Children asking to miss school or wetting themselves over 'horror movie' toilets
More than one in 10 parents say their children have asked to miss school because of the poor state of the toilets, new figures suggest.
A new poll by charity Parentkind found almost a third of parents have raised concerns about school toilets to staff, while about one in six say the loos at their child's school are unclean.
One parent said the toilets were so dirty their children 'felt like they were stepping into a horror movie', while another said their child had spotted cockroaches in the toilets.
The Censuswide poll of 2,000 parents to school-age children found 11% of parents said their children had missed school or asked to stay at home because of worries about the school loos.
They added some children had either wet themselves in school or suffered constipation while trying to avoid using the toilets.
Earlier this week Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced schools will receive about £2.3billion per year to fix 'crumbling classrooms' and £2.4billion a year to rebuild 500 schools.
In response, the chief executive of Parentkind called on the government to use some of those funds to make school loos 'fit for use'.
Jason Elsom said: 'With a million children facing humiliation because of the disgusting state of school toilets, we need to shine a light on the health and well-being of our children who are refusing to drink during the day to avoid going to the toilet and the millions of children suffering constipation because their school toilets are so dirty.
'Parents tell us that we need to set aside the cash to clean and upgrade school loos.
'Parents tell us their children have seen 'cockroaches coming out of the floors' and toilets 'covered in poo and urine'.'
The Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) says it's 'dismayed' at the research findings, and said 'years of government underfunding' may in part explain why parents feel this way about school bathrooms.
Pepe Di'lasio, general secretary of the ASCL, added: 'Schools understand the vital importance of toilets being clean and in good order, work hard to ensure this is the case, and will be dismayed at the findings of this research.
'Many schools are struggling with old and outdated buildings which require a great deal of maintenance. More Trending
'We urgently need improved investment in upgrading and modernising school buildings.'
A Department for Education spokesperson said: 'We're investing in excellence everywhere for every child, which is why this government is dedicated to fixing the foundations by rebuilding crumbling school buildings.
'Despite inheriting a schools estate in disrepair, the government is creating safe learning environments through condition funding and ramping up the School Rebuilding Programme to give children growing up in our country the best start in life.
'We have increased overall capital budgets by over a billion pounds a year on average, the highest since 2010, showing this government's strong and unwavering commitment to the maintenance and renewal of the education estate.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Mums 'in love triangle' fought in school playground in front of children
MORE: I've been revising for my son's GCSEs – I'm more stressed than him
MORE: Free school meals to be extended to 500,000 chilldren across the country
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
3 days ago
- Scottish Sun
Major update on £450 a month benefit available to thousands of Scots
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE SCOTTISH Government has issued a major update on a £450 a month benefit that is available to thousands of adults. The Adult Disability Payment helps anyone who has a disability, terminal illness, or long-term health condition that affects their everyday life. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Ministers have shared a major update on the benefit Credit: Getty It is open to Scots aged between 16 and state pension age, and the payment is made up of two parts. These are daily living and mobility, and people may qualify for one or both parts. Scots may qualify for the daily living part if you need help with things like preparing food, taking nutrition (eating and drinking), managing therapy or monitoring a health condition and washing and bathing. While the mobility part refers to whether you need help with planning and following a journey or moving around. Depending on which parts you qualify for, you could get anywhere between £116.80 and £441.60 a month. But now, the SNP has vowed not to cut the payment as Labour announced plans to slash overall welfare payments. It comes as ministers look to cut the increasing welfare bill by clawing back billions of pounds of benefits. On Wednesday, the UK Government revealed its plans to slash benefits further in the House of Commons. The new plans will see changes made to a number of different benefits - including personal independence payment (PIP) and universal credit. The criteria for PIP is expected to become stricter, while those on UC will see the sickness-related element cut. Millions hit by benefit cuts as Rachel Reeves warns 'if you can work, you should work!' in bid to fix 'broken system' UC will also not be issued to anyone until they reach 22 years of age. Most Scots who claim sickness benefits do so through the Adult Disability Payment, which is devolved, rather than through PIP. But the cuts mean that there is likely to be less money available for Scottish benefits. However, Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville promised that the Scottish Government "will not let disabled people down or cast them aside", according to the Daily Record. She said: "The reforms do not reflect the Scottish Government's values. "We will not let disabled people down or cast them aside as the UK Government has done. We will not cut Scotland's Adult Disability Payment. 'The UK Government should follow our lead and protect the social security safety system, rather than dismantling it. "If they do not, then disabled people can draw no other conclusion than the UK Government remain content to balance the books on the backs of the most vulnerable.' Ms Somerville also called the UK Government's plans "hugely damaging" to struggling adults, especially during the current cost of living crisis. Who can apply for Adult Disability Payment YOU must be between 16 and State Pension age to apply for this benefit. You may qualify for the daily living part if you need help with: preparing food taking nutrition (eating and drinking) managing therapy or monitoring a health condition washing and bathing managing toilet needs or incontinence dressing and undressing communicating verbally reading and understanding signs, symbols and words engaging socially with other people face to face making budgeting decisions You may qualify for the mobility part if you need help with planning and following a journey or moving around. Do not apply if you get Personal Independence Payment (PIP) or Disability Living Allowance (DLA) for adults. You would get these from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). You can apply for Adult Disability Payment if you: live in the EU, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein or Gibraltar have spent a major part of your life in Scotland You need to apply for Adult Disability Payment even if you get Child Disability Payment. You can apply any time from when you are 15, soon to turn 16, until your 18th birthday. If your application is successful, you will not have any gaps between payments. Branding it a "damaging policy", she said, "I strongly urge them to scrap their harmful proposals." She added: "With around half of all children in poverty in Scotland living in a household with a disabled person, the changes threaten to undermine the progress that we are making to reduce child poverty, and the work of the UK Government's Child Poverty Taskforce. 'That the UK Government is prioritising deep cuts to disabled people's support is made even worse by their failure to abolish the two-child limit, which is estimated to have pushed more than 35,000 children into poverty since July last year." UK Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall told the Daily Record: 'Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. 'This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity. 'This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot – putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change.'
Daily Mail
5 days ago
- Daily Mail
Fears legalising assisted dying may 'break the NHS' and lead to cuts in care as minister confirms there is no extra money for helping people die
Legalising assisted dying could be a' Trojan horse that breaks the NHS ', a leading opponent warned today after it was revealed that the health service has no money set aside for setting up a suicide service. Dame Siobhain McDonagh warned that an assisted dying service could 'rob our stretched NHS of much needed resources' after Wes Streeting spoke in the Commons. The Health Secretary told MPs no money has yet been allocated for the setting up of an assisted dying service, ahead of a vote expected on Friday on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. Last year, Mr Streeting said there were 'choices and trade-offs', adding 'any new service comes at the expense of other competing pressures and priorities'. It has prompted fears that the money needed to get a legalised euthanasia system off the ground could eat into the NHS's finances. Health was one of the major winners from Rachel Reeves ' spending review last week but bosses have warned that even the annual £30bn annual funding she allocated is not enough. Dame Siobhain said: 'It's now clear that the assisted dying Bill will rob our stretched NHS of much needed resources and could become the trojan horse that breaks the NHS, the proudest institution and the proudest measure in our Labour Party's history. 'We already know from the impact assessment that this new system could cost tens if not hundreds of millions of pounds making our mission to cut waiting times and rebuild our NHS harder.' It is expected MPs will have a vote on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on Friday, which could see it either progress to the House of Lords or fall. If it goes ahead Friday will be the first time the Bill has been voted on in its entirety since November's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55. While supporters of the Bill say it is coming back to the Commons with better safeguards after more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent on it to date, opponents claim the process has been rushed and that the Bill is now weaker than it was when first introduced last year. A key change was the replacing of a High Court judge requirement for sign-off of applications from terminally ill people, with a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and the three-member panel. While the Bill has the backing of some MPs from medical backgrounds, concerns have also been raised by the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Psychiatrists. Disability campaigners have voiced worries about coercion and how vulnerable people could be caught up in any new law, although the proposed legislation is supported by MP and disability rights advocate Marie Tidball as well as former director of public prosecutions Sir Max Hill. This morning Mr Streeting was asked by Labour MP Katrina Murray, who like him voted no in November, whether the NHS has the money to fund assisted dying on top of its other priorities. She said: 'If passed, the assisted dying Bill would make thousands of terminally ill people every year eligible to end their lives on the NHS. 'Does our health service have the money to fund this service as well as its priority of bringing down waiting lists?' Mr Streeting responded: 'Of course, the Government is neutral (on assisted dying). It's for the House to decide. 'There isn't money allocated to set up the service in the Bill at present, but it's for members of this House and the Lords, should the Bill proceed, to decide whether or not to proceed and that's a decision that this Government will respect either way.' MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. An impact assessment published by the Government last month estimated that the establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and the three-member expert panels would cost an average of between £10.9 million and £13.6 million per year, although overall implementation costs of a service were not possible to work out yet. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years. Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater has said the proposed legislation is about giving dying people choice at the end of their lives, saying it is 'about the human cost' and 'not about pounds and pence'. She has described her Bill as the 'most robust piece of legislation in this area in the world'. Dozens of Labour MPs called for Friday's overall vote to be delayed, asking Commons Leader Lucy Powell for more time to scrutinise a Bill they say is 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'.
Daily Mail
5 days ago
- Daily Mail
The NHS must fund services like fracture clinics that can save money and boost productivity: RUTH SUNDERLAND
In her Spending Review, Rachel Reeves announced £29billion for the National Health Service to finance a ten year plan. The plan aims to reduce pressure on hospitals, promote early intervention to slow down or stop people's health problems getting worse, to emphasise prevention and to move the clunky manual admin to digital. Improving the nation's health is a moral imperative in its own right. It is also one of the keys to unlocking the productivity that has eluded the UK since the financial crisis. More than nine million people of working age are economically inactive, around 2.8million of them because they are long-term sick. This is a drain on the welfare budget and a vast waste of potential and talent. Simply throwing money into the ravenous mouth of the NHS will not solve the problem. But there are intelligent, targeted moves health secretary Wes Streeting could make. Chief among these is to honour his promise to provide fracture clinics that would save the NHS a fortune on the costs of osteoporosis and also result in big benefits for employers. Osteoporosis is a very widespread bone condition affecting around 3million Britons. It costs the NHS multiple millions to treat and it costs the economy dearly, because many victims are forced to give up their jobs while others have to give up work to look after a relative with the disease. The good news is that these costs could be dramatically reduced, if Streeting has the good sense to make good on a promise he made to roll out Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) to every NHS Trust in the UK. Campaigners are hoping this will feature in the ten year plan and bring an end to a cruel postcode lottery. Where they exist, FLS clinics offer people over 50 who arrive at A&E with a fracture an assessment for osteoporosis. Patients who are found to have the condition, which means their bones are weak and prone to break, are then offered treatment and advice. It would cost around £30m a year to set up and staff a universal service, plus another £12m annually on the cost of drugs. But over five years this would create savings of £440m for the NHS in terms of the cost of treating fractures, according to the Royal Osteoporosis Society (ROS). Ending the FLS postcode lottery would also be a huge benefit to business. Broken bones caused by osteoporosis have cost firms £142m and 1.5million lost work days during Labour's first year in power, independent research for the ROS has found. Musculoskeletal conditions, including osteoporosis, are the single biggest contributor to those lost work days, and the percentage of sickness absence caused has been increasing in recent years. I have personally spoken to some of the people behind the statistics. Stephen Robinson from North Yorkshire had no fewer than ten spinal fractures but because there was no FLS near his home, these were not diagnosed. The final fracture was caused by a sneeze. He had to pay £3,500 for a private diagnosis before he could gain access to treatment and he was forced to give up his job as a forklift truck driver. This experience is, unfortunately not isolated. This is why the Mail has been running a War on Osteoporosis campaign and why we will be watching closely to see if universal FLS is included in the ten year plan. But it is not just osteoporosis. In my own experience physiotherapy services are over-stretched, as is after care for cancer patients and mental health provision. Readers will no doubt be aware of more. The slow pace on helping osteoporosis sufferers is just one example of false economies in the NHS, where patients are denied valuable services that would more than pay for themselves in the name of short-term penny pinching. So come on Wes, show us you care.
