at all' – but that he nonetheless found himself blaming his own government for the war and its heavy toll. 'The feeling I have is a feeling of 40 years of hatred toward this foolish government,' he said, lamenting the money that had been spent to develop Fordo, a uranium enrichment site that the United States targeted. 'All these years of slogans and chest beating, saying we have a strong defence system and that no enemy could ever attack our soil.' 'That's not even counting how much the value of our currency has dropped, how much of our human capital has fled the country, how much chaos has been created,' he added. 'The psychological, financial and cultural toll on the country is immense.' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
26 minutes ago
- Business Times
Oil hits five-month high after US hits key Iranian nuclear sites
[TOKYO] Oil prices jumped on Monday to their highest since January as Washington's weekend move to join Israel in attacking Iran's nuclear facilities stoked supply worries. Brent crude futures rose US$1.88 or 2.44 per cent at US$78.89 a barrel as of 1122 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude advanced US$1.87 or 2.53 per cent at US$75.71. Both contracts jumped by more than 3 per cent earlier in the session to US$81.40 and US$78.40, respectively, five-month highs, before giving up some gains. The rise in prices came after U.S. President Donald Trump said he had 'obliterated' Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes over the weekend, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. Iran is Opec's third-largest crude producer. Market participants expect further price gains amid mounting fears that an Iranian retaliation may include a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of global crude supply flows. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Iran's Press TV reported that the Iranian parliament approved a measure to close the strait. Iran has in the past threatened to close the strait but has never followed through on the move. 'The risks of damage to oil infrastructure ... have multiplied,' said Sparta Commodities senior analyst June Goh. Although there are alternative pipeline routes out of the region, there will still be crude volumes that cannot be fully exported out if the Strait of Hormuz becomes inaccessible. Shippers will increasingly stay out of the region, she added. Brent has risen 13 per cent since the conflict began on June 13, while WTI has gained around 10 per cent. The current geopolitical risk premium is unlikely to last without tangible supply disruptions, analysts said. Meanwhile, the unwinding of some of the long positions accumulated following a recent price rally could cap an upside to oil prices, Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank, wrote in a market commentary on Sunday. REUTERS
Straits Times
38 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Russia may be ‘a friend' of Iran, but Moscow seems unlikely to offer Tehran much help
There's little sign that Russia will provide military aid to Iran as it prioritises the Ukraine war. PHOTO: REUTERS Russia may be 'a friend' of Iran, but Moscow seems unlikely to offer Tehran much help Follow our live coverage here. The Iranian foreign minister said on June 22 that he was heading to Russia to meet President Vladimir Putin on June 23, as Iran weighed a response to a wave of US strikes on its nuclear sites. There was little sign that Russia was prepared to provide military assistance to Iran, its closest remaining Middle East ally, as it prioritised its own war against Ukraine. Iran has not received concrete support from any allies through 10 days of war with Israel. In announcing the trip to Moscow, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called Russia 'a friend of Iran' and said that the two countries 'enjoy a strategic partnership and we always consult with each other and coordinate our positions'. The Russian Foreign Ministry condemned the American military intervention in Iran, saying it had undermined global efforts to contain the proliferation of nuclear weapons. But the Kremlin has not publicly commented on the attacks, and it has not announced any tangible steps to help Iran. The guarded reaction reflects Mr Putin's limited resources, with Russia in its fourth year of war in Ukraine. Russia is trying to maintain warm relations with Iran's Middle Eastern rivals, including Saudi Arabia. The Kremlin is also likely to tread carefully on issues that may alienate US President Donald Trump, whose support – or, at least, acquiescence – it needs to secure a peace deal in Ukraine on its own terms. In addition, Russia has benefited from a rise in oil prices caused by the growing unrest in the Middle East. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
