'28 Years Later' Review: A Thrilling, Surreal, Grand, But Uneven Entry To The Beloved Franchise
Throughout the decades, since the dawn of cinema, moviegoers have been fascinated with the undead. Whether it's from the horrors of playing God in 'Frankenstein' to 'Night of the Living Dead', where the modern concept of zombies was born, Hollywood has found interesting ways to spin the narrative about the deceased in bold new ways. However, no franchise has had fans in a frenzy like '28 Days Later', an unsettling 2002 movie that resonated worldwide and became the cornerstone of many zombie movies today. The film was a massive success and was greenlit for a sequel, which manifested in the form of '28 Weeks Later'.
Now, 18 years since the second installment, we once again revisit post-zombie apocalypse Great Britain to witness what has unfolded in '28 Years Later'. Starring Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Alfie Williams, and Ralph Fiennes, this film dives deep into the lives of people who survived the resurgence of the Rage Virus, as well as life in the mainland. With returning director Danny Boyle and scriptwriter Alex Garland, this film has been hyped up to be the heart-pounding zombie horror film that we all need right now, but does it meet expectations?
The story kicks off on a small island away from the mainland, where some portion of human civilisation now resides. Amongst this tight-knit community of farmers and tinkerers are Spike (played by Alfie Williams) and his father, Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), who are tasked with venturing beyond their walls as a rite of passage. In their hunt, they've encountered various horrors, wonders, death and life.
'28 Years Later' is an interesting film, to say the least. It is still filled with those endless escalations of tension and bloody good jump scares, with an added twist of more surrealism as well as comedy. It is a wildly different and experimental take on the franchise that some may find endearing, while most will find it weird.
First things first – is the horror aspect of the film effective? Incredibly so. The film has greatly reflected upon its previous installments and features a much more unapologetic escalation of tension — it does not care how uncomfortable you, get because that's the whole point. Every slow and painful build-up does this film a massive service, as viewers are used to zombies by now, so it relies heavily on the elements of surprise and speed. The film will leave you in the dark, often literally, so it can slowly creep under your skin, which results in an effective scare-fest.
There are only a handful of moments where we feel comfortable and relaxed in the film. But you know these calmer scenes are about to end when the cinematography becomes incredibly frantic and jumps from camera to camera. This is, again, in service to the ever-escalating tension the film is trying to impress upon you.
Though this installment is grander in scale, it is far more intimate than its predecessors. Every second of the film is used to build a far more cohesive narrative between the survivors, regardless of whether they are resting for the night or on the run. It is this piece of humanity that recent zombie movies, even horror movies in general, tend to forget. It is this take that allows the jokes and gags thrown in the film to actually work, as well as the ultimate climax to shine – to the point that some audience members are moved to tears. Because of this, '28 Years Later' is without a doubt the most hopeful and uplifting entry in the franchise so far.
If we are to describe the film in two words, it would be 'beautifully stressful'. The latter is understandable, but the former isn't, especially for one as disturbingly gory as this. This is because the movie takes us on an almost magical journey during its more subdued scenes, making us temporarily forget that this is a horror movie. Though they are plenty jarring, it's these moments that push the characters to grow more as a human beings, which we are totally here for!
However, it is also one of the weirdest entries in the zombie genre. Many scenes in the first act of the film have been spliced with scenes of older films. In hindsight, this meshing of films is often used to hint at something far more political, but it is incredibly jarring upon first watch, yet believe us when we say that's one of the more tamer aspects of this film.
There's one particular scene that makes us scratch our heads, but we can't discuss it, as it is a massive spoiler. Yet, we are confident that you'll know what we mean when you watch the movie for yourself. Before heading into theatres, note that, in lore, the infected are technically still alive and they have never been considered dead. That may not make sense, but that has been an extremely sensitive topic for filmmakers ever since the first zombie film, so it's best to keep it in mind when watching this entry or its sequels.
The reason why we are so confident that there's going to be a sequel to '28 Years Later' is one of this film's major weak points – it does have a proper ending. That's right, the movie ends on a cliffhanger. Throughout the film, you'll find yourself wondering what this film is really about. '28 Days Later' talked about the spread of the infection throughout the country; '28 Weeks Later' was about how the virus was initially contained only for it to break out and totally ravage the country. '28 Years Later' tries to explore what happens to survivors, but does so half-heartedly; it actually hurts the film. Rather than being a cohesive 'zombie' narrative with an intriguing family drama, it is instead a 'zombie' prequel with some elements of family drama and mystery, neither of which are resolved.
Though it doesn't outright say it, the words 'to be continued' are written all over the film's ending. This is, sometimes, fine, but we're pretty sure that many viewers are going to have some issues with the ending: an action sequence filled with jittery camera movements all to the tune of a remixed kids' show song. If you don't believe us, we invite you to watch the film and see for yourself.
Overall, '28 Years Later' is a divisive entry into the storied franchise that is as head-scratching as it is absurdist. The film opens with an intense scene that establishes how life in Great Britain is holding up years after the initial spread of the virus, and ends with the most out-of-place cliffhanger to ever be featured in cinema. If you are a fan of the franchise, it is still an interesting watch, but we do implore you to lower your expectations.
'28 Years Later' is currently showing in cinemas nationwide.
What's your Reaction?
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0
Follow us on Instagram, Facebook or Telegram for more updates and breaking news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hype Malaysia
3 days ago
- Hype Malaysia
'28 Years Later' Review: A Thrilling, Surreal, Grand, But Uneven Entry To The Beloved Franchise
Throughout the decades, since the dawn of cinema, moviegoers have been fascinated with the undead. Whether it's from the horrors of playing God in 'Frankenstein' to 'Night of the Living Dead', where the modern concept of zombies was born, Hollywood has found interesting ways to spin the narrative about the deceased in bold new ways. However, no franchise has had fans in a frenzy like '28 Days Later', an unsettling 2002 movie that resonated worldwide and became the cornerstone of many zombie movies today. The film was a massive success and was greenlit for a sequel, which manifested in the form of '28 Weeks Later'. Now, 18 years since the second installment, we once again revisit post-zombie apocalypse Great Britain to witness what has unfolded in '28 Years Later'. Starring Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Alfie Williams, and Ralph Fiennes, this film dives deep into the lives of people who survived the resurgence of the Rage Virus, as well as life in the mainland. With returning director Danny Boyle and scriptwriter Alex Garland, this film has been hyped up to be the heart-pounding zombie horror film that we all need right now, but does it meet expectations? The story kicks off on a small island away from the mainland, where some portion of human civilisation now resides. Amongst this tight-knit community of farmers and tinkerers are Spike (played by Alfie Williams) and his father, Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), who are tasked with venturing beyond their walls as a rite of passage. In their hunt, they've encountered various horrors, wonders, death and life. '28 Years Later' is an interesting film, to say the least. It is still filled with those endless escalations of tension and bloody good jump scares, with an added twist of more surrealism as well as comedy. It is a wildly different and experimental take on the franchise that some may find endearing, while most will find it weird. First things first – is the horror aspect of the film effective? Incredibly so. The film has greatly reflected upon its previous installments and features a much more unapologetic escalation of tension — it does not care how uncomfortable you, get because that's the whole point. Every slow and painful build-up does this film a massive service, as viewers are used to zombies by now, so it relies heavily on the elements of surprise and speed. The film will leave you in the dark, often literally, so it can slowly creep under your skin, which results in an effective scare-fest. There are only a handful of moments where we feel comfortable and relaxed in the film. But you know these calmer scenes are about to end when the cinematography becomes incredibly frantic and jumps from camera to camera. This is, again, in service to the ever-escalating tension the film is trying to impress upon you. Though this installment is grander in scale, it is far more intimate than its predecessors. Every second of the film is used to build a far more cohesive narrative between the survivors, regardless of whether they are resting for the night or on the run. It is this piece of humanity that recent zombie movies, even horror movies in general, tend to forget. It is this take that allows the jokes and gags thrown in the film to actually work, as well as the ultimate climax to shine – to the point that some audience members are moved to tears. Because of this, '28 Years Later' is without a doubt the most hopeful and uplifting entry in the franchise so far. If we are to describe the film in two words, it would be 'beautifully stressful'. The latter is understandable, but the former isn't, especially for one as disturbingly gory as this. This is because the movie takes us on an almost magical journey during its more subdued scenes, making us temporarily forget that this is a horror movie. Though they are plenty jarring, it's these moments that push the characters to grow more as a human beings, which we are totally here for! However, it is also one of the weirdest entries in the zombie genre. Many scenes in the first act of the film have been spliced with scenes of older films. In hindsight, this meshing of films is often used to hint at something far more political, but it is incredibly jarring upon first watch, yet believe us when we say that's one of the more tamer aspects of this film. There's one particular scene that makes us scratch our heads, but we can't discuss it, as it is a massive spoiler. Yet, we are confident that you'll know what we mean when you watch the movie for yourself. Before heading into theatres, note that, in lore, the infected are technically still alive and they have never been considered dead. That may not make sense, but that has been an extremely sensitive topic for filmmakers ever since the first zombie film, so it's best to keep it in mind when watching this entry or its sequels. The reason why we are so confident that there's going to be a sequel to '28 Years Later' is one of this film's major weak points – it does have a proper ending. That's right, the movie ends on a cliffhanger. Throughout the film, you'll find yourself wondering what this film is really about. '28 Days Later' talked about the spread of the infection throughout the country; '28 Weeks Later' was about how the virus was initially contained only for it to break out and totally ravage the country. '28 Years Later' tries to explore what happens to survivors, but does so half-heartedly; it actually hurts the film. Rather than being a cohesive 'zombie' narrative with an intriguing family drama, it is instead a 'zombie' prequel with some elements of family drama and mystery, neither of which are resolved. Though it doesn't outright say it, the words 'to be continued' are written all over the film's ending. This is, sometimes, fine, but we're pretty sure that many viewers are going to have some issues with the ending: an action sequence filled with jittery camera movements all to the tune of a remixed kids' show song. If you don't believe us, we invite you to watch the film and see for yourself. Overall, '28 Years Later' is a divisive entry into the storied franchise that is as head-scratching as it is absurdist. The film opens with an intense scene that establishes how life in Great Britain is holding up years after the initial spread of the virus, and ends with the most out-of-place cliffhanger to ever be featured in cinema. If you are a fan of the franchise, it is still an interesting watch, but we do implore you to lower your expectations. '28 Years Later' is currently showing in cinemas nationwide. What's your Reaction? +1 0 +1 0 +1 0 +1 0 +1 0 +1 0 Follow us on Instagram, Facebook or Telegram for more updates and breaking news.
Sinar Daily
14-06-2025
- Sinar Daily
Chris Martin, Dakota Johnson call it quits after eight years
Sources say "it feels final this time". By DANIAL HAKIM 05 Jun 2025 12:45pm Chris Martin, 48, and Dakota Johnson, 35, began dating in 2017, keeping much of their relationship out of the public eye. Photo: Instagram AFTER nearly eight years of low-key romance filled with sweet public moments, secret engagement rumours, Coldplay frontman Chris Martin and Fifty Shades of Grey star Dakota Johnson have reportedly parted ways and this time, sources say, it's for Martin, 48, and Dakota Johnson, 35, began dating in 2017, keeping much of their relationship out of the public couple were last seen together on May 16, 2025, during a casual outing in Malibu, a location they have called home since a few months prior, in January, Johnson was spotted holding hands with Martin in India while he was touring with their private nature, the pair offered rare glimpses into their bond."We've been together for quite a while, and we go out sometimes, but we both work so much that it's nice to be at home and be cozy and private.'Most of the partying takes place inside my house," Johnson shared in a 2021 interview with Elle love story even crossed into the music world when Martin publicly dedicated Coldplay's chart-topping hit My Universe to Johnson during a London concert. 'This is about my universe, and she's here,' Martin said, pointing to Johnson in the audience. Though engagement speculation first emerged in 2020, People reported in March 2024 that the couple had actually been engaged "for years" but were in "no rush to get married."However, their relationship was far from picture-perfect as breakup rumours surfaced in August rep denied the rumours at the time, calling them 'nothing but a false alarm,' and other insiders insisted the couple were 'happily together.'However, by June 4, multiple sources confirmed the split, with one stating bluntly that 'it feels final this time.'Over the years, Johnson built a close relationship with Martin's children from his previous marriage to Gwyneth Paltrow, daughter Apple and son Moses.'I love those kids like my life depends on it. With all my heart,' she expressed in a candid interview in also gushed about watching Martin perform on-stage. Dakota Johnson is set to star in the upcoming Materialists alongside Chris Evans and Pedro Pascal, in theatres June 13. Photo: Instagram / @materialists 'I don't know. I love watching him. I could watch him every day. I don't know how to explain it. I feel like, I don't know... I'm watching my most favourite being do his most favorite thing,' she reflections on love and relationships in general grew even more candid while promoting her upcoming film Materialists, in theatres June 13.'For a long time we've all been so quick to judge relationships or how they should happen. When people should get married. Divorce is bad.'Why is divorce bad? Why do people have to get married at a certain age or only once? Why? It doesn't matter,' Johnson said in a recent their relationship may have reportedly ended, both Martin and Johnson continue to soar band Coldplay is still riding the wave of their blockbuster Music of the Spheres tour, which topped Billboard's Top Tours chart in April 2025 after raking in over $67.4 million in Asia alone. The band's latest album Moon Music debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard meanwhile, is preparing for the release of Materialists, where she stars alongside Chris Evans and Pedro Pascal. Despite the breakup, she remains a fixture in Hollywood, known for her enigmatic charm on-screen and an ever-evolving career.
New Straits Times
09-06-2025
- New Straits Times
#SHOWBIZ: Chris Martin leaves fans in frenzy after cryptic shout-out to ex-girlfriend Dakota Johnson
LAS VEGAS: Coldplay's lead singer, Chris Martin, surprised fans on Friday night when he ended his show in Las Vegas with a shout-out to his rumoured ex-girlfriend, Dakota Johnson. Daily Mail reported yesterday that the 48-year-old singer, who was with the 35-year-old actress for eight years, has reportedly split from her. "Thank you so much, everybody," Martin told the crowd at Allegiant Stadium, before unexpectedly referencing Johnson's latest film. "Be kind to yourself, be kind to each other. Don't forget to see Materialists. We love you!" Martin said in a video shared by Deuxmoi. While the person who uploaded the video appeared to believe that Martin and Johnson had not broken up, many fans seemed to disagree. "I can totally see him supporting her even after the break-up," said one fan. "You can break up with someone and still be supportive. Look at him and Gwyneth Paltrow," another commented. Martin and Johnson began seeing each other in 2017, but the intensely private couple did not confirm their relationship until some time later.
