For some Californians, high transportation costs put owning a car out of reach

Los Angeles — Getting to work is work for Franchescoli Andrade, who rides his bike, hops on a train and then takes a bus every day.
His 20-mile journey from South Los Angeles to the San Fernando Valley takes about 90 minutes each way.
"Half an hour just to get to downtown, to get to the train station, then another half-an-hour just to get from the train station to get here, and then the bus will take me straight to my job," Andrade told CBS News. "I would do this journey every day just to get my family through."
His journey was easier when he had a car. But following a crash, fixing it just cost too much for Andrade, who is the sole provider for his family.
"It's almost like a struggle, every paycheck," Andrade said.
To cut down on daycare costs, his wife stays at home with their young son. "It's heart wrenching, you know," Andrade said. "Because it makes me feel like I'm not enough, you know, as a human. Like, I'm not really doing much."
Andrade's family's struggles mirror that of millions in California. According to a study released earlier this year from the nonprofit United Way, 35% of California households — or about 3.8 million households — do not make enough to afford basic costs of living, such as rent, groceries and gas.
United Way CEO Pete Manzo says the study is just a snapshot of a national problem.
"It's a crisis we've been living with," Manzo told CBS News. "It's like we're running a high fever. We have too many households where people are working hard and they can't earn a decent standard of living."
One of the biggest challenges is access to transportation. AAA says the cost of owning a new car — including monthly payments, insurance, maintenance and fuel — runs more than $12,000 per year for the average American household.
"You're basically saying to a family, it's going to be a $1,000 a month or more to get to and from work, to get to and from school," Manzo said. "It's not cheap." The costs may not be as high in some other states as in California. But nationwide, taking into account inflation, the financial burden of transportation is steadily rising, along with housing and childcare, United Way analysis has found.
Manzo says that advising families in California to move somewhere more affordable isn't necessarily a practical solution.
"For one family, that might be a decent idea," Manzo said. "But it's pretty disruptive to just pick up and leave all your other family relationships and all your community ties to move somewhere to make it cheaper...Expecting them all to move somewhere cheaper just doesn't make sense."
For now, Andrade is saving up to afford a car for his family. "They tell me, you know, don't give up, you got this."
Teen questioned after family's quadruple murder
Iranians evacuate capital Tehran, some say the regime is frightened
Parents, brother of slain Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman speak about her death

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Insider

an hour ago

• Business Insider

M&A News: Home Depot and QXO Battle for GMS in Construction Supremacy Bid

American home improvement retailer Home Depot (HD) has initiated a bidding war with smaller rival QXO Inc. (QXO) to strengthen its market position and capture greater contract revenue. According to a Wall Street Journal report, Home Depot made an undisclosed takeover offer for GMS Inc. (GMS) yesterday, following an unsolicited bid from QXO on Wednesday. Confident Investing Starts Here: Home Depot and QXO aim to secure a larger share of the construction supplies and tools market by becoming bigger and more technologically advanced players capable of winning larger contracts. GMS distributes building products and tool supplies, including wallboard, ceilings, steel framing, and complementary construction products to residential and commercial contractors across North America. It operates around 320 distribution centers and 100 tool sales, rental, and service centers. QXO Makes a Compelling Bid for GMS QXO offered to buy all of GMS' outstanding shares for $95.20 per share in cash, valuing the company at about $5 billion. This offer represents a 27% premium over GMS' 60-day volume-weighted average price. The news pushed shares of both companies higher on June 18, with QXO surging 11.7% and GMS closing up 10.6%. QXO has given GMS' board until June 24 to review and respond to the offer. CEO Brad Jacobs has warned that if the company fails to respond, he will take the offer directly to GMS' shareholders. Jacobs is 'confident' that shareholders will find the offer attractive. Interestingly, both GMS and QXO have built their businesses by acquiring smaller companies in the sector over the years. GMS' board has stated that it is reviewing the offer in consultation with its independent legal and financial advisors, acting in the best interests of the company and its shareholders. In the meantime, GMS reported better-than-expected results for Q4FY25 on June 18. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $1.29, beating the consensus of $1.11, while revenues of $1.33 billion also surpassed estimates of $1.3 billion. Despite the downturn in the construction market amid interest rate challenges and overall uncertainty, GMS delivered a solid quarterly performance. Considering its resilient results, it appears that QXO and Home Depot are betting on the right horse for now. Is Home Depot Stock a Good Buy Now? On TipRanks, HD stock has a Strong Buy consensus rating based on 19 Buys and five Hold ratings. Also, the average Home Depot price target of $428.77 implies 23.6% upside potential from current levels. Year-to-date, HD stock has lost 9.7%.

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

Does Kroger (NYSE:KR) Deserve A Spot On Your Watchlist?

It's common for many investors, especially those who are inexperienced, to buy shares in companies with a good story even if these companies are loss-making. Sometimes these stories can cloud the minds of investors, leading them to invest with their emotions rather than on the merit of good company fundamentals. While a well funded company may sustain losses for years, it will need to generate a profit eventually, or else investors will move on and the company will wither away. Despite being in the age of tech-stock blue-sky investing, many investors still adopt a more traditional strategy; buying shares in profitable companies like Kroger (NYSE:KR). Now this is not to say that the company presents the best investment opportunity around, but profitability is a key component to success in business. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. If you believe that markets are even vaguely efficient, then over the long term you'd expect a company's share price to follow its earnings per share (EPS) outcomes. That means EPS growth is considered a real positive by most successful long-term investors. It certainly is nice to see that Kroger has managed to grow EPS by 21% per year over three years. If growth like this continues on into the future, then shareholders will have plenty to smile about. It's often helpful to take a look at earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) margins, as well as revenue growth, to get another take on the quality of the company's growth. It seems Kroger is pretty stable, since revenue and EBIT margins are pretty flat year on year. That's not bad, but it doesn't point to ongoing future growth, either. In the chart below, you can see how the company has grown earnings and revenue, over time. For finer detail, click on the image. View our latest analysis for Kroger While we live in the present moment, there's little doubt that the future matters most in the investment decision process. So why not check this interactive chart depicting future EPS estimates, for Kroger? Since Kroger has a market capitalisation of US$44b, we wouldn't expect insiders to hold a large percentage of shares. But we do take comfort from the fact that they are investors in the company. Indeed, they have a considerable amount of wealth invested in it, currently valued at US$372m. This comes in at 0.9% of shares in the company, which is a fair amount of a business of this size. This still shows shareholders there is a degree of alignment between management and themselves. While it's always good to see some strong conviction in the company from insiders through heavy investment, it's also important for shareholders to ask if management compensation policies are reasonable. A brief analysis of the CEO compensation suggests they are. For companies with market capitalisations over US$8.0b, like Kroger, the median CEO pay is around US$14m. The Kroger CEO received total compensation of just US$379k in the year to February 2025. That's clearly well below average, so at a glance that arrangement seems generous to shareholders and points to a modest remuneration culture. CEO compensation is hardly the most important aspect of a company to consider, but when it's reasonable, that gives a little more confidence that leadership are looking out for shareholder interests. It can also be a sign of good governance, more generally. You can't deny that Kroger has grown its earnings per share at a very impressive rate. That's attractive. If you still have your doubts, remember too that company insiders have a considerable investment aligning themselves with the shareholders and CEO pay is quite modest compared to similarly sized companiess. Everyone has their own preferences when it comes to investing but it definitely makes Kroger look rather interesting indeed. We should say that we've discovered 3 warning signs for Kroger that you should be aware of before investing here. Although Kroger certainly looks good, it may appeal to more investors if insiders were buying up shares. If you like to see companies with more skin in the game, then check out this handpicked selection of companies that not only boast of strong growth but have strong insider backing. Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Vita Life Sciences Set for a 12.72% Revenue Growth While Tackling Operational Challenges By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$2.42 · 0.1% Overvalued Vossloh rides a €500 billion wave to boost growth and earnings in the next decade By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €78.41 · 0.1% Overvalued Intuitive Surgical Will Transform Healthcare with 12% Revenue Growth By Unike – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $325.55 · 0.6% Undervalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

The Hill

2 hours ago

• The Hill

Is the US in a debt-fueled national death spiral?

My Albanian-born father-in-law was an American patriot. In the mid-20th century, he served for decades as a CIA operative, quietly fighting against the spread of communism in Europe and Southeast Asia. Before his death at age 92, he lamented America's future, saying, 'I'm glad I won't be around to see the end.' Long before the U.S. was on the brink of World War III, I shared his bittersweet pessimism, prompted by the 'death spiral math' found on the U.S. Debt Clock. The 'clock' ticks real-time government data showing the ever-growing national debt — $36.9 trillion as of this writing — the most owed by any country or empire in human history. Nonetheless, this decades-long travesty of overspending, attributed to presidents from both parties, is still manageable if the U.S. gross domestic product — estimated at $29.2 trillion in 2024 — were to exceed the nearly $37 trillion national debt. At least, that is the economic theory recently espoused by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who stated, 'If the economy grows faster than the debt, we stabilize the country.' Bessent's philosophy of 'we can grow our way out of debt' supports adding an estimated $3.3 trillion to the national debt, according to the Congressional Budget Office, if President Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' were to become law. Cue the laugh track, because Bessent's growth fantasy is a joke when viewed through the lens of history and facts. The national debt has exceeded GDP since 2013, and the Debt Clock shows the U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio today at 123 percent. Reducing that unwieldy ratio requires a sustained economic boom not seen since the decades following World War II. In 1946, due to five years of war, the debt-to-GDP ratio reached a record 119 percent. If that upside-down ratio had persisted, it is unlikely that the U.S. would have maintained its global superpower status. Fortunately, America managed to climb its way out of debt through sustained post-war growth. Fueled by national optimism, the country experienced a significant baby boom that spurred unprecedented suburban expansion. The development of a national highway system, coast-to-coast new infrastructure and technological advancements coincided with the rise of consumerism, driven by wartime pent-up demand. By 1966, after 20 years of growth (with a few dips), the debt-to-GDP ratio decreased to 40 percent. Then, in 1974, with the Vietnam War winding down, the U.S. achieved its lowest post-war debt-to-GDP ratio of 31 percent, hitting that amount again in 1981 for the last time. After that, the debt-to-GDP ratio continued its dramatic climb. Does anyone honestly believe that Trump's 'Golden Age of America' policies will stimulate levels of explosive growth needed to reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio from 123 percent to double digits? Bessent's 'we can grow our way out of debt' wish-casting could easily be thwarted, starting with Trump's trade war. Then add untamed inflation, an aging population, ongoing global crises, natural disasters, supply-chain issues, AI's unpredictable impact and Trump's self-inflicted scientific brain drain resulting from cuts to research funding. Moreover, a shortage of highly skilled tech workers, the fallout from Trump's immigration policy, and economic uncertainty all contribute to slow growth, while government spending remains unchecked. No wonder the World Bank recently issued new economic projections contradicting Bessent's optimism. In 2024, the U.S. economy grew by 2.8 percent. However, for 2025, the World Bank's initial downward forecast of 1.8 percent growth has again been revised to 1.4 percent. It appears that Trump's Golden Age is only mining 'fool's gold.' Especially when, according to the Debt Clock's 'time machine,' the debt-to-GDP ratio is projected to reach 140 percent by 2029 — the year Trump leaves office. Most Americans don't know that the two largest federal expenditures are Medicaid and Medicare, totaling nearly $1.7 trillion, followed by Social Security at $1.5 trillion, according to the Debt Clock. Cuts to these massive programs are inevitable and will be painful, while Americans have a low tolerance for pain and sacrifice. Yet, that is the future. On the tax receipt side, the Debt Clock displays $5.1 trillion in revenue, relatively small compared to the $36.9 trillion national debt. This debt has risen so rapidly that interest has reached $1.03 trillion — the third-largest item in the federal budget. Debt service now exceeds defense spending, the fourth-largest expenditure at $907.7 billion. That little-known budget factor arose last year. In February, Niall Ferguson, a Hoover Institution fellow, wrote a stunning paper titled 'Ferguson's Law: Debt Service, Military Spending, and the Fiscal Limits of Power.' His 'law' states, 'Any great power that spends more on debt servicing than on defense risks ceasing to be a great power.' Ferguson argues that 'the debt burden draws scarce resources towards itself, reducing the amount available for national security, and leaving the power increasingly vulnerable to military challenge.' He cites numerous historical references to support his theory. For the optimists, Ferguson writes, 'it is very rare but not unprecedented for a great power to return to the right side of the Ferguson limit.' Thus, there is hope for our nation, but hope does not reverse the current death spiral of spending more on debt service than on defense. War is expensive, and the debt crisis will intensify as the U.S. edges closer to direct involvement in a Middle East conflict, which could easily widen. Our enemies are keenly aware of America's economic vulnerabilities. More defense spending means more borrowing and, eventually, the U.S. could cease to be a great power, according to Ferguson's Law. Meanwhile, proposed reductions to the two largest federal budget entitlements cited above elicited angry jeers from town hall participants, such as 'cuts will cause people to die.' To which Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) retorted, 'Well, we are all going to die.' But unlike my late father-in-law, many of us reading this might be around to see the end. Myra Adams is an opinion writer who served on the creative team of two Republican presidential campaigns in 2004 and 2008.