Diabetic patients taking GLP-1s may face increased risk of eye disease, study suggests
Diabetes is the leading cause of vision loss in people between 18 and 64 years old, according to the American Diabetes Association — and the best way to prevent this is to control blood sugar levels.
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1s), such as Ozempic and Mounjaro, have become popular medications for controlling diabetes and treating obesity — but new Canadian research suggests they can also lead to a paradoxical side effect in the form of eye problems.
A retrospective study conducted from January 2020 to November 2023 included more than 139,000 diabetic patients, some of whom were taking GLP-1s for at least six months and some who were not taking the medications over a three-year period.
The average age of the participants was 66 years old, and approximately 47% were women.
Researchers found that the participants taking the weight-loss medications had twice the risk of developing neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) compared to the people not taking them.
"There have been growing reports of [eye] adverse events with GLP-1 receptor agonists, but no clear consensus regarding their impact on age-related macular degeneration (AMD) progression," study author Dr. Rajeev Muni, an ophthalmologist and vice-chair of clinical research in the Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences at the University of Toronto, told Fox News Digital.
"In particular, we observed a dose-response relationship — the longer patients were exposed to these medications, the greater their risk appeared to be," added author Reut Shor, a researcher in the department of ophthalmology and vision sciences at the University of Toronto.
The findings were published in the journal JAMA Ophthalmology.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of vision loss in those aged 50 and older in the developing world, according to the American Society of Retinal Specialists.
Approximately 20 million adults in the U.S. have the condition.
It mainly affects people's central vision, which means they have a challenging time seeing in front of them, but their peripheral vision is intact, according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
There are two types of AMD – dry and wet.
Dry AMD, the most common type, occurs when small yellow deposits of protein develop under the macula, but symptoms may not occur in the early stages, experts said.
"The longer patients were exposed to these medications, the greater their risk appeared to be."
In about two out of every 10 cases, dry AMD develops into wet AMD — also known as neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
With this more advanced type of disease, abnormal blood vessels form under the retina and start to leak, causing damage to the central part of the retina, known as the macula, according to WebMD.
"When this occurs, symptoms include loss of central vision, distortions in vision and blank areas missing in the central vision," Nishika Reddy, M.D., assistant professor of ophthalmology at Moran Eye Center's Midvalley Health Center at the University of Utah, told Fox News Digital. (She was not part of the study.)
Risk factors for nAMD include chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease and diabetes – all of which often overlap with those who take GLP-1s, experts confirmed.
The study authors cautioned that their findings should be taken in the context of the overall higher risk of eye disease in older people.
The incidence of nAMD in the general population is about one in 1,000, and it doubled to two in 1,000 for the group taking the GLP-1s in the study.
However, the overall absolute risk is still small, according to the researchers.
The study's main limitation is that it was observational in nature, meaning the researchers could not confirm that GLP-1s medications cause neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
The study also could not draw conclusions about younger populations, the researchers acknowledged.
"Also, our findings apply only to diabetic patients aged 66 years or older, and cannot be directly generalized to non-diabetic individuals using GLP-1 receptor agonists for weight loss," Shor told Fox News Digital.
"While the risk of developing macular degeneration while on a GLP-1 drug is low, patients should be aware of the possible eye side effects."
GLP-1 receptors are present in the retina regardless of age or diabetes status — so theoretically, the risk could apply to younger populations.
More research is needed to better understand why diabetic people on GLP-1s have increased eye disease, Shor said.
"While the risk of developing macular degeneration while on a GLP-1 drug is low, patients should be aware of the possible eye side effects related to these types of medications," Reddy said.
If someone notices blurred or distorted vision, straight lines appearing wavy, or any new blind spots, they should seek medical attention, according to Muni.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
Early detection of eye disease is crucial, experts agree, as timely treatment can reduce the risk of vision loss.
The study authors said they hope their findings will empower patients to monitor for early symptoms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
3 Reasons Why You ‘Shut Down' In Relationships, By A Psychologist
Silence isn't always the end but it's definitely a signal worth paying attention to. It's your ... More discomfort asking you to listen to what it has been trying to say all along. 'I can't talk to them anymore' is something most of us have said at some point. It often sounds final, like an ultimatum laced with frustration and resignation. But beneath that sentence lies something deeper than just communication fatigue. Clinically observed, this phrase often marks a quiet turning point, be it in romantic relationships, friendships or even between parents and adult children. Here are three psychological insights behind what this sentence often really means. 1. You're No Longer Emotionally Safe With Them Emotional safety is the invisible foundation of every meaningful relationship. It's what allows us to speak freely, share how we feel, admit when we're hurt and even disagree without fear. When that foundation begins to crack, something shifts inside us, often before we consciously realize it. You start scanning your sentences before speaking. You shrink parts of yourself. You tone down your sadness, sugarcoat your needs and avoid the very conversations that matter most. Eventually, you find yourself growing defensive, almost as if your nervous system is bracing for an imminent impact. At such a point, you may start questioning yourself, 'Is this going to turn into a fight? Am I going to be misunderstood again?' Remember that this isn't overreacting. It's your body doing the job of protecting you in a way that it has learned over many years. According to Stephen Porges' Polyvagal Theory, our nervous system is constantly scanning for cues of safety or threat in our relationships. This often happens outside of conscious awareness. If your body senses relational danger, even something as subtle as a sigh, a sarcastic tone or a dismissive glance, your social engagement system (the part of the nervous system that supports openness, collaboration and empathy for others around) begins to shut down. In its place, self-protection sets in. Recent neurobiological research confirms that emotional safety is no longer a luxury. It's an important biological necessity. We must feel safe in order to be vulnerable. And as Brené Brown puts it, 'Vulnerability is the birthplace of love, belonging, joy, courage, empathy, accountability, and authenticity.' Some people flinch at the idea of safety in relationships, assuming it means monotony or comfort zones. But in truth, the kind of intimacy we're all wired to long for only deepens when we no longer feel the need to armor up. So, if you find yourself going quiet, pulling back or walking on eggshells instead of growing freely in a relationship, it may not mean you've just 'shut down.' It could mean your body no longer feels safe enough to stay open. 2. You've Noticed A Pattern Of Being Invalidated Or Ignored Most people don't give up on connection easily. They try and try again, giving it 'one last shot,' then another, just to be heard and understood, and keep the other person in their lives. They explain, they stay calm, they ask for change. But when every attempt is met with defensiveness, denial, minimization or avoidance, the message, whether intentional or otherwise, is painfully clear: 'Your inner world doesn't matter here.' This gradual decline of emotional validation cuts deeper than we realize. According to a 2024 dyadic study on romantic relationships, 'When individuals perceive that their emotions are considered undesirable or unacceptable by others, it appears to heighten their psychological distress.' This distress doesn't stay neatly tucked away either. Especially for women, it spills over into the relationship itself, impacting not only how satisfied they feel, but how emotionally connected their partner feels too. 'When women feel emotionally invalidated within the relationship, it can lead to higher psychological distress, which subsequently affects the men's overall satisfaction with the relationship,' the researchers write. Simply put, when one partner stops feeling emotionally safe, both partners start feeling emotionally disconnected. And here's what's often missed — invalidation doesn't always look like yelling or cruelty. It can be a sigh. An eye-roll. A partner constantly changing the subject. Being told, 'You always take things the wrong way.' It's being talked over, told to calm down or having your feelings fact-checked — unsolicited. Eventually, trying starts to feel hopeless. Every bid for connection becomes a risk without reward. And so, silence begins to feel safer than speaking because your nervous system is protecting you from being hurt again. 3. You're Tired Of Being The Only One Trying Doing the emotional heavy lifting means initiating the hard conversations, reading the room, anticipating reactions, holding space and keeping the peace. You become the unofficial project manager of the relationship's wellbeing. And after a while, what once felt like care starts to feel like over-functioning. This invisible effort has a name. A five-part study in the Journal of Business and Psychology calls it the 'invisible family load' — the managerial, cognitive and emotional labor that keeps relationships running. While the managerial and cognitive aspects (like planning appointments or remembering milestones) had some upsides, the emotional family load was linked to greater exhaustion, sleep disturbances, family conflict and lower life satisfaction. In short, constantly managing the emotional climate drains your emotional reserves. When you're the one constantly regulating the tension, smoothing over miscommunications or making up for your partner's emotional absence, your nervous system stays stuck in a state of quiet vigilance. You begin to feel more like the glue holding things together than a person in what was supposed to be a mutually nourishing bond. And it's not that you don't want to connect with the other person, but that you're exhausted from being the only one showing up for the relationship, over and over again. Emotional labor without reciprocity turns love into labor. A Sisyphean task. Instead, your needs and efforts deserve to be seen, acknowledged and reciprocated. What Can You Do When You Feel Like You're Shutting Down? When you reach a point where speaking feels impossible, the instinct is often to shut down or walk away. But before you make any decisions, it can help to pause to reflect on what's really going on underneath the silence. Here are a few questions to gently explore on your own or with the help of a therapist: Additionally, give yourself permission to step back. Needing space isn't the same as giving up; in fact, it's often an act of self-preservation. It helps you calm your nervous system, regain perspective and reflect without reactivity. Therapy — individual or relational — can offer a safer space to unpack the conversations that feel too complex to navigate alone. And sometimes, the kindest thing you can do for yourself is to stop chasing connections where there's no safety or reciprocity. Think your communication is stuck in a loop with no clear way forward? Take the Ineffective Arguing Inventory to find out.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Loneliness: Less Deadly, More Costly - Here's How To Fix It
Loneliness may be less deadly, but the costs are still high - especially in the workplace When loneliness was declared an epidemic in 2023, the most urgent concern was its widely reported link to early mortality. New research complicates that picture. An international study from the University of Waterloo found that loneliness did not independently raise the risk of death once other health factors were considered. That shift does not lessen the issue. It sharpens it. Addressing loneliness has always been about quality of life, well-being and restoring societal connection. It is also a missed business opportunity. Indeed's 2024 Work Wellbeing Report shows companies with the highest employee well-being scores outperformed the S&P 500 by 11% from January 2021 to mid-2024 - and belonging ranked as the most important driver of well-being. In 2025, thought leadership on loneliness is abundant. The real question: which actions are changing individual lives, workplace cultures and the systems that bind them? Recognizing Loneliness in Life and Work First, it's worth asking whether loneliness is truly understood. Allison Gilbert, co-author of The Joy of Connections with Dr. Ruth Westheimer and social health expert, starts there. 'We don't always recognize loneliness while we're experiencing it,' she said in a phone interview. The stock image of loneliness is a solitary person in a room. In reality, it's entirely common to feel lonely at an event, in a relationship and most certainly at work. In fact, Cigna's 2025 Loneliness in America report highlights that over 50% of American workers and over 60% of caregivers feel lonely. When misread, loneliness is mismanaged. Gilbert notes it can mask itself as irritability, anger, depression or even addiction. In high-functioning environments these signals are easy to miss. Just as small actions build routine, ignored cues let discontent harden into isolation. Personal Social Hygiene What can management look like for individuals? Treat it as hygiene. If flossing helps prevent cavities, managing loneliness requires simple, consistent maintenance. Gilbert recommends practicing social hygiene: low-friction, repeatable behaviors that prioritize developing and nurturing connections: The key is repetition. Belonging is built through rhythm, not one-offs. Organizational Social Hygiene For companies, loneliness often shows up as disengagement - and it is costly. Gallup's 2025 State of the Workplace Report revealed that the economic impact of disengagement eclipsed $400 billion in 2024. Disengagement also typically signals a breakdown in trust: work feels disconnected from purpose, feedback goes unanswered and recognition is sporadic. The result? Disconnection that leads to lower employee retention and productivity. Perhaps social hygiene for managers looks like adjusting communication to create clarity, trust and connection by: Takeaways: Addressing loneliness starts with building connection into the everyday. 1) For individuals, that means small, repeatable habits that nurture relationships. 2) For organizations, building belonging isn't just about culture. It's smart business. Creating Space for Connection (Literally) If recognizing loneliness is the first step, the next is designing the conditions that make connection possible. That surfaces a structural issue: space. The design failure isn't new. Sociologist Robert Putnam has long pointed to the collapse of 'third spaces' like churches, bowling leagues and community halls as a root cause of declining social trust. Moreover, dedicated spaces for social well-being in the workplace are still a growing concept. Many companies have invested in physical and mental health. But social health, what Jaclyn Pascocello, co-founder and COO of Fabrik, calls the third tier of well-being, remains largely untapped. Fabrik, which Pascocello co-founded with Gwen Wiscount in 2023, offers one response. The company transforms underused office buildings into affordable workspaces designed for social health. The model centers on consistency and accessibility: more than 60 recurring gatherings occur each month, all hosted by community members. From book clubs and glass-engraving workshops to quiet group reading, people return because the formats do too. Critical to the design is the understanding that members connect in different ways. 'Some people thrive in big group events,' Pascocello said in a Zoom interview. 'Others want a quiet corner. We let people self-select how they prefer to engage, whether that's with a name tag, a color, or a room where they can just be around others without pressure to talk.' Recurring experiences also lead to something else: accountability. When gatherings become routine, people depend on and look forward to seeing each other. When they do, trust builds, relationships form and real community happens. For team leaders and event organizers alike here are a few tangible strategies: Takeaway: Connection doesn't happen by chance. It happens through structure, shared space and rhythms that encourage return. The goal isn't to force interaction; it's to make connecting easier to access again and again. Connection as Essential Care If loneliness compromises quality of life, treating it deserves the same rigor as any other care priority - especially in aging populations. What's missing isn't concern. It's approaches for treating belonging as essential, not extra. Life Story Club, founded by Lily Zhou, provides a solution through storytelling. Since 2020, the program has served over 2,400 older adults across New York City through 151 storytelling clubs that meet weekly. Sessions are recorded and led by trained, culturally aligned facilitators. The result is an experience so powerful that members clear their calendars to attend, and some relatives become facilitators when a participant passes. 'We're creating a type of reality that older adults want to live long for,' interim executive director Dr. Jennifer Wong shared in a Zoom interview. In fact, while most members are in their late 70s, several centenarians participate weekly. The model extends beyond enrichment. Many participants are referred by clinicians or partners such as Citymeals on Wheels. Through its Story RX initiative, the program is also prescribed by providers including Cleveland Clinic based on social isolation screenings. Yet dignified connection is not only an aging issue. Honoring lived experience may be one of the most underutilized tools for societal connection at every stage of life. Putting the Principle Into Practice Takeaway: Sharing lived experiences is a simple, but effective way to show care, support quality of life and mitigate loneliness throughout life. Two Years Later - What's Next for Loneliness? Almost two years after loneliness was declared a crisis, awareness is no longer the issue. The question now is: what moves the needle? What's clear from the approaches shared is that connection and meaningful change never hinge on a single initiative; they grow through deliberate action. Intentionally meeting people where they are, and getting creative about how strategic communication, space and recognition can drive better outcomes for individuals and organizations alike.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
White House office tells agencies to apply 'Gold Standard Science' to depoliticize research, restore trust
EXCLUSIVE: The White House Office of Science and Technology on Monday directed federal agencies to implement "gold standard science" principles to depoliticize science and restore public trust, Fox News Digital has learned. White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Michael Kratsios sent guidance to federal research agencies Monday morning, incorporating President Donald Trump's executive order on "Restoring Gold Standard Science." Fox News Digital exclusively obtained the guidance sent to federal agencies. President Trump, in May, signed an executive order to restore "Gold Standard Science" as the cornerstone of federal scientific research. "Gold Standard Science" is "reproducible, transparent and falsifiable," according to the order. It is also "subject to unbiased peer review; clear about errors and uncertainties; skeptical of assumptions; collaborative and interdisciplinary; accepting of negative results as positive outcomes; and free from conflicts of interest." The executive order reinstated "the scientific integrity policies" of the first Trump administration and "ensures that science is no longer manipulated or misused to justify political ends." "President Trump's Gold Standard Science EO will transform the conduct and management of federal science, from research design to public communication, in order to strengthen scientific inquiry, rebuild public trust, and ensure the U.S. continues to be the global leader in rigorous, evidence-based science," Kratsios told Fox News Digital. "But federal agencies are only one part of our nation's research ecosystem." Kratsios added, "American universities, scientific journals, industry and philanthropic leaders all have a crucial role in improving the overall quality of research, and we encourage this executive action to serve as a model for the entire scientific enterprise." Kratsios sent the memo to federal agencies Monday morning to provide guidance to federal departments and agencies on implementing gold standard science "in the conduct and management of all aspects of their scientific activities, from research design to public communication." "By adopting these standards, agencies will strengthen scientific inquiry, rebuild public trust, and ensure the United States continues as the global leader in rigorous, evidence-based science," the memo states. Kratsios said that "Gold Standard Science" represents a "commitment to the highest standards of scientific integrity, defined by nine core tenets: reproducible; transparent; communicative of error and uncertainty; collaborative and interdisciplinary; skeptical of its findings and assumptions; structured for falsifiability of hypotheses; subject to unbiased peer review; accepting of negative results as positive outcomes; and without conflicts of interest." "These tenets ensure that federally-supported research and research used in federal decision-making is transparent, rigorous, and impactful, enabling federal decisions to be informed by the most credible, reliable, and impartial scientific evidence available," Kratsios wrote in the guidance. But "Gold Standard Science" is not limited to science, Kratsios said, saying that it is critical for tackling complex challenges in energy innovation and national security as well. "In an age of rapid technological progress and heightened public scrutiny, federally-funded and federally-performed science, and its use in Federal decision-making, must be beyond reproach," he wrote. As for conducting science "without conflicts of interest," Kratsios said it is imperative to ensure that "research is designed, executed, reviewed, and reported free from financial, personal, or institutional influences that could bias outcomes or undermine objectivity." "This approach is important for generating trustworthy and credible new knowledge, as it upholds scientific integrity, fosters public confidence, and ensures that results reflect evidence rather than external agendas," the memo states. "Maintaining freedom from conflicts of interest requires researchers, reviewers, and managers to disclose all relevant affiliations, funding sources, and relationships relevant to the science conducted, adhering to stringent ethical standards supported by strong institutional oversight, transparent reporting systems, and independent expert review mechanisms." Kratsios said agencies must "prioritize conducting and managing scientific research free from conflicts of interest to advance unbiased science," and must "require disclosure of all relevant conflicts of interest by researchers, reviewers, and agency officials involved in the funding or performance of Federal research." "These efforts include requiring comprehensive, standardized disclosure of all financial, personal, or institutional interests in research proposals, publications, peer and merit reviews, and data repositories, with clear and standardized protocols to identify, mitigate, and manage potential biases," the memo states. "Agencies should mandate the use of independent oversight approaches and enforce strict conflict-of-interest policies." Agencies have 60 days to outline "Gold Standard Science" implementation plans, including plans for training and resources to ensure agency personnel understand the new policy, and the use of artificial intelligence-driven tools when practical. After Trump signed the May executive order to restore gold standard science, a senior White House official said there had been a decline in "disruptive research" and investments in biomedical research, along with "serious cases" of fraud and misconduct and the inability to reproduce scientific methods for the purpose of restoring public trust. The official also blamed policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and "woke DEI initiatives" for endangering the public's trust in government scientists. Now-retired National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci was repeatedly denounced for flip-flopping and obfuscating during his time engineering the federal response to COVID-19, leading many, particularly on the right, to disregard and dismiss the legitimacy of federal health authorities outright. That order cites the fact the Biden administration included political edits from teachers' unions in school-reopening guidance, instead of leading with any scientific evidence. Meanwhile, in an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital in April, Kratsios echoed Trump, saying the U.S. is in the "golden age" and that this special moment in time is "underpinned by unbelievable science and technology."
