Global carriers bypass Middle East; US airlines face heightened risks after Iran strikes
An American Airlines Boeing 737 MAX 8 flight approaches for landing in Washington DC, March 13, 2019. Safe Airspace said the US attacks on Iran may increase risks to US operators in the Middle East. REUTERS/ Joshua Roberts/ File photo
An organization that monitors flight risks warned on Sunday that US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites could heighten the threat to American operators in the region, as airlines continued to avoid large parts of the Middle East due to ongoing missile exchanges.
But following a barrage of early morning Iranian missiles, Israel has reopened its airspace for six hours on Sunday to bring back those stranded abroad since the conflict with Iran began on June 13.
Safe Airspace, a membership-based website run by OPSGROUP, said the US attacks on Iran may increase risks to US operators in the region.
"While there have been no specific threats made against civil aviation, Iran has previously warned it would retaliate by attacking US military interests in the Middle East—either directly or via proxies such as Hezbollah," Safe Airspace said.
Meanwhile, flight tracking website FlightRadar24, said airlines maintained flight diversions around the region.
"Following US attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, commercial traffic in the region is operating as it has since new airspace restrictions were put into place last week," it said on social media platform X.
Its website showed airlines were not flying in the airspace over Iran, Iraq, Syria and Israel. They have chosen other routings such as north via the Caspian Sea or south via Egypt and Saudi Arabia, even if these result in higher fuel and crew costs and longer flight times.
Missile and drone barrages in an expanding number of conflict zones globally represent a high risk to airline traffic.
Since Israel launched strikes on Iran on June 13, carriers have suspended flights to destinations in the affected countries, though there have been some evacuation flights from neighboring nations and some bringing stranded Israelis home.
In the days before the US strikes, American Airlines suspended flights to Qatar and United Airlines did the same with flights to Dubai.
Safe Airspace said it was possible airspace risks could now extend to countries including Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. "We continue to advise a high degree of caution at this time," it said.
Rescue and evacuation flights
Israel's carriers, El Al Israel Airlines, Arkia, Israir, and Air Haifa, said earlier on Sunday they had suspended rescue flights that allowed people to return to Israel until further notice.
El Al said it would also extend its cancellation of scheduled flights through Friday and Israir said it had halted the sale of tickets for all flights through July 7.
A spokesperson for Israel's airports authority said the country's main airport, Ben Gurion near Tel Aviv, was expected to reopen for rescue flight landings on Sunday between 1100 and 1700 GMT.
Flag carrier El Al, along with Arkia, Air Haifa and Israir said they would operate at least 10 flights on Sunday starting at 1100 GMT.
Tens of thousands of Israelis and others who had booked tickets to Israel are stuck abroad.
At the same time, nearly 40,000 tourists in Israel are looking to leave the country, some of whom are going via Jordan's borders to Amman and Aqaba and others via Egypt and by boat to Cyprus.
"In accordance with security directives, we are working to bring Israelis home as quickly as possible," Israel's Transport Minister Miri Regev said in a statement.
Japan's foreign ministry said on Sunday it had evacuated 21 people, including 16 Japanese nationals, from Iran overland to Azerbaijan. It said it was the second such evacuation since Thursday and that it would conduct further evacuations if necessary.
New Zealand's government said on Sunday it would send a Hercules military transport plane to the Middle East on standby to evacuate New Zealanders from the region.
It said in a statement that government personnel and a C-130J Hercules aircraft would leave Auckland on Monday. The plane would take some days to reach the region, it said.
The government was also in talks with commercial airlines to assess how they may be able to assist, it added. — Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

GMA Network
13 hours ago
- GMA Network
Global carriers bypass Middle East; US airlines face heightened risks after Iran strikes
An American Airlines Boeing 737 MAX 8 flight approaches for landing in Washington DC, March 13, 2019. Safe Airspace said the US attacks on Iran may increase risks to US operators in the Middle East. REUTERS/ Joshua Roberts/ File photo An organization that monitors flight risks warned on Sunday that US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites could heighten the threat to American operators in the region, as airlines continued to avoid large parts of the Middle East due to ongoing missile exchanges. But following a barrage of early morning Iranian missiles, Israel has reopened its airspace for six hours on Sunday to bring back those stranded abroad since the conflict with Iran began on June 13. Safe Airspace, a membership-based website run by OPSGROUP, said the US attacks on Iran may increase risks to US operators in the region. "While there have been no specific threats made against civil aviation, Iran has previously warned it would retaliate by attacking US military interests in the Middle East—either directly or via proxies such as Hezbollah," Safe Airspace said. Meanwhile, flight tracking website FlightRadar24, said airlines maintained flight diversions around the region. "Following US attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, commercial traffic in the region is operating as it has since new airspace restrictions were put into place last week," it said on social media platform X. Its website showed airlines were not flying in the airspace over Iran, Iraq, Syria and Israel. They have chosen other routings such as north via the Caspian Sea or south via Egypt and Saudi Arabia, even if these result in higher fuel and crew costs and longer flight times. Missile and drone barrages in an expanding number of conflict zones globally represent a high risk to airline traffic. Since Israel launched strikes on Iran on June 13, carriers have suspended flights to destinations in the affected countries, though there have been some evacuation flights from neighboring nations and some bringing stranded Israelis home. In the days before the US strikes, American Airlines suspended flights to Qatar and United Airlines did the same with flights to Dubai. Safe Airspace said it was possible airspace risks could now extend to countries including Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. "We continue to advise a high degree of caution at this time," it said. Rescue and evacuation flights Israel's carriers, El Al Israel Airlines, Arkia, Israir, and Air Haifa, said earlier on Sunday they had suspended rescue flights that allowed people to return to Israel until further notice. El Al said it would also extend its cancellation of scheduled flights through Friday and Israir said it had halted the sale of tickets for all flights through July 7. A spokesperson for Israel's airports authority said the country's main airport, Ben Gurion near Tel Aviv, was expected to reopen for rescue flight landings on Sunday between 1100 and 1700 GMT. Flag carrier El Al, along with Arkia, Air Haifa and Israir said they would operate at least 10 flights on Sunday starting at 1100 GMT. Tens of thousands of Israelis and others who had booked tickets to Israel are stuck abroad. At the same time, nearly 40,000 tourists in Israel are looking to leave the country, some of whom are going via Jordan's borders to Amman and Aqaba and others via Egypt and by boat to Cyprus. "In accordance with security directives, we are working to bring Israelis home as quickly as possible," Israel's Transport Minister Miri Regev said in a statement. Japan's foreign ministry said on Sunday it had evacuated 21 people, including 16 Japanese nationals, from Iran overland to Azerbaijan. It said it was the second such evacuation since Thursday and that it would conduct further evacuations if necessary. New Zealand's government said on Sunday it would send a Hercules military transport plane to the Middle East on standby to evacuate New Zealanders from the region. It said in a statement that government personnel and a C-130J Hercules aircraft would leave Auckland on Monday. The plane would take some days to reach the region, it said. The government was also in talks with commercial airlines to assess how they may be able to assist, it added. — Reuters


GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
Middle East tensions put investors on alert, weighing worst-case scenarios
Global oil prices may jump to around $130 per barrel in the most severe case scenario resulting from the tensions between Israel and Iran, according to Oxford Economics analysts. File photo NEW YORK - Investors are mulling a host of different market scenarios should the US deepen its involvement in the Middle East conflict, with the potential for ripple effects if energy prices skyrocket. They are honed in on the evolving situation between Israel and Iran, which have exchanged missile strikes, and are poised for action if the US decides to join Israel in its bombing campaign. That would likely cause an initial selloff in equities and possible safe-haven bid for the dollar on concerns US military action against Iran would send inflation higher, dampening consumer confidence and lessening the chance of near-term interest rate cuts. The move by the US to deploy B-2 bombers to Guam on Saturday has caught the attention of market participants. While the bombers could be used to deliver the 30,000-pound bombs able to destroy Iran's underground nuclear program facilities, it is unclear whether the move is tied to Middle East events. The move "just underscores the administration's willingness to threaten to intervene," said Mark Spindel, chief investment officer of Potomac River Capital LLC. "I think this will help oil prices stay higher; the easy direction for them right now is up at this point," Spindel added. While US West Texas Intermediate crude prices (WTI) have climbed some 10% over the past week, the S&P 500 has been little changed, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks. However, if attacks were to take out Iranian oil supply, "that's when the market is going to sit up and take notice," said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B Riley Wealth. "If you get disruption to supply of oil product on the global marketplace, that is not reflected in today's WTI price and that is where things get negative," Hogan said. The White House said on Thursday that President Donald Trump would decide on US involvement in the conflict in the next two weeks. Israeli officials, however, have told the Trump administration they do not want to wait the two weeks and that Israel could act alone before the deadline is up, two sources said. Analysts at Oxford Economics modeled three scenarios, including a de-escalation in the conflict, a complete shutdown in Iranian production, and a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, "each with increasingly large impacts on global oil prices," the firm said in a note. In the most severe case, global oil prices jump to around $130 per barrel, driving US inflation near 6% by the end of this year, Oxford said in the note. "Although the price shock inevitably dampens consumer spending because of the hit to real incomes, the scale of the rise in inflation and concerns about the potential for second-round inflation effects likely ruin any chance of rate cuts in the US this year," Oxford said in the note. Oil impact The biggest market impact from the escalating conflict has been restricted to oil, with oil prices soaring on worries that the Iran-Israel conflict could disrupt supplies. Global benchmark Brent crude futures LCOc1 have risen as much as 18% since June 10, hitting a near five-month high of $79.04 on Thursday. The accompanying rise in investors' expectations for further near-term volatility in oil prices has outpaced the rise in volatility expectations for other major asset classes, including stocks and bonds. But other asset classes, including stocks, could still feel the knock-on effects of higher oil prices, especially if there is a larger surge in oil prices if the worst market fears of supply disruptions come true, analysts said. "Geopolitical tensions have been mostly ignored by equities, but they are being factored into oil," Citigroup analysts wrote in a note. "To us, the key for equities from here will come from energy commodity pricing," they said. Stocks unperturbed US stocks have so far weathered rising Middle East conflict with little sign of panic. A more direct US involvement in the conflict could, however, spook markets, investors said. As the days pass, Potomac River Capital's Spindel said, markets have become increasingly focused on the Middle East. "The stock market can only digest one thing at a time, and right now we're all focused on if, whether and when the US enters this conflict." Economists warn that a dramatic rise in oil prices could damage a global economy already strained by Trump's tariffs. Still, any pullback in equities might be fleeting, history suggests. During past prominent instances of Middle East tensions coming to a boil, including the 2003 Iraq invasion and the 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities, stocks initially languished but soon recovered to trade higher in the months ahead. On average, the S&P 500 slipped 0.3% in the three weeks following the start of conflict, but was 2.3% higher on average two months following the conflict, according to data from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro. Dollar woes An escalation in the conflict could have mixed implications for the US dollar, which has tumbled this year amid worries over diminished US exceptionalism. In the event of US direct engagement in the Iran-Israel war, the dollar could initially benefit from a safety bid, analysts said. "Traders are likely to worry more about the implicit erosion of the terms of trade for Europe, the UK, and Japan, rather than the economic shock to the U.S., a major oil producer," Thierry Wizman, Global FX & Rates Strategist at Macquarie Group, said in a note. But longer-term, the prospect of US-directed "nation-building" would probably weaken the dollar, he said. "We recall that after the attacks of 9/11, and running through the decade-long US presence in Afghanistan and Iraq, the USD weakened," Wizman said. —Reuters


GMA Network
5 days ago
- GMA Network
PH waiting for US decision on tariffs
The Philippines is awaiting the United States' decision on its plea for the latter to lower the tariff rates on Philippine goods. In an interview with reporters on Wednesday, Trade Secretary Ma. Cristina Roque said that there would be 'really no second round (dialogue) for us.' Last month, Roque, along with Economic Affairs Adviser Frederick Go and Philippine Ambassador to the United States Jose Manuel Romualdez, met with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and tackled 'mutually beneficial ways to strengthen the bilateral relations' amid the 17% tariff rate imposed by the US. The trade dialogue was held within the 90-day suspension of US President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariff policy. The suspension will expire on July 8. 'Everything is a wait-and-see until they put it out… But we don't know what the outcome will be when they give us the verdict,' Roque said. The Department of Trade and Industry chief, however, expressed confidence that the US will give a favorable decision on the Philippines' tariff plea, 'which is lower than 17%.' Trump had earlier expressed willingness to extend the suspension of his reciprocal tariff policy for countries with ongoing trade talks with the US. 'Actually, I've heard that also, and that was what was told to us also, that there might be an extension. But, again, there's no [confirmation] yet,' Roque said. 'For now, the tariff is at 10%, which is lower than 17%. So, even with the extension, I feel we should be okay. Yeah, favorable for us because 10%. But, of course, if we really get the tariff lower than 10%, why not? But, again, everything is under negotiation,' she said. Trump in April announced a sweeping reciprocal tariff policy on its trading partners, including the Philippines, which would be facing a 17% tariff on its exports to the US. Although it is the lowest among its Southeast Asian peers, still the Philippine government sent a delegation to Washington to seek dialogue with US officials. Trump had argued that the trading relationship between the US and its trading partners has become 'highly unbalanced,' thus the higher tariffs would be targeted on countries that have significant trade imbalances with America. In other words, the US leader is trying to level the playing field for American industries by 'reciprocating' what other states are charging them for the goods they are selling in their countries. Data from the USTR showed that the US goods trade deficit with the Philippines stood at $4.9 billion in 2024, up 21.8% from 2023. US total goods trade with the Philippines amounted to about $23.5 billion in 2024, with American goods exports to the Philippines amounting to $9.3 billion, up 0.4%, while goods imports totaled $14.2 billion. The US is the Philippines' top destination for its goods in 2024 at $58.7 billion, accounting for a lion's share, or 80.2%, of the top 10 nations where it exports, according to data from the Philippine Statistics Authority. —VBL, GMA Integrated News