WaPo Columnist Catherine Rampell Joins MSNBC as ‘The Weekend' Co-Host
Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell is joining MSNBC as a co-host of the 'The Weekend,' where she will sit alongside Ayman Mohyeldin and another to-be-named co-host in the evenings. Rampell, a frequent guest on various MSNBC shows, made the announcement on Tuesday morning while appearing on 'Ana Cabrera Reports.'
An exact date for Rampell's first 'The Weekend' show, which airs from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. ET on Saturdays and Sundays, is not set just yet, but a person with knowledge of her hiring said she will start this spring.
Rampell, a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Princeton University, is known for her work covering economics, politics and public policy, with an emphasis on data-driven stories. Prior to the Post, she worked at The New York Times, where she covered economics and theater. In 2021, she received the Online Journalism Award for Commentary.
Her hiring is the latest in a string of changes from new MSNBC president Rebecca Kutler, who took over the top job earlier this year for Rashida Jones.
Last week, MSNBC signed Politico alum and current White House Correspondents' Association President Eugene Daniels to be its new Senior Washington Correspondent, as well as The Washington Post's Jackie Alemany as a Washington Correspondent. Both will serve as co-hosts of a new version of 'The Weekend' that airs in the mornings, alongside Jonathan Capehart.
Kutler's push to revamp MSNBC also included the jettisoning of longtime MSNBC anchor Joy Reid and the promotion of former Biden Administration Press Secretary Jen Psaki into a primetime role. Alex Wagner has also lost her primetime gig, but will remain at the channel.
The moves come after MSNBC's ratings took a big hit following the 2024 election, but have enjoyed a recent increase following President Trump's inauguration.
The post WaPo Columnist Catherine Rampell Joins MSNBC as 'The Weekend' Co-Host appeared first on TheWrap.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
Ex-ambassador to Russia: Putin, Xi will celebrate Trump's ‘preemptive war' in Iran
Former U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul warned on Saturday of how U.S. strikes on Iran could influence U.S. adversaries around the world. In an interview on MSNBC, McFaul said Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping would be glad to see the U.S. engaging in 'preemptive' strikes. 'I think we've really got to understand our other interests in the world that might be affected by this attack today. This is a preemptive war. The world does not support preemptive wars. We learned that in 2003,' McFaul said, referring to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, which was launched based on the theory that Saddam Hussein's regime had weapons of mass destruction and threatened America. 'Putin will be celebrating this because he did his own preemptive war in Ukraine and now it's like, well, this is just what great powers do. Maybe Xi Jinping is going to think the same. He's going to say, 'Well, if they can do it here, we can do it in Taiwan,'' McFaul added. Trump announced on Saturday evening that the U.S. had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites and said, 'NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' McFaul, in the interview, said he wishes the president 'well' in his aim to bring about peace, saying that outcome is possible but not likely. 'I hope he can bring about an agreement as soon as possible. It's happened before — capitulation after an attack like this — so it could happen, but it's not what I'm predicting,' McFaul said. 'The idea that they will now sit down and negotiate with us some long-term deal in the immediate run, I think, is highly unlikely,' he added. McFaul said it's 'good news' that the U.S. strikes, according to Trump, 'totally obliterated' the Iranian nuclear facilities, saying, 'I applaud that.' 'That's good news for today, but we need to think about what are the first, second, third and fourth order consequences after this,' McFaul added. 'Most immediately, they are going to retaliate, and I hope we are prepared to prevent that and prevail against our forces in the region.'
Axios
40 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump administration says U.S. does not seek regime change in Iran
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told reporters the U.S. war against Iran is "not open-ended" and is "not about regime change," stressing that Saturday's U.S. military strikes were strictly targeted at Iran's nuclear program. Vice President Vance flatly denied that the U.S. is at war with Iran, telling NBC's "Meet the Press" instead: "We're at war with Iran's nuclear program." Why it matters: President Trump and his top aides, including Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dan Caine, have hailed the U.S. bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites as a "spectacular success." But the unprecedented U.S. strikes on Iran have plunged both countries — as well as Israel, the Middle East and the wider world — into a state of deep uncertainty and danger. "Anything can happen in conflict, and we acknowledge that. But the scope of this was intentionally limited," Hegseth said when asked if the U.S. was prepared for a "protracted" war. The "capabilities" of the American military, however, are "unlimited," Hegseth added — warning that Iran now has a "choice" on whether to pursue peace or escalation. Trump, Vance and Hegseth have called for Iran to come to the negotiating table and voluntarily renounce its nuclear program in order to bring an end to the fighting. Trump has also urged Iran not to retaliate, threatening "far greater" U.S. strikes if American assets or troops in the region are targeted. Zoom in: Hegseth and Caine detailed the extraordinary "Operation Midnight Hammer" in a press briefing at the Pentagon on Sunday morning. The "complex and high-risk mission" was carried out primarily by seven B-2 stealth bombers, each with two crew members, who flew 18 hours east from the U.S. and "linked up with escort and support aircraft," Caine said. Several B-2 bombers, which were detected by flight radar and reported by the media on Saturday, flew west from Missouri over the Pacific as part of a "deception effort." At approximately 6:40pm ET, or 2:10am Iran time, the lead B-2 bomber dropped two "massive ordnance penetrators" — 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs — on Iran's underground Fordow nuclear facility. The remaining bombers hit their targets with a total of 14 bunker-busters, with all three Iranian nuclear sites struck between 6:40pm ET and 7:05pm ET. Tomahawk missiles from a U.S. submarine also struck the Isfahan nuclear site. Caine said the U.S. is "unaware" of any shots fired at the strike team. Iran's fighters "did not fly, and it appears that Iran's surface-to-air missile systems did not see us," the general added. Between the lines: "This was largest B-2 operational strike in U.S. history, and the second-longest B-2 mission ever flown — exceeded only by those in the days following 9/11," Caine told reporters. State of play: All three targets sustained "severe damage," but the assessment to determine whether Iran still has some nuclear capability is ongoing, the officials said. Trump had claimed last night that Iran's key uranium enrichment sites "have been completely and totally obliterated." Hegseth said that the U.S. believes it "achieved destruction of capabilities" at Fordow — a facility built into a mountain and deep underground — but Caine cautioned that it's too early to tell the extent of the damage. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has threatened to respond with strikes against U.S. forces in the Middle East. Caine said that the U.S. is being "proactive, not reactive," when it comes to protecting and repositioning its assets in the region. "Ultimately, wherever it may be — whether it's in Iraq or Syria or bases in the Gulf .... it would be a very bad idea for Iran or its proxies to attempt to attack American forces," Hegseth warned.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
House Democrat: Strike on Iran ‘not necessarily the death blow' to nuclear program
Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, suggested the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities are 'not necessarily the death blow' that President Trump claimed when he announced the military action Saturday evening. In an interview on MSNBC, Smith questioned Trump's assessment that the three Iranian nuclear sites were 'totally obliterated' by the strikes and raised the possibility that the U.S. is unaware of more sites. 'President Trump, in his typical fashion, you know, claims facts not in evidence, saying we totally obliterated their whole program,' Smith said. 'Nobody knows that right now. Maybe. Maybe not. We do not know how many of these centrifuges were destroyed.' He also said the U.S. 'can't be 100 percent sure that we knew about all of Iran's centrifuges,' noting the U.S. didn't know about Iran's Fordow nuclear site — one of the three that the U.S. bombed on Saturday — for a decade before it was discovered. And Smith questioned 'how quickly' Iran could reconstitute its nuclear program, adding, 'It sadly does not take that long to build centrifuges once you know how.' 'So it's not necessarily the death blow to Iran's nuclear program. We're still going to have to negotiate with them at some point,' he said. 'So, you know, this assumption that their nuclear program is gone and they'll never be able to build it is simply wrong at this point.' The announcement of U.S. action against Iran came two days after the White House said Trump would decide whether to get involved in the conflict between Iran and Israel 'in the next two weeks' to give a window for negotiations. White House sources indicated the U.S. had given Israel a heads up before it struck the Iranian sites and that Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke after the strikes. The strikes marked a significant entrance by the U.S. into a conflict between Israel and Iran that had been underway for more than a week. They also indicated a shift by Trump, who said he was seeking a diplomatic solution with Iran and sent U.S. officials to make a deal with Tehran on its nuclear program. Smith released a statement on Saturday condemning 'in the strongest terms' Trump's decision to order U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, criticizing the president for acting without congressional approval and without specifying 'clear objectives for these actions.' 'There are no guarantees that it will eliminate the possibility of Iran developing a nuclear weapon or how long it might set their program back,' Smith said in the statement. He said negotiating a nuclear deal is 'the way to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon and to protect American service members.' 'The path that the President has chosen risks unleashing a wider war in the region that is both incredibly unpredictable and treacherous and that threatens the safety and security of the United States, Israel, and ultimately the world,' Smith added in the statement.
