Winter viruses can trigger a heart attack or stroke, our study shows. It's another good reason to get a flu or COVID shot
Winter is here, along with cold days and the inevitable seasonal surge in respiratory viruses.
But it's not only the sniffles we need to worry about. Heart attacks and strokes also tend to rise during the winter months.
In new research out this week we show one reason why.
Our study shows catching common respiratory viruses raises your short-term risk of a heart attack or stroke. In other words, common viruses, such as those that cause flu and COVID, can trigger them.
Traditional risk factors such as smoking, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, diabetes, obesity and lack of exercise are the main reasons for heart attacks and strokes.
And rates of heart attacks and strokes can rise in winter for a number of reasons. Factors such as low temperature, less physical activity, more time spent indoors – perhaps with indoor air pollutants – can affect blood clotting and worsen the effects of traditional risk factors.
But our new findings build on those from other researchers to show how respiratory viruses can also be a trigger.
The theory is respiratory virus infections set off a heart attack or stroke, rather than directly cause them. If traditional risk factors are like dousing a house in petrol, the viral infection is like the matchstick that ignites the flame.
For healthy, young people, a newer, well-kept house is unlikely to spontaneously combust. But an older or even abandoned house with faulty electric wiring needs just a spark to lead to a blaze.
People who are particularly vulnerable to a heart attack or stroke triggered by a respiratory virus are those with more than one of those traditional risk factors, especially older people.
Our team conducted a meta-analysis (a study of existing studies) to see which respiratory viruses play a role in triggering heart attacks and strokes, and the strength of the link. This meant studying more than 11,000 scientific papers, spanning 40 years of research.
Overall, the influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID) were the main triggers.
If you catch the flu, we found the risk of a heart attack goes up almost 5.4 times and a stroke by 4.7 times compared with not being infected. The danger zone is short – within the first few days or weeks – and tapers off with time after being infected.
Catching COVID can also trigger heart attacks and strokes, but there haven't been enough studies to say exactly what the increased risk is.
We also found an increased risk of heart attacks or strokes with other viruses, including respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), enterovirus and cytomegalovirus. But the links are not as strong, probably because these viruses are less commonly detected or tested for.
Over a person's lifetime, our bodies wear and tear and the inside wall of our blood vessels becomes rough. Fatty build-ups (plaques) stick easily to these rough areas, inevitably accumulating and causing tight spaces.
Generally, blood can still pass through, and these build-ups don't cause issues. Think of this as dousing the house in petrol, but it's not yet alight.
So how does a viral infection act like a matchstick to ignite the flame? Through a cascading process of inflammation.
High levels of inflammation that follow a viral infection can crack open a plaque. The body activates blood clotting to fix the crack but this clot could inadvertently block a blood vessel completely, causing a heart attack or stroke.
Some studies have found fragments of the COVID virus inside the blood clots that cause heart attacks – further evidence to back our findings.
We don't know whether younger, healthier people are also at increased risk of a heart attack or stroke after infection with a respiratory virus.
That's because people in the studies we analysed were almost always older adults with at least one of those traditional risk factors, so were already vulnerable.
The bad news is we will all be vulnerable eventually, just by getting older.
The triggers we identified are mostly preventable by vaccination.
There is good evidence from clinical trials the flu vaccine can reduce the risk of a heart attack or stroke, especially if someone already has heart problems.
We aren't clear exactly how this works. But the theory is that avoiding common infections, or having less severe symptoms, reduces the chances of setting off the inflammatory chain reaction.
COVID vaccination could also indirectly protect against heart attacks and strokes. But the evidence is still emerging.
Heart attacks and strokes are among Australia's biggest killers. If vaccinations could help reduce even a small fraction of people having a heart attack or stroke, this could bring substantial benefit to their lives, the community, our stressed health system and the economy.
At-risk groups should get vaccinated against flu and COVID. Pregnant women, and people over 60 with medical problems, should receive RSV vaccination to reduce their risk of severe disease.
So if you are older or have predisposing medical conditions, check Australia's National Immunisation Program to see if you are eligible for a free vaccine.
For younger people, a healthy lifestyle with regular exercise and balanced diet will set you up for life. Consider checking your heart age (a measure of your risk of heart disease), getting an annual flu vaccine and discuss COVID boosters with your GP.
This article is republished from The Conversation. It was written by: Tu Nguyen, Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Christopher Reid, Curtin University; Diana Vlasenko, Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Hazel Clothier, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, and Jim Buttery, Murdoch Children's Research Institute
Read more:
Kicked out for coming out: more than half of LGBTIQ+ flatmates face discrimination for their identity
Ticks carry decades of history in each troublesome bite
Mosquito, tick or flea? How to avoid, identify and treat insect bites this summer
Tu Nguyen is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program PhD Scholarship and a Murdoch Children's Research Institute Top-Up Scholarship.
Christopher Reid receives funding from National Health and Medical Research Council and the Medical Research Future Fund.
Jim Buttery receives funding from the Medical Research Future Fund, the US Centres for Disease Control, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the Victorian State Government.
Diana Vlasenko and Hazel Clothier do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Recovering from surgery isn't easy. Exercising in the water can help.
The thought of getting back to an exercise routine after surgery might make you wince. It can be a struggle to know where to begin, especially if your body isn't working the way it used to. The good news is that heading to your local pool or aquatic therapy can be a great alternative to land-based physical therapy and exercise. Research, including a 2024 study, says aquatic exercise can significantly help patients recover both mentally and physically after most surgeries.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Study Reveals Parents Do Have A Favorite Child. Here's Who It Is.
When snow began to fall the other day, my children made a beeline outside to scoop it up and stomp around. Within minutes, they were chucking snowballs at one another, most of which disintegrated mid-flight and landed in a flurry on their faces and necks. There was a lot of delighted shrieking, punctuated every few minutes by an aggrieved howl of 'No fair!' or 'He hit me!' Both of my kids wanted to throw snow at their sibling. Neither wanted snow to land on their exposed skin. I stood there uselessly saying benign things like, 'Gentle!' and 'Not the face!' Finally, my 11-year-old daughter ran up to me to deliver an accusation: 'Whenever I hit him, you say 'Stop,' but when he hits me, you say nothing!' I looked over at my 15-year-old son and raised my eyebrows to ask, 'Does this sound familiar?' 'You know what he says?' I told my daughter. 'That when he hits you, I say 'Stop,' but when you hit him, I say nothing.' 'Oh,' my daughter said, quietly assessing this predicament. Over the years, whether wielding snow or Nerf guns or water balloons, both of my children have regularly accused me of favoring their sibling over them. The problem with identifying favoritism is these shifting perspectives: the parent's and each siblings'. None of us are unbiased, and we're all predisposed to see ourselves as the aggrieved ones whenever confronted with criticism. With siblings, some degree of comparison is inevitable, and it's hard not to show your relief when one kid is behaving by piling on the praise for the sibling who is doing their homework or brushing their teeth. I don't feel like I'm showing favoritism to one kid, but that's mostly because I'm so overwhelmed by the unique ways they are both trying my patience. While every family has their own particular dynamic, researchers have discovered that, in most families, favoritism actually follows a similar pattern. Researchers from Brigham Young University and Western University pulled from 30 peer-reviewed journal articles and dissertation/theses, along with 14 databases, for their meta-analysis of 'parental differential treatment,' or the ways that parents treat siblings differently. They categorized parents' actions into categories of 'differential affection, differential conflict, differential resources — like how much time you spend with your kids or things that you give to them — as well as differential autonomy or freedom — like how much leeway you give kids,' Alex Jensen, one of the study's authors, told HuffPost. A parent might show differential treatment by spending more time with one child, or spending more money on them, for example. The researchers examined how this differential treatment varied by the children's birth order and gender, as well as their temperament and personality. While previous research has been mixed when it comes to favoritism and gender, this study found that 'daughters tend to be favored, and that was across the board,' Jensen said. Both mothers and fathers tended to show differential treatment for daughters. Not surprisingly, 'agreeable or conscientious children tend to be favored. That's also across the board,' Jensen said. When it came to birth order, it was also no surprise to see that parents tended to grant first-born children more freedom and autonomy — these children are, after all, older than their siblings by definition. But this favoritism persisted into adulthood, Jensen said, well past the point when a parent would worry about a child's ability to, say, go to the store on their own. It's possible thatsome patterns, like relying on the competence of an eldest daughter, begin in childhood and continue throughout adulthood. Jensen thinks this could be one explanation for why parents tended to favor girls, noting that they have a reputation of being easier to manage, behavior-wise, than boys. 'Maybe daughters are just a little bit easier to parent,' Jensen said, noting that if girls have fewer behavior problems than boys at school, it makes sense that a similar pattern would emerge at home. This seems more likely to him than another theoretical explanation: that parents treat daughters differently because they presume they will one day become the caregivers of their elderly parents. 'From an evolutionary kind of standpoint, I guess that's possible,' Jensen said, albeit less so than the theory that girls are simply 'easier to parent.' The big question, of course, is why favoritism matters. Of all the things parents are supposed to be tending to, what are the consequences of letting favoritism go unchecked? Does it really matter if, once in a while, I avert my gaze the moment my daughter lobs a snowball at my son's head? But like many other relationship dynamics in childhood, favoritism in a family can cast a long shadow. Children who are favored 'tend to have better mental health, do better in school, have better family relationships. They're less likely to engage in substance use than other teenagers. They get in less trouble at school and home,' Jensen said. Children who are not favored, on the other hand, are more likely to have negative outcomes. It's possible, Jensen noted, that when favoritism goes to an extreme, even the favored child will suffer because of it — but it would be tricky to determine when that line is crossed in a particular family, let alone in the general population. While a family might fall into a pattern of favoring daughters, older siblings or children who are more conscientious (who wouldn't want one of those?), there can also be a huge amount of variation over the years in the way that parents feel about their children. Dr. Blaise Aguirre, a psychiatrist who is a professor at Harvard Medical School and author of the forthcoming 'I Hate Myself: Overcome Self-Hatred And Realize Why You're Wrong About You,' told HuffPost, 'people, just generally speaking, tend to feel closer to those who are temperamentally similar to who they are.' For example, if an emotionally intense child has a parent who is less so, 'they just don't understand how a child could be so reactive, and so it can be confusing,' Aguirre said. He added that parents tend to prefer easygoing children, the kind who don't get calls home from the teacher. Aguirre also noted that a person's parenting can change significantly between a first child and subsequent children. 'These relationships are in constant states of flux,' he said. Infants, Aguirre noted, are sort of hard-wired to charm their parents in a way that protects their own survival. As children grow, however, some parent-pleasing behaviors can lead to comparisons among siblings and accusations of favoritism. In addition, 'we tend to remember rejection far more than we remember praise,' Aguirre said. 'If you're getting equal amounts of praise and rejection, if you could actually measure 50% praise, 50% rejection, when your parents criticize you for your behavior, you're going to remember that more.' Unless the praise is for a sibling. 'You'll remember your sibling's positive praise, much more than you remember their rejection,' Aguirre said. As a parent, you can't always control how your child recalls and interprets the things that you say or do. You can, however, listen with an open mind to any concerns your child has, whether they have to do with favoritism or something else. If a child says you're playing favorites, Aguirre suggested that a parent say something like, 'That's just not my experience, but clearly, it's yours. So, tell me: What is it that you see?' 'Getting them to kind of understand their own state of mind and understand the state of mind of the parent,' and having them 'name and label what their experience is,' Aguirre said, often has the effect of making a child feel less upset. Aguirre said that he would advise parents to talk with their children without delay about any feelings that arise. 'Often the perception is in the mind of the child,' he said. 'I think that the best thing to do is to sort of deal with it right away, lest it become ingrained in the child who sees themselves as less favorable, as being defective in some way.' A parent might ask a child to consider another's perspective, like I did with my daughter, or reassure their child that they love them for what makes them unique, not how their math grades or musical talent compares to a sibling's. Aguirre recalled one way that his mother cleverly eliminated the chance that any of her eight children might accuse her of favoritism. 'When my mom was dying, we were all spending time with her. She said, could she have a chat with each of us individually? And so I went in there, and she says, 'I'm just going to tell you, you're my favorite.'' Later, after all the siblings had their one-on-ones, they spoke about it and discovered that she had told each one of them exactly the same thing. There Might Actually Be Some Science Behind Eldest Daughter Syndrome It's Time We Acknowledge That Older Sisters Are The Backbone Of Society New Study Reveals A Downside To Being A Firstborn Or Only Child
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
2 High-Yield Healthcare Dividend Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist in June
The average healthcare stock has a yield of just 1.7%. Medtronic's dividend yield is 3.3%. Alexandria Real Estate Equities' yield is 7.4%. 10 stocks we like better than Medtronic › The healthcare sector isn't exactly known for offering huge yields, with Health Care Select Sector SPDR (NYSEMKT: XLV) offering a yield of just 1.7%. If dividend investors take some time to dig into the sector, however, they can do much better. For example, Medtronic (NYSE: MDT) has a 3.3% yield today, and Alexandria Real Estate Equities (NYSE: ARE) is offering a yield of 7.4%. Here's what you need to know about each of these high-yield healthcare stocks. Medtronic makes medical devices. It is one of the largest competitors in the space, making products across the cardiovascular, neuroscience, medical surgical, and diabetes categories. It has a leading position in each of the areas in which it operates, and it operates on a global scale. That said, the last few years haven't been the best ones for the company. Innovation, which is highly important in the healthcare space, can be lumpy. And given Medtronic's size, the business has become a little cumbersome. Growth has stalled out, and profitability has come under pressure. Investors have focused on the negatives pushing the shares lower and the dividend yield up toward the high end of Medtronic's historical yield range. If you are a dividend investor that thinks in decades and not days, however, this is likely to be an investment opportunity. The company's innovation pipeline is starting to turn into new-product introductions. As new products gain traction, financial performance is likely to improve. And management has been working to streamline the business with cost cuts and a move to refocus on its most profitable operations. To that end, the company is set to spin off its lower-margin diabetes division in 2026. The move is expected to be immediately accretive to earnings, and the dividend policy isn't expected to change. All in, Medtronic is doing what it needs to do to get back on the growth path. And that should support continued dividend increases; the medical device maker only has two years to go before it hits Dividend King status (50+ years of annual dividend increases). June could be an opportune time to buy the stock hand over fist. Alexandria is a real estate investment trust (REIT), which seems pretty far away from healthcare. Its primary focus is on office properties, which also seems a bit removed from healthcare. The key here is that the REIT owns biomedical research facilities, which combine research space and office space in one property. Both are important to each other since the research takes place in specialized space, while the analysis of that research takes place in a normal office environment. Alexandria is one of the largest pure play medical research REITs you can buy. Alexandria counts some of the largest and most important medical research groups as tenants, from both the private side of the equation and the government side. However, like any landlord, the REIT's revenues will be impacted by the occupancy levels of its properties. And those rise and fall over time. Right now, occupancy is relatively weak, dropping to 91.7% at the end of the first quarter of 2025 from 94.6% at the end of 2024. Swings like this happen from time to time, but Wall Street is treating Alexandria as if its dividend is at a material risk of being cut. Only the funds from operations (FFO) payout ratio in the first quarter was a fairly strong 57%. There's room for adversity before a dividend cut would be in order. To be fair, office properties, and particularly highly specialized office properties, tend to have higher operating costs than other real estate assets. But it seems highly likely that Alexandria will manage its way through this weak patch and continue to extend its 15-year streak of annual dividend increases. For income lovers, this healthcare REIT is worth a deep dive in June. The average healthcare stock has an uninspiring dividend yield. But the average is made up of many different companies, some of which actually have very attractive dividend yields. That list includes industry-leading companies like Medtronic and Alexandria Real Estate. You might just want to pick up shares in one, or both, of these high yielders before June is over after you get to know them a little better. Before you buy stock in Medtronic, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Medtronic wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Medtronic. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alexandria Real Estate Equities. The Motley Fool recommends Medtronic and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $75 calls on Medtronic and short January 2026 $85 calls on Medtronic. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 High-Yield Healthcare Dividend Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist in June was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
