
History and fun facts behind the Philippine flag, according to historian
National Flag Day is celebrated on May 28 every year, as declared in the Presidential Proclamation 374 under then-president Diosdado Macapagal in 1965.
Historian Professor Xiao Chua shared with GMA News Online the history of the occasion as well as a few fun facts about the Philippine flag.
According to Chua, the Philippine flag was designed by General Emilio Aguinaldo and was sewn by three women in Hong Kong including Marcela Agoncillo, her daughter Lorenza, as well as Delfina Herbosa de Natividad.
'Ito ay tinahi ng tatlong babae sa Hong Kong: Si Marcela Agoncillo yung isa, Delfina Herbosa, at anak ni Marcela si Lorenza,' he said.
(It was sewn by three women in Hong Kong: Marcela Agoncillo, Delfina Herbosa, and Marcela's daughter Lorenza.)
'Sa Hong Kong after i-design ito ng Hong Kong Junta sa pamumuno ni Emilio Aguinaldo. So dala-dala ni Aguinaldo yung flag na yan noong muli tayong lumaban para sa ating kasarinlan noong nanalo tayo after 300 years of Spanish colonialism, napalaya natin ang Pilipinas, June 12, 1898,' he added.
(In Hong Kong after it was designed by the Hong Kong Junta led by Emilio Aguinaldo. So Aguinaldo carried that flag when we fought again for our independence when we won after 300 years of Spanish colonialism, we liberated the Philippines, June 12, 1898.)
The Philippine flag was first raised on May 28, 1898, Chua said.
'Noong May 28, sa araw na tinatawag natin ngayong Flag Day, nanalo ang mga puwersa ni Heneral Emilio Aguinaldo sa Battle of Alapan dito sa Imus, Cavite,' he said.
(On May 28, the day we now call National Flag Day, the forces of General Emilio Aguinaldo won the Battle of Alapan here in Imus, Cavite.)
'Sa battle na yan na nanalo tayo laban sa Espanyol, sinelebrate yan sa isang teatro sa Cavite City noong gabi na yun. Doon unang inilabas ang watawat ng Pilipinas,' he added.
(In that battle that we won against the Spanish, it was celebrated in a theater in Cavite City that night. That is where the Philippine flag was first raised.)
According to the National Historical Commission of the Philippines (NHCP), the Philippine flag was banned in 1907 when Americans took over the Philippines.
The NHCP adds that the Philippine Commission enacted the Flag Law of 1907 that prohibited Filipinos from displaying the Philippine flag even inside their homes.
Senator Rafael Palma in 1919 sponsored Senate Bill No. 1 after Gov. Gen. Francis Harrison recommended that the law should be repealed since the distrust between the Filipinos and the Americans no longer exists.
In the same year, the new law was approved and repealed the ban of the Philippine flag.
Chua reminded Filipinos that the Philippine flag is a product of the Philippine revolution. He said that the Philippine flag also symbolizes the oneness of the Filipino people despite differences.
'Tandaan natin na yung watawat ng Pilipinas ay produkto ng kasaysayan ng himagsikang Pilipino. Ibig sabihin, nabuo yan dahil sa struggle natin to independence,' he said.
(Let us remember that the Philippine flag is a product of the history of the Philippine revolution. It was created because of our struggle for independence.)
'Iyan yung mahalagang simbolo na kapag tumingala tayo, iisa yung watawat natin, iisa yung awit natin. It reminds us that, yes, we are different, iba-iba tayo, pero iisa din tayo,' he added.
(That is the important symbol that when we look up, our flag is one, our anthem is one. It reminds us that, yes, we are different, but we are also one.) — LA, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


GMA Network
4 days ago
- GMA Network
Cellphone in the classroom: Enemy, ally, or security blanket?
Teacher Jam Angelo Veruasa weighs in on cellphone use in the classroom. Photo of Veruasa by Sherylin Untalan. Photo of cellphone: GMA Integrated News file On any given school day, inside a classroom, students quietly take their seats. Some pull out pens and notebooks. Many reach for their smartphones—checking messages, reviewing class schedules, or scrolling through TikTok. The sight is so familiar it barely draws attention, but for teacher Jam Angelo Veruasa, it represents one of the most urgent challenges in today's classrooms: the increasingly complex role of the cellphone in education. Veruasa, who teaches Personal Development and Introduction to Philosophy to Grade 11 students, knows that the issue goes far beyond simple rules about whether phones are allowed in class. For him and countless other educators, the real question is not just about control—it's about connection, discipline, digital identity, and the growing emotional reliance students have on their screens. "Ang cellphone ay hindi na lang siya basta gadget. Isa na siyang bahagi ng identity ng mga kabataan ngayon," Veruasa shared during a sit-in interview with GMA News Online. (The cellphone is not just any gadget. It is a part of the identity of the youth nowadays.) "At dahil bahagi siya ng identity nila, kapag tinanggal mo 'yan, parang tinanggalan mo sila ng karapatan." (And because it is part of their identity, when you remove it, it is like you have taken away their rights.) The Department of Education permits the use of cellphones in classrooms—as long as they're used for learning. But what happens when the device becomes a lifeline for attention, validation, or emotional stability? In Veruasa's classroom, the cellphone is both a tool for engagement and a mirror of deeper student struggles. Managing it requires more than rules. It requires empathy, critical thinking, and a new kind of teaching—one that recognizes both the power and peril of being connected all the time. Double-edged tool Veruasa does not see the cellphone as an enemy. In fact, he said that in many ways, it can be an ally—if used responsibly. "Sa klase ko sa Personal Development, may mga pagkakataon na kailangan naming gamitin ang cellphone para mag-reflect, maghanap ng article, o manood ng isang short video na konektado sa lesson," he explained. "Hindi ko siya agad ipinagbabawal. Pero dapat may malinaw na parameters." (In my Personal Development class, there are instances that we need to use cellphones to reflect, search for an article, or watch a short video connected to the lesson. I do not ban its use immediately. But there must be clear parameters.) In his Introduction to Philosophy class, he sometimes encourages students to research key thinkers or ethical dilemmas on the spot using their phones. This real-time engagement with philosophical material, he said, allows students to connect abstract ideas to real-world issues. "Kapag pinag-uusapan namin si Socrates, halimbawa, tanong ko sa kanila: 'May ganito pa bang tao ngayon na handang mamatay para sa prinsipyo?' Saka sila maghahanap ng mga example gamit ang cellphone nila. Doon nabubuhay ang diskusyon." (When we discuss Socrates, for example, I ask them: 'Is there a person nowadays who is willing to die for his principles?' That's when they search for examples using their cellphones. That's when the discussion comes alive.) But the same device that sparks learning can also be a gateway to distractions—and even danger. The temptation to scroll through social media, check online games, or message friends is constant. Veruasa shared that despite their best intentions, many students struggle to remain focused when their phones are within arm's reach. "May mga estudyante talaga na kahit alam nilang bawal sa activity na 'yun, pasimpleng magti-TikTok o maglalaro ng Mobile Legends. Mahirap kontrolin, lalo na kung walang malinaw na disiplina." (There are students who, despite knowing it is not allowed in a particular activity, will still use it for TikTok or Mobile Legends. It is hard to control, especially when there are no clear disciplinary measures.) He admitted that while he sets expectations at the beginning of each quarter, he must repeatedly remind students of boundaries. "Laging may paalala. Kasi kung hindi mo ipapaalala, makakalimot talaga sila. Hindi sa dahil pasaway sila, kundi kasi normal na sa kanila ang laging may screen." (There are always reminders. Because if you do not issue a reminder, they will really forget. They are not rebellious, but it is just normal for them to always have a screen.) What cellphones reveal about students For Veruasa, cellphone use is not just a behavior—it is a window into his students' emotional and psychological worlds. One of the most revealing aspects, he noted, is how dependent many students are on their devices for validation, connection, and even emotional regulation. "Sa Personal Development, 'pag pinag-uusapan na ang self-worth, makikita mo kung gaano kalaki ang epekto ng social media sa self-esteem nila," he said. (In Personal Development, when we talk about self-worth, you will see how big an effect social media has on their self-esteem.) "May mga batang ang saya lang kapag mataas ang likes. May mga nasasaktan kapag hindi pinansin." (There are students who are just so happy when they get a high number of likes. Then there are those who feel hurt when they are not noticed much [on social media].) Cellphones, he added, often amplify the emotional volatility of adolescence. Some students may pretend to research a lesson but are actually dealing with personal issues through chat apps. Others may withdraw into their phones as a coping mechanism. "May isa akong estudyante noon na laging nakababad sa phone. Akala mo distracted lang. Pero nu'ng kinausap ko, nalaman ko may pinagdadaanan pala sa bahay. Sa phone lang siya nakakahanap ng peace." (I had one student before who was always using the cellphone. You would think the student was just distracted. But after talking with the student, I found out that the student was having problems at home. It is via the phone that the student found peace.) Rather than enforce a blanket ban, Veruasa sees the cellphone as a diagnostic tool—an indicator of who may need more attention, more care, or more understanding. "Hindi lahat ng cellphone use ay disrespect. Minsan, iyun na lang ang sandalan nila." (Not all cellphone use can be regarded as disrespect. Sometimes that's the only way they find support.) The struggle for balance Still, the burden of managing cellphone use often falls solely on teachers. There are no standard guidelines, no classroom tech aides, and limited institutional support. Veruasa noted that teachers must play the roles of educator, disciplinarian, and sometimes even counselor, all while covering the curriculum. "Ang hirap, kasi hindi naman kami trained bilang digital behavior experts. Pero kami 'yung nasa frontline. Kaya trial and error lagi," he said. (It's hard because we are not trained to be digital behavior experts. But we are on the frontline. So it's always trial and error.) To cope, Veruasa adopts a mix of strategies. He negotiates screen time by integrating cellphone use into specific activities and designating phone-free moments for deeper reflection or group sharing. He also encourages open dialogue. "Sa umpisa pa lang, sinasabi ko: 'Okay, gagamit tayo ng cellphone, pero kung may gagamit sa hindi tama, tatanungin ko kayo: Bakit mo ginawa?' Hindi ako agad galit. Kailangan nilang maramdaman na kasama sila sa proseso." (From the start, I say: 'Okay, we will use cellphones. But if it will not be used in the right way, I will ask you: Why did you do it?' I do not get angry right away. They need to feel that they are part of the process.) That participatory approach, he believes, fosters accountability and self-awareness among students. Over time, he has seen some students become more mindful of their phone habits. "Yung iba, sila na mismo 'yung magsasabi: 'Sir, off ko na muna para maka-focus ako.' Doon mo makikita na may epekto talaga ang tiwala." (Others would be the first to say, "Sir, I will turn it off first so I can focus." That's when you will see that having trust in them has an effect.) A broader digital literacy agenda Veruasa believes that what is lacking is a systemic effort to teach digital literacy and self-regulation as part of the formal curriculum. He argues that it is not enough to tell students to 'focus' or 'stop scrolling'—they must be equipped with the tools to understand why they scroll in the first place. "Kung gusto talaga nating matuto sila gumamit ng cellphone nang maayos, dapat kasama sa tinuturo natin 'yung emotional triggers nila. Bakit sila nai-insecure? Bakit sila anxious? Ano 'yung mga dapat nilang bantayan sa sarili nila kapag online sila?" (If we really want them to learn how to use the cellphone in the right away, we should include in our lessons their emotional triggers. Why are they insecure? Why are they anxious. What should they guard in themselves when they are online?) He suggested integrating lessons on algorithmic influence, online safety, and mindfulness into both guidance counseling and academic subjects. In his own classes, he sometimes devotes entire sessions to exploring how digital life shapes values and relationships. "Napag-usapan namin minsan: 'Kung walang cellphone ngayon, paano mo ipaparamdam sa tao na mahalaga siya?' Nahihirapan silang sumagot. Doon mo makikita gaano kalalim ang epekto ng cellphone sa empathy nila." (We get to talk about it sometimes - 'If cellphones do not exist today, how will you let a person know that he or she is important?' They find it hard to answer. That's when you see how deep is the effect of cellphone use in their empathy.) A call for shared responsibility For Veruasa, the question of cellphone use in the classroom is no longer just a matter of classroom discipline or institutional policy. It's a reflection of how education must now grapple with the emotional, mental, and digital worlds that students inhabit—often without guidance. "Kapag tinanggal mo 'yung cellphone, parang tinanggalan mo sila ng access sa mundo nila," he explains. "Pero kapag pinayagan mo naman ito ng walang parameters, para mo silang pinabayaan sa isang lugar na walang direksyon." (If you ban the use of cellphones, it is like you removed their access to their own world. But when you allow it without parameters, it's like you let them free in a place without direction.) In this delicate balancing act, Veruasa sees his role not as an enforcer of outdated norms, but as a facilitator of deeper learning and self-awareness. His teaching, especially in subjects like Philosophy and Personal Development, offers a rare space where students are invited to think critically about their choices, habits, and distractions. Here, the cellphone is not demonized—but it is examined. 'Dapat may kaakibat na pag-unawa at tulong sa kung paano gamitin ang cellphone nang makabuluhan,' he said. 'Hindi siya puwedeng alisin lang, pero hindi rin puwedeng pabayaan.' (There should be understanding and help extended as to how the cellphone can be used in a relevant way. It cannot be removed just like that, but it also cannot just be allowed freely.) The future of education, he believes, lies not in banning technology but in teaching digital responsibility, emotional resilience, and mindfulness—skills as vital today as reading and writing. And in doing so, perhaps classrooms can evolve into spaces where students don't just absorb knowledge, but learn how to navigate their modern realities with both intelligence and compassion. In the end, the cellphone is merely a window. What students truly need is someone willing to help them see more clearly through it—and beyond it. —KG, GMA Integrated News

GMA Network
5 days ago
- GMA Network
Poodle joins dog lifeguard team on Spanish beach
TORROX, Spain — Poodle Nilo has joined four labradors on a dog rescue squad at Las Lindes beach near Malaga in Spain, helping lifeguards tow people back to shore. With his fluffy white coat, a life vest strapped across his chest and sunblock slathered on his long nose, the two-year-old Standard Poodle cuts an unusual figure, as Spanish dog beach rescue squads generally use Labradors and Newfoundlands. Nilo's handler, dog instructor Miguel Sanchez-Merenciano, 45, told Reuters that he enters the water first to reach a swimmer in distress before calling Nilo or other dogs to help them back to safety. Poodles, an originally German breed, were historically used for water rescue, he said, though mainly in hunting and retrieval work in northern European lakes, their lustrous fur protecting them from the cold. Indeed, the name "poodle" comes from the German verb "puddeln," which means to splash, Sanchez-Merenciano said. Poodles are also known for their superior intelligence and exceptional learning ability, according to the American Kennel Club (AKC). Nilo was once scared of loud noises and crowds, so his training had to be done step by step, Sanchez-Merenciano explained. "He has gone from swimming vertically and incorrectly to swimming completely horizontally, with perfect strokes, using his tail perfectly like a rudder to turn and to move." — Reuters

GMA Network
12-06-2025
- GMA Network
No reported affected Filipinos so far in Air India plane crash — OWWA
Wreckage of an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner lies at the site, showing part of its registration "VT-ANB," where it crashed in Ahmedabad, India, June 12, 2025. REUTERS/ Amit Dave The Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA) on Thursday said there have been no reported Filipinos affected by the recent Air India plane crash so far. 'As of now, no reported Filipino nationals affected po. We are continuously monitoring po,' OWWA Administrator Patricia Yvonne Caunan told the media. According to a Reuters report, at least 30 of the 242 people on board died in the incident. Police officers said the plane bound for London crashed in a residential area near the airport minutes after taking off from India's western city of Ahmedabad. The passengers included 217 adults, 11 children and two infants, a source told Reuters. Of them, 169 were Indian nationals, 53 were Britons, seven Portuguese, and one Canadian, Air India said. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has sent his condolences to the Indian government and the families of the passengers who were killed in the incident. — BAP, GMA Integrated News