Swiss proposal mandates UBS to boost capital by $26bn

The Swiss government has proposed new capital norms, requiring UBS to increase its core capital by $26bn following its acquisition of Credit Suisse.
This move aims to enhance financial stability and prevent future banking crises.
The proposed regulations would mandate UBS to fully capitalise its foreign subsidiaries, reported Reuters.
UBS has been given a timeframe of six to eight years to comply once the legislation is enacted.
However, UBS has expressed strong opposition to the capital requirement, labelling it "extreme" and misaligned with international standards.
The government indicated that the new capital requirements would allow UBS to reduce its Additional Tier 1 (AT1) bond holdings by $8bn.
Currently, UBS is only required to capitalise 60% of its foreign units, with the option to use AT1 debt to meet some of its capital needs.
UBS executives have raised concerns that the additional capital requirements could hinder the bank's competitiveness and impact Switzerland's status as a financial hub.
The proposal follows the collapse of Credit Suisse in 2023, which prompted Swiss officials, including Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter, to advocate for stricter regulations to safeguard taxpayers and the economy.
Keller-Sutter, who currently holds Switzerland's rotating presidency, stated that the measures are essential for the stability of the financial sector.
The federal council plans to present draft proposals for stakeholder consultations in the latter half of 2025, with parliamentary approval required before the laws can take effect in 2028.
However, separate ordinances could be implemented as early as 2027.
UBS's Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio may need to rise from 14.3% to as high as 17%, surpassing that of major global competitors.
UBS has indicated that it disagrees with the proposed capital increase, which it claims would necessitate holding approximately $24bn in additional CET1 capital.
The Swiss government has also proposed reforms to strengthen the market regulator FINMA and improve banks' access to liquidity from the Swiss National Bank.
Last month, UBS Group agreed to pay $511m to settle a US investigation into its subsidiary, Credit Suisse Group, for facilitating tax evasion among wealthy Americans.
"Swiss proposal mandates UBS to boost capital by $26bn" was originally created and published by Private Banker International, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Miami Herald

15 minutes ago

• Miami Herald

Support for renewables shrinks as fossil fuel interest grows

Support for renewables shrinks as fossil fuel interest grows Republicans and Democrats alike are less likely to support renewable energy than they were five years ago, according to a survey released June 5 by the Pew Research Center. Floodlight examines the survey results, which mirror growing pockets of opposition to solar farms, reignited political support for coal plants and moves by President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans to kill federally funded clean energy projects. This shift in opinion dates back to when Democratic President Joe Biden took office, said Brian Kennedy, Pew senior researcher and one of the study's authors. "This isn't a new trend," he said. Still, Kenneth Gillingham, professor of environmental and energy economics at the Yale School of the Environment, was surprised. "I see this shift … as a successful effort to link climate change and renewable energy to broader culture war issues," Gillingham said. He added that in the past, "prominent" Republicans supported renewables and sought solutions to climate change, but those stances could now be seen as "disloyal" to Trump. The survey of 5,085 U.S. adults taken April 28 to May 4 revealed that while 79% of Americans favored expanding wind and solar production in 2020, that number has dropped to 60%. And 39% of Americans today support expansion of oil, coal and natural gas - almost double the 20% that supported it in 2020. Combustion of fossil fuels - in transportation, energy generation and industrial production - is the No. 1 cause of climate change. Much of the change in opinion is driven by Republicans, whose support of oil and gas grew from 35% in 2020 to 67% today. But Democrats also indicated less support for renewable energy and more for fossil fuels than five years ago. While many results reflect Trump's policies opposing most renewables and boosting fossil fuels, Pew found a few notable exceptions: 69% of all respondents favor offshore wind - a technology Trump has specifically targeted. Both Democrats and Republicans indicated stronger support for nuclear power, with Republicans' favorable opinions increasing from 53% in 2020 to 69% in 2025. Democrats' support rose from 37% to 52%. The Trump administration has signaled support for a nuclear renaissance, despite its high cost. There were wide partisan splits on several topics. In March, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced it would scale back environmental regulations. Pew asked whether it was possible to do that and still protect air and water quality: 77% of Republicans said yes and 67% of Democrats said no. Pew didn't ask the respondents why their attitudes have shifted. But Kennedy said in Pew's past surveys, Republicans have expressed concern about the economic impacts of climate change policies and transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources. Mike Murphy, a Republican consultant and electric vehicle backer, said when the environmental benefits of clean technologies are touted, it polarizes Republicans. Instead, Murphy said messages should be about pocketbook issues - like lower fuel costs - and jobs. "It's hard for pro-climate people to understand," said Murphy, who has advised dozens of state and national GOP campaigns including John McCain's 2008 presidential bid. "(They think) we just need to shout louder and hit people over the head about climate, climate, climate. The key is you want to talk about jobs and national security and other events that naturally resonate a lot more with right-of-center people." That's what Murphy's groups, the EV Politics Project and the American EV Jobs Alliance, are trying to do to depoliticize electric vehicles. "Whenever electric cars are seen through a climate lens," Murphy said, "their appeal narrows." It's a strategy also being used by the Electrification Coalition, a left-of-center pro-EV group. Ben Prochazka, the coalition's executive director, echoed Murphy's strategy, adding that EVs have "become overly politicized and caught in the culture wars, impacting markets and ultimately hurting our ability to realize their many benefits for all Americans." Prochazka noted that once introduced to EVs, consumers support them: "EV drivers love their vehicles, with more than eight out of ten reporting that their next car will also be electric." Perhaps those practical messages are getting through. In the Pew survey, electric vehicles were the one item that saw an uptick in support - 4 percentage points in the past year. But popular support might not be enough to stop Congress from killing a $7,500 electric vehicle credit, which Murphy said would be "policy disaster." Republicans, he said, are in a "real squeeze," because "they don't have enough money for the tax cuts the president has promised." Murphy said: "It's easier for Republicans to cut Biden electric cars … than it is for them to cut more Medicaid." Gillingham is still optimistic that solar, wind and other greenhouse gas-reducing technologies will move forward - because they are the cheapest. "The continued decline in the price of renewable energy and battery technologies, as well as other new technologies, is a reason to continue to have hope that the worst impacts of climate change can be addressed," he said. Published by Canary Media, Renewable Energy World Floodlight is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates the powers stalling climate action. This story was produced by Floodlight and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. © Stacker Media, LLC.

New York Post

21 minutes ago

• New York Post

California Gov. Gavin Newsom calls wife ‘first partner,' gets dragged online, including by Riley Gaines

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is getting roasted on social media after he called his wife, Jennifer, 'first partner' in a birthday tribute. 'Happy Birthday to the First Partner of California, the outstanding mother of our four incredible children, and the love of my life,' Newsom wrote to mark his wife's 51st birthday on Thursday. The backlash was swift with women's rights activist Riley Gaines leading the charge, tweeting: 'I can't even fathom my husband unironically calling me his partner????' 3 Governor Gavin Newsom and his wife. X / @CAgovernor Others piled on as they ripped Newsom for being too woke. ''First Partner' is grounds for an immediate divorce,' one raged on X. Another chimed in: 'Have you ever considered marrying your 'partner' so that she's your wife? The first lady? 3 Gavin Newsom speaks at a press conference on June 12. JOHN G MABANGLO/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock 'Were you not sure about her gender and wanted to go gender neutral?' I'm so confused … why is it so wrong to use female terms? Are you that misogynistic?' another user questioned. Some mocked the Democrat for still referring to his wife as a 'mother,' even though he avoided saying 'wife.' 3 Jennifer Siebel Newsom speaking at the Milken Institute Global Conference on May 5. REUTERS 'Shame on him, he forgot to call her the birthing person instead of mother,' one person wrote on X, sarcastically. His wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, describes herself as the 'first partner' on the governor's official website and in her own social media bios. 'Jennifer Siebel Newsom chose the title First Partner, as opposed to the traditional title of First Lady, to send a signal of inclusivity, recognizing that one day there will be a woman or LGBTQ+ Governor of California, and to elevate the importance of partnership and the need for, and benefits of, a caring, inclusive government,' her bio on the website reads.

Yahoo

23 minutes ago

• Yahoo

US prepares action targeting allies' chip plants in China, WSJ reports

(Reuters) -A U.S. official has informed leading global semiconductor companies of plans to cancel waivers allowing them to use American technology in China, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. Jeffrey Kessler, under secretary of commerce for industry and security at the Commerce Department, told Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing this week that he wanted to cancel those waivers, WSJ reported. Shares of U.S. chip equipment makers that supply chipmaking plants in China fell on the news. KLA Corp dropped 3.8%, Lam Research fell 4.7% and Applied Materials sank 3.8%. A Commerce Department spokesperson said in a statement, 'Chipmakers will still be able to operate in China. The new enforcement mechanisms on chips mirror licensing requirements that apply to other semiconductor companies that export to China and ensure the United States has an equal and reciprocal process.' The move would make it harder for foreign chipmakers to operate in China where they produce semiconductors used in a wide range of industries.