Asim Munir meets Trump: From Zia, Musharaff to Munir, what happens when Pakistan's army chiefs meet US presidents
US President
Donald Trump
will meet Pakistan's Field Marshal
General Asim Munir
for a private lunch in the Cabinet Room of the
White House
today. The agenda has not been published, but officials expect the two men to discuss
regional security
, counter‑terrorism and bilateral ties. The meeting is the first at this level in 15 years and follows last month's India‑Pakistan clash and Israel's strike in Iran.
Today's lunch signals a potential thaw in relations after successive administrations — under Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Trump's own first term — largely side-lined Pakistan over its alleged support for militant groups. During that earlier term, Trump suspended nearly $2 billion in
military aid
to Islamabad, accusing it of harbouring terrorists. A new opening now comes as conflicts across the Middle East grow and South Asia faces fresh friction.
What has changed US attitude toward Pakistan?
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Cua Duong: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You)
Unsold Furniture | Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
Observers trace the shift to earlier moments in the relationship built around two military rulers — Mohammad Zia ul‑Haq and Pervez
Musharraf
. Both leaders aligned with US goals at key times and secured economic and defence support that reshaped ties.
Army chief meetings reveal where power lies in Pakistan
In Pakistan, the Army Chief dominates national security, foreign policy and nuclear command. US administrations often bypass civilian leaders and engage directly with the army chief to ensure clear communication on Afghanistan, India, counter‑terrorism and nuclear safety. Each presidential meeting with a Pakistani Army Chief has coincided with broader strategic needs or global events.
Live Events
Zia‑ul‑Haq forged Cold War–era military ties
General Mohammad Zia‑ul‑Haq met several US Presidents in the 1980s, including Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Those meetings took place as Pakistan became a frontline state in the US‑backed push against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. Under Zia, Pakistan's military and intelligence services worked with the
CIA
to fund and train Afghan mujahideen, unlocking substantial US military and economic aid.
President Reagan publicly welcomed Zia to the White House in December 1982, praising Pakistan's support for regional stability. Their meetings laid groundwork for the military‑to‑military relationship that would shape future US‑Pakistan ties.
Musharraf–Clinton: post‑Kargil outreach after a coup
General Pervez Musharraf met President Bill Clinton in March 2000, just months after seizing power in a military coup. Clinton's brief visit followed the 1999 Kargil conflict and heightened nuclear worries in South Asia. Though Washington opposed the coup, the decision to meet Musharraf helped stabilise the region and kept dialogue open with Pakistan's real power centre.
Bush–Musharraf alliance deepened after 9/11
President George W. Bush met Musharraf in 2006 during a visit to Islamabad. After 9/11, the US relied on Pakistan's military for logistics and intelligence in the War on Terror. Pakistan received more than $10 billion in military and economic aid, and Washington designated it a 'Major Non‑NATO Ally,' granting privileged access to US military technology.
Quiet nuclear‑safety talks began under Musharraf
Post‑9/11 worries over Pakistan's nuclear arsenal led Washington to open confidential security talks. Then Secretary of State Colin Powell said the US had invited Pakistani officials 'to see how safety and security is ensured in the United States.' Pakistan's foreign minister replied, 'Who would refuse.' That dialogue marked the start of discreet cooperation on nuclear safeguards.
Bajwa–Trump: coordination during Afghan exit plans
In another meeting, although not standalone, General
Qamar Javed Bajwa
met President Trump in July 2019 while Prime Minister Imran Khan visited Washington. The US was seeking an Afghan peace deal and needed Pakistan's help with the Taliban talks. Bajwa's presence underscored the army's sway over Afghan outcomes and revived military coordination after years of strain.
Trump–Munir lunch signals a fresh opening in 2025
General Asim Munir's lunch with President Trump on 18 June 2025 is the first such engagement in 15 years. It comes amid regional tensions, including a recent India‑Pakistan clash and Israeli strikes in Iran. Washington is likely seeking Pakistan's cooperation in managing fallout and balancing China's growing influence. The private White House setting suggests the US is again turning to Pakistan's military leadership as a key regional security player.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Delhi must underline for Washington the grave dangers of Asim Munir's vision of Pakistan
In 2018, in his first term, US President Donald Trump had spelt out, in his typically blunt style, the sense that Rawalpindi and Islamabad had taken advantage of Washington: 'The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools… they give safe haven to terrorists'. This week, he said: 'I love Pakistan'. It would be simplistic to view the unprecedented lunch meeting at the White House between Trump and General Asim Munir — the first time a military leader who is not head of state in Pakistan has been accorded the honour — as a major u-turn. Indeed, India-US ties have been steadily deepening over the last three decades, based on a convergence of economic and strategic interests and shared values, even as the US-Pakistan relationship has grown more volatile. That said, the current moment in international relations is one of flux and Delhi must tread carefully. The Pahalgam attack underscored the grave national security threat that Pakistan-sponsored terrorism continues to present for India. With Operation Sindoor, Delhi has made it clear to both Rawalpindi and the world that it will pierce the shield of 'proxies' and not give in to Pakistan's nuclear blackmail. India has raised the costs of terror in order to ensure that such attacks on its soil are not carried out with impunity. Communicating the new normal it has etched with Pakistan after Pahalgam to its friends abroad is Delhi's challenge. To be sure, Delhi cannot control who Trump chooses to engage, and for what reasons. Pakistan's geography — it shares a 900-km border with Iran — may make it an attractive tactical partner for the US in the current Israel-Iran war. There is speculation that Pakistan's rolling out the red carpet for the privately-owned US cryptocurrency firm, World Liberty Financial (WLF), may have helped ingratiate Munir to the White House — Donald Trump Jr has close ties with WLF. A White House spokesperson has claimed that Munir has proposed Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his self-proclaimed role — firmly denied by India — in the post Op Sindoor cessation of hostilities. For India, though, the question is less why the Munir-Trump meeting, and more about how to ensure that the red lines it has laid down are respected, including by the US. Just a fortnight before terrorists killed 26 people in Pahalgam after confirming their religion, Munir had reiterated some of the nastiest tropes of the two-nation theory. He called Kashmir Pakistan's 'jugular vein', and reduced the complex and layered identities of the Subcontinent's people to their religion. It is now for Delhi — diplomatically, through the appropriate channels — to remind Washington that Pakistan's Field Marshal is a fundamentalist with an army at his disposal. Delhi has done well so far in standing its ground and making it clear that it will not compromise on its national interest: Even if belatedly, it issued a clear denial of President Trump's claims about mediating the ceasefire. Now, it must underline for Washington the danger that Munir's vision of Pakistan poses for stability in the region and for global order — and why Delhi has drawn some hard red lines.
Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
Iran-Israel conflict: Donald Trump warns Iran has ‘two weeks' to avoid US strikes
US President Donald Trump warned escalating tensions on Friday, giving Iran a "maximum" of two weeks to avoid potential American air strikes. His remarks come as Israel asserts it has already delayed Iran's presumed nuclear ambitions by at least two years. Trump also dismissed European diplomatic efforts, saying it would be "very hard" to ask Israel to halt its ongoing military actions, according to a report by AFP. A series of blasts were heard in Tehran on Friday as Israel kept up the massive wave of strikes it says is aimed at stopping Iran from developing nuclear weapons -- an ambition Tehran has denied. 'According to the assessment we hear, we already delayed for at least two or three years the possibility for them to have a nuclear bomb,' Israel's foreign minister Gideon Saar said in an interview published Saturday. Saar said Israel's week-long onslaught will continue. "We will do everything that we can do there in order to remove this threat," he told German newspaper Bild. As Trump mulls the prospect of joining the war on Israel's side, top diplomats from Britain, France and Germany met their Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi in Geneva and urged him to resume talks with the United States that had been derailed by Israel's attacks. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said "we invited the Iranian minister to consider negotiations with all sides, including the United States, without awaiting the cessation of strikes, which we also hope for." But Araghchi told NBC News after the meeting that "we're not prepared to negotiate with them (the United States) anymore, as long as the aggression continues." Trump was dismissive of European efforts, telling reporters, "Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this." Trump also said he's unlikely to ask Israel to stop its attacks to get Iran back to the table. "If somebody's winning, it's a little bit harder to do," he said. Any US involvement would likely feature powerful bunker-busting bombs that no other country possesses to destroy an underground uranium enrichment facility in Fordo. On the streets of Tehran, many shops were closed and normally busting markets largely abandoned on Friday. Since Israel launched its offensive on June 13, targeting nuclear and military sites but also hitting residential areas, Iran has responded with barrages which Israeli authorities say have killed at least 25 people. A hospital in the Israeli port of Haifa reported 19 injured, including one person in serious condition, after the latest Iranian salvo. More than 450 missiles have been fired at the country so far, along with about 400 drones, according to Israel's National Public Diplomacy Directorate. We will do everything that we can do there in order to remove this threat. Iran said on Sunday that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. It has not updated the toll since.
The Hindu
30 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Pakistan nominates Donald Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for ‘leadership' during India-Pakistan conflict
Pakistan has said in a post on social media platform X that U.S. President Donald Trump should get Nobel Peace Prize in 2026 'in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis'. Mr. Trump has repeatedly claimed credit for playing a substantial role in easing the conflict — despite Indian authorities disputing that. The nomination came after Mr. Trump was asked on Friday (June 20, 2025) about the Nobel and said he should be awarded it for a variety of reasons, including his work on India and Pakistan and arranging a treaty he said would be signed on Monday to end hostilities between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda. 'I should have gotten it four or five times,' the President said. 'They won't give me a Nobel Peace Prize because they only give it to liberals.'
